CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sarah Wilson95 › Posts

Posts by Sarah Wilson95

331 posts shown.

Discussion policy - criteria in Feedback & Suggestions ·
You have carried out censorship, regardless of what the folks running this Reddit might say when everything settles down.

You FORBADE the discussion, which had started somewhat more or less normally, without any major deviation from the usual topics, nothing more radical than the rest, nothing more serious than the rest, and nothing different from the thread it was actually building upon.

UNDERSTAND THIS
people have been debating for days about the various symbols used during killings, and when someone points out, "okay, people were killed under the cross too"—amidst all that chaos in the Politics subforum—your action is pure censorship, because you provided an "explanation" that amounts to imposing a specific viewpoint and disrespecting the secular nature of the United States.
Discussion policy - criteria in Feedback & Suggestions ·
driftingdriver said:Sarah Wilson95, you’ve basically laid out every single reason why this thread needs to be shut down, so I don't really have anything left to add. It’s up to the admins now.

By the way, your thread title isn't just an insult to me—and look, I’m just a simple servant of God—but you’re actually disrespecting God by trying to canonize me with that "Gospel of albatros" nonsense.

- Don't take the Lord your God's name in vain.

So, whether you realize it or not, you're effectively insulting 90% of the population here in the States.

🙄 driftingdriver, aren't you overreacting just a little bit with all of this?

First off, you're well aware that for days now, people in the Politics section have been debating the banning of symbols, arguing that people were killed under the guise of all those different emblems. This often leads to a pathological kind of relativism or attempts at relativizing history—which is a recurring issue in our political discussions—specifically regarding how certain symbols were used during violent eras. In that context, someone started this thread which could essentially be summarized as, "Sure, but they killed people in the name of the cross, too."

So, how did you react?
What was your move?
Why are you forcing your viewpoint on everyone?
Why are you practicing censorship?
Is this platform meant to be a gathering for Christian fundamentalists?
Are you truly certain you understood the core of the topic, or perhaps you could have simply closed the thread or moved it to the Lounge without all this drama and sentimental language about your own empathy for that famous 90%?
Schizophrenia - General Discussion in Psychology & Therapy ·
rustynomad7 said:I was deeply in love with "someone like that" with "that condition"🙂 for a long time... but eventually, I realized I was going to snap if I stayed with him. It feels somewhat metaphorical—much like any social circle, you end up picking up someone’s mindset, whether you realize it or not—though perhaps it varies depending on the specific temperament of each individual dealing with schizophrenia.
The reality is that the weight of this "illness" inevitably hits those closest to you. You practically need superhuman strength—divine intervention, maybe?—to truly "live" alongside them. I thought I had that strength. I didn't. In fact, that realization left me feeling incredibly guilty...
Though I should add one thing: even when you're "difficult," having a specific role in society matters. I actually gained quite a bit from that relationship...

Oh, absolutely.
When you experience one of those major "shifts," you learn so much more than you ever thought possible, and suddenly an entire unknown world opens up to you—one that was completely invisible before. It used to cross my mind, wondering what might happen if we looked at the whole dimension; honestly, it feels like our brains—the ones of us "neurotypical" people—are just operating in such a cramped, limited way, working with a much smaller capacity, which is why everything feels so tight and restricted.
Then again, I know it’s not quite like that either, because they lack that specific filter when it comes to perceiving reality and processing it.

But it works both ways; just as much as you gain, you lose a significant amount too. You end up completely drained, consumed by wasted time, and forced to start all over again as long as you still have the strength—or the will. You can be emotionally broken until there's nothing left of you,
and the thing is, nobody is to blame, and nobody intended for it to happen this way.
Discussion policy - criteria in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Beyond various other criteria—and I really don't want to get bogged down in the prerequisites here🤣—I find myself wondering if the designated moderators on Reddit, for instance, are actually familiar with the US Constitution? Do they possess even a surface-level understanding of concepts like democracy, political democracy, or the plurality of opinion?

