CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by vividsailor7 · · 👁 260 views · 3.9K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants vividsailor7redcrane22Sandra Rivera37swiftbear86melloworca6Dana Martin87ironskipper80mellowgardener15goldenmarlin6analogbison13Nicholas Myersstormygardener34Roger RodriguezDonna Mitchell3Kenneth Vaughn2Laura Ward98briskseal32Susan Vaughn46Zachary Lewis4driftingmason52rustyheron55Laura Chavez47vividstag24lonecanyon8 …
steeleagle152 steeleagle152 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jun 2011
#2661 ·
wiredpilot25 said:For the past week, I've been dealing with some intense pain around my right kidney and urinary tract. I went to see my doctor, and she sent me for an urgent urine and blood test. My blood work came back fine, but here’s what the urinalysis showed:
WBC 1-2, RBC 1-2, plenty of squamous epithelial cells, and some bacteria. Normal WBC and RBC counts are 0-2.
The pain actually got worse, so I ended up at the ER yesterday. Once again, the blood work was normal, but the urine results were:
RBC 2-3, WBC 5-10, lots of epithelium, and some bacteria. They gave me Spasmex via IV and referred me for a urine culture. During the day, I noticed some tiny particles after peeing. Can anyone give me a rough idea of what this might be? I'm honestly pretty terrified that it's something serious. I haven't had any fever or nausea, though.

I'm no medical expert or anything, but I guess I had similar issues when I was dealing with kidney stones. I don't know how bad your pain is, but I'd say it was probably the worst thing I've ever felt.

Sent from my iPhone 8 using Reddit
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2662 ·
Michelle Perez40 said:Look, you have high white blood cell counts in your urine, which usually points to an infection. They sent you for a culture to figure out exactly which bacteria we're dealing with. It’s likely nothing to worry about, and once you get the right antibiotics, you should start feeling better pretty quickly.

Thanks so much! Just waiting on those culture results now—should be back this Friday.
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2663 ·
steeleagle152 said:I'm not a doctor or anything, but I dealt with similar issues when I had kidney stones. I don't know exactly what you're feeling, but for me, it was easily the most intense pain I've ever experienced.

Sent from my iPhone 8 using Reddit

It’s disgusting pain. I’m breaking out in sweats, feels like a hundred knives are slicing me up from the inside. Taking some Advil helps a bit.
steeleagle152 steeleagle152 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jun 2011
#2664 ·
wiredpilot25 said:It’s this disgusting pain, like I’m sweating through everything because it feels like a hundred knives are just slicing me up from the inside. I take some Advil and it helps a bit, I guess.

That sounds like kidney stones to me... I had pain like that once and it was honestly unbearable, maybe even worse than childbirth... just awful. Though, I wouldn't say it felt like cutting, more like these pains that just tear through your back and spine...

Sent from my iPhone 8 using Reddit
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2665 ·
steeleagle152 said:Sounds like kidney stones... I had pain like that once and it was unbearable, seriously worse than labor pains... just awful. Honestly, I wouldn't call them sharp pains, more like this intense ache that felt like it was tearing my back and spine apart...

Sent from my iPhone 8 using Reddit

How did you guys deal with it?
Chloe Garcia10 Chloe Garcia10 Member
41 messages
joined Feb 2009
#2666 ·
Hey there!
Before my colonoscopy, I went in to get some blood work done, specifically a CBC and a PT/INR.
The CBC looks fine, but here’s what my PT/INR results are showing:
P-PT ratio 1.06 (0.70-1.12),
P-PT INR 1.00 L (recommended 2.0-3.5), though it says under the unit "ter.rasp."
Just so you know, I'm not on any blood thinners or anticoagulants.
Is this result considered normal, or is that second value too low? What does it actually mean?
redharbor12 redharbor12 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2018
#2667 ·
Please translate:

In the right lower lobe of the lung, there is a visible nodular lesion measuring 13 mm, showing pathological FDG uptake with an SUVmax of 3.8.

I would appreciate an urgent response. My husband received these results yesterday.
Nicholas Doyle91 Nicholas Doyle91 Member
28 messages
joined Dec 2008
#2668 ·
redharbor12 said:Can someone translate this for me?

In the lungs, specifically in the lower right lobe, there’s a nodular lesion measuring 13 mm that shows pathological FDG uptake, with an SUVmax of 3.8.

I really need a quick answer here—my husband just got his results back yesterday.

