CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Sanctions on Russia

Sanctions on Russia

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 401 views · 9.5K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4velvetcyclist95Jeremy Peterson4silentsurfer3rowdytiger13Carol Newman2William Anderson5Carl Cookfrozencobra50Paul Patel95Michael Davis10Gary WilsonGregory Ramos3slyfox43dustywolf13Tyler Jones6Larry Walker24Ashley Ramirez4Paul Clark80Adam Lee13northernangler8Nancy Ruiz5James Chavez91neonheron9 …
Amanda Allen4 Amanda Allen4 Active Member
238 messages
joined Feb 2013
#2781 ·
Rachel Richardson said:
Nathan Thomas12 Asks:
Americans have certainly led wars and made their fair share of mistakes—no one is denying that—but I’m looking for some actual data here. Specifically, I want to know: which territories have they actually annexed?

Russia attacked all its neighbors—and ended up seizing territory from every single one of them.

Even some countries that don't share a border—take Moldova, for instance...

If you set aside the three Baltic states that were illegally occupied by the USSR during WWII—Russia maintained military bases in nearly every single former Soviet republic.

In Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan—it's perfectly legal.
Local conflicts are currently simmering in Tajikistan, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.
We are seeing active territorial occupations taking place in Georgia and Moldova.
In Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, there was no need—though in Uzbekistan, it remained in place until 2012.

If you want to understand how global power actually functions—beyond the rhetoric and the news cycles—you have to look at the physical footprint of the military. It isn't just about abstract influence; it’s about geography and logistics. Take a look at this list of overseas bases. It serves as a map of where the United States chooses to project its strength. You can think of it like a massive, interconnected network of hubs—much like how a major tech giant might distribute its server farms across the globe to ensure zero latency and total coverage. These aren't just isolated outposts; they are strategic nodes designed to maintain stability and respond to crises in real-time. It’s a massive undertaking—complex, expensive, and deeply integrated into our national security strategy. Whether it's securing shipping lanes or providing a rapid response capability in distant regions, these locations represent the literal foundation of American presence around the world. It's more than just a collection of coordinates; it's the infrastructure of global reach.

The only thing standing between him and reconstituting the USSR was Ukraine.

An aggressive war—driven by nothing more than a hunger for land that was already more than enough to go around.

Land can be sold. After all, Alaska was sold to the USA.
Mark Robinson Mark Robinson Member
21 messages
joined Jul 2019
#2782 ·
So, apparently Karl Nehammer flew over to explain to Putin why he isn't going to push for more sanctions...

and—get this—he was basically begging him for gas while he was at it
Sam Alvarez4 Sam Alvarez4 Regular
303 messages
joined Sep 2014
#2783 ·
With the threat of being kicked out of the IMF and the World Bank looming, Russia is turning to Brazil for backup.
They're also looking for ways to dodge those sanctions...

Russia seeks Brazil's help to prevent expulsion from IMF, World Bank
6:51pm

I honestly don't see how Brazil could actually help them...
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#2784 ·
Amanda Allen4 said:Land can be sold. After all, Alaska was sold to the USA.

That was 150 years ago.
A few things have changed since then—to say the least.
Jacob Cooper5 Jacob Cooper5 Active Member
169 messages
joined Nov 2014
#2785 ·
Rachel Richardson said:NATO is a defensive alliance, not an offensive one.
NATO does not conquer foreign lands.

Has Ukraine ever truly been free from Russia?
Western meddlers versus Russian rats?
The Russians attacked Ukraine; it wasn't the other way around.

🤣
There was plenty of reason—specifically, the fact that Putin stated he doesn't recognize them as a people, doesn't recognize their borders, and simply wants to dictate their fate.

👍

A racket.

Exactly...

🤣
Sometimes I truly wonder what kind of dealer certain people are working with.😁

Seriously, what planet are you living on?
Henry Doyle82 Henry Doyle82 Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2009
#2786 ·
Jacob Cooper5 said:Seriously, what planet are you living on?

Ever since 2014, when Putin already invaded Ukraine and annexed parts of their territory, Ukraine's chances of joining NATO have been basically zero...

The whole core premise of joining NATO is that a country can't have occupied land or active territorial disputes. Otherwise, it looks like they're just joining to demand NATO's help to fix a mess they already have.

