Electronic / EDM
in Music ·
Your last comment was SO incredibly stupid and baseless, just totally clueless and full of misunderstandings. I honestly doubt any kind of response from me could actually help you understand...
Listen to me closely, you little punk.
Up until now, I’ve been pretty decent when posting on this thread—maybe excluding my very first post—but I can usually handle a little initial annoyance.
After the nonsense you just spewed, though? I don't know how anyone could.
Anyway, after that first irritation, I made a real effort NOT to troll you. Instead, I actually tried to wrap my head around your logic and maybe present some actual arguments to back up my views.
And I gotta admit, I was REALLY successful at holding myself back.
But seriously, enough is enough.
Because look; I laid out EVERY single one of my claims and stances regarding those charlatans with solid reasoning in my last post. Since it's a bit harder to prove my points off the top of my head (because let's face it, I'm definitely no trained music theorist—not that I think they even matter), I tried using a proper analogy to make my point easier for you to grasp.
Bottom line: in my opinion, even a lobotomized ox [kudos, Daniel Bailey7! 😉] would get exactly what I'm saying, but alas! Not you.
On the flip side, all your little gems basically boil down to "there's no point in arguing" if someone doesn't agree with you; or just a simple "Vangelis is my favorite" without providing even a tiny shred of an argument or an explanation as to why.
Oh, right, I forgot, there's no point in arguing about it, right?
Well, if there's no point, then why don't you just beat it? It's SO DAMN OBVIOUS that you have absolutely nothing to gain or say here.
-------------
P-fucking-s: to that incredibly rude, patronizing, and completely empty "you wouldn't understand" statement you used to desperately mask your own idiocy, I'll say just this:
try me, dammit, if you dare!
Listen to me closely, you little punk.
Up until now, I’ve been pretty decent when posting on this thread—maybe excluding my very first post—but I can usually handle a little initial annoyance.
After the nonsense you just spewed, though? I don't know how anyone could.
Anyway, after that first irritation, I made a real effort NOT to troll you. Instead, I actually tried to wrap my head around your logic and maybe present some actual arguments to back up my views.
And I gotta admit, I was REALLY successful at holding myself back.
But seriously, enough is enough.
Because look; I laid out EVERY single one of my claims and stances regarding those charlatans with solid reasoning in my last post. Since it's a bit harder to prove my points off the top of my head (because let's face it, I'm definitely no trained music theorist—not that I think they even matter), I tried using a proper analogy to make my point easier for you to grasp.
Bottom line: in my opinion, even a lobotomized ox [kudos, Daniel Bailey7! 😉] would get exactly what I'm saying, but alas! Not you.
On the flip side, all your little gems basically boil down to "there's no point in arguing" if someone doesn't agree with you; or just a simple "Vangelis is my favorite" without providing even a tiny shred of an argument or an explanation as to why.
Oh, right, I forgot, there's no point in arguing about it, right?
Well, if there's no point, then why don't you just beat it? It's SO DAMN OBVIOUS that you have absolutely nothing to gain or say here.
-------------
P-fucking-s: to that incredibly rude, patronizing, and completely empty "you wouldn't understand" statement you used to desperately mask your own idiocy, I'll say just this:
try me, dammit, if you dare!