Man, I hate to be the one to say it, but based on how that’s worded, it sounds like they might be looking at something malignant (please correct me if I'm totally off base here)...
Nancy Hughes7 Nancy Hughes7 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Feb 2018
#2669 ·
Hey there.
What would you point to regarding low ACTH levels? These were pulled at 8 AM and 4 PM.
0.7 ref (1.6-13.9)
0.8 ref (1.6-13.9)

Cortisol is sitting right within the normal range.
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2670 ·
Michelle Perez40 said:Look, you have high white blood cell counts in your urine, which usually means there's some inflammation going on. They sent you for a culture to identify the specific bacteria involved. It probably isn't anything to lose sleep over, and once you get started on antibiotics, you should feel better pretty quickly.

So the urine culture came back sterile and the ultrasound looks fine. The only issue is those white blood cells in my urine. I've been taking some baby ibuprofen and some antispasmodics. I feel slightly better, but now it feels like my kidneys and bladder are aching too. My doctor has no clue what's actually happening—she's rambling about kidney stones and how they might be causing an infection as they pass. Honestly, I'm just confused at this point...
lonegull44 lonegull44 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2018
#2671 ·
Could someone please help me make sense of these results?
Standard cervical spine imaging shows spondylosis. Vertebral body heights are within normal limits.
There is a listhemic misalignment of the C3 body relative to C4 by 1.9 mm, and the C5 and C6 bodies show a shift of up to 2.5 mm.
The intervertebral disc spaces at C5/C6 and C6/C7 are reduced.
A pre-vertebral calcification is noted at C5/C6.
Moderate degenerative changes are present in the facet joints from C5/C6 moving caudally.
Foramen arcuale of the atlas is noted.
The right transverse process of the C7 vertebral body is more massive.

This is for my neck. I’m dealing with constant pressure in my neck, and after a recent bout of stiffness, I was sent in for imaging. I’m a 40-year-old male. Honestly, looking at all this jargon is making me a bit anxious. Also, because of some knee pain, I had both knees imaged as well—here are those results.

Imaging of both knees shows the joint space width is maintained. No signs of marginal osteophyte formation.
Bone mineralization appears normal.
Bilateral patellar lateralization.

Thanks in advance.
Kenneth Bailey27 Kenneth Bailey27 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2018
#2672 ·
wiredpilot25 said:So, the urine culture came back sterile and the ultrasound looks fine. The only real issue is those white blood cell counts in the urine. I've been taking some antibiotics and muscle relaxants, which helped a bit, but now I’m dealing with this nagging ache in my kidneys and bladder. My doctor seems totally stumped; she's rambling about some kind of sediment or "sand" causing an infection as it passes through. Honestly, none of this makes any sense to me anymore.

Usually, if you have kidney grit or sediment, it shows up on an ultrasound, though there is always that small chance it stays hidden. Think of that "sand" as the precursor to actual kidney stones. That stuff can definitely trigger an infection as it moves around. There isn't really a specific medication to target the sediment itself; your best bet is just to flush your system. You honestly can't drink too much water—I'd say aim for closer to a gallon a day if you can handle it.

Sent from my TA-1032 using Reddit
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2673 ·
Michelle Perez40 said:Kidney sand usually shows up on an ultrasound, though there is a chance it might go undetected. Think of kidney sand as the precursor to actual stones. That grit can definitely trigger an infection. You don't necessarily need specific medication for it—you just have to stay hydrated. Seriously, drink plenty of fluids. Four liters a day is totally fine.

Sent from my TA-1032 using Reddit

Thanks so much for the info!
Just one more thing. I started having pain about a week before my ultrasound. Is it possible that some sand was passing through and irritating my urinary tract, causing the inflammation?
Kenneth Bailey27 Kenneth Bailey27 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2018
#2674 ·
wiredpilot25 said:Thanks so much for getting back to me!
Just one more thing—I actually started feeling pain about a week before my ultrasound. Is there any chance that some sediment was passing through and just irritating my urinary tract, causing the inflammation to kick in that way?

Well, yeah, that’s definitely a possibility. Look, I’m far from being a doctor, but based on what I know about how that area works, it makes total sense that small amounts of sediment could have caused enough irritation to trigger things. That said, you probably shouldn't be overdoing the fluids for another few weeks while this settles down. Once you've finished your course of antibiotics, sticking to some cranberry juice and Vitamin C might help keep everything clean and disinfected.

Sent from my TA-1032 using Reddit
wiredpilot25 wiredpilot25 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2019
#2675 ·
Michelle Perez40 said:Well, now, it’s probably possible. Look, I’m no doctor, but based on what I know about this stuff, it’s plausible that smaller amounts caused some irritation. But honestly, drinking a ton of fluids for a few weeks won't hurt, and once you finish your antibiotics, you can stick to cranberry juice and Vitamin C to help cleanse your system.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy using Reddit

My bad, I totally thought you were a doctor—you sounded like one. 🙂
Anyway, thanks so much.🎉 🎉 🎉
shadowtiger0 shadowtiger0 Active Member
63 messages
joined Mar 2023
#2676 ·
I’m looking for some perspective on these hormone blood work results.

