CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Gregory Brown94 › Posts

Posts by Gregory Brown94

195 posts shown.

Thoughts on Thor: Love and Thunder? in Movies ·
Rebecca Scott95 said:This officially takes the top spot as the Marvel Cinematic Universe film with the shortest gap between its trailer drop and the actual release. Honestly, I’m curious why they usually make us wait so long—maybe it's just because this one picks up right where Doctor Strange 2 left off.

To make things better—or worse—they’re only two months apart. I feel like they can afford to be a bit risky with the Thor marketing since he’s the only one from the original Avengers who still gets consistent solo movies. Plus, Marvel is in a tough spot. They don't have much breathing room for Thor's promo when they're still riding the Spider-Man 3 hype, all while Doctor Strange 2 is being teased and Moon Knight is currently airing.
Thoughts on Thor: Love and Thunder? in Movies ·
New promo banner

image

If the rumors are actually true, we might see the first teaser or trailer dropping next week. It would be pretty awesome if that happens 🙂
Bruce Willis retires from acting in Movies ·
Every time a major celebrity announces they're retiring or, God forbid, passes away, it really feels like the end of an era. It’s heavy. Even though it's a rare condition, a person can still find ways to live through it alongside their family and truly make the most of what they have left.
Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania (2023) in Movies ·
Alternative logo

image

The ship used for traveling through the quantum realm. It honestly looks more like something Kang built rather than anything from the Pym family.

image

Here’s the latest leaked info:

- Someone from the Fantastic Four might show up in the movie
- They'll suddenly pop up in the MCU looking for help from the Pyms
- Both Kang's time ship and the Janet van Dyne quantum realm should make an appearance (though plenty of people are skeptical about this, especially regarding the realm part)
- Maybe the trap theory exists because things are getting mixed up with Kang's Chronopolis
- In Kang's Chronopolis, time flows slowly; you see ancient pyramids and early humans on the outskirts, but as you get closer to the center, it feels like you're racing into the future.
- At the center of Chronopolis lies Kang's castle—it's massive. Maybe that's where the TVA is located, or perhaps it houses the tech used to build the TVA later on. We have to remember how the variants were experimenting with all this and opening time gates.
- So, it's possible Kang is born in the future—rumors say the year 3000—maybe because he was born in the very city he ended up creating. A grandfather paradox, kind of like in Terminator...
- Without a portal or a time ship, you just can't travel through the different eras within Chronopolis.
All-time greatest movie heroes in Movies ·
This is one of those topics you just can't wrap up with a single sentence. Every era brings its own set of heroes and massive franchises that somehow become part of our DNA. It’s the same for every genre—they all have their icons.

If I were to just throw some names out there right now, my list would look something like this: the female lead or android from Metropolis, Charlie Chaplin, Popeye, Bruce Lee, Dave from 2001: A Space Odyssey, Ellen Ripley from Alien, the Arnold Schwarzenegger character in Predator, the T-800 (Arnold Schwarzenegger) in Terminator 2, Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker, and Van Helsing (from the very first Dracula).

If I actually had to pick just one, I’m afraid the fictional world wins out for me—it’s gotta be Luke Skywalker.
Kenneth Cruz67 said:It’s about time. You’ve just cluttered up this whole thread about car reveals and testing with a mountain of nonsense—just vague ideas and massive images showcasing things nobody actually cares about. And then, when someone asks you a real question, you play dumb. Maybe take a break. It might do you some good.

Thanks.

But honestly, the questions I'm getting are on the level of "why is the Earth round."

Basically—it looks like the rest of you have finally mastered the art of analysis. You basically just stare at pictures and call it a day, yet you act like seeing a "possible wingless Alpine concept" is like witnessing a miracle from above. 🤦

Goodbye!
swiftmaker12 said:What’s the current situation with diffusers, airflow, and how much downforce these cars actually have?
is there any word on this
asking for a friend who is currently being forced to take a mandatory break...

Basically, the issue is that modern cars are dealing with high-pressure airflow both above and below the chassis. That famous porpoising effect happens when the top side pushes the rear end so hard toward the ground that it creates a sort of vacuum under the car at the diffuser level. But since the floor edges aren't perfectly sealed against the track, the air starts leaking in through the diffuser. This essentially cancels out all that downward pressure from the top, causing the car to lift up. Then, once it lifts, the top side slams it back down again...

According to McLaren, they aren't entirely sure why their car isn't experiencing that specific porpoising sensation. Just my own guess, though—maybe the deflectors are grabbing too much air, which prevents the Venturi tunnels from working quite like they're supposed to. Still, even a weakened diffuser seems more than enough given how these current cars are built.
Here’s the first look at the 2022 floor, specifically from Gasly's AlphaTauri after the crane picked up the car following the crash.

image

You can clearly see how the deflectors are positioned under the floor now, but regardless, they function just like the lane deflectors—moving air to create the turbulence needed to glue the car to the track.
Tyler Bennett5 said:What's up with that exhaust setup on the Ferrari? Is that some kind of double exhaust thing?

That’s just the wastegate pipe. It runs from the turbocharger valve and its whole job is to bleed off excess pressure within the compressor itself. Up until recently, teams were running two separate pipes, but then the FIA stepped in with a rule saying you can only have one, and it has to be tucked away inside the exhaust.
graniteharbor502 said:My ranking of the cars after these three days in Barcelona:
1. Mercedes
2. Red Bull Racing
3. Ferrari
4. McLaren
5. AlphaTauri
6. Aston Martin
7. Alpine
8. Williams
9. Alfa Romeo
10. Haas

Of course, we have to keep in mind that most of these cars will probably look a bit different by the time we get to Bahrain. Everyone is hiding their best tricks so the others don't just copy them.
In my opinion, Red Bull Racing has the most potential for development.

I agree. Honestly, I haven't had enough free time away from work to follow everything closely, but if I understood correctly, Red Bull doesn't seem to have that weird porpoising issue—where the floor suddenly gains or loses grip and you see the drivers bouncing all over the place. I think the key to getting 100% performance out of these things will be exactly that: taming the porpoising. If they can fix it, the driver gets maximum grip, a much more stable car under braking, and naturally, way more confidence in the machine.

But...

image

I'm sure Mercedes will do whatever it takes to get rid of that problem. I've written quite a bit about how I was initially convinced that cars with a certain sidepod philosophy—maybe having a sharp drop-off—might have an advantage. Later on, though, I started doubting that, and now I suspect those very cars might actually hold a slight edge. I'm thinking of teams like Red Bull Racing, Alpine, and AlphaTauri, because they don't have that sudden drop; instead, they guide the airflow smoothly toward the diffuser.

Mercedes doesn't have that setup, so perhaps that high level of grip they have at the top creates an imbalance. It’s like the high-pressure area on the floor is fighting against the ground effect trying to suck the car down. From what I've managed to observe, cars struggling with porpoising seem to struggle on the main straight in Barcelona, which is slightly downhill with minor bumps. That's really tough on ground effect; any little bump on the track that forcibly "lifts" the car can have disastrous consequences for grip. You could end up with a driver oversteering instantly because the rear end just snapped loose.
Jason Campbell70 said:A little free advice—don't act like a know-it-all about things you clearly don't understand. Eventually, you'll run into someone who loves to troll and actually knows more than you do, and they'll make you look ridiculous.

And who am I supposed to argue with? People who claim Alpina is going to show up without sidepods? That sounds like someone who just started watching Formula 1 yesterday. Seriously, if you think you’re smarter than me, please, just draw me a technical sketch or a quick scribble showing what a car without sidepods would even look like.

I see even the President is messing around... Honestly, why bother reading through technical regulations for hours just to explain to everyone that it's physically impossible to cram the cooling systems—which normally go in the sidepods—into the engine cover? Why else would Formula E, the only series that could potentially do this, still stick to cars with sidepods?

You guys are all ganging up on me for no reason. Go find that Scrabble tweet and mess with him instead, or just send him a DM if that's more your style. If you keep picking on me, I might just go into total isolation, much like Lewis Hamilton did. Take it easy and go find some other people to debate technical topics with...

On topic—I haven't had much time to keep up because of work. All I can say is that this is the most exciting pre-season testing I've seen since 2014. Though, in this era, the cars are all pretty, there aren't any ugly ones. 🎉
Jason Campbell70 said:Thanks for the reply, but I'm really not interested in going back and forth over this anymore. 👍

Pilatus is basically the perfect example of why this forum struggles. Honestly, I don't know how you all don't get tired of taking a few words out of context and twisting them into something entirely different from what was actually said.

I'm being serious here—it’s this repetitive, irrational behavior that happens year after year. Every single year, it's the exact same headache. It's just not right. It feels like some people live for this forum, lacking any empathy or sense of community. To those who actually act like decent humans, I respect you. You're the only reason I haven't left yet. 🙏

Kudos to Scrabble, though. They managed to turn the entire F1 community into a live-action version of 🙏Idiocracy
just by trolling with a single tweet.
Anyway, that's my rant done. I feel a little better getting that off my chest. Even if I end up getting a warning for it...
Jason Campbell70 said:That sharp little winglet (if that's what we're calling it) is actually just a side impact structure. It has its own legality box, separate from the sidepod legality box.
It wouldn't be the first time a crash structure poked out slightly from the rest of the car's bodywork.

And while this Scarbsov idea is perfectly legal under the current regs, it's very likely that you couldn't possibly cool all the PU components plus the intercooler using just the central inlet.

So, the central inlet would only handle cooling for certain parts. Maybe the intercooler and the oil cooler, then only engine radiators go into the sidepods. That would allow the sidepods to be smaller.

You're claiming the technical regulations limit the minimum width of the car's sides.
Just copy-paste the specific part of the technical regs for me. I'm not really interested in looking at colorful diagrams.

You basically answered your own question and now you're trying to turn a monologue into a dialogue. htebati Scrabs is just joking around and messing with you guys, but you've latched onto this problem like it's some crisis only Hank Pym can solve. Unless the TVA shows up with some Vremenski vrata 🤣

Just one question, since you clearly fell for those Scarbsov troll posts that only people out of the loop fall for: is there actually an aero advantage if you strip away two pre-set wings on the sides? Not even at a high-speed track like Indianapolis, that wouldn't work.

I don't feel like digging through the "bible" that is the technical regulations to find the minimum allowable widths for the car's sides. I won't even try.

Anyway, Alpine looks pretty bad. 🎉Haas is full of little surprises since they're clearly copying Ferrari. If that concept works, we might see a repeat of the early hybrid era when Ferrari was leading and Haas was right on their heels...
image

Here’s a 3D render showing all the components laid out. Every single one of them is strictly governed by the rulebook. Even if you tried to design an ultra-wide Power Unit radiator inlet and split up the cooling ducts so they could handle the whole PU, you’d still be stuck—you have to officially register any part you're claiming is a "bodywork" element.

Honestly, it's just impossible. Completely impossible. We aren't in the V8 era anymore where you could cram extra stuff under the engine cover on those 20-foot-long monsters. If I'm not making myself clear enough, just take a look at this Alfie packaging from lane▼

image

So, looking at this, we see relatively small sidepod radiators. Now, just imagine trying to fit those two right above that insanely complex Power Unit. At this point, we basically need Hank Pym to show up and shrink a few parts down for us.
Here’s a photo of Red Bull's RB18 that actually looks like a real camera shot, unlike those previous ones that looked like they were taken with a toaster:

image

I honestly can't believe what I'm looking at—Red Bull is running a pull rod front suspension! I think that might be a first for them since joining Formula 1. The front wing design looks a lot like the Mercedes setup, and the sidepod inlets follow a similar pattern too. It turns out Red Bull actually went with the exact design I predicted Mercedes would eventually adopt—pulling that top edge of the inlet back and placing the rearview mirror mount right along the opening's edge. It's really quite interesting. 🙂
ruggedhawk20 said:Mercedes ended up building two cars.

The Mercedes W13. Just thinking about it brings back a lot of mixed emotions. It was such a strange chapter for the team, wasn't it? One moment you're at the top of the world, and the next, you're struggling to find any kind of rhythm with a car that just feels... off. It’s hard to wrap my head around how much went wrong with the technical direction there. I guess we all expected more, but sometimes things just don't click, no matter how much talent is sitting in the cockpit. It's a tough one to process.
Mercedes W13 Mercedes M13

Check out the technical breakdown of the car over on the Mercedes website. It gives you a look at how everything is put together.

Who knows what kind of schemes Toto is cooking up this time?

Gregory Brown94, does the rulebook actually allow using two different cars?

You mixed up the names of the W13 and the PJ M13. 😁 Regarding the whole idea of using two different cars—it just isn't happening. Everything is homologated before the season even kicks off. Any massive change like that would have to pass a full crash test first. So yeah, it’s basically an expensive way to go nowhere.

fadedwalker18 Asks:
It’s not going to work without some guesswork and speculation. We're only human, after all, right?

What is Scarbs speculating about regarding Alpine:

image
I've been looking for a decent geojson editor lately. It’s surprisingly hard to find one that doesn't feel clunky or overcomplicated. Just trying to get something simple to work with.

If that actually happens, things are going to get absolutely insane. 🙏🙏

Good grief, I can't believe people actually fell for that nonsense. It’s just not possible under the current regulations. Even at the absolute extreme, the most aggressive floors we've seen were on the Williams, and that's basically the ceiling. It doesn't work, whether you're looking at the rulebook or the actual engineering behind it.

Look, the Mercedes W13 is basically the result of a long-term strategy that Mercedes has been pushing since they first entered Formula 1. It’s pretty obvious that their main focus is maximizing power, so they’re pouring almost all their resources into the engine and leaving aerodynamics as a secondary thought. Of course, it’s classic Mercedes—they always push things to the absolute extreme while constantly bothering the FIA with questions about whether their designs actually follow the regulations. It reminds me of their history of testing the limits: like that roll bar blade back in 2010, or trying to use a W-duct right when the F-Duct was banned, or even those nose designs back in 2014. They always play it smart, but they definitely lean into the extremes. The W13 isn't any different, and honestly, it feels a lot like what happened in 2017. Back then, we saw massive aerodynamic shifts, but the 2016 car was really just an upgraded version of the previous concept. That seems to be happening again with the transition from the W12 to the W13; it looks like they just took the 2021 model and modified it enough to fit the new rules. I genuinely think they have a dangerously fast machine on their hands, and frankly, I don't think McLaren or Williams are that far behind.

It feels like Ferrari might actually have a car that can work on pretty much any type of circuit. And speaking of Red Bull, I’m convinced their engineers were spending way too much time hanging out at Alpha Tauri's garage—it’s honestly eerie how similar they look. I’ve got my doubts about Aston Martin, Alfa Romeo, and even Alpha Tauri, along with Red Bull. I don't quite get why they're sticking to a concept that doesn't show any significant drop-off. When you look at the sidepod-level floor designs used by teams like Alfa Romeo and Aston Martin, they seem to be banking on a concept where high-pressure fluid is created in the tunnels to feed the upper diffuser surfaces with fast-moving air. Alpha Tauri and Red Bull just don't have that. I just know that sidepod-level floors have almost never worked in Formula 1 history, so I'm not sure if this new era will finally make that kind of logic actually function.

Alpha Tauri and Red Bull seem to be chasing a concept that traces back to the old Red Bull RB5 from 2009. Back then, we were dealing with smaller cars, but once the dimensions grew, they started using hot exhaust gases to blow out the rear end. Honestly, seeing that approach makes me think Ferrari's F1-75 looks absolutely lethal—like they’ve really nailed something special.

I'm really looking forward to seeing what Alpine is cooking up in their workshop. Just as a reminder, they're moving to a completely separate turbocharger concept, similar to how Mercedes and Honda did it. Since everything is changing, nothing is predictable right now.
A photo of the Red Bull RB18 just leaked!

image

From what I can gather, it looks like they’re following a similar philosophy to AlphaTauri, though the engine cover end seems way more aggressive—it actually has these shark fin-style triangular fins on it. With this sidepod design, it feels like Red Bull is taking a little trip back to 2009 🙂
ruggedhawk20 said:All that's missing is a little rubber ducky inside

image

hehehe, though I wouldn't joke about the Ferrari F1-75. Even if it starts raining, there's no way any water is going to pool up in those holes. Actually, it'll probably be the opposite—heat is just going to vent right out of them 😲
ruggedhawk20 said:What are those indentations actually for?

Man, I am seriously looking forward to this. 🎉

So, back in 2021, we saw cars where almost everyone was following the exact same sidepod concept. What does that actually imply, and why should we care now? Since I’m currently diving deep into the Ferrari setup, I wanted to offer a quick breakdown regarding the sidepods and how the fluid flow works.

image

The blue arrow shows how the directed airflow moves toward the top of the sidepod, and here’s what we're looking at. That sudden drop creates negative downforce, which you can see mapped out on that spectrum. To break it down: red indicates fast-moving fluid, green shows where the flow slows down and stabilizes, and blue represents the stabilized fluid following its natural path along the car's contours. Eventually, it hits the upper part of the diffuser—which features those specific vanes—where it mixes with the underfloor flow. This causes a sudden upward surge, acting like a burst of turbulence that generates extra downforce. So, basically, the fluid in that image serves a dual purpose: creating downforce while maintaining grip. Now, let's move on to the breakdown of the 2022 model.

image

First off, we have to look at the front wing design changes starting this year. They’ve done away with those specific endplate elements that used to trigger the Y250 vortex—that turbulence responsible for sucking the car down toward the track. Back in 2022, the wing elements were basically bolted right up against the nose. Combined with the Gurney flap, that whole setup generated a massive amount of vortex flow (shown in light green here) that would just exit along the sides of the chassis.

Roze—this is the fluid flow passing through the deflector, which creates that vortex used to stabilize the car and press it down toward the track.

That dark green shade bleeding into deep blue right next to the front right wheel? That’s just turbulence caused by the wheel itself, combined with this year's addition: the vertical plate/winglet. So, we've got three distinct areas of turbulence running along the side, which together create what's known as a low-pressure field. It’s a bit like when a massive semi-truck passes you on the highway—you feel that slight pull toward the vehicle while it's alongside, and then once it clears, there's that sudden gust that feels like it might knock you off your feet. That’s basically the low-pressure field at work, stabilizing the car before the airflow hits the rear. All of this actually helps the air flow smoothly along the sidepod, which I’ve marked with that orange dotted line. Essentially, all the air from the bottom of the sidepod travels cleanly toward the diffuser and the rear wing mounts, eventually turning into the turbulence that stabilizes the car and generates downforce.

I finally got around to fixing that dent.So, what's actually happening here? If you look back at the 2021 car, you can see how the airflow drops aggressively to create downforce before everything funnels into the diffuser. The 2022 design tries to do the same thing, but since the diffuser and the rear wing mount are now positioned right next to each other, the upper edge sits much higher up. Because of that, the air that used to stabilize in the famous sidepod hole of the Ferrari F1-75 just flows naturally along the engine cover, hits the exhaust level, and then turns into pure turbulence behind the car. I tried to sketch it out using colored dotted lines. Red shows the aggressive, fast airflow creating downforce; yellow/green represents the air calming down as it moves through the hole; light blue is the air at the bottom of the hole moving toward the rear; and dark blue is the stable airflow continuing its path backward.

Look at those light blue lines—you can see how the fluids move toward the edges of the opening. Once they hit those edges, a high-pressure field builds up, which creates that suction effect. Since the Ferrari F1-75 has that upper edge on the side that looks almost like a cylindrical thickening, the fluid moving around those side openings stabilizes as it passes that rounded section. In the end, it all converges on the diffuser, just like the fluids passing over the hole and the hot fluid exiting through the vents (that orange-colored area).

The F1-75 is honestly a stroke of pure genius 🎉
swiftmaker12 said:Ferrari looks terrible. The aerodynamics are zero, it’s too heavy, slow, and they just seem totally lost.
Given how Binotto was talking back in 2019 about how Ferkan was putting every single resource into 2022, I’d say they didn't build a car—they built a disaster...

Ferrari won't have any luck until they bring in some outsiders to take over management...
Just hire some waiters from an American diner to run things instead...

Turn off the internet, unplug the cables.

I'm just glad Vettel got away from them in time.
At least he saved himself a few years of stress.

I see it differently. Their aerodynamics are actually brilliant. It reminds me of how Red Bull pushed the diffuser limits back in 2009 (which they eventually took to the extreme). You might think I'm crazy.

Well...

Back in 2009, Red Bull focused on blowing the diffuser using hot air exits, but it all came down to the floor because that year introduced a new aero concept where elements were placed extremely low.

Now in 2022, we have another radical rule change. Instead of those low-set elements, we're seeing a situation where, for the first time in the hybrid era, everything is centered along the Z-axis—from the exhaust up to the rear wing mounts and the diffuser edges. With the F1-75, Ferrari is directing every possible bit of airflow toward the exhaust and those rear wing mounting points.

Honestly, now I'm questioning if Williams, McLaren, or Haas even have good concepts, since they're likely just carrying over knowledge from the old era. Aston Martin and Alfa Romeo are trying something with a double floor, though I'm not sure how effective that really is. Sure, it speeds up the flow toward the rear, but with a double floor, you lose control. You can get that same effect with a standard "bottle-shaped" concept while maintaining much better control over the airflow.

AlphaTauri feels like a total safe bet. I don't like how shallow everything looks; it isn't aggressive, except maybe at the rear where they have that widened hot air exit meant to act as a pseudo-stabilizer.

Ferrari basically took every available concept and engineered the most ideal solution. Literally. It looks hot and sexy; the bodywork is elegantly filled out exactly where it needs to be. Just... perfectly.