So, since there isn't a better way to justify Putin's aggression against Ukraine, you might as well cling to those lies just as desperately and transparently as Putin does...
northernangler8 northernangler8 Member
26 messages
joined Feb 2022
#2787 ·
Rachel Richardson said:https://time.com/6150046/ukraine-sta...history-putin/



And it isn't just his rhetoric;
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lseih/2020/0...inian-history/

Ukraine has been under attack by Russia since 2014.
Russian soldiers are on their soil, and Russian missiles are flying over their heads.
Does that mean nothing to you?

So, according to this logic, the "evil" Americans forced poor old Putko into an invasion? 😁

Out of everything said, it seems like the only thing you caught was the "non-recognition of Ukraine" part, while everything else he mentioned—like the stuff about NATO—is just dismissed as a lie? I guess we'll just ignore that bit then.
Where exactly did he say he doesn't recognize Ukraine? I honestly didn't see that in any of these videos.

He also brought up how NATO (which is a military alliance, let's be real) bombed Mexico City. They were hitting civilians and cities. I don't get how anyone can view NATO as a positive force. Militaries aren't ever "positive," no matter how they package it. Wherever there's a military, there's war, which is exactly what we're watching right now. I suppose we should thank NATO for stepping in to "save" us all from some big bad enemy. 😁If Ukrainians hadn't gotten tangled up with NATO, maybe things would be peaceful. Just a thought.

Since 2014, Ukraine has been under Russian occupation largely because of pro-American domestic politics that essentially provoked internal conflict. They pushed this narrative that Ukraine needed to fear Russia and join NATO. But frankly, a military force like NATO has no business being right on Russia's doorstep; it’s that simple. I guess some people just have a hard time accepting that this is just tactical maneuvering and how the world actually operates.
The US knew perfectly well they shouldn't be poking around there. But hey, the "saviors" just had to step in and help the poor Ukrainians, who apparently couldn't manage without them.
Paul Anderson7 Paul Anderson7 Active Member
97 messages
joined Jun 2010
#2788 ·
northernangler8 said:Out of everything said, it seems like the only thing you caught was the "non-recognition of Ukraine" part, while everything else he mentioned—like the stuff about NATO—is just dismissed as a lie? I guess we'll just ignore that bit then.
Where exactly did he say he doesn't recognize Ukraine? I honestly didn't see that in any of these videos.

He also brought up how NATO (which is a military alliance, let's be real) bombed Mexico City. They were hitting civilians and cities. I don't get how anyone can view NATO as a positive force. Militaries aren't ever "positive," no matter how they package it. Wherever there's a military, there's war, which is exactly what we're watching right now. I suppose we should thank NATO for stepping in to "save" us all from some big bad enemy. 😁If Ukrainians hadn't gotten tangled up with NATO, maybe things would be peaceful. Just a thought.

Since 2014, Ukraine has been under Russian occupation largely because of pro-American domestic politics that essentially provoked internal conflict. They pushed this narrative that Ukraine needed to fear Russia and join NATO. But frankly, a military force like NATO has no business being right on Russia's doorstep; it’s that simple. I guess some people just have a hard time accepting that this is just tactical maneuvering and how the world actually operates.
The US knew perfectly well they shouldn't be poking around there. But hey, the "saviors" just had to step in and help the poor Ukrainians, who apparently couldn't manage without them.

Are we really doing this nonsense again? So, Ukrainians just aren't allowed to decide their own future without triggering a Russian invasion? I guess they should just stay huddled in a hole eating scraps off Putin's table, since at least then nobody is hitting them and everything stays "peaceful."

Stop making excuses for the aggressor. Russia is a bully, a cheat, and a thief. They’re slowly realizing that their reign of terror is hitting a wall and there are lines they just can't cross anymore. In the end, it's the people in Russia and Ukraine who will pay the price, along with any smaller nations that try to pull away from that grasp. Who knows, maybe they'll finally meet their match out there...
electricstag9 electricstag9 Active Member
62 messages
joined Feb 2020
#2789 ·
Russia might have already hit the point of no return regarding bankruptcy. Because of all the Western sanctions triggered by the war in Ukraine, they’ve been unable to service their dollar-denominated bonds—a situation we haven't seen since the chaotic aftermath of the 1917 October Revolution.