PROLACTIN 1026 ( 86 - 324 ) - Unfortunately, I had my blood drawn just 75 minutes after waking up—that probably explains why this is through the roof.

FSH 13.99 ( 1.5 - 12.4 )

LH 9.23 ( 1.7 - 8.6 )

PROGESTERONE 1.0 ( less than 0.5 )

ESTRADIOL 107.80 ( 41.40 - 159.00 )

TESTOSTERONE 20.91 ( 8.64 - 29.00 )

TSH 2.550 ( 0.270 - 4.200 )

CORTISOL ( 8am ) 671 ( 171 - 536 )

CORTISOL ( 4pm) 221 ( 64 - 327 )

Mid-thirties, non-smoker, active athlete—had these done because of some disappointing results from a semen analysis.
Andrew Jones12 Andrew Jones12 Member
17 messages
joined Aug 2017
#2677 ·
shadowtiger0 said:I’d appreciate some input on these blood work results (hormones).

PROLACTIN 1026 ( 86 - 324 ) - Unfortunately, I had the draw done 1 hour and 15 minutes after waking up. That's likely why it's so high.

FSH 13.99 ( 1.5 - 12.4 )

LH 9.23 ( 1.7 - 8.6 )

PROGESTERONE 1.0 ( less than 0.5 )

ESTRADIOL 107.80 ( 41.40 - 159.00 )

TESTOSTERONE 20.91 ( 8.64 - 29.00 )

TSH 2.550 ( 0.270 - 4.200 )

CORTISOL ( 8am) 671 ( 171 - 536 )

CORTISOL ( 4pm) 221 ( 64 - 327 )

Mid-30s, non-smoker, athlete. Had this done because of poor semen analysis results.

The results are only reliable if the sample was taken within two hours of waking. This value is significantly elevated. I wouldn't chalk this up to normal physiological fluctuations in prolactin, especially since your other pituitary hormones are also high. Hyperprolactinemia in men is one of the most common culprits behind infertility. You need to see an endocrinologist—they will likely order a pituitary MRI. Before that, get a solid neurological exam and make sure you aren't taking any medications that could trigger hyperprolactinemia.
Peter Rogers Peter Rogers Active Member
60 messages
joined Dec 2011
#2678 ·
If a five-year-old comes back with an IgA level under 0.1, does that automatically mean we're looking at selective immunodeficiency, or could this just be some weird, temporary phase?
The little guy has been going through the ringer for a while now because of persistent lymph node hyperplasia in multiple areas.
We’re currently stuck in limbo waiting on a decision regarding a biopsy.
And we're also just sitting around waiting for a referral to see an immunologist.

Hypothetically, if this actually turns out to be selective immunodeficiency, do the rest of us in the family need to get tested too? Is this kind of thing hereditary?
Honestly, the absolute worst part of all this is the looming fear of a potential transfusion; you just never know what kind of curveball is waiting around the corner. He’s supposed to undergo a procedure on his jugular veins soon, and I’m left totally in the dark about these lab results, other than knowing he shouldn't be receiving any blood products.
Andrew Jones12 Andrew Jones12 Member
17 messages
joined Aug 2017
#2679 ·
Emily Ortiz27 said:Can an IgA level under 0.1 in a five-year-old be a sign of selective immunodeficiency, or could this just be a passing phase?
The kid’s been stuck in the system for a while now. They're still running tests because of some persistent hyperplasia across multiple lymph node regions. It's a long road.
Waiting on the biopsy results. Just hanging in there.
Still waiting on that referral to the immunologist.

If we're talking about selective immunodeficiency, does the rest of the family need to get tested? Is this something passed down through the genes?
The worst part is the constant anxiety over a potential transfusion. You never really know what’s waiting for you around the corner. He’s facing a procedure on his jugular now, and all I know about the lab results is that he shouldn't be receiving any blood products.

Didn't you mention earlier that you were waiting on the pathology results from the lymph node biopsy?

It could be selective IgA deficiency. But if that’s the case, you'd need to see normal levels of the other immunoglobulins—or perhaps even a slight compensatory rise in IgE. Usually, doctors start looking into this when someone is constantly battling respiratory issues or gut infections. Most IgA is secretory, meaning it sits right in the lining of your airways and digestive tract to act as a first line of defense against pathogens. Because of that, we often see these patients dealing with atopy or autoimmune struggles like Celiac disease. That said, there's a huge percentage of people living with this deficiency who don't have a single symptom to their name.

Anaphylactic reactions following a transfusion aren't exactly common. In fact, they’re practically non-existent if the patient produces even a tiny amount of IgA. The real danger zone is for those who don't produce any at all—to them, that protein is a total foreign invader. Still, if the diagnosis is on the table, you can't ignore it. It has to be flagged during preoperative screening, and it demands tight coordination between the anesthesiologist and the hematology or immunology team. I've seen enough cases to know that cutting corners in communication like that is how mistakes happen.

In most cases, the cause remains a mystery. We see hereditary patterns in about a quarter of patients, but it doesn't follow standard Mendelian rules like hemophilia does. It’s far more complex and, frankly, poorly understood. I'm not even sure if testing immediate relatives makes any sense. At the end of the day, a diagnosis hinges on finding that specific isolated deficiency or a significant drop in IgA while everything else stays normal—an assessment that isn't exactly complicated or expensive.
Peter Rogers Peter Rogers Active Member
60 messages
joined Dec 2011
#2680 ·
I honestly don't even know where to start with this one, but here we go. You ever look at some of these "innovative" medical tech startups and just feel that immediate, sinking sensation in your gut? That’s exactly what happened when I first stumbled upon the whole Livmed situation. It’s like, are we actually serious right now? Are we really going to sit here and pretend that this isn't just another case of overhyped Silicon Valley nonsense trying to disrupt an industry they clearly don't understand? I mean, come on. They talk a big game about streamlining patient care and using data to revolutionize how we handle wellness, but when you actually peel back the layers of the marketing fluff, what do you actually have? Is there any substance there, or is it just a bunch of flashy UI designs meant to distract investors from the fact that the actual utility is pretty thin? It feels like they're selling us a shiny new gadget when all we really need is for the healthcare system to stop being such a bloated, disorganized mess in the first place. And don't even get me started on the privacy implications. We live in an era where every single bit of our biometric data is being vacuumed up by some startup based out of Palo Alto, and they act like it's this incredible gift to humanity. Since when did giving away our most intimate health metrics became a fair trade for a slightly more convenient app interface? It’s wild, man. Truly wild. Does anyone else feel like we're just being treated like data points in a giant experiment, or am I just shouting into the void here? kaže:
Wait, didn't you say earlier that you were still holding out for the PhD results from the lymph node biopsy?

So, look, it’s totally possible we're looking at selective IgA deficiency here, but you can't just jump to that conclusion without checking the rest of the data. To actually call it that, you'd need to see that the other immunoglobulin classes are sitting right where they should be—or maybe even slightly elevated, like IgE, just to compensate for the gap. Usually, doctors start getting suspicious about a deficiency when someone is constantly battling a revolving door of respiratory issues or gut infections. Since most IgA is the secretory type that gets pumped into the linings of your respiratory and digestive tracts to act as a frontline defense against bugs, losing that shield leaves you wide open. That’s why you often see people dealing with allergic stuff or even autoimmune struggles like Celiac disease popping up more frequently. But honestly? A huge chunk of people living with this don't show any symptoms at all, so it’s a weird one.

Look, anaphylactic reactions after a transfusion aren't exactly common, and you’re almost never going to see them if the patient is producing even a tiny bit of IgA. The real danger zone? That's the folks who don't produce any IgA at all—to their system, that stuff is just a completely foreign protein. But hey, regardless of how rare it is, if a diagnosis like that is on the books, you absolutely have to flag it during the preoperative workup. It’s not optional. You need the anesthesiologist and the hematologist or immunologist actually talking to each other and working together on this. Is it worth skipping that step? Not a chance.

In most cases, we’re basically flying blind because the actual cause remains a total mystery, right? You see some hereditary patterns showing up in maybe a quarter of the people dealing with this, but don't go thinking it follows any straightforward Mendelian rules like hemophilia or something easy to track. It’s way more complicated and honestly just unexplained as hell. I’m sitting here wondering if there’s even any point in testing immediate family members—I mean, when the diagnosis boils down to just an isolated deficiency or a massive drop in IgA while everything else looks perfectly normal, the whole thing isn't exactly a complex or pricey puzzle to solve, is it?

Thanks, but honestly, it’s not just about waiting on the lab results—it's the whole damn procedure to get the tissue removed for the biopsy that I'm stuck waiting on.
I honestly can't wrap my head around why everyone is just sitting around waiting like this. I mean, seriously, what is the actual logic behind all this stalling? Is there some grand master plan I’m missing, or are we all just collectively losing our minds? I don't get it.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads