#5381 ·
urbanotter said:It seems like because they finally "get" that tactic, NATO members are ramping up their defense spending; NATO is planning to have 300,000 troops on standby, while the US is actively deploying new personnel to Europe..
That’s just how it goes when sanctions fail to hit the mark; instead of getting the intended result, they end up swinging back like a boomerang, often hurting the ones who imposed them even more than the targets themselves.😉
Oh, please. That’s exactly how Putin's propaganda machine wants you to think. They love to twist the truth until they end up contradicting themselves, but that’s the standard playbook when the propaganda is aimed at
the gullible.
In your little summary here, you conveniently left out everything that didn't fit your narrative, just so you could tailor the story to whatever you want to believe.
Ebiga, it doesn't work like that.
NATO isn't beefing up its military or increasing investment because sanctions aren't working. What NATO is doing has absolutely nothing to do with sanctions.
NATO is acting because there is a threat, and there needs to be a response to that threat. This isn't some unprecedented move.
Even the most naive people don't buy those flowery speeches about being a "guarantor of peace and security" anymore, which is actually a good thing.
The fact remains: Putin only respects raw power, and NATO is that power.
It couldn't be any simpler; anything else is just hot air and speculation.
This whole narrative—that sanctions are failing, so therefore the West is mobilizing its military—is a story useful to Russia and Putin, not to the West. So, we all know exactly where this line of reasoning is coming from, don't we?
I’d be worried if the West were the one claiming sanctions weren't working and using that as an excuse to put NATO forces on high alert... but they’ll never say that, because hiding a lie that blatant would be impossible. We aren't in Russia.
Lp