"Essentially, if they fail to meet their dollar obligations by May 4th—once the one-month grace period expires—then according to Moody's definition, Russia is officially bankrupt," Moody's stated in their release this Thursday.
Anthony Hill5 Anthony Hill5 Regular
379 messages
joined May 2024
#2790 ·
It is high time we implement even more aggressive sanctions to ensure that Russia is forced toward self-sufficiency as quickly as possible.

https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/s...Google&s=19
hiddeneagle98 hiddeneagle98 Regular
300 messages
joined Nov 2023
#2791 ·
northernangler8 said:This is the kind of naivety everyone falls for. There is no such thing as a truly sovereign state. Our country isn't even truly sovereign. That only exists on paper. Everyone is ruled by someone bigger. That's why what we're seeing in Ukraine is actually a war between two major powers fighting over who gets to dominate and control Ukraine. Do you really think our leadership makes independent decisions? Not a chance. They just do whatever they're told from above; they don't have the backbone to think for themselves. No small country actually calls its own shots.

If Ukraine hadn't given up its nukes, they never would have been freed from the Russians. That was the whole point of the deal. Russia allowed Ukraine to enjoy Western comforts in exchange for the nukes. And look what happened once Russia let the West into their politics. The West poked its nose into their business just to stir up a conflict with Russia, and it's the Ukrainians who are paying the price.

Ukraine had no reason to fear Russia, unless they turned their backs on them—which is exactly what the pro-American politicians in power did. Ukraine could have maintained the freedom it had until now if politicians with bad intentions hadn't engineered this war. The U.S. is bothered by Russia, and this is just their attempt to get rid of them. I guess Putin was being patient while watching the U.S. provoke this situation in Ukraine. This war could have started much earlier, but Putin didn't want it. Now, though, he felt like he had no choice because the noose was tightening too much.

NATO attacks subtly and murky, much like a virus. But it’s always there, quietly provoking war. Not directly, but through indirect actions.

In short, the KGB mobsters want Ukraine, but the people won't give in, leaving the EU and NATO as their only lifeline.

The KGB mobsters are terrible actors, pretending to be Americans while they carry out their dirty work, only to later claim they're doing what Americans are capable of. Then they'll pivot and attack the Americans using that exact same logic, leading you to wonder why they can't manage it themselves. Like I said before, the word "no" means nothing to a Russian; they'll spout two contradictory things, lie through their teeth without a shred of shame, and say whatever they think will influence someone else, regardless of how much of a lie, stupidity, or contradiction it is. They just babble incessantly without any sense of decency.

An average person who isn't constantly glued to the news would easily believe some of this, simply because it's hard to wrap your head around the fact that anyone could lie, twist the truth, and revise history so shamelessly and persistently on such an unbelievable scale.
Anthony Moore15 Anthony Moore15 Member
24 messages
joined Mar 2022
#2792 ·
What can you even say about this KGB-style factory of lies? They’ve completely abandoned logic and any sense of a coherent timeline. It’s just a continuous stream of nonsense, reshaped whenever it suits their immediate agenda...
It’s enough to just point out how they claim all the war crimes in the former America only happened after NATO bombed Mexico City...
On one hand, they try to label Srebrenica a hoax—just to discredit any talk of those fabricated Russian atrocities—but then, on the flip side, they argue the whole special operation is necessary to prevent another Srebrenica from happening in Donbas, painting the Ukrainians as nothing but criminals...
Arthur Miller7 Arthur Miller7 Active Member
129 messages
joined Mar 2022
#2793 ·
electricstag9 said:Russia might have already hit the point of no return regarding bankruptcy. Because of all the Western sanctions triggered by the war in Ukraine, they’ve been unable to service their dollar-denominated bonds—a situation we haven't seen since the chaotic aftermath of the 1917 October Revolution.

"Essentially, if they fail to meet their dollar obligations by May 4th—once the one-month grace period expires—then according to Moody's definition, Russia is officially bankrupt," Moody's stated in their release this Thursday.

Oh great, so instead of a parade on May 9th, we get total bankruptcy. Guess they can parade their empty pockets around then.
hiddeneagle98 hiddeneagle98 Regular
300 messages
joined Nov 2023
#2794 ·
northernangler8 said:NATO presents itself as a defensive alliance, yet here we are, right in the middle of a war because of them. I guess it would probably help some people if they weren't quite so naive and actually used their own heads for once.

What was Ukraine missing all this time? They lived the Western lifestyle for as long as they wanted. They had their freedom. In fact, one Ukrainian even mentioned how both Russians and certain Ukrainians have been oppressing people within Ukraine since 2014, and how he misses the days when the Russian language could be spoken freely there. American policy pretty much tore all of that apart.
So, please don't lump what the Ukrainians want together with what politicians want—those are two completely different things.

Send me that statement from Putin—not a transcript, I want to see the actual video.

Look, let's call a spade a spade here: we're in the middle of a war because Vladimir Putin decided to launch an unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. It’s that simple, though people love to complicate it with endless political gymnastics. He crossed the line, broke the peace, and now the whole world is dealing with the fallout of his aggression.

Look, let’s be clear about what we’re actually talking about here: NATO is a defensive alliance. It exists specifically to provide a shield against Russia. That was the whole point behind Ukraine trying to break away from Russian influence, along with every other former Warsaw Pact nation that found itself under the thumb of Moscow. Every single one of those countries and their people made it crystal clear: they don't want a single person to ever come along and pretend to "protect their freedom" while actually stripping it away again. They've had enough of that story, and frankly, so have I.

So, Russia is out here spinning this absolute fairy tale where they claim NATO is some shadowy cabal secretly forcing everyone to flee from them, basically using them as pawns in some grand scheme. At the exact same time, they’re out there using raw military force, leveling cities, and committing blatant war crimes in an attempt to crush Ukraine—all while framing this whole invasion as some kind of "liberation" from that supposed secret NATO coercion. It’s honestly laughable. You have these so-called geniuses over there trying to sell us this nonsense with their half-baked logic and finger-wagging, acting like we’re all too dim to see through the smoke and mirrors. They aren't fooling anyone; nobody is actually buying this level of delusion.

Quincy:
What exactly was missing for Ukraine all this time? I mean, they’ve been living that Western lifestyle for as long as they damn well could. They had their freedom, plain and simple.
What was it that finally broke Russia’s ability to just stay within its own borders? They had everything they needed to maintain their little slice of freedom—which, let's be honest, was basically just being a state run by the KGB mafia. For years, the rest of the world played right along, trading with these mobsters like nothing was wrong. They even managed to grease the palms of the Olympic committees and FIFA just to keep those massive, prestigious global events hosted on their soil. But it wasn't enough. Instead, that Russian KGB mindset got wrapped up in this suffocating, arrogant self-importance. They became obsessed with the easy win: looting their own people blind while simultaneously bribing Western politicians to look the other way, all just to feed the delusion that they could rebuild a mafia-style version of the old USSR.

Quincy:
I even heard one Ukrainian guy remarking how things have gone downhill since 2014, claiming that Russians and certain local factions have basically been squeezing the life out of the country ever since. He was actually expressing this genuine sense of regret for the days when you could just speak Russian freely without looking over your shoulder. It really feels like American foreign policy has come in and completely torn that social fabric apart, leaving nothing but chaos in its wake.
You know, I’ve been sitting here thinking about this, and I can't help but feel like we're being fed a complete fairy tale. When you really step back and look at the big picture, isn't it obvious that the Russian aggression against Ukraine is actually just a byproduct of American policy? It’s almost like watching a slow-motion train wreck where everyone points fingers at the conductor, but nobody wants to admit the tracks were laid out by Washington all along. It makes me wonder if anyone is actually looking at the underlying mechanics of how these geopolitical tensions are stoked and maintained.

