silentridge8 said:Does anyone have a direct link to the Pro Nutrition website? Every time I try to Google it, I can't find anything useful 🤷 (at least nothing showing an American site or somewhere that actually ships within the States 🤔 )
It’s quite a chore to type out "Pronutrition"... and even then, you just end up staring at the very first page of Google results 🙂
I decided to do a little digging on Google regarding pregnancy after stopping the pill, and honestly, I couldn't find much information suggesting you actually need to wait several months... instead, this is what I stumbled upon on the Mayo Clinic website:
The moment you experience withdrawal bleeding after discontinuing oral contraceptives, your body has completely metabolized the hormonal components of the contraceptive. This typically occurs within 24 hours, though it can vary slightly; regardless, you can begin planning for pregnancy as soon as your first period following the cessation of oral contraceptives arrives. Please be mindful that during the metabolism of the active ingredients in oral contraceptives, higher amounts of folic acid are consumed, which is essential for proper embryonic development. For this reason, it is advisable to start taking folic acid during your final cycles of oral contraceptive use.
And then there's this on WebMD:
Dr. Branko Radaković 01.17.2006 11:59 AM Re: pregnancy after the pill Once you stop taking birth control pills, there is no need for a waiting period if you wish to conceive. If you had regular cycles prior to starting the pill, you can generally assume you will become pregnant relatively quickly, provided all other health factors for both you and your partner are optimal for conception.
Morgan Lopez10 said:After going through all my tests, those were specifically the ones recommended to me, so I didn't just pick them out of thin air. I simply wanted to point out that these hormones aren't exactly harmless, especially when you have to take a break for six months rather than just one month.
Well, I wasn't suggesting you took them without cause... It’s just that until you actually start a regimen, you can't know for certain if it suits you. Though, presumably, common sense dictates that if you start feeling unwell, you should stop... I was lucky enough that the first ones I tried worked perfectly for me. Some of my friends had to cycle through several different brands before they found one that didn't cause issues. I agree that they might not be completely benign, but sometimes you just have to choose the lesser of two evils... constantly relying on Advil is likely far more damaging... plus, birth control does offer some very positive side effects. 😁
Morgan Lopez10 said:I was on Triquillar for over a year. My circulation went completely out the window, and I was dealing with leg cramps every single day. They don't affect fertility directly, but it really makes you wonder why everyone insists on taking a break for a few months before trying to conceive. 🤔 The pill has its perks, sure, but it has plenty of downsides too, so you really need to weigh your options carefully.
Well, it seems obvious that if you were on those pills for over a year and feeling that way, they weren't the right ones for you. It isn't normal to suffer like that, and you shouldn't have stayed on them so long if they were causing such issues.
And honestly, I don't see what's so controversial about needing a little hiatus before trying to get pregnant. We are talking about hormones here—it only makes sense that you'd want to let everything settle back into a natural, stable equilibrium before deciding to start a family. That’s just my layman's take on it, but it seems perfectly logical to me; I fail to see where the actual problem lies.
wanderinghound62 said:😢😢😢 What exactly am I expected to do regarding those blood tests if I decide to go on the pill (or something similar)? Is it truly unavoidable and absolutely necessary?😕 Did any of you ladies actually do that?
Has anyone else here, besides myself, had their doctor recommend birth control pills for any particular reason?
I started taking them for that very same reason, and honestly, life has been so much easier... I've been on them for a few years now. Before this, I used to swallow enough Advil to numb a horse just to get through one period! About 3 or 4 days before my cycle would start, the cramps would kick in for a day or two, then nothing for two days, and then once the bleeding actually started, three more days of agony... without the painkillers, I simply couldn't function. Now, I rarely need anything at all since the pain isn't intense anymore. Maybe once every few months I'll take a single tablet, but most of the time, I don't need a thing. My periods last about 4 or 5 days now, whereas they used to drag on for 6 or 7. The flow is lighter too. For me, personally, it was a massive help. I recently tried taking a little break to see how things would go—I'd almost forgotten how miserable it used to be, but the memory came rushing back quickly, so I went right back to my prescription.🙂
And yes, you definitely need to get those blood tests done. It’s really nothing to be embarrassed about, even for someone like me who is deathly afraid of needles.😁 I make sure to have them redone every year... it's better to stay on top of things so you can have some peace of mind.
I just wanted to chime in and confirm that you don't actually need to take breaks from them... I've been on Logest continuously for over three years now, and my doctor explicitly told me there’s no reason to cycle off. It’s the same story with Yasmin... But look, since you've already gone ahead and stopped, hopefully things will settle down for you soon. Honestly, I don't personally know anyone who ran into such a specific issue, though I suppose it isn't entirely surprising—things tend to get pretty chaotic when you suddenly stop taking them. At any rate, you should probably give your gynecologist a call just to get their professional take on it...
I honestly haven't the slightest clue what the definitive truth is here, but I’ve encountered that same line of reasoning you mentioned in several places now. It leaves me frequently questioning which approach actually makes more sense from a logical standpoint. On a similar note, I recall reading somewhere about potential links to breast cancer, suggesting that one shouldn't wear a bra constantly—though, if I recall correctly, the primary recommendation was simply to avoid sleeping in one. Honestly, I can't imagine any sane person would even consider doing that.
Nancy Jackson83 said:Honestly, I think I’ve developed a bit of an obsession. I ended up spending just as much on the frames as I did on the actual prescription lenses...
I am quite fond of eyewear myself. If I actually had the funds, I would probably own a hundred different pairs of frames by now. However, as much as I enjoy them, I try to be practical and hunt for the best deals whenever I shop. 🙂 Once I find myself in a more prosperous position—an optimist, I suppose—I will certainly allow myself to be a bit more extravagant.🙂
Nancy Jackson83 said:I picked up these http://www.london-eyewear.co.uk/OLIV...tdetail,,.html
here in the States $333 and got a 20% discount
The thing is, I haven't been able to find the technical specifications anywhere
Personally, that seems a bit steep to me... I managed to get my prescription sunglasses for less than $267. Granted, I had to spend quite some time searching, but cheaper options definitely exist out there. Most optical shops will naturally try to upsell you on the most expensive frames available. However, in my experience, there isn't actually a massive difference in the quality of the lenses themselves.
Hannah Clark51 said:Ugh... I remember hearing this ridiculous nonsense back in school about how gay people aren't allowed to donate blood. There was this doctor who came to speak to us, and she claimed they were just a "high-risk group." Really? Since when does risk depend on gender rather than how often someone switches partners or practices safe sex? It’s completely nonsensical! Gender has absolutely nothing to do with it. 😕 😕 😕
Look, as much as I consider myself a liberal and open-minded person regarding LGBTQ+ rights... I can't help but feel there's a connection here. It seems to me that gay men might constitute a higher-risk group—or at least a riskier one compared to heterosexuals—and when it comes to blood donation, it's better to minimize risk whenever possible.
Based on my own personal observations, having met quite a few gay men over the years, I get the impression that there is a greater tendency toward promiscuous behavior, and honestly, it feels like there are very few truly monogamous individuals in that community.
The real question is why the ban is permanent. Why can't it be a temporary deferral, like a three-month waiting period? This same logic should apply to all the other groups mentioned, such as former drug users or anyone who has had sexual encounters with sex workers....
(I haven't managed to read every single post yet, so please forgive me if I've repeated something already 🙂)
Sam Hughes5 said:Everything seems fine... but if this doesn't end up fitting me, I'm going to be quite frustrated. What happens then? Can I actually return it?
Yes, you can return it without any real hassle. Honestly, it took me quite some time to figure out which cuts actually work for my body type, though I finally have a few reliable models in my rotation now. If I may offer a small piece of advice—if you find yourself caught between two sizes, I would strongly suggest ordering the smaller one. That goes for more than just bras, too. For instance, I often fluctuate between a 36 and a 38, but I invariably opt for the 36 and simply use the tightest hook. It provides much better support.
Sam Hughes5 said:I would honestly love to be wearing a DD or an E cup, but no matter where I shop... I can never find anything larger than a C. Plus, I absolutely cannot stand wireless bras; I need that structural support to actually lift everything up properly.
The real issue is that you simply cannot find decent options in big-box retailers like Target or Walmart. That is precisely why I have resorted to ordering through catalogs—companies like Lands' End or maybe even Amazon. They carry actual E cups, the prices are reasonable, and the quality is actually reliable.
briskfalcon15 said:I shall, with full intention, be veering off-topic now. 😉 It seems you clearly have some significant issues when it comes to selecting a proper bra. The number indicates the range, whereas the letter represents the basket. It makes perfect sense to me that you'd see a variance of about two inches in circumference depending on which manufacturer you're looking at—brands just can't seem to agree on sizing standards. However, I find it completely illogical that a single basket would fluctuate anywhere from an A to a D cup. That level of inconsistency is frankly absurd.😕
I find myself sitting here, rereading this over and over, and I have to admit—I’m just not grasping it. It simply refuses to click. 😕 In my estimation, an 85D could likely serve as a functional substitute for a 90C, though I certainly wouldn't recommend trying to swap it for a 90A. It really comes down to the individual; one ought to take the time to measure oneself properly to determine their true size. I recall seeing a segment on *The Oprah Winfrey Show* regarding this very topic—I don't exactly sit down to watch daytime talk shows religiously, mind you, but the subject caught my attention when I happened to be watching. It seems to be a widespread issue, as most women appear to be wearing the incorrect bra size. I find myself wondering whether such inaccuracies have actual implications for one's physical health, or if the consequences are merely aesthetic in nature.
frozencobra37 said:Hmm... I'm sitting at about 285 pounds myself, and honestly, I don't spend much time fretting over it. If anything, my only real grievance is that I can't get my bathroom scale to cooperate properly. To get around it, I actually prop up one side of the scale with something to tilt it, then I try to balance by putting one foot on the device and... well, you get the idea. It basically cuts the reading in half. This morning it clocked in at 143 lbs. 🙂 I haven't stepped on a scale in ages; with how brutal this summer has been, I genuinely thought I might have surged past 300.
That is certainly an interesting way to weigh yourself, though I have serious doubts about its scientific accuracy. 🙂
But hearing that you aren't particularly worried about it? That’s the part that actually concerns me...
velvetwolf92 said:Has anyone else dealt with Dr. Krešić and/or Dr. Brnčić?
I’ve heard some incredibly negative things about Dr. Krešić—not from my own experience personally, but from people very close to me. If you want the details, there were some posts about this just a few pages back (maybe pages 2 or 3). As for Dr. Brnčić, I’ve heard she’s quite good, though I should probably add a caveat: I heard similar things about Krešić once, and well, reality didn't quite match the hype.
My intention here isn't to badmouth a physician who, quite frankly, holds a grudge against me; rather, I simply want to caution everyone to always take a doctor's opinion with a healthy grain of salt. Now, this situation didn't happen to me personally, but I feel as though I lived it myself. A woman went in for an X-ray on her ankle due to some persistent issues. What she didn't realize was that she had conceived just a week prior—something she had been trying to achieve for quite some time. Upon discovering the pregnancy during the X-ray process, the doctor flatly advised her that the best course of action was to have an abortion. Naturally, the patient began asking questions because she desperately wanted this child. When she requested a written opinion—which would be standard procedure if one were pursuing medical termination—the doctor refused to put anything in writing. Furthermore, the doctor became incredibly indignant when the patient asked for a referral, mentioning that the staff at the local clinic had suggested seeking a second opinion. Instead of providing documentation, the doctor snapped that if she insisted on seeing someone else, then that new doctor could handle her pregnancy too. As it turns out, she sought a second opinion elsewhere and received a completely different diagnosis, along with various explanations as to why the first doctor's advice was utterly nonsensical. Today, that woman is raising a perfectly healthy child.
I honestly cannot fathom what kind of motives could drive a doctor to behave in such a manner. I had always heard wonderful things about her, and I even had positive experiences with her myself when she was my own physician, but after hearing this, I simply couldn't bring myself to return to her care. I truly believe it is best to treat every medical opinion as a starting point rather than gospel, and if you are facing anything remotely serious, you should absolutely seek a second opinion.
Terry Fisher2 said:Things are about to get intense. Hayden is sitting on a 12-point lead, but realistically, there are only three drivers who can actually challenge him—Valentino Rossi, Loris Capirossi, and Max Biaggi (plus Predrosa if he’s feeling healthy again). With just two races left on the calendar, if Rossi sweeps both wins, he'll likely clinch it, though nothing is set in stone; if the American manages a second-place finish, he'd still hold a 2-point cushion. (Based on the 25-20-16-13 scoring system...)
Look, I wasn't asking for a data dump or a history lesson... Everything you just laid out is common knowledge to anyone who has even a passing interest in NASCAR. And as for your claim that only those specific drivers have a mathematical shot at overtaking Hayden? That's purely theoretical. In any practical sense, this championship battle is essentially a two-horse race between Rossi and Hayden; anything else would be a massive shocker. I was specifically asking for an opinion (assuming you actually have one)...
I am quite uncertain as to how many of you actually follow NASCAR these days... I haven't happened to stumble upon a single thread dedicated to the sport lately (my apologies if I have somehow overlooked one)
What are your thoughts on whether "The GOAT" will manage to pull off a victory this season? Are you rooting for his success, or would you personally prefer to see a shift in the hierarchy?