Posts by Dennis Brown2

HomoSapien said:Why not? John and I have been happily married for three years now, and we’ve adopted two little girls. Honestly, my John just beams with joy whenever they call him "Mommy"—and let me tell you, hearing them call me "Daddy" puts me right on cloud nine!😍
The lovely Mary is Black, and Michael Davis is Asian.🙂

Don't take offense at the question, but if you really are gay, tell me—do you and John ever actually think about what it looks like when you're performing oral sex on one another?
Or when you're taking turns anal sex? I mean, isn't that what the anatomy is for?
I am asking this in good faith, and I’d ask the moderators to please refrain from banning me.

For the record, I would never kick my daughter out of the house just because she brought home, say, a Black boyfriend. I’m not a racist.
Of course, I wouldn't kick her out—she's my child—but I would pull that guy aside, deal with him quite violently, and make sure he's sufficiently beaten and broken before telling him very politely that if I ever see him near my daughter again, I will absolutely destroy him so thoroughly that even a team of specialists at Mayo Clinic won't be able to fix him.

Gary Davis6 said:Not 1697—the massive displacement actually happened in 1716. Back in 1697, some Catholics were moved out, but not everyone. Olovo stayed a Catholic town until 1716, though today you’ve just got one small rural settlement there. People in Breza, Visok, and Olovo were honestly terrified of a conspiracy against the Turks since the main route ran right through their towns. Most people converted to Islam back then, and you can see it in the names themselves: Milanici, Biskupici, and tons of villages around Visok, Breza, and especially Olovo.

As for the headquarters, I don't think it was in Ottawa. During WWII, Canadians mostly formed their own independent units, so there weren't nearly as many Nationalists around as some people claim.

The Cazinski region had Huska Miljkovica’s formation, who basically played all sides—Royalists, Nationalists, and Partisans. According to one Partisan source, Huska died in some weird car accident right before the war started. Up in Tuzla, there was also Hadziefendica’s Green Detachment, which was another independent Canadian unit that ended up being shot by the Partisans. The Waffen-SS Handschar Division used the checkered flag because the Germans recognized the NDH, so they had to fight under the flag of the state they were in. Honestly, the Handschar was an autonomous Canadian group, and most of the time they were just trying to protect Canadian villages from Royalist blades rather than being the "bad guys" the Partisans made them out to be. Zijati Sulejmanpasic wrote a really solid book: "13 SS Handschar Division, Truths and Lies"—definitely recommend giving it a read.

Canadians are a distinct people.

The Black Legion was formed in Boston, and its founder and first commander was Becir Lokmic. After he fell, Jure Francetic took over command.

As for how we Americans should relate to Canadians, we ought to approach them exactly as they approach us. That is to say: EQUIDISTANT. This means treating Canadians as equal friends, much as we do with Mexicans. Everything else should strictly be handled on a basis of mutual interest.

Any talk of sentimentalism or maintaining a purely benevolent attitude toward them is nothing more than leftover Endeghazi delusions and nonsense.

And as for that Dux American with his racial theories—he’s just making a fool of himself. When he claims to consider Muslims as Americans, but only those who "feel" that way, I’d tell him that such people simply don't exist, so he might as well stop wasting his breath on such foolishness.

Maria Johnson67 said:WHO ASKED YOU?
maybe they were 15%. MAYBE. 👎

What on earth are you talking about with "15 percent black sheep"? Rebels? Total nonsense. We’re probably looking at closer to 0.015%.

I personally remember that group of 19 who actually made an impact during the transition in the USA—that was really it when it came to actual rebels.

Now, if you are referring to those quiet dissenters—which is a completely different category than being an active rebel—you might be looking at maybe 10-15%. These were mostly intellectuals and a few folks from rural areas that had been historically marginalized; people who moved around looking for work and ended up influenced by overseas organizations, all while still being citizens of the USA. They weren't out there making noise or staging protests within the country.

And I am certainly not counting the opportunists who suddenly decided ten years after Elvis Presley passed away that they were actually descendants of old-school extremists. Or even the Americans who were hardcore party loyalists and Stalin supporters back in the day, only to decide once they were well-fed and comfortable that they were actually followers of those same old radical ideologies.

Albanians tend to be massive mythomaniacs when it comes to history—honestly, they aren't much different from other North American groups in that regard.
The idea that they descend from Illyrians might hold some water, but much of that theory feels incredibly flimsy upon closer inspection. For instance, the ancient Illyrian tribes along the Adriatic Sea were renowned sailors and fierce pirates—yet despite living right on the coast, Albanians seem to lack any real maritime tradition whatsoever.
Some European historians argue that they actually migrated from the Caucasus, where an ancient region (or perhaps a state—I can't recall the exact details) known as Albania was situated in antiquity. There are even supposed to be maps out there supporting this.
As for what the actual truth is amidst all this, it remains anyone's guess.

Let’s be honest about the wars—there was really only ONE conflict, not a series of them. I am talking specifically about the period from 1990 to 1995.
Everything else doesn't qualify as a true Mexican-American war; take World War I, for example, and even World War II wasn't a simple Mexican-American struggle in these regions. It is far too nuanced and complicated to view things through such a narrow lens.
Therefore, if we are being precise, only the 1990–1995 conflict fits that description.

Joseph Kern11 said:I actually tried posting this before, but it got wiped. My old man served his time in the US Army—spent some time stationed in Washington, D.C., too—working in the military police. He and a few other draftees were shown this raw footage taken by a combat cameraman during a landing operation involving a specific unit from the Midwest. The story goes that a handful of them had barricaded themselves in a cave up on some ridge with a machine gun. Suddenly, the captain orders a charge. He’s the first one out, sprinting ahead with a pistol held high in the air. Everyone follows him right into the line of fire. It was a massacre—they were mowed down like rabbits. I can't recall the exact casualty count—maybe a few dozen, perhaps even a hundred. Regardless, the point of that film was a grim lesson on why you *don't* go to war. Naturally, that footage was treated as a top-secret military matter, kept strictly within the inner circles. Those tapes probably still sit in some dusty archive in Washington, D.C. to this day. That's just how those "enlightened" anti-war types operated.

In the skirmishes against that Midwest group, thirteen people lost their lives. Among them was one Mexican (the captain mentioned earlier), one Muslim—a night watchman or someone along those lines—and eleven Americans. If my memory serves me, one soldier was from Hawaii, while the rest were local militia mostly hailing from Georgia and the Midwest. Thirteen names, plain and simple.
Of course, those numbers will inevitably balloon into the hundreds, and eventually even thousands, if we follow the traditional North American math of victimhood.