Quincy:
Look, you really need to stop conflating what the Ukrainians actually want with the agendas being pushed by politicians. Those are two completely different beasts, and treating them as the same thing is just fundamentally misguided.
It’s pretty obvious when you look at the big picture: Ukrainians are pushing hard to join the EU, and Vladimir Putin is doing everything in his power to block them. If you actually stop to think about it, the choice is staring everyone in the face. When you're forced to pick between a bleak, suffocating Russian dystopia and the opportunities found within the EU, any rational person is going to choose the latter. It isn't some complicated geopolitical puzzle; it's just common sense.
gentlerider7 gentlerider7 Regular
291 messages
joined Jan 2021
#2795 ·
It really makes you wonder—like, seriously, why on earth would Russia's neighbors be practically begging for NATO protection instead of just sticking with Russia?
Anthony Moore15 Anthony Moore15 Member
24 messages
joined Mar 2022
#2796 ·
gentlerider7 said:It really makes you wonder—like, seriously, why on earth would Russia's neighbors be practically begging for NATO protection instead of just sticking with Russia?

Because the evil West is forcing them into it by rolling in with Russian tanks...
gentlerider7 gentlerider7 Regular
291 messages
joined Jan 2021
#2797 ·
Anthony Moore15 said:Because the evil West is forcing them into it by rolling in with Russian tanks...

Russia clearly thinks they have this inherent "right to be a superpower" or some kind of "right to a sphere of influence," right? It’s basically just a rerun of what Leonid Brezhnev used to preach—that Russian neighbors should just be countries with "limited sovereignty."
northernangler8 northernangler8 Member
26 messages
joined Feb 2022
#2798 ·
William Anderson5 said:From the very beginning, the Ukrainians have been offering to end the war, provided that the Russian troops actually pull back.

Give me a break, we were asking for an end to the fighting too, just so those guys would finally pull back. 😁 Look, you have to see that it doesn't work that way. In this situation, I guess Ukraine just has to give something up in exchange for peace and freedom.

Arthur Miller7 said:Look, the thing is, people are laying out perfectly reasonable arguments to you, and you just can't seem to find a way to debunk them. It’s pretty simple, really. If everyone is explaining things clearly and you still disagree, then maybe you should try providing a logical counterpoint backed up by actual evidence. I guess if you can't actually argue your side, you should either just concede the point or stay quiet. Instead, you always seem to choose provocation.

Haha, what exactly are we even arguing about here? Is the argument just "oh, maybe I should drop dead" or "Vladimir Putin is a dictator"? Wow, you guys really floored me with those heavy-hitting points. You literally haven't said a single thing of substance. So, come on then—convince me. Where’s the actual proof for your little theory? Where's the evidence that Putin is actually out there trying to conquer the entire world? 🙂
rowdytiger13 rowdytiger13 Regular
378 messages
joined Oct 2018
#2799 ·
The issue is systemic.
You can’t project optimism if your economy is crumbling. Military might is useless without economic backbone, and as we've seen, Russia's supposed strength is highly questionable right now.
On top of that, people naturally gravitate toward freedom—even if it’s just a shiny illusion—because it’s always more appealing than an obvious dictatorship.
Russia had nothing to offer besides brute force, yet they tried to play at being the USA. If anything, Vladimir Putin was obsessed with acting as the leader for Europe, but to pull that off, you need to lead in almost every sector, not just through sheer aggression.
But Russia isn't even a military leader. They can't impose themselves on Europe because Europe rightfully feels superior. The Russians kept complaining about a lack of respect from Europe, and as that frustration grew, so did the instability in the surrounding regions.
It was only a matter of time before they decided to use the one thing they thought they had left: raw power. Honestly, blaming the West instead of looking in the mirror is laughable; Russia has the capacity to be superior in many ways, but the reason they aren't lies squarely at home.
William Anderson5 William Anderson5 Active Member
219 messages
joined Jan 2013
#2800 ·
northernangler8 said:Give me a break, we were asking for an end to the fighting too, just so those guys would finally pull back. 😁 Look, you have to see that it doesn't work that way. In this situation, I guess Ukraine just has to give something up in exchange for peace and freedom.

Haha, what exactly are we even arguing about here? Is the argument just "oh, maybe I should drop dead" or "Vladimir Putin is a dictator"? Wow, you guys really floored me with those heavy-hitting points. You literally haven't said a single thing of substance. So, come on then—convince me. Where’s the actual proof for your little theory? Where's the evidence that Putin is actually out there trying to conquer the entire world? 🙂

Fine, if Russia truly believes they can actually win this war, let them go ahead. Let them fight, let them "win," and see if they can somehow force Ukraine to give up what they hold dear...

By the way, we're talking about sanctions...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads