CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Sanctions on Russia

Sanctions on Russia

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 442 views · 9.5K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4velvetcyclist95Jeremy Peterson4silentsurfer3rowdytiger13Carol Newman2William Anderson5Carl Cookfrozencobra50Paul Patel95Michael Davis10Gary WilsonGregory Ramos3slyfox43dustywolf13Tyler Jones6Larry Walker24Ashley Ramirez4Paul Clark80Adam Lee13northernangler8Nancy Ruiz5James Chavez91neonheron9 …
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#3041 ·
RussianOilTracker, from what I can see, they’re tracking pretty much every single tanker hauling cargo out of Russia
https://twitter.com/RuOilTracker/sta...3ElJH0lbg&s=19

Like people have been saying in this thread and even a few posts back, the Netherlands is such a massive importer of Russian oil—it either gets unloaded in Rotterdam and sent off to refineries in western Germany, or it gets processed right there at the port before heading over to western Germany again. Honestly, if the dockworkers themselves start refusing to touch any cargo coming from Russia, then the embargo is basically already working on the ground.

Besides, I'm not even entirely sure if there are pipelines running from western to eastern Germany anymore. Those refineries out east mostly rely on the northern branch of the Druzhba pipeline, so now they're going to be forced to source it either through the Baltic Sea or via the Czech Republic.
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#3042 ·
Germany: "A ban on Russian fossil fuels 👎, a ban on uranium 👍" 🤦

https://www.politico.eu/article/russ...s-ukraine-war/
Dennis Price Dennis Price Active Member
86 messages
joined Mar 2022
#3043 ·
Carl Lee27 said:RussianOilTracker, from what I can see, they’re tracking pretty much every single tanker hauling cargo out of Russia
https://twitter.com/RuOilTracker/sta...3ElJH0lbg&s=19

Like people have been saying in this thread and even a few posts back, the Netherlands is such a massive importer of Russian oil—it either gets unloaded in Rotterdam and sent off to refineries in western Germany, or it gets processed right there at the port before heading over to western Germany again. Honestly, if the dockworkers themselves start refusing to touch any cargo coming from Russia, then the embargo is basically already working on the ground.

Besides, I'm not even entirely sure if there are pipelines running from western to eastern Germany anymore. Those refineries out east mostly rely on the northern branch of the Druzhba pipeline, so now they're going to be forced to source it either through the Baltic Sea or via the Czech Republic.

Doesn't hold water. That’s just the most inflexible part of how Germany handles its oil supply.
wearytrucker22 wearytrucker22 Active Member
222 messages
joined Dec 2012
#3044 ·
analogbear5 said:Also, let's not forget the most critical link in this whole chain that people on this forum always seem to overlook: someone actually has to move the oil.

Basically, Russia sends its oil to Europe using Aframax and Suezmax tankers with capacities up to 600,000 barrels—that's about a week's trip there and a week back.

Those tankers just aren't efficient enough for long-haul voyages. To get oil over to China, you'd need VLCC tankers—they have over 70 of them, but since those massive ships can't fit through the Suez, you'd be looking at a month-long trip each way. Plus, all 800-ish VLCCs currently in existence are already running at full tilt.

Besides, if the Chinese decide to buy Russian oil—which would make shipping costs skyrocket—it would free up a massive amount of Arab oil that could head to Europe instead of China.

It isn't true that a VLCC can't pass through the Bosphorus; in the Mediterranean, VLCCs dock at Malta, Gibraltar, Genoa, and places before and south of Rome, and it takes them about 45-50 days to reach China or Hong Kong at full speed. Only a handful of VLCCs actually sail around the Cape of Good Hope.
Russia doesn't have a single port capable of receiving a VLCC, and as far as I know, a VLCC has never once docked there. India, for instance, only has one port that handles VLCCs.
quietviper0 quietviper0 Member
43 messages
joined May 2023
#3045 ·
analogbear5 said:Also, let's not forget the most critical link in this whole chain that people on this forum always seem to overlook: someone actually has to move the oil.

Basically, Russia sends its oil to Europe using Aframax and Suezmax tankers with capacities up to 600,000 barrels—that's about a week's trip there and a week back.

Those tankers just aren't efficient enough for long-haul voyages. To get oil over to China, you'd need VLCC tankers—they have over 70 of them, but since those massive ships can't fit through the Suez, you'd be looking at a month-long trip each way. Plus, all 800-ish VLCCs currently in existence are already running at full tilt.

Besides, if the Chinese decide to buy Russian oil—which would make shipping costs skyrocket—it would free up a massive amount of Arab oil that could head to Europe instead of China.

Ever since this whole invasion kicked off, there’s been this non-stop, relentless noise about the Russian oil business, and honestly, we've heard it all before... it's pretty much been chewed over a thousand times now, but it remains an undeniable fact that they are looking at some massive, uphill struggles if a full-scale embargo on their oil exports actually gets put into motion...
I haven't really seen much discussion or even any real debate popping up anywhere regarding what all of this actually implies for our own country...

When you talk about that portion of oil moving via tankers, you're suggesting it's "only" inefficient, implying it’s still a viable option for now... but we really have to consider the segment being moved through pipelines, because rerouting that kind of infrastructure to a different market is just completely impossible within any reasonable timeframe. It's also worth remembering that there's another side to this equation involving derivatives, so it isn't just crude oil sitting on the table... there are so many other moving parts at play here...

What I’m really sitting here wondering is whether this same logic applies when you flip the whole thing around... and if it doesn't, then how exactly are we prepared to handle the fallout?...
Let’s start by looking at the pipeline traffic... As far as I can gather, if those pipelines ever run dry, our only real move for bringing in extra crude would be via tanker shipments. It makes me wonder, though—do we actually have enough breathing room at our coastal terminals to handle the influx of large vessels and manage the unloading process needed to make up for whatever isn't flowing through the pipes? And beyond that, once that oil hits the docks, is there even enough transport capacity or the logistical flexibility to actually get it moved out to the refineries that are sitting idle because the pipeline supply dropped off...

Well, that naturally brings up some interesting questions regarding tanker transport logistics... I suspect that the Russian shipping traffic you mentioned, specifically involving those smaller tankers, is primarily focused on routes connecting the Baltic Sea to the North Sea, or perhaps moving between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean... It leads me to believe that the Russian fleet might be better equipped with those smaller vessels specifically tailored for those shorter hauls, whereas the more frequent and standard shipments heading out toward the Far East are likely handled by the larger tankers within their fleet...
So, here’s what I’ve been chewing on lately... if we were to actually implement an embargo on Russian oil and start essentially "intercepting" shipments destined for the East, would there even be enough tankers floating around near the Suez Canal to make that work? Or would we find ourselves in a situation where the only vessels available are the ones already committed to those specific Eastern routes, effectively leaving us with nothing to work with once the oil shipments depart... I suppose my gut feeling is that the Arab suppliers would be the very first ones to feel the heat from such a move, though I guess whether they pass through the Suez wouldn't even matter for the others...

That brings up another interesting point... I wonder if our refineries could actually handle that specific type of crude if it ever made its way to them, and honestly, just how massive of an undertaking would it be to overhaul their systems? I can only imagine the sheer scale of the work required and the astronomical costs involved in retrofitting a refinery to process a completely different grade of oil... it's quite a daunting thought, really...

Furthermore, since nobody seems to have announced anything or even shown much interest in ramping up production just to satisfy what Europe wants, I can't help but wonder... at what price point are these bidding wars for available shipments actually happening, and honestly, what does it really cost to successfully reroute something that was already sold off a while ago?...

And I was just wondering about one thing... if we actually manage to intercept oil that was originally destined for somewhere else, do they start looking for replacement supplies? Like, do they go searching for whatever oil is left floating around the global market once the Russian stuff is off the table...

And then, just as we’re reaching the final stretch, I can't help but wonder about one last thing... if it all turns out to be true and nobody is actually willing to ramp up production while demand stays pretty much where it is, I have to ask... will Russia end up selling their oil regardless, simply because the sheer friction in the global market makes every single barrel of oil everywhere else become more expensive by some kind of multiplier effect...

I know, I have plenty of questions myself... 😁

Looking at what the IEA says on their website, they point out that we’re covering about 20% of our crude oil needs through pipelines coming from Russia, and honestly, that doesn't strike me as something that can be swapped out overnight... They also mention we import about 10% of our refined products from Russia, which is quite a significant amount too, likely arriving via rail, whereas the alternatives would either require everything to be produced right here on American soil—given our own uncertain raw material supplies and refinery capacities—or being shipped in by sea, which brings its own set of questionable port capacity issues...
Dana Chase51 Dana Chase51 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2010
#3046 ·
It might sound a bit cynical to say, but looking strictly at oil transport trends, the US should actually see a benefit from these developments. Canada will likely be forced to pivot toward facilities like the JANAF pipeline, whether due to EU pressure or potential issues with the Druzhba pipeline. Ports like Rijeka, Omišalj, and Ploče could quite easily handle all the necessary oil for the US.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3047 ·
velvetscout10 said:Just like the boss
🙂

The Bulgarian energy minister just announced they had their May advance payment kicked back because it wasn't paid in rubles.
The Russians are basically saying: - "Here, take your euros and go buy gas somewhere else. We only deal in rubles here."

It's like watching slow-witted children playing games.
Quite a shady maneuver on their part.
hollowdriver13 said:Germany: "A ban on Russian fossil fuels 👎, a ban on uranium 👍" 🤦

https://www.politico.eu/article/russ...s-ukraine-war/

And the Germans too.
Real pro-Russian behavior there.🤮
Dana Chase51 said:It might sound a bit cynical to say, but looking strictly at oil transport trends, the US should actually see a benefit from these developments. Canada will likely be forced to pivot toward facilities like the JANAF pipeline, whether due to EU pressure or potential issues with the Druzhba pipeline. Ports like Rijeka, Omišalj, and Ploče could quite easily handle all the necessary oil for the US.

Exactly.
The US stands to gain quite a bit from this.
wanderingmaker3 wanderingmaker3 Member
39 messages
joined Dec 2009
#3048 ·
Canada isn't going to stop importing gas and oil from Russia.
Someone made a point a few posts back that actually makes sense.
You know what Viktor Orbán is like—he’s not about to bow down to some bureaucrats in the European Union, especially since he's fond of Vladimir Putin anyway.
So, if things shift, those pipelines could easily start flowing a different direction toward us.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3049 ·
wanderingmaker3 said:Canada isn't going to stop importing gas and oil from Russia.
Someone made a point a few posts back that actually makes sense.
You know what Viktor Orbán is like—he’s not about to bow down to some bureaucrats in the European Union, especially since he's fond of Vladimir Putin anyway.
So, if things shift, those pipelines could easily start flowing a different direction toward us.

If the Ukrainians decide to blow up those pipelines, what exactly is Orbán going to import then?
wearytrucker22 wearytrucker22 Active Member
222 messages
joined Dec 2012
#3050 ·
wanderingmaker3 said:Canada isn't going to stop importing gas and oil from Russia.
Someone made a point a few posts back that actually makes sense.
You know what Viktor Orbán is like—he’s not about to bow down to some bureaucrats in the European Union, especially since he's fond of Vladimir Putin anyway.
So, if things shift, those pipelines could easily start flowing a different direction toward us.

But how exactly are they going to get it into Canada? You realize Canada doesn't have a coastline, and for heaven's sake, they don't even share a border with Russia.
dustyowl29 dustyowl29 Regular
258 messages
joined Dec 2007
#3051 ·
So, we’ve reached a point of total absurdity here—major powers are still out there importing and paying for oil and gas using rubles, while the smaller nations are the ones cutting ties and stopping imports from Russia. Honestly, who’s actually winning this one?
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#3052 ·
wanderingmaker3 said:Canada isn't going to stop importing gas and oil from Russia.
Someone made a point a few posts back that actually makes sense.
You know what Viktor Orbán is like—he’s not about to bow down to some bureaucrats in the European Union, especially since he's fond of Vladimir Putin anyway.
So, if things shift, those pipelines could easily start flowing a different direction toward us.

What exactly "makes sense" there? Thinking that pipelines running through Ukraine are going to stay operational for the next 5, 10, or even 15 years?
Almost every single pipeline heading toward Europe—aside from those tiny little branches reaching out to Latvia and Finland—runs right through Ukraine or stays incredibly close to the Ukrainian border. It seems like Orbán is the only one who hasn't realized that the US is giving Europe a very short window to diversify their energy sources before the Ukrainians get the green light to just blow those pipelines sky-high.
All that Russian oil exports headed West is basically living on borrowed time, and that goes for the pipelines and the ports on both the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea too.
Joshua Myers432 Joshua Myers432 Regular
285 messages
joined Feb 2011
#3053 ·
Carl Lee27 said:What exactly "makes sense" there? Thinking that pipelines running through Ukraine are going to stay operational for the next 5, 10, or even 15 years?
Almost every single pipeline heading toward Europe—aside from those tiny little branches reaching out to Latvia and Finland—runs right through Ukraine or stays incredibly close to the Ukrainian border. It seems like Orbán is the only one who hasn't realized that the US is giving Europe a very short window to diversify their energy sources before the Ukrainians get the green light to just blow those pipelines sky-high.
All that Russian oil exports headed West is basically living on borrowed time, and that goes for the pipelines and the ports on both the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea too.

It's going to be a struggle for Germany to pivot that quickly. If they could, this whole situation would have been resolved long ago.
fadedjackal8 fadedjackal8 Member
28 messages
joined Apr 2022
#3054 ·
They’ve got nukes ☕
Joshua Myers432 Joshua Myers432 Regular
285 messages
joined Feb 2011
#3055 ·
fadedjackal8 said:They’ve got nukes ☕

Right, because you just mash a few buttons and suddenly you've got functional nukes ready to go in three days. 🤦

I assume you're hiring the staff from a liberal arts college or some other useless institution.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3056 ·
The struggles facing the German economy aren't actually an American problem, nor are they a Ukrainian one...
dustyowl29 dustyowl29 Regular
258 messages
joined Dec 2007
#3057 ·
Germany just rolled out their new playbook to stop leaning so hard on Russia
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3058 ·
dustyowl29 said:Germany just rolled out their new playbook to stop leaning so hard on Russia

The Germans act more like an object of American policy rather than an independent subject in most matters.
It was frankly predictable—in fact, they were quite brazen themselves back when they decided to go rogue.
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#3059 ·
Word on the street is Canada might have finally blinked on the oil embargo

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world...ban-eu-embargo
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3060 ·
Carl Lee27 said:Word on the street is Canada might have finally blinked on the oil embargo

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world...ban-eu-embargo

Honestly—this was always just a matter of when, not if.

Russia broke the rules first; now it's payback time.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads