darkotter35 said:The whole topic is interesting because it’s just a mess of conflicting opinions and noise.
🤣 this is just pro-Kremlin rambling designed to stir up panic. Fall is already here, and all those doomsday predictions turned out to be nothing more than the fever dreams of some guy obsessed with Putin.
Raymond Wood77 said:It’s an okay movie, but technically it’s a disaster. The artificial gravity concept is cool, but that's just not how physics works in space.
How do you just forget about having a technician on board the rocket?
From a technical standpoint, the movie is just one massive plot hole after another. It doesn't hold up to reality, not even by movie standards. That alone ruined it for me. Even if you ignore the science, it’s boring, hollow, predictable, and completely lacks imagination.
Just watched this. It’s actually pretty solid for what it is. It deals with school shootings—kids driven by motives that feel uncomfortably close to real-life tragedies attacking their own campus.
The only recognizable face for me was Thomas Jane. I still remember him from his lead role in The Mist.
17-year-old Zoe Hull uses her wits, survival skills, and compassion to fight for her life, and those of her fellow classmates, against a group of live-streaming school shooters.
Cut the nonsense. This forum exists for exchanging ideas, perspectives, and actual discussion. If you start censoring individual opinions, you’ve got a problem. But I see censorship is your favorite pastime. Let’s not forget how things went down during the corona era on those political PDFs, where anyone daring to suggest it wasn't just a common flu got banned immediately. It was pathetic. The way this moderator is acting is a clear sign they aren't capable of being an objective moderator here. Why didn't you just frame it like this: "Imagine being such a loser that you feel the need to trash the president of a country you don't even live in on some random internet forum." But of course, that wouldn't occur to you. Must be a pretty great life when you have that kind of urge on a message board. And when, as a moderator, you feel the need to censor opinions and facts regarding a foreign leader, that's clearly the pinnacle of human existence. Logic was never the strong suit of regressive mindsets, which is why free speech is such a massive issue and censorship remains their go-to tool. 😵
This isn't a space for political bickering. What we’re seeing here is blatant political censorship on the corona subforum. In the threads about corona in the USA, you see endless political posts attacking Trump that stay up without being flagged or removed. But the second someone hits back at that propaganda with actual facts, those comments get wiped from the PDF via partial bans—which is exactly what happened to me, unfairly. I wasn't insulting anyone, trolling, or doing anything of the sort. They let some people slide while silencing others. It's pathetic to see regressive political factions weaponizing even this small bit of digital power to stifle free speech. It's an embarrassment to the individuals involved and to this forum as a whole.
Hey, The spread of political propaganda on this PDF happened exactly how I called it. Using the topic of the US during the pandemic as a weapon to attack the current administration and President Trump is blatant political maneuvering. Whenever actual facts and answers are presented, it just leads to retaliation and partial bans. It’s nothing new on this forum; this tactic has been used forever. But it’s pathetic coming from the people running this place. It’s a disgrace to exploit a pandemic for political agendas and censor any dissenting views. I was only offering a different perspective; I wasn't attacking anyone personally. Meanwhile, lying to shut down common sense happens constantly here. Facts are the enemy of propaganda, and that's why I got kicked off. It's a shame to see so much hatred driving things.
Maybe it’s because if you aren't overindulging in greasy, sugary, processed junk, smoking, or drinking too much, you might actually survive long enough to see next week. There isn't much logic to dispute here. The only thing that doesn't make sense is the constant moralizing—people trying to lecture others by making these ridiculous connections between virus potential and lifestyle choices.
Karen Sanchez19 said:Hmm, I remember just once when I was a kid, they used to try and break my fever by pressing cold sheets against me. Back then, I ran a fever for five straight days. Later on, I never bothered taking Advil during the flu. Usually, the fever lasts maybe one or two nights at most, and even then, it’s only after a massive spike—like hitting 103 degrees Fahrenheit. By the next day, it's gone. Isn't it actually an established fact that for healthy people, you shouldn't be suppressing a fever unless it hits 104°F? (Or maybe 103°F?) Isn't that how you trigger a more aggressive immune response?
A fever is just the immune system doing its job. People try to kill a fever for three reasons: they're soft, they want to go to work and infect everyone else, or they simply aren't educated.
Fair enough, but I just don't see the lead actress in this kind of role. She’s a decent actress, she just doesn't fit the part. If you aren't expecting anything groundbreaking from a standard action flick, you'll probably be fine with it.
hiddenowl20 said:8. Once the dust settled, I got the feeling the writer and director weren't actually trying to tell a story about a mother seeking revenge against a cartel. Instead, the subtext seems to be more about the American attitude toward Latinos living in the States and those migrating to the US in search of a better life.
Michael Morgan said:Honestly, I thought the movie was pretty solid and actually a blast to watch. If we’re being totally real here, Hardy basically carried about 80% of the whole thing on his back. That elevator scene? Man, that was easily the highlight for me. 😂
Hardy is solid 👍
The movie was alright for me—just your typical mindless action flick, which is what I expected. A few good moments here and there...
I’m sick of every single movie feeling like a desperate attempt to prove how much Chinese money has bought up Hollywood. 🙄 Just another title in a long line of films doing the exact same thing. Hollywood is circling the drain. 1... 2... 3... 👎
boldfox26 said:Give me a definition for a lucky punch...
Is Volkov just swinging at air? Was Mirko Randleman's hit a lucky punch?
What about Jones's kick against DC?
Explain these "lucky punches" to me...
It’s when you've spent the whole fight getting outclassed, thinking the decision is basically a done deal, and then you land one fluke shot that somehow knocks the other guy down or finishes him. Just watch the Francis Ngannou vs. Volkov fight. You'll get the definition of a lucky punch pretty quickly.