Posts by Matthew Doyle73

Oh yeah, if things go south, I’m more than ready to take manual control of the autopilot myself. 😛 🙂

goldentinker79 said:you could probably hack the Pentagon using nothing more than a mid-range office PC

Forget the Pentagon—you could break into your neighbor's computer at any hour of the day. That's really the issue here.😛 🙂

Richard Hernandez13 said:In those typical teen movies, if a woman wears glasses, keeps her hair in a ponytail, or doesn't have perfectly manicured eyebrows, she's automatically cast as the ugly girl.

The big exception is Sandra Bullock. She plays that exact type of character in almost every other movie, yet she’s hotter than all those other actresses combined. 😳

Dana Reyes3 said:If the venue ends up being half-empty----

--- I honestly think we’ll be listening to Justin Timberlake played on a banjo at the next album release.😢

On a side note, does anyone else remember that scene from *Malcolm in the Middle*? You know, the one where the three brothers break into that closed amusement park at night, Malcolm says, "This feels like a classic horror movie setup," and Reese just goes, "Let's split up!" 😛

Personally, I much prefer those action game clichés where I’m basically invincible—like, the only way I'm going down is if I take a direct hit from a rocket launcher. 😛 🙂

You probably wouldn't have run into me there either (at least I hope 😳) , but honestly, the album isn't a total disaster. For instance, when I'm just walking around my neighborhood, I much prefer listening to him over stuff like Maroon 5, Jack Johnson, or some generic elevator music 🙄

Around Christmas, I caught a documentary on TV about Peanuts. It’s less about the action and more about the philosophy, but honestly, I don't think I'll ever experience anything quite like it again. It really hits differently when you're an adult.🙂

[No content provided to rewrite.]

Rebecca Miller2 said:So, what am I, if not a scientist? Oh, Matthew Doyle73?

Look, let's be clear: I'm speaking as a scientist here. Those conspiracy theories claiming nobody ever set foot on the moon? Those are the kind of fringe ideas you only see being peddled by self-proclaimed "experts" who wouldn't know a peer-reviewed study if it hit them in the face. 😉

What exactly am I even doing here... laying out these massive truths that neither you, nor any of you, can manage to answer even one out of ten?

That’s still a massive improvement over you ignoring ten out of my ten points. I’m picking this debate right back up where we left off, since you clearly didn't have the guts to follow through. Claiming you "don't have time for my questions" while simultaneously insisting you "won the argument" is a total contradiction—assuming, of course, you actually understand what that means.

If Jews are truly as brilliant as everyone claims, then by all means, let's have a public debate... just not here. It’s way too much effort!😁 We need to move this conversation beyond small forums and onto the major networks—think CNN or Fox News. We should be having deep, serious discussions based on history, the Bible, the Talmud, and the Kabbalah to really understand who the Jews are today. There is a massive disconnect between modern groups and the actual biblical Jews from Palestine.

Up until now, they’ve only been calling you out for that nightmare stage. I hope that tells you something.

Besides, even JBE wrote about the Khazar people!

Whatever. 🙂

I actually stumbled upon an interesting book at the bookstore the other day!

Hmm, I’ve been looking into some solid technical analysis myself, and honestly, it all ties directly back to everything we've been discussing here. 😛

Don't tell me you aren't aware of that, "distinguished" Matthew Doyle73? 😛

I have no idea how often you find yourself staring through the library windows. 🙄

Keep wagging that tail, buddy!🙂

🙂

Jews have never actually been great scientists; they’re just master deceivers hiding behind a scientific veneer. The better you spin those fairy tales, the more useful you become to the Masons.

To you, "always" just means "whenever I need a convenient excuse to quote them." You keep clinging to those saints who wrote all that nonsense about gay people like it’s gospel truth. It’s funny, really—I should have realized you were only interested in the "great deceivers" all along. I’ll be sure to remind you of that next time you try to pull some heavy-handed authority from the Old Testament.

[User Name] said: "Quote"

To give you an idea: Biblical Jews used to track their lineage through... I want it. ! Even the Bible says that a man fathers children! It’s not the woman who does the creating—she serves as the vessel for a man's will. A man is the one who brings life into being because Jehovah granted him that power here on Earth. He is made in God's image, and through the woman, he delivers his child.

Go ahead and quote those frauds who wrote it.
a) men giving birth
b) what if women just didn't have children?

Or better yet, try actually having a kid and then let me know if you managed to pull that off.

Even today, you see Jews elevating women above everything else! The moment a conversation shifts toward Abraham, they immediately start... praising Sara?! Look, it wasn't Sara who was chosen; it was Abraham! But for Jews, that’s just too much to swallow.

For crying out loud, they know their own book better than you do. Or maybe you think you're the one with all the answers now, especially after you started claiming the entire Bible is just packed with perverts because everyone was just as obsessed with it as you are. 😛

Is this even normal?

Look, let’s be real here—your theories are getting a bit out there. You keep bringing up God mentioning the bondage of sin, but you're twisting it to claim that being a sinner makes one a slave. If that’s how you plan to interpret the entire Bible, then honestly, I’d sooner take a Jew's word for it than listen to yours.

Why is it that modern Jews seem to reject the Old Testament, even though they hypocritically cling to it whenever it serves their political agenda?

Look, you’re doing the same thing again. You know exactly how this goes. Whenever I bring up Jesus saying "love your enemies," you immediately jump in to tell me that can't be right because it contradicts something written in the Old Testament. Or even better, when I mention his line about "letting him who is without sin cast the first stone," you hit me with this whole highly reasoned argument about how those were just Pharisaic setups and why we shouldn't take his words at face value.

Come on, Matthew Doyle73, you’re all over the place—showing up in every single thread around here. You can definitely handle this one, right?

Oh, sure, whatever you say. I honestly thought you’d just sit there through this whole thread, dodging my points and talking in circles, hoping my questions would get buried so deep that nobody would even notice them. Well, newsflash: I managed to pull our actual discussion back out of the gutter, so feel free to jump back in whenever you actually find the courage. Or, better yet, look right here—there’s plenty of substance for you to chew on. Try actually responding to something instead of hiding behind that tired old excuse of "I don't have time to reply, therefore I win." We aren't competing for some trophy here. 😛.

Rebecca Miller2 said:What kind of "scientists" are we even talking about?
Jews

Anyone with half a brain can become a scientist, and honestly, it’s despite being Jewish, not because of it.

Throughout history, Jews have consistently been leading scientists and doctors—you probably know this since you're constantly quoting their brilliant, if intense, writings. Genetics has played its part in everything else.

If you really think you're somehow superior to any Jew, why don't you go out there and prove it by becoming a scientist yourself?

I seem to recall some war movie where a bunch of kids huddle up in a basement and try to act all tough like they're mobsters. Is that what you're talking about? 😳

Blaise said:Matthew Doyle73
Your question is so incredibly convoluted that I'm struggling to even put a coherent thought down on paper.

I didn't bother asking you because whenever you weigh in on this thread, it’s basically like watching a monologue where someone just argues with themselves 😛 🙂.

In any other case, I don't see any reason why a person with a disability should be granted more rights than I have. They might get certain benefits, but let's not confuse those with actual rights.

I have no desire to live in a society where a retiree or anyone else is allowed to do something that I am prohibited from doing.😳

fadedsailor932 said:+ and another little joke about a squirrel

Man, I would totally watch that 😳

By the way, total off-topic tangent here, but I've always felt bummed that they never made a full cartoon series for Roger Rabbit and Baby Herman. As far as I can remember, there was only that one single episode set in the hospital. 😢

strider2 said:Oh, come on, Matthew Doyle73... if we're talking about women, they aren't scientists—they're just thieves who've been looting their husbands' pockets the whole time. 😲 At least, that's what an alien would say, and he’s got some pretty reliable sources.

Oh, absolutely. And the husbands? They're just sitting there at home, totally clueless, until one day they tune into the Nobel Prize ceremony and suddenly realize: "Holy crap... my suit... my coat... my tie... IT'S ALL GONE!!!" Seriously, those Europeans can't be trusted; they must all be colorblind or something. It's a total disaster. 😛 🙂

Blaise said:Fair enough. But if those powerful rights aren't structured to protect everyone from their own potential abuse, then we've completely missed the point.

And how does that actually relate to the equality of those rights? Who exactly would need to have fewer rights just so we could shield ourselves from them abusing theirs?

Thomas Ramirez2 said:Women tend to be passive when it comes to male-dominated fields, and they aren't exactly out there demanding equality. Unless, of course, they are taught otherwise. But let’s look at who has been driving progress in science and education over the last century.

It’s the exact same story as the hundred years before that: Scientists 😛

Thomas Ramirez2 said:Commoners don't have the same standing as the Prime Minister.

I mean, why would any Prime Minister be more prone to committing crimes than anyone else? 😢

I already told you guys how much I can't stand covers... But these two? Haha, they actually hit different. 😉

Well... I definitely agree that we should all start on equal footing with the same set of rights—and if we can push for even more of them, then even better—but those are really just minor details at this stage. 😳

Rebecca Miller2 said:Besides, the test itself isn't even valid...

Which one? There are plenty of them, and if I actually decided to tackle them, most would just tear you apart. It’s pretty obvious to everyone here that some things are just too clear-cut when they're coming from minds that aren't yours.😛 😢

Do you mean the thread title? 😳

Of course not. Everyone has certain rights—even death row inmates—but nobody is truly equal.

The point I’m making here is that equality should be measured by how much someone abuses it to infringe upon my own rights and standing, rather than being dictated by the circumstances of their birth, their religion, their socioeconomic status, their mental health, or their gender.