CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Chris Peterson53 › Posts

Posts by Chris Peterson53

167 posts shown.

I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Roger Evans said:I think you've said your piece, and that's really the only way forward for you.
When you post a thread like this on a forum, you should expect people to give you their honest thoughts—and yeah, you probably won't like some of them. I don't see why anyone should be ashamed or hide anything.

Don't get mad, but it's hard to expect the majority to back you up given the situation. That's not about being closed-minded or stupid; it's just common sense and logic. And it's not personal—nobody knows you here, so people are just reacting to what you wrote. A kid can't have a mother who's using, no matter how well she manages her daily responsibilities. Those are just facts.

Anyhow, it's a huge deal that you're actually aware you have a problem and are trying to fix it.
From the bottom of my heart, I hope you do what's best for you and your little angel!!😘
GOOD LUCK!!🙂

Exactly!
As for everything else that triggered these reactions—just thank the hypocrite who took your sincere plea for help and used it as a platform to spout his twisted views!
He even has the nerve to throw Christ's teachings into his own nonsense!
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Noah Sanchez7 said:We have finally reached the heart of the matter >> creating and shaping a society >> so that a child isn't ashamed of having a parent with an addiction, and an addict isn't ashamed of their struggle, just as a person in a wheelchair shouldn't be ashamed of their physical disability..

Now, does anyone have the guts and integrity to argue that such a hypothetical, less intolerant society wouldn't be better than the one we live in today?

Am I hearing you right, "violent" and unadjusted with a disgusting persona..?

Everything you're talking about is purely theoretical!
And let's be clear: society is shaped by the majority, not some fringe group!
Plus, this tiny minority you claim to represent? They have a choice!

If you want honest answers, then the questioner needs to act with honor, whether they have any sense left or not!
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Noah Sanchez7 said:When are you guys finally going to... Do you see what I mean? 😠 😠 😠
I'll be driven by my cravings for drugs, while you all chase a new Mercedes-Benz or a massive plasma CNN.

What's the damn difference?

🙏 🙏 🙏
Enjoy your little journey......🤣
The real difference—the one you seem to miss—is that I’m actually going to enjoy my Mercedes-Benz and my big-screen CNN in peace and good health, while you'll already be six feet under!

Goodbye, and just get lost already!
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
up99;9113560 said:
Chris Peterson53 said:You’re a complete moron—clueless and thick-headed—thinking you can take out a loan just to kickstart some "entrepreneurial venture."
And then what? You plan on using the profits from that business to pay back the debt while spending the rest on stuff to shove up your vein ten times a day?

Listen, you idiot, blinded by stereotypes and prejudices: life isn't nearly as simple as you think it is.

Maybe try visiting a local pub instead...

🤣 🤣
Wow, genius, someone's got some frayed nerves! And in the meantime, you went out and grabbed some stuff, so now you've got holes burned into your brain? Is that what this is—some sort of "enlightenment" or higher consciousness? Because from where I'm sitting, it looks like the raw primitivism of your actual personality is just leaking through!

Here is the text from your post 91114:
I'm heading down to the bank to grab a loan—I've got my eye on some good stuff!

Go see an ophthalmologist, because my avatar clearly shows a noble mare...😁
As far as calling people idiots or whatever other names you want to throw around goes... I always go by the old American rule:
It doesn't matter what is being said, it matters WHO is saying it!
Check out this new terminology for drug dealing: Entrepreneurship!🤣
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Steven Lopez19;9111975 said:What now? Left you speechless...?????[/QUOT

Oh, Steven Lopez19—did you seriously miss the point? He went straight to the bank to secure his funds (he even made sure we all knew he’s financially independent, didn't he?) just so I'd understand exactly who holds the cash and how it was earned. He needs silence so he can focus on paying back his loans, but apparently, that's my fault—because the people on this forum just "don't get him." According to him, we're all just small-minded, unrefined, uneducated trolls. Typical.
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Noah Sanchez7 said:Not the first one. Definitely the second...

When I wrote that, I wasn't talking specifically to you.
I was referring to the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture them.
There are vaccines out there for almost everything, including HIV and various cancers.
But no matter how much they charge for a vaccine, the profit margin won't match what they make once a patient gets sick.
Because, as we both know, a vaccine provides long-term protection.

By the way, have you heard of the Zodiac medication?
It's a drug that makes you quit smoking effortlessly. My mom is a perfect example.
I couldn't believe my eyes when she finally quit.
That medication is overpriced here, but in the US, it's practically free.
Basically, you just have to want it.

If there's really a fight against addiction, why isn't that vaccine provided for free? Even if it's a once-a-year thing?
Then addicts wouldn't have any excuses left.

If you're going to argue about costs, then why shouldn't the government step up? Why should the state suffer because of junkies? The government wouldn't be "suffering"—on the contrary, they'd be rehabilitating people to become productive workers, which means less crime, less theft, and less of everything else. Right?

Personal choice
freedom of decision
You throw these lofty terms around, and then suddenly, you're arguing that society should hand out free vaccines to strip away your precious "personal choice." Hypocrite!

The only vaccine society should be distributing for free as a preventative measure is:
a vaccine against people like you!


Not every addict—no, just hypocrites exactly like you! You who dare to lecture an addict—someone who understands their fate and their children's future—by suggesting, with total cynicism, that their mother should take the hit instead: "Let her be tested, since addicts clearly know best!"
You want to wrap yourself in the cloak of Robin Hood, playing the hero for "rights" that essentially advise people to stay addicted just so they can feel "enlightened" (evolved, right?)—but in reality, you're just a common social parasite trying to pass off your parasitic existence as some superior art form of living!
I'm about to relapse, please help! in Psychology ·
Noah Sanchez7 said:@Ciara, if you felt targeted or anything like that, then you really don't get where I'm coming from.

My whole point isn't that I have an issue with people taking anxiolytics, antidepressants, xanax, or whatever else—but I also don't have an issue with someone using heroin. My main point is specifically that those who rely on prescription meds shouldn't be judging addicts, because at the end of the day, they're both just dealing with dependency.

Furthermore, I want to prove that a person has the right to be vulnerable, the right to try to help themselves, and the right to do so on their own terms without needing a doctor's permission.

I also want to show that for some people, addiction is a life path they've chosen, not just some tragic mistake. You don't have to respect that choice, but you shouldn't judge it either.
Someone choosing the "path of least resistance" might be viewed as "lesser" on some moral hierarchy compared to someone taking the "hard road"—which we could call the righteous path—but that doesn't give anyone the right to condemn or cast them aside. We aren't living in the Middle Ages,
or in a society based on slavery.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here’s a simple example: Did you know that under certain laws here in the US, you can actually face up to a year in prison just for growing a single plant in your garden? One single plant!!
Now I ask you, how does that hold up against common sense?
Who actually has the authority to arrest me just because I'm growing a plant in my backyard, even if I plan to smoke it later?

Oh, you are: you're owned by the drug!
Your posts are nothing more than the glorification of your own choices—namely, drugs!
Look, I'll give you credit for choosing to live that way, but only as long as you aren't hurting anyone else! And you *are* causing harm, simply through these destructive posts of yours.
But the author's child didn't get a choice in the matter!
Your little philosophy regarding free will doesn't apply here.
Every single person—whether it's a government agency or an individual—has a right to protect that child!
And for the mother, that protection is her absolute priority!
The facts presented in these threads (and I mean that with respect to the authors) are things a mother needs to sit with and reflect on. They carry extra weight because they're coming from addicts themselves.
As someone who is sober, these posts have opened up entirely new perspectives for me...
And as a mother, my heart goes out to the author; I truly hope she finds the strength to pull through!
Parents sacrifice all sorts of things for the sake of their children. Especially mothers, because
giving birth is the easy part—the hardest thing is carrying the weight of responsibility for a child who never asked to be brought into this world!
Regardless of how much of a hellish nightmare detoxing is, I believe love and responsibility for a child should always win out!
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
Taylor Campbell4 said:Quincy Jones:
Everyone judges based on their own perspective—you’re no exception here. No one can truly assess a situation without bias unless they've actually lived through it themselves. That’s why both your arguments and mine carry the same level of subjectivity.
I wasn't unaware; I just expressed my thoughts more clearly back then.
And I don't think our biases are equal, mainly because I've provided actual arguments while you're relying entirely on your own hypotheses. For instance, I mentioned a specific woman, and I even have a friend whose father was involved in an incident over in Warsaw—it's the same principle.
There are plenty of counterarguments that completely debunk your logic, especially since you're implying you know exactly what a deceased person would think about this issue just to fuel a sense of vengeance—all to justify your own retaliatory mindset and lack of understanding.

(I apologize if I'm not being diplomatic enough to lead you to the conclusion yourself—perhaps if I let us arrive at the realization together, we might actually get somewhere, rather than you just digging your heels in like this.)

Quincy Jones:
We aren't discussing the innocent here!
Since the legal system isn't perfect in any country, we technically couldn't debate the death penalty at all, right? We could never be 100% certain that someone wouldn't be wrongfully convicted. So, do we just ignore the risk entirely?

PS: If you're actually advocating for someone to be eliminated, then you're essentially calling for a death. It's better to just admit that instead of trying to hide behind wordplay.

PPS: Go back and read the PS in my previous post.

I'm done bickering with you—it’s a waste of breath since nothing productive comes of it. Your claims are completely nonsensical, and you have a knack for twisting them to favor the wrongly accused. However, I will address your bolded point:
We can be certain (often, if not always) when a maniac PERSONALLY CONFESSES TO THEIR CRIMES AND ACTUALLY TAKES PRIDE IN THEM!

Later! 🤣
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
Taylor Campbell4 said:I honestly don't see how this discussion holds any water when we're just basing everything on our own hypothetical reactions to imaginary scenarios.

BTW, I’m actually in the middle of translating a book right now about this young woman whose entire family—three brothers, her father, and her mother—was wiped out during a genocide. She loved them more than anything, yet she managed to completely forgive every single one of the killers. And here you are, preaching about how anyone who wishes death upon others will be punished by Bog! What happens if someone wishes death upon an innocent person who was wrongly accused? Given the statistics, those cases happen more often than you'd think. Thoughts have consequences too, not just actions—and thoughts are, well, events in their own right; they have an impact. Even physics suggests through various experiments that our thoughts can influence matter...

PS: And Bog, naturally, doesn't punish anyone. 🙂

Everyone draws conclusions based on their own perspective—you aren't some special exception here! No one can judge without bias unless they've actually lived through a similar situation. That's why your arguments and mine are equally biased. But hey, I get to keep my opinion, and you get to keep yours! If we're going to nitpick every little detail, neither of us is going to be "right."
The point here isn't that we were discussing the innocent!
We were talking about criminals!
And far too often, people act as devil's advocates until those very criminals are declared innocent!
Personally, I don't wish death on anyone, but I firmly believe that: everyone has a right to life! Those who usurp that right—repeatedly—should be eliminated.

PS
And stop making threats in the name of God!
Who HE chooses to punish is known only to HIM!
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
Taylor Campbell4 said:
If their victims actually had a voice in all this, they’d be saying the exact same thing.

That just isn't true.

edit: It would only be true if we didn't have things like love, empathy, and forgiveness—if we weren't human to begin with.

edit2: Killers are often deeply disturbed, unbalanced, and sick people—and sick people need treatment, not execution.

🤣
Oh, please. How could you say that? A young woman, brutally murdered, violated, her life stolen against her will—do you honestly think she'd say, "I love you because you inflicted such unspeakable agony upon me," or "Thank you for taking away the future I actually wanted"?
Get your head out of the clouds! Even Bog punished those who were beyond saving (think Sodom and Gomorrah). He didn't label them "sick" and send them to therapy. And the story of Lot proves there was a foundation for forgiveness, but it had limits.

God forbid, but what if it were your own child? What if they were tortured and killed by some irredeemable, incurable maniac—someone you knew could destroy even more children tomorrow if left free? Would you really give that monster a brotherly kiss and wish him well?
I suspect you'd have a very different opinion then!
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
Austin Roberts8 said:Fine, I’ll play your game. If you want to answer my points with nothing but a bunch of circular, useless questions, let's go. What exactly is "justice" to you? Who gets to decide? Who’s sitting in judgment? Is that judge actually fair or objective? And what’s the point of punishment anyway—is it about retribution, rehabilitation, or just a way to scare others into staying in line?
You completely missed the point of the example I gave. If the death penalty were an actual institutional reality, there would be some kind of psychological deterrent in place for everyone—including the occasional psycho. You’re obsessing over the actions of one psycho as if we have fifty of them running around every single day committing mass murders together. That’s a terrible argument because you're generalizing based on an event that happens once in a blue moon.
I’ve said it five thousand times already: you CANNOT punish him. The scale of his crimes is simply beyond the scope of any legal punishment. His death isn't a sentence; it's just removing a sick individual from the face of the earth.
I’m not even going to touch that last part because you clearly read it in some sociology textbook that sounds great on paper but fails miserably in the real world. And describing revenge as this infinite cycle is just pure stupidity. If you kill my sister, I kill you, and that’s that—it’s over.
As for your first question, the answer is that it depends. Depending on how massive the crime was, it could be all three of those things or just one. It all comes down to the scale of what they did.

🙏 Exactly!
Irredeemable, incurable killers
need to be wiped off the face of the earth!
If their victims had the chance to speak, they’d say the exact same thing!
We are fighting for the right to life of the people who will become victims tomorrow!
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
Robin Torres2 said:Just try putting yourself in those shoes for a second. Imagine having a noose around your neck with maybe two minutes left to live... Does it really not bother you?

How incredibly enlightening!🤣
Now why don't you put yourself in the shoes of someone being butchered to death by that very same violent maniac?
Just imagine—two minutes before your final breath hits.

Does that still seem inconsequential to you?
To be or not to be... a father? in Philosophy ·
Quote:

Dracula says:


What is this even supposed to mean?
Are you saying your life as it stands right now lacks purpose—and that you want to find that purpose by having kids?
Don't let the tone of my previous post mislead you; obviously, anyone who wants children needs to dedicate actual time and attention to them. But I just don't get why someone would want this in the first place—simply because it wouldn't be a bad idea?

I wasn't trying to force this question on you, so I apologize if it came off that way...
Then again, you can't really answer the question anyway since you aren't a woman.
And this idea that you can't find righteous, honest, and modest women? That's a total delusion.
They are absolutely out there.
You just have to be persistent and actually look for them.
Hell, you can even find them right here on this forum.

P.S. Please don't address me so formally—I'm just some 24-year-old kid.🙂[/COLOR]

Wow,🙏
is that actually you, Dracula?
So, do you have any recommendations for a certain "fine specimen" (oops, sorry, I'm picking up your style...)
of a righteous, honest, and modest woman?

And would finding such a woman actually be enough motivation—or even a valid excuse—to become a father?
To be or not to be... a father? in Philosophy ·
William Gonzalez3 said:I suppose there might be a reason to become a father—just so you have the chance to one day be a grandfather...

How true is that!😁

Especially if a man actually aims to become a great-grandfather...

You really ought to become a father while you're still young
say, by age 23 at the latest...😍
By God, if someone in this entire county decides to haul that car away without even needing the keys—and let's be honest, given the ownership situation, it wouldn't even be a crime!
What kind of nonsense is this?

I’m starting to think this usurper realizes exactly who she's dealing with!
If my memory serves me right from that other thread, isn't she the same one praying she doesn't get kicked out of the apartment her in-laws actually own?
Dealing with low self-esteem in Psychology ·
quietranger14...
It’s a lifelong process—maybe even until the day we die—trying to peel back the layers. Sometimes, out of pure fear, I think we’ve finally unmasked the exact same toxic patterns in ourselves that we see in our abusers.
I actually caught myself in the middle of
a completely unchecked, white-hot rage,
where I ended up pummeling my boyfriend because he grabbed my breasts and squeezed them hard enough to cause real pain...
I literally snapped an umbrella over him.
Honestly, if the police hadn't shown up right then, I don't know what would have happened...
I was fully capable of killing him...
Thankfully, I didn't face any legal repercussions—there were witnesses who saw him verbally and physically attacking me first...

I was truly capable of killing him
That realization terrified me—it forced me into some serious self-analysis...
I need to learn how to keep that kind of fury far away from my soul...
To never let myself slip into that state of mind again...
Whether it's "justified" anger or the kind of senseless rage I saw in my father...

Self-observation, learning, analyzing, and recognizing the signs before they escalate—that is the entire foundation.
And I think you're actually quite good at spotting those patterns....
Dealing with low self-esteem in Psychology ·
brighteagle39 said:Self-respect and self-confidence are two things that are deeply intertwined. I'm struggling to understand how one could be missing while the other remains intact. Usually, they move in tandem; once you build a healthy sense of self-respect, you naturally become a confident person. Conversely, where self-respect is lacking, confidence tends to vanish as well, and if someone does possess confidence without that underlying respect, it usually isn't built on very solid ground.

I couldn't disagree more.

It looks like I am one of the few here—perhaps the most isolated by time and experience—who was a victim
of an abusive father (everything except sexual abuse).
All the advice and explanations offered by those who share similar views are utterly worthless unless they have lived through it themselves.
There is no magic recipe, no "smart" advice; every victim is unique in their own way, just as every instance of abuse carries its own specific nuances.
And every single survivor must find their own personal path out of the abyss of low self-esteem and lack of confidence!

I’m going to share a piece of my own story here; perhaps it might offer some direction or at least provoke some thought for other victims.
My father hated me from the moment I was born simply because I wasn't a son.
He was a primitive, uneducated brute who solved everything with profanity and physical violence.
My mother was weak—completely incapable of standing up to him.
From the age of six, I began to feel this intense rage, defiance, and hatred toward my father,
and there was absolutely no one there to guide me or explain things properly.
To me, my parent became a forbidden subject.
I used to read books in secret so he wouldn't catch me, often borrowing them from relatives.
By the time I was ten, I realized my only way out as a girl was education and escape!
Of course, if it weren't for the law, he wouldn't have even sent me to elementary school.
He would burden me with heavy manual labor just so I wouldn't have time to study—because in his eyes, only "trash" goes to school. To him, women were only meant for domestic chores and sex. He believed women and horses both needed to be beaten to be useful, and so on. Despite all that, I was an excellent student.
My mother's only support was: "He's your father, you just have to endure it!"
The support from my educated relatives? "Just get a job somewhere. Why bother with school?"
I started hating them all, because books taught me that life doesn't have to be this way.
That hatred became my engine;
it gave me confidence, but certainly not self-respect.
I saw myself as ugly, worthless, finding a thousand different flaws in my reflection...
but that rage and defiance kept pushing me forward...
At 15, I fled the hellscape that was my childhood home.
I went out on my own, sought social services to help with my schooling, and worked every job I could find...
I managed to finish my education, but it wasn't