#7021 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:not really feeling this debate, but gotta say I hate states
let's all just hold hands or something lol
same
can we all just hold hands please lol
yeah, I'm all for this total mess too
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)
Started by Morgan Williams · · 👁 1K views · 18K replies
Participants
…
…
same
yeah, I'm all for this total mess too
#7023 ·
#7024 ·
Walter Grant5 said:samecan we all just hold hands please lol
yeah, I'm all for this total mess too
let's gooooo 🎉
#7025 ·
amberlynx0 said:The Antifascist network in Washington, D.C. pulls in 70,000 bucks a year from the government. 🤣
Let me guess, the head of the association is Saša Broz, isn't she? 🙏
We’ve got to find some way to get those University of Washington engineering grads into decent jobs. There has to be a way to get them hired.
#7027 ·
amberlynx0 said:The Antifascist network in Washington, D.C. pulls in 70,000 bucks a year from the government. 🤣
Let me guess, the head of the association is Saša Broz, isn't she? 🙏
$23? That’s about what a single paintbrush for cleaning highway tunnels costs these days.
#7028 ·
ruggedjackal46 said:$23? That’s about what a single paintbrush for cleaning highway tunnels costs these days.
That is just one isolated instance. Besides, I don't see why we're even making this comparison—as if pointing out a minor expense somehow justifies blatant theft. 🤷
#7029 ·
Walter Grant5 said:man, you seen that Spy bridge documentary yet?
nah.
should I? looks kinda mid to me.
#7031 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:nah.
should I? looks kinda mid to me.
Don't bother. The Revenant is a pass for me. Too much marketing, too much hype, all those visual filters... just not feeling it.
#7032 ·
I'll pass then. Thanks for the tip.
> looks incredible—an absolute stunner. Honestly, might even look better than >. Cinematography is my favorite part of filmmaking, so I’m hooked. Sure, there was a ton of hype, but mostly because of Leo (who wasn't anything special; Hardy totally outshined him, plus Gleeson and Poulter were just hanging around), rather than > or >. The buzz died down fast after the release, though, since most people found it way too slow and boring. It’s got its flaws, obviously, but if you actually care about movies, you’ll dig this. Catch it in a theater or wait for the Blu-ray.
> looks incredible—an absolute stunner. Honestly, might even look better than >. Cinematography is my favorite part of filmmaking, so I’m hooked. Sure, there was a ton of hype, but mostly because of Leo (who wasn't anything special; Hardy totally outshined him, plus Gleeson and Poulter were just hanging around), rather than > or >. The buzz died down fast after the release, though, since most people found it way too slow and boring. It’s got its flaws, obviously, but if you actually care about movies, you’ll dig this. Catch it in a theater or wait for the Blu-ray.
#7033 ·
You're wrong about Emmanuel Lubezki. I've never seen this many mainstream types obsessing over a cinematographer like they are right now.
#7034 ·
@Matthew Anderson4
Then you’ve got Knight of Cups. Honestly, there isn't much of a story there and the movie itself is just mediocre (though you could argue Knight of Cups barely qualifies as a film 😁), but Emmanuel Lubezki’s camerawork? That is top-tier.
It’s like having the most beautiful painting in the world—if the actual subject is just average, the frame won't make it great. It’s kind of like how blood is just another element in the atmosphere for The Revenant; visually, they might be on the same level, but that's about it.
I’d only recommend The Revenant for the cinematography. It’s worth seeing on a big screen in a theater, sure, but everything else falls flat. It’s probably the weakest work from Alejandro G. Iñárritu.
Then you’ve got Knight of Cups. Honestly, there isn't much of a story there and the movie itself is just mediocre (though you could argue Knight of Cups barely qualifies as a film 😁), but Emmanuel Lubezki’s camerawork? That is top-tier.
It’s like having the most beautiful painting in the world—if the actual subject is just average, the frame won't make it great. It’s kind of like how blood is just another element in the atmosphere for The Revenant; visually, they might be on the same level, but that's about it.
I’d only recommend The Revenant for the cinematography. It’s worth seeing on a big screen in a theater, sure, but everything else falls flat. It’s probably the weakest work from Alejandro G. Iñárritu.
#7035 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:I'll pass then. Thanks for the tip.
> looks incredible—an absolute stunner. Honestly, might even look better than >. Cinematography is my favorite part of filmmaking, so I’m hooked. Sure, there was a ton of hype, but mostly because of Leo (who wasn't anything special; Hardy totally outshined him, plus Gleeson and Poulter were just hanging around), rather than > or >. The buzz died down fast after the release, though, since most people found it way too slow and boring. It’s got its flaws, obviously, but if you actually care about movies, you’ll dig this. Catch it in a theater or wait for the Blu-ray.
Give me a break!
#7036 ·
http://hop-portal.com/2016/01/zastup...-moral-crnoji/
I have no interest in debating whether this account is factual or not, though it remains entirely plausible that a person could simply vote for themselves, be the sole participant in doing so, and somehow emerge victorious... 😳
I have no interest in debating whether this account is factual or not, though it remains entirely plausible that a person could simply vote for themselves, be the sole participant in doing so, and somehow emerge victorious... 😳
#7037 ·
Walter Grant5 said:man, you seen that Spy bridge documentary yet?
I mean, who's even starring in this thing, is it like a Tom Clancy thriller with some high-level DC politicians? 😕
#7038 ·
Walter Grant5 said:You're wrong about Emmanuel Lubezki. I've never seen this many mainstream types obsessing over a cinematographer like they are right now.
Facts.
vivideagle7 said:@Matthew Anderson4
Then you’ve got Knight of Cups. Honestly, there isn't much of a story there and the movie itself is just mediocre (though you could argue Knight of Cups barely qualifies as a film 😁), but Emmanuel Lubezki’s camerawork? That is top-tier.
It’s like having the most beautiful painting in the world—if the actual subject is just average, the frame won't make it great. It’s kind of like how blood is just another element in the atmosphere for The Revenant; visually, they might be on the same level, but that's about it.
I’d only recommend The Revenant for the cinematography. It’s worth seeing on a big screen in a theater, sure, but everything else falls flat. It’s probably the weakest work from Alejandro G. Iñárritu.
Everything holds up. Honestly, the cinematography was so good I actually walked out of the theater feeling pretty stoked. If killer camera work can make a movie great, why wouldn't it?
Pure carnage. Best movie of the 21st century, hands down. It’s basically a whole different universe compared to *The Revenant*.
Noah Roberts46 said:Give me a break!
Just speaking for the photography side of things. 😁
#7039 ·
Jason Anderson4 said:I mean, who's even starring in this thing, is it like a Tom Clancy thriller with some high-level DC politicians? 😕
Honestly, those guys would be way better actors.
#7040 ·
To be fair, I actually found Spy Game to be quite a solid film. It isn't exactly my usual genre—there aren't any massive explosions, high-octane action sequences, or killer robots to speak of—but it possessed a certain quality that stayed with me...
🔗 Similar threads
- Group chat drama and the "truth in Off-topic · Jul 29, 2026
- Is everything becoming just another AI chatbot? in Software · Jul 29, 2026
- Is the "Empty Chat" era officially dead? in Random / Off-topic · Jul 28, 2026
- Private Chat for Me and My Inner Circle Only. Chapter III. The Return of the King. in Off-topic · May 7, 2023
- ChatGPT in IT Support · Apr 21, 2023