It seems to me that the only concept truly understood around here is CENSORSHIP.

Mod driftingdriver has decided to shut down this thread, which was essentially just an extension of those endless debates regarding various symbols and ideologies. In this case, the conversation was dominated by—often in an ignorant and hostile manner toward opposing views—attacks on the star symbol, where people were essentially clashing over deeply divided sides.

The specific topic he closed dealt with the symbolism of the cross, touching upon the controversial idea that brutal bloodshed has been committed UNDER THAT SYMBOL as well.

Mod driftingdriver is shutting down the discussion and forbidding further debate by claiming that since 90% of the population in this country are believers, any topic concerning the symbolism of the cross—specifically its negative historical context—is prohibited.

So, this serves as the opening post for this controversial, closed, and forbidden topic (we all know how many of these exist on Politics; this one is practically child's play):

the cross...
Since I’ve been handed a warning from our dear moderator for "trolling" (even though my comments were directly relevant to the subject), I’m going to start a new thread.

I propose that the cross, much like the red star or the swastika, should be banned as a symbol under which heinous crimes have been committed.
Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people have died or been murdered (whether directly or indirectly) at the hands of those who wore the cross, doing so in the name of "God."
Unlike the swastika or the red star, the cross remains highly relevant today, and evil continues to be perpetrated under its sign.


1. This thread wasn't closed because it was a potential breeding ground for bickering and insults, driven by our mods' terrifying fear that users might virtually murder one another.
2) It wasn't moved to the Lounge, which is what they generously do for so many others.
3) It wasn't closed under any other pretext, but rather because

driftingdriver said:In the US, the vast majority are Christians. This topic is absurd. If anyone wants to discuss banning the cross, they should go to the forums of extremist nations and lament about it there as much as they like. They won't do it here.

driftingdriver said:I could write a thick book explaining why this was closed and why you received a warning. With that topic, you horribly insulted 90% of the people in the US and, by extension, 90% of our users. The penalty could have been even harsher, but I hope you will correct your views.

and the little extra touch:

Reddit forum rules

Pay close attention to:

insulting other users, intentionally provoking personal arguments, or engaging in non-constructive national, religious and similar conflicts (trolling)


The sheer arrogance here is what worries me—this tendency to impose certain views and enforce censorship without offering any thoughtful explanation.

At this rate, I expect we’ll soon be required to list our religious affiliations during registration, which is something we at least owe to the 90% of Americans who identify as believers.

For those who aren't aware, things are moving in that direction quite smoothly. 👍

edit:

😁 Make sure you don't miss out on this brilliant display of intellectual concern:

driftingdriver said:I could easily write a thick book explaining why this was shut down and why you received a warning. By choosing that topic, you’ve deeply offended 90% of the people in the US and, by extension, 90% of the users here. The penalty could have been even harsher, but I sincerely hope you will reconsider your positions..
Schizophrenia - General Discussion in Psychology & Therapy ·
Noah Garcia4 said:It’s basically equine therapy; hopefully, it helps lower their ☕

Based on what was shared, I could tell it was all about horses... and honestly, after talking with the doctor for about twenty minutes, I realized he spent roughly seventeen of those minutes just raving about Risperdal. He seemed more interested in showing off how much he loves that specific medication than anything else. I barely caught a mention of Sulpiride in passing, and I didn't even get a chance to ask about Depakene. 🙄I just made sure to jot everything down in my phone.

The explanation I got was that it usually takes a few weeks for the Risperdal to actually kick in, averaging about six
Schizophrenia - General Discussion in Psychology & Therapy ·
Noah Garcia4 said:I’ve heard people mention that before, but I haven't actually given it a shot myself 😕
What are you, some kind of shrink? A medical doctor? Or just a total lunatic?

The last one, most likely🤣😁, but the reason I phrased it that way above is because drag Ukućan was mentioned regarding that meal replacement brand I was asking about earlier
Schizophrenia - General Discussion in Psychology & Therapy ·
Quick question, can anyone help me out here?

I was looking up Depakine online and saw it’s used for epilepsy, but apparently, it's also being prescribed to someone dealing with psychotic obsessions—it seems like they're using it alongside Risperidone and Sulpiride as part of their daily regimen.

So, Depakine😕 what am I looking at here? Is this supposed to be some kind of "alternative" to Cogentin?
Schizophrenia - General Discussion in Psychology & Therapy ·
silentraven11 said:I think nobody is replying because you posted this in the wrong spot. You should probably just start a new thread since this case doesn't really have anything to do with schizophrenia. Most people here are dealing with schizophrenia or similar disorders, and there aren't many psychiatrists on this forum—maybe a few psychologists or people pretending to be them. It's mostly patients looking for help and giving advice to one another. I don't know if my advice would even help you, considering I took that medication but I don't have schizophrenia or any related condition...

Anyway, that drug isn't just prescribed for schizophrenia and stuff like that, so don't let that stress you out. They prescribe it for all sorts of F-codes. I was diagnosed with transient depression and BPD, and I was on it with breaks for three years. I'm 21 now. I think people get too worked up over side effects that are super rare and usually sound terrifying but never actually happen. If something were serious, your doctor should have warned you. And you should warn them if you notice any issues with side effects.

The only thing I'm unsure about is that the drug hasn't been tested on minors, so who knows how it affects kids. And that part about dementia doesn't sound great either.

As for you saying the kid is sleepy and passive from the meds, that's totally normal, especially at first. I used to sleep half the day away. Also, the most common side effects are increased appetite and mild amnesia. It really weakens your memory; for me, those three years were just a total fog. You kind of lose track of time. It's almost like some kind of drug, I guess. And honestly, you do become more passive, and it can turn into a sort of vegetative state—lower ability to learn, being slow, feeling dull, etc.
Personally, I think you should wait and see if the medicine actually helps the child. If the negative effects outweigh the good ones, it's better to stop taking it. In layman's terms, this report looks pretty poorly written to me, and I wouldn't trust a doctor or psychologist who wrote it like that. What was the reason you took the child to a psychiatrist in the first place? Not that I'm prying...
Based on what was written, I think the diagnosis is an exaggeration. It might be best to find a different doctor. That's all from me, since I'm not an expert.

I feel like I should weigh in on this debate as well. My take is that—beyond the point you just made—the core issue is that we are dealing with a community of grown adults here, all of whom are responsible for their own words and the content they produce for the other adults in their lives.

When you’re talking about a child—or more accurately, an adolescent or a young adult—there is a certain sensitivity to how things are handled. Regardless of what specific diagnosis is on the paper, most people tend to recoil or get visibly unsettled when they realize that the medical landscape isn't always as segmented as they imagine. They get nervous when they learn that the exact same medication, like a standard antipsychotic, might be prescribed for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or those brief psychotic episodes that fall under various other labels. It can be quite jarring for people to realize that these treatments often overlap across so many different conditions.

Look, I really need to emphasize this because it’s truly paramount, and honestly, it's the only thing that actually matters right now:

rapidfalcon22 said:If I were to suggest that you are indeed "seriously ill,"... You possess more than enough intelligence and strength to handle whatever comes your way. I’m operating under the assumption that you are a mature adult. Taking ownership of my own wellness and actively fighting to improve my health is something I feel deeply committed to doing for myself. Whether you're talking about physical exhaustion or just feeling mentally drained, it all hits the same way.

It isn't really about suggesting that someone living with a specific diagnosis lacks intelligence, wisdom, or quick wit, nor is it an indictment of their perseverance. More importantly, this isn't a commentary on whether they possess inner strength or resilience.
To suggest, even by accident, that we’re dealing with weak-willed individuals who are simply "giving in" to temptation is nothing short of complete nonsense; it is an absolute absurdity, a total lapse in judgment, and a raw, unnecessary insult to everyone involved.
No, they really aren't in a position to offer much help right now, especially if they don't have access to the necessary medication. It’s difficult to make headway when that's the case, because at the end of the day, we are dealing with a genuine medical condition—or, if it's easier for people to wrap their heads around, a serious illness. The current situation remains quite steady for the moment. It seems like there are certain individuals out there who simply won't allow her the space she needs to truly be herself or find her footing. It really comes down to that process of stripping everything away, pulling out the noise, gathering up what actually matters, and finally just being able to settle into a sense of normalcy.

Based on what we currently know from mainstream Western medicine and psychiatry—both fields that hold significant prestige today—it seems the only real option left is to swallow a constant stream of pills. The issue is that these medications can be incredibly harsh on the system, potentially damaging the liver, messing with blood counts, causing unwanted hair growth, or triggering hormonal shifts like elevated prolactin in men, which can lead to issues with blood pressure and pelvic floor dysfunction. I recall people dealing with jaw spasms or uncontrollable salivation back in the day; honestly, it’s probably for the best if they aren't experiencing those specific symptoms right now, though it’s likely because they are in a state where they can't even begin to contemplate their own dignity or the basic necessity of maintaining control over their motor skills, their lives, or their own thoughts. But then again, that is precisely where the core of the problem lies, and it feels like we are just spinning in circles.

Look, I’m certainly no medical expert here, so please take this with a grain of salt, but it seems to me that once those neurotransmitters are effectively blocked, everything else just falls into place. Once you hit that level of blockade, all that unnecessary noise—the anxiety, the physical pain, the paranoia—just sort of evaporates, leaving everything feeling completely under control. 🙄It’s simply that. It really doesn't get any better than this. I was just wondering what kind of updates or news the medical community is rolling out today.😢
I just took whatever was being offered at the time, because there really wasn't any other option on the table.
Noah Garcia4 said:it’s not that your child will pass away, but rather that they may never fully recover

as harsh as this might sound—especially to a mother who is terrified and clinging to any shred of hope, which is completely human, honestly—it could very well be the reality if we are looking at psychotic development rather than purely neurological issues, or perhaps a combination of both

you really have to pay close attention to those specific details, like sleep deprivation or instances where he "stayed up all night," because those can be early indicators of severe psychiatric disorders that might become significantly more complicated as he gets older..

similarly, rapidfalcon22, please try to wrap your head around the idea and truly accept that if medication becomes necessary, whether it's this specific one or another, it DOES NOT mean he is destined to spend the rest of his life in a vegetative state or whatever scenario you're fearing. It simply means that, and I say this again because modern American medicine and psychiatry aren't magic bullets, if these medications allow him to function, attend school, and maintain some level of control over his struggles—struggles that, let's face it, only he truly understands while you only see the outward symptoms—then that is a meaningful step forward. It provides relief.

medication manages symptoms and can help stabilize things, but it doesn't offer a cure, and it certainly won't fix everything overnight. that's just the way it is

furthermore, the fact that he is a young person, practically still a child, DOES NOT mean there is much a parent can do beyond educating themselves on the nuances of psychopharmacology. no matter how much unconditional love or how intense the desire to help is, a parent simply cannot inhabit their child's mind and truly grasp what they are experiencing internally...

it is an entirely different world, a completely different universe altogether...

p.s. for your own peace of mind and for your child's sake, please seek out a second opinion from another psychiatrist. do this not just for the diagnosis itself or what ends up on the medical record, but to evaluate their approach, their choice of medication, how they communicate these things to you, and—most importantly—how your child reacts to them.

social isolation and disrupted sleep patterns COULD just be typical adolescent growing pains, but they could also be the onset of a serious psychotic disorder. you should weigh those possibilities just as heavily as his emotional detachment and his lack of insight into his own condition.
Uninhabited islands!? in Close to Politics ·
ruggeddriver2 said:On my island, the average age has hit 70. Honestly, it’s a disaster. It feels like the absolute last chance for our brilliant politicians to finally wake up and actually do something meaningful to encourage people to move back to these deserted islands.
Open

It mostly plays out that way, unfortunately, and I’m becoming increasingly convinced that it isn't just some coincidence. Our islands have been passed down through us since prehistoric times.🙄😁They have been steadily declining over the last century, and that rate of disappearance has only accelerated during the past fifty years or so.

It’s a recurring pattern, really. If you look at a place like Manhattan, what happened after that bridge was built is nothing short of a tragedy, no matter how harsh that might sound. Sure, the connection made life much easier for the locals on paper, but the reality was a wave of concrete sprawl, rampant overdevelopment, and pure greed. You saw all that looting and corruption during the nineties, and even before that, they tore apart the local industry back in the old days of the socialist era, followed by those massive waves of migration from all over the former America.

There are still a few places out there—places like Maui, Oahu, or maybe even parts of the Florida Keys—that truly feel alive and vibrant, but honestly, most of the rest is just a heartbreaking sight to see. You can actually feel the decline happening; it’s palpable, and there are plenty of examples of towns that are effectively on life support, just slowly fading away right before your eyes. 👎
Carl Hill6 said:Fido and his entire crew can go jump in a lake. Right now, Fido alone is running four different active clone accounts
and I won't even get started on Rebekah.


I'm a writer🙏 🙏 🙏 😁 and that’s more than enough for me🤣
granitepilot282 said:I’m thinking about all those losers who couldn't hold their own in a real, logical debate against Jalnuški. They couldn't stand him, and now they're practically dancing in the streets because he's gone.
To act all high and mighty on this Forum and celebrate just because one actually decent contributor left? That’s nothing more than being a complete moral coward.

🤣 wait, what???????

It seems everyone here is reaching their breaking point,
either the Forum has lost its unique charm entirely, or you all have collectively decided to take things far too seriously. Normally, you wouldn't hear language like that used in the General Discussion section, but here we are.

I’m certainly not gloating; I’m just poking a little fun at you all since nobody seems interested in a boycott anyway. 😬 😁

Maybe while I'm at it, I can finally figure out which one of you is actually just a clone of someone else.🤣
Bradley Nelson2 said:I'm Nina 55555 😛

Don't try to play games with me,😁 you clearly weren't paying attention to how things were unfolding, nor did you really grasp what was going on with the writer1989 situation, and honestly, you missed the window for the boycott entirely. If it makes you feel any better, back when there was that massive strike against Obelix, I didn't even show up until midday on the second day, 🤣 which is exactly when those hardliners on the right cornered me (using some pretty pointed language 🙄 such as what on earth are you doing here?) to tell me I needed to get moving and actually join the picket line. 😁

The takeaway is this: I managed to make up for lost time, 😬 so there is absolutely no reason for you to worry.
Joseph Doyle16 said:Do you know where the term "tough guys" comes from?😁

Dealing with hard water can be such a persistent headache when you aren't using additives like Calgon or similar water softeners to help manage the mineral buildup.🤣
So, people are complaining, they're dissatisfied, and they feel like they're being persecuted by the moderator. They're confused about his age and his identity because he’s never posted under this specific handle🤣 on Reddit before. Did he go out for a few beers? No? Well, then this guy is somehow hypnotically transforming the posts on the board, fixing typos, shortening messages—it's almost as if he possesses a sheer force of will😁

Honestly, a handful of those loudmouths among the boycotters should have been disciplined a long time ago, and now their spoiled behavior is finally catching up with them. Then you have some of those "refined" so-called conservatives who, with their polite vocabulary and quiet demeanor, pen the most outrageous, professional-grade fascist tracts—stuff those loudmouths aren't even capable of, let alone willing to attempt

It seems everyone has an issue with writer1989🤣.

Just take a moment to look closely at these tough guys and how determined they are to fight against injustice, persecution, and censorship—but only when it suits them🙏.

Have they really abandoned us?

An associate of A. Pavelić from the overseas community—Mr. Vjeko Servatzy—is still standing with us, because we know our own Torquemad is always watching from the shadows, tending to the wounds left by the moderation team's heavy hand🙄

Metallica is (obviously) some legendary, high-profile veteran from the diaspora whose eardrums would probably turn into rusted scrap metal if he didn't post something on the board every once in a while.

As for c-respond, that's just one of them pretending to be a woman😁—personally, I find it quite charming that these undercover conservatives nurture such feminist tendencies within their gentle souls👍

Public Enemy and More Sea are also clearly cloned handles... and don't even get me started on Coyote and Apollo

But tell me, does anyone actually know who nina5555 is?😁 😕

And is this whole boycott actually happening, or is it just a complete farce?
Brenda Carter96 said:Maybe try reading more carefully next time.

Fair enough.😉

You were actually referring to a different example earlier on. I apologize if my previous point seemed rushed, but the core of what I was saying—in a general sense—remains valid.
Brenda Carter96 said:Sometimes you just have to commit fully to a confrontation and, in the end, resort to physical force, bed restraints, and all sorts of unpleasant, heavy-handed measures. You need to have the courage to be cruel sometimes. Yes.
.

I’m sorry, but what kind of "courage" are we talking about here? You can't just use force on anyone; neither the police nor emergency services will step in unless there is an immediate danger to that individual or a threat they pose to others. Period.

It is especially problematic when someone is currently in that withdrawn, lethargic phase. What exactly would you do? Tie them up while they're in that state and haul them off to St. John? It doesn't make sense.😁

Perhaps it would be more effective to guide them toward voluntary consent by explaining that their medication needs adjustment—which is clearly necessary—provided it comes from someone they actually trust. They could talk about adjusting a dosage or something similar, rather than just forcing chemicals into them until they become a complete zombie.

There should be no violence, and this idea of working "behind the scenes" collaborating with the psychiatrist, well, I have to wonder if that psychiatrist is treating the parents or the patient, considering they haven't even seen the patient in years!?!?

Good grief...
Is it true that on this subforum...? in Close to Politics ·
Chloe Garcia98 said:To is actually me, Vesna Pusić 😁

well, I am Ruza Tomasich😬
Best history textbooks covering the 90s? in Close to Politics ·
nimblewalker58 said:Do you happen to have the textbook handy?

The whole thing I’m trying to wrap my head around is this—I actually finished my history degree back in '82, and if I recall correctly, our final presentation was centered entirely on the Non-Aligned Movement 😁

I think I might pick up that book by this specific author; it’s been all over the news lately, so maybe I’ll just transcribe a few key passages from it.

By the way, I’m still so incredibly grateful that you were the one to recite those seven secretaries from the Skopje summit—honestly, why on earth do I still remember such trivial nonsense?🙈
I even know exactly what the Eighth Offensive refers to, though I really wasn't about to volunteer that information. 😁


wtf?😕 🤣

you're welcome / no problem, anyway😁
Best history textbooks covering the 90s? in Close to Politics ·
shadowtiger said:There’s this constant chatter about how history textbooks from the '90s supposedly glorified Nazi Germany—claiming they painted the Nationalists as the "good guys" and the Partisans as the villains. Is there any actual truth to that, or is it just more old-school propaganda left over from the American era? I’ve still got my old history books lying around here, and honestly, I don't see any of that nonsense; I’m certain it wasn't in the curriculum back when I was in 8th grade in 1994. So, I'm curious to hear from anyone who actually went through school after '94. What was the reality of what was being taught?

I’ll take the risk of giving you a serious response here,

but I have to ask first—where on earth did you get such a nonsensical idea?

The reality is actually quite the opposite: due to a variety of circumstances, those collaborators were depicted as the villains, while the resistance fighters were often presented as somewhat ambiguous, or even implicitly bad.

And if you ask me, attempting such a "historical revision" is nothing short of twisted and malicious.

👋
Happy April 10th!! in Close to Politics ·
Carl Hill6 said:It is easy to talk trash behind a screen.
You wouldn't say that to someone's face.

there are plenty who would

a lot of them - are🙂