CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Gerald Rivera60 › Posts

Posts by Gerald Rivera60

165 posts shown.

Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
Freudian theory frequently treats libido through a mechanical lens. It is often framed as an energy source that, if obstructed, will inevitably seek an alternative outlet.
The Ego employs various mechanisms to manage this release—sublimation being a prime example.

By the way, William Morris8, if you don't mind me asking, where did you pick up such a deep understanding of psychoanalysis?
Just curious...
Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
William Morris8 said:Not for me. Is he a neuropsychiatrist, a cognitive scientist, or something along those lines? I'm just surprised he’s leaning so heavily on psychoanalytic concepts, which is why I'm asking.

If Google isn't lying,
this guy is a dancer, a choreographer, a poet—an artist writing about performance art through the lens of psychoanalytic theory...
So, he isn't from a psychological background.
Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
Interesting point...
... I’ve done some reading on Freud directly. He’s essentially treated as a persona non grata among most American psychologists, so there's a real chance his theories were misrepresented to us.
Besides, I highly doubt any professor in an American personality psychology department is actually reading Freud in the original language...
If that's the case, even Fulgosi might be misinterpreting him in personality psychology; I really should double-check that, though I don't have the book on hand right now.
It's barely morning and I've already learned something new. At least the day isn't a total wash. ;-)
Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
William Morris8 said:I'm not sure about the translation, but I can clarify something else: Freud distinguishes between instinct and Drive (Trieb). Instinct is what's genetically passed down to all individuals of a species (like a spider spinning a web), whereas Drive is a concept that articulates somatic and psychological functioning.

I’m not entirely convinced Freud makes that specific distinction here. It seems more likely that, spurred by the horrors of World War I, he introduced the concept of the death instinct (later termed Thanatos) as an opposing force to the life instinct (Eros).
He didn't really view instinct as a genetically programmed complex or a behavioral pattern triggered by specific stimuli—things like nesting behaviors or mating rituals. He might have differentiated the two terms, but in Freud's work, that gap is much smaller than how modern science separates them today.
Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
So you’re translating something from the realm of psychoanalysis—basically depth psychology...
...I have to admit my knowledge of depth psychology is fairly superficial, though I’m open to being corrected...

As for "reverse drive," I’d go with inverse drive (maybe impulse, but if memory serves, when discussing Freud, people used instinct or drive interchangeably)

The "pleasure principle" is just that... the principle the Id follows, while the Ego operates according to the reality principle...

"Pre-linguistic trauma"... perhaps pre-linguistic trauma... a trauma occurring somewhere before age one, right as the Ego begins to form.

"Matherial theory"... is this regarding communication? Like Communication Theory? If I were doing it, I might just leave it as Material Theory of Communication...

'Beyond pleasure principle' — "on the other side of the pleasure principle" (the original German is "Jenseits des Lustprinzips," so that's about the gist of it)

...it's always worth checking something like the
Psychoanalysis Dictionary
Authors: Jean Laplanche, J. B. Pontalis
New York : "Random House" : Forward, 1992.
Logan's Run (1976) in Movies ·
Ethan Martinez11 said:Your criteria are useless. I don't give a damn about IMDb ratings.

I don't use IMDb scores as a benchmark either. If I want a sense of what a movie is actually like, I'd rather just read some reviews.

As for Logan's Run... it isn't a masterpiece, but it's solid.
And I agree with the people who think Michael York was the wrong fit for this role. To me, he's much better suited for those "nerdy" types.
Logan's Run (1976) in Movies ·
Ethan Martinez11 said:So, what’s wrong with it?


It seems like this movie doesn't carry much weight with the cinephile crowd—not that anyone really cares. It barely even registers a decent score on IMDb.

Personally, I found it alright. The standout for me was that "carousel" sequence... the whole execution scene where they kill off everyone who hits thirty.
Nonverbal communication tips? in Psychology ·
I’m not looking to jump into this debate, I just wanted to drop a potentially interesting link here:
http://members.aol.com/nonverbal2/entries.htm#Entries

Paul Eckman spent considerable time studying nonverbal behavior and the mechanics of detecting deception.
His research suggests that even professionals who deal with lies daily—think FBI agents or federal investigators—aren't actually any better at spotting them than the average person. They're essentially just as bad off as everyone else.
William H. Sheldon in Psychology ·
Walter Moore4 said:Can anyone recommend a solid book by William H. Sheldon regarding body type psychology? I'm looking for the stuff on endomorph, mesomorph, and ectomorph constitutions. My Google searches haven't been very productive. English or American sources are fine. Thanks!

You can find a chapter in Ante Fulgosi's "Personality Psychology" (which should be available at most major bookstores) that covers constitutional theories of personality, specifically focusing on Kretschmer and Sheldon. That should be plenty if you just want to grasp the theory.

If you need something more in-depth, check Amazon for Sheldon's work:
The Varieties of Temperament: A Psychology of Constitutional Differences
To praise or to criticize? in Psychology ·
The principle of liberty states:
"In conclusion, we can say that this most likely involves a combination of various biopsychosocial factors which ultimately result in illness." (WebMD) Wow. Truly groundbreaking stuff. They really sold me on that one. How about you?

What they’re saying is true, but it doesn't do much for this specific situation.

The principle of liberty states:
It is a sad delusion to believe that medication can solve or even just mitigate the core issue. Drugs act on the brain. But where does depression actually start? Is the root cause inside the mind, or is it out there in the world?

I can manage it, but only in the short term. Just enough to put out the fire.

The principle of liberty states:
The term "diagnosis" in psychiatry is almost a joke. You can see the same individual walk into one doctor's office and receive one label, then walk into another and be told they have something entirely different. I realize this might ruffle some feathers, but it’s my honest take. I’ve formed this perspective through years of living with and discussing the reality of the field with my girlfriend, who has been navigating the American mental health system for nearly two decades. We both rely on what is supposed to be a science—psychiatry—to find our way forward.

Diagnosis is essential. But people aren't machines. You can't just run a diagnostic based on simple if-then logic and expect results. It doesn't work that way.

Psychiatry isn't a science. I know, I can already hear the practitioners sharpening their scalpels for me. 😁 )

Psychiatry is a system. Unfortunately, for many—if not most—once they enter it, getting out is an uphill battle. But that isn’t a failure of psychiatry itself. It is a symptom of society at large. Psychiatry serves a specific role in our social structure, and that function extends far beyond simply "curing" the sick.

Just a general observation... there isn't just one type of depression. You first have to distinguish between what used to be called endogenous depression—the kind caused strictly by chemical imbalances in the brain—and other forms that stem from upbringing or traumatic life experiences.
One more thing. People have become far too passive. They fall into a depression and immediately rush to a doctor, expecting a pill to magically fix everything. By doing this, we essentially outsource our own lives. We hand over the responsibility for our mental state to an external force instead of acknowledging that we are the ones in control. On the other hand, society seems to prefer it that way. It benefits from people who won't take charge.

Listen... one quick request. If it isn't too much trouble, try breaking up the text a bit more. It would make everything much easier to read.
Need help with some psychology terms in Psychology ·
placidmoose32 said:Hey everyone.

A friend of mine was diagnosed with:

Hypothymia
Clinical Depression
Anhedonia

Could someone be kind enough to give me a general idea of what this actually means?
Thanks!

Low mood, reduced arousal levels, and an inability to experience pleasure or enjoyment.
Basically, a total lack of drive... similar to depression, though they likely lacked the specific cognitive markers required for a full clinical diagnosis.
Keep in mind, the causes behind your friend's condition could be entirely physiological or organic in nature.
brightviper24 said:Is that the one where the white ninja works as a cop, gets framed for drugs or murder, and then goes on a revenge spree?

No...
In this one, Franca Nero is getting vengeance for a friend who stood up to a massive corporation.
Quote: Mad Scientist
Ethan Perez97 said:Can't Wait.

I remember it clearly. As a kid, that was definitely my absolute favorite. Return of the Ninja

Is this where Sho fights that guy wearing some kind of metal mask?
The character spent years living in Japan, where he mastered his craft. Now, he’s smuggling drugs inside Japanese dolls... or something to that effect.

I’m fine with that one too.
There’s another one where he isn't wearing the standard mask, but more of a helmet... IMDb says it's titled Pray for Death, and I thought that one was pretty decent too.

I just remembered another one... Ninja III.
A dying ninja transfers his spirit into some girl.
... man, those ninjas.
🙂
Ethan Perez97 said:Please. No ninja can touch Sho Kosugi. He’s the ultimate badass, and he happens to be a ninja on top of that.😎 😎

Man... Sho is an icon...
looks like he has a new movie in the works...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0453538/

Does anyone remember that movie where Franca Nero plays a white ninja and Sho Kosugi plays a Black ninja... and Sho loses in the end?
I think... Franca Nero 🙄

And since we're talking about ninjas, there's also The Octagon with Chuck Norris.

Those two films were the peak ninja movies of my childhood. There was also that series starring Charles Bronson and Sho Kosugi.
Dudikoff showed up later.

And btw, I'm pretty sure Cynthia Rothrock was a world champion in kickboxing.
I’m against remakes if they’re being made purely for the paycheck. I realize that line is blurry—everyone wants to make money, and there's nothing wrong with that. But profit shouldn't be the only motivation.

On another note, how often does it happen when you're watching a movie that you can't help but think about how you would have handled certain things differently? How many times have you sat there thinking you could have shot or directed specific scenes better?

Remakes are everywhere these days. With some, the connection is obvious, while with others, it’s much harder to spot—most people don't even realize that Ocean's Eleven is a remake. It's clear that Hollywood is suffering from a massive drought of original ideas.

It happens again. Multiple films can be based on the exact same literary source material, and if that’s the case, they aren't actually true remakes.

I fail to see the logic behind a remake of Psych. Why bother with literal copying? It wasn't exactly a box office hit to begin with.

Look, I’m not inherently for or against remakes. It all depends on the execution. You have to consider the source material, how much time has passed since the original, and whether the foundation was actually solid to begin with. If someone takes an overlooked gem from the 1950s that had a great concept and handles the remake with actual skill, you might end up with something decent.

In most cases, the originals simply hold more weight than the remakes.
The Mailman Always Rings Twice in Movies ·
End of film:
`It's like when you're waiting for a really important letter,'
`The letter's so important you're afraid you won't hear the mailman ring, but—don't you see?—he always gives two strikes.'
Douglas Phillips4 said:Yeah, I'm picking up a DVD burner these days (maybe even today 👏 ). It's going to be great. 🎉

Now the real question is: what are you all using to rip movies? Is it just DVD Shrink, DVD Decrypter, and those other handy little tools? Even if they handle dual-layer discs, media is still way too expensive to be wasting it. 🙄

Also, what software are you using to build the menus? I know even Nero can do it—I've made some VCDs with menus before—but that's pretty basic. Anything more advanced?

I'm completely lost here, honestly. 😳

Here is my current setup:
Ripping: DVD Shrink + Nero, Alcohol 120%, or something similar.
Authoring: TMPGEnc, DVD Author... (not many bells and whistles, but fine for basic menus).
...I picked up Adobe Encore, but haven't had a chance to dive in yet. Supposedly, it's top-tier.
For more serious authoring, people often suggest DVD Maestro or Sonic. I haven't actually used them for anything significant; I've mostly just opened them and closed them again.
Horror movieology! in Movies ·
Dennis Long7 said:The issue is that movies like The Silence of the Lambs or those cannibal flicks lack anything supernatural...
Pure horror requires a supernatural element; otherwise, it isn't true horror.
Films like The Silence of the Lambs or Scream are essentially thrillers with horror elements. Those elements consist of tension, dread, terror, violent scenes, and creating a sense of unease... but there's nothing paranormal involved.
That’s why I believe horror should be defined primarily by its content.🙂

I'm almost on the same page as you...
... and honestly, all these subgenre divisions are pretty arbitrary anyway...
... I agree with your point regarding the supernatural criterion...
... though even by that standard, some films we call horror would barely make the cut...
Horror movieology! in Movies ·
Brian Foster2 said:I think you’re mixing up a few things. Check www.imdb.com and you’ll see that "The Silence of the Lambs" is also tagged as a thriller and a crime movie, even if it carries a horror label.

On the other hand, Friday the 13th is categorized as Mystery / Horror / Thriller.

So both films fall under the horror umbrella. However, anyone who has sat through all ten installments of Friday the 13th will tell you it leans heavily into pure horror. After the third entry, there isn't much plot left—it's just a slaughterfest.

Personally, I find these genre distinctions somewhat pointless. The best films always transcend these labels anyway.

(...under every horror title, you'll see Horror/Thriller, and under every thriller, it's Thriller/Horror).
Horror movieology! in Movies ·
I don't consider Cannibal to be a horror film... I suppose everyone has their own definition of what qualifies as horror, but in my opinion, a high body count doesn't automatically make something a horror movie.
... though drawing a clear line between horror and thriller can be difficult sometimes.
... I know I'm drifting into off-topic territory here, but why is Friday the 13th categorized as horror while Lamb is seen as a thriller? Even though, personally, I find Lamb much more unsettling than Jason Voorhees.
Do we define horror based on the content itself, or by the reaction it provokes in the audience—assuming that was the filmmaker's intent?
... honestly, it might not even matter how we define these things. There is a general consensus on certain classics, while other films remain subjective... everyone will agree that The Exorcist is a horror film, but there will always be a debate over whether Cannibal or Lamb belongs in that category.