Nathan Murphy said:That kind of logic is fundamentally flawed. To me, this feels exactly like saying, "I'm not a fan of [famous controversial figure], but..."
Look, I’ve traveled the entire world—actually, more than he has, because unlike him, I also traveled all over Europe, which my memory tells me he hasn't done extensively. I took photos and videos myself, but it never crossed my mind to turn it into a YouTube channel or plaster it all over the internet.
Let's break this down so you can see how much you're actually defending him. You previously defended him by claiming he wasn't violent, and then I showed you that he is an incredibly aggressive individual bordering on sociopathic.
Writes books? The guy has written about 12 books if I'm not mistaken, including Rahan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahan_(comics). There were major revelations surrounding those books; just because he puts pen to paper doesn't mean he's successful when the man is deeply unhappy deep down.
Draws for fun? Again, you're taking his word at face value when he says he draws for pleasure. In reality, as investigators have revealed, he's often just tracing from sketches we don't see. You can do that easily on large paper; on camera, it looks seamless, but in person, the guide lines are obvious. I can't believe you fell for that. It seems to me you're a huge fan and haven't looked at what the whistleblowers have uncovered. This is the behavior of a deeply unhappy man trying to prove to the world that he's talented at everything.
Playing house? As for the woman he's with, it was revealed she films content for OnlyFans; she's essentially his financier. Give me a break. 🤣
Working out? Which workouts exactly? Fine, I'll give you that one point, because my friends back home tell me he’s legitimate when it comes to Muay Thai; that’s the only thing he’s actually good at. As for things like Capoeira (which you conveniently left out), people say he bought his credentials. When you watch how a supposed master actually performs Capoeira , it's clearly a sham.
So, I don't see what the whistleblowers are doing wrong, other than targeting a man who lies about everything, profits from those lies, or at least did for a while. He is deeply unhappy internally and spreads zero love; rather, his outbursts prove he is a very violent person. He burned every bridge with his friends, and he lied about being in some elite special forces unit—the truth is he didn't make the cut and was kicked out.
In short, you've presented a superficial version of him because, hey, the guy travels and has a Black wife. On the other hand, you seem totally indifferent to the fact that he's a sociopath who promotes violence and is a pathological liar who profits from people through staged videos. But no, you're upset with the whistleblowers because they actually had the nerve to expose him. 🙏To me feels exactly like those people who say, "I’m not against the owner, but..."
Now, have these guys gone too far? Honestly, I'm not so sure. They are simply exposing someone who built a career on lies and has a negative impact on the youth—someone who is clearly deeply unhappy within. I don't see an issue with that. As far as I'm concerned, let them expose every single person like Chamberlin and his crowd. Seeing folks defend Badjun like they're defending Byron is, if you ask me, a little bit concerning.
Another case successfully closed by Inspector Crane. What can I say? You caught me, buddy. Guess I’m the one who’s been leading you astray all this time. ☕
Honestly, you people are hilarious. Still dedicating this much energy to a guy who wanders around South America without a cent to his name? He's fifty years old, and if you shook him down, he probably wouldn't even have enough cash for a bus ticket home. And comparing him to a mogul like Mamić? Please. 🤣🤣
The guy is definitely a weirdo, no question about it. But what's even weirder is this obsessive fixation on him that's been going on for nearly two years. It's getting creepy, man. As funny as it was at first, it's just unsettling now.