Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Ashley Bailey6 said:Why did I even bother reading Hracak?
And then there was the friction.

You probably heard the term "Gerbilling" once in your life and your subconscious just took over. 😁

Ashley Bailey6 said:Why did I even bother reading Hracak?
And then there was the friction.

Trust me, you aren't alone in this one.🤣

Lubricants are meant for ladies.

Maybe we should pivot this conversation away from gay sex for a second.



Here you go, folks. Enjoy the chills.

Charles Roberts33 said:Maybe we should pivot this conversation away from gay sex for a second.

Here you go, folks. Enjoy the chills.

he wants to move away from gay sex by dropping a link to some powerhouse female singer🐔

anyway, I saw this funny joke on an American site once:

What do two gay guys do? They fall in love.
What do two lesbians do? They fall in love.
What do a gay guy and a lesbian do? They run America.

I honestly can't quite wrap my head around why I keep clicking on these links. As if that wasn't enough, I was treated to an extra little "bonus" in the form of that Broccoli commercial featuring a single mom and her kid trailing behind.

I’ve learned the hard way lately: always open random links in incognito mode. It’s the only way to save your YouTube feed from getting totally trashed. Once you click on one piece of garbage like that, your suggestion box is basically poisoned for weeks.

Look, we aren't going to sit here and disrespect the late Nina like that.😳

Nino is doing just fine, why don't you guys quit whining...

A new Valderammina hairstyle. Clearly channeling some Jennifer Aniston vibes... ☕

Good grief, I honestly thought at first it was some kind of filter, you know, like one of those things people use to sharpen images.
Lizard ppl 🤦

He’s definitely a handsome guy, I suppose 🙏

Six kids 🙏

S T R O J

It feels like I’ve opened a third eye.

We are living within a one-dimensional space designed to simulate an eleven-dimensional reality.
Because of how evolution works, we are only capable of perceiving three of those simulated dimensions.

Cats, naturally, can grasp all eleven dimensions; they know perfectly well we are stuck in a one-dimensional space. For practical reasons, they simply choose to operate within the eleven.

Matthew Young35 said:It feels like I’ve opened a third eye.

We are living within a one-dimensional space designed to simulate an eleven-dimensional reality.
Because of how evolution works, we are only capable of perceiving three of those simulated dimensions.

Cats, naturally, can grasp all eleven dimensions; they know perfectly well we are stuck in a one-dimensional space. For practical reasons, they simply choose to operate within the eleven.

This is just as plausible as any religion.

We don't know shit.
Not until scientists prove otherwise, or at least try to, or think they have.

Ultimately, they're the only ones actually touching reality.
Everyone else is just searching for meaning or trying to feel special.

Ashley Bailey6 said:This is just as plausible as any religion.

We don't know shit.
Not until scientists prove otherwise, or at least try to, or think they have.

Ultimately, they're the only ones actually touching reality.
Everyone else is just searching for meaning or trying to feel special.

Say whatever you want, but I'm convinced we're living in a simulation.

And if we are in a simulation, the only logical conclusion is that it exists within a one-dimensional space. Why? Because it’s the simplest path.

Susskind got me thinking about this.
Though, even he hasn't quite grasped how things truly stand.

If someone has a bit of spare time and a decent grasp of mathematics, they could prove my point quite easily. We can split the Nobel Prize down the middle: I'll take 40%, and whoever handles the math gets 60%. I respect the work.

100% psychiatrist

Take a screenshot. You just finished talking to a future Nobel Prize winner.
☕

So, I’m sitting here watching this guy Michio Kaku... just rambling on about ten or eleven dimensions.
LOL

Why can't they grasp the fact that a single dimension is plenty when we're talking about virtual space?

Complete nonsense.

Or perhaps it's a zero-dimensional space.
Hmmm
But then, by definition, it wouldn't be space at all....

I need to refine my theory a bit.
I'll check back in tomorrow once I've worked it out...

Matthew Young35 said:Say whatever you want, but I'm convinced we're living in a simulation.

And if we are in a simulation, the only logical conclusion is that it exists within a one-dimensional space. Why? Because it’s the simplest path.

Susskind got me thinking about this.
Though, even he hasn't quite grasped how things truly stand.

If someone has a bit of spare time and a decent grasp of mathematics, they could prove my point quite easily. We can split the Nobel Prize down the middle: I'll take 40%, and whoever handles the math gets 60%. I respect the work.

If you're going to quote Neymar, at least use some quotation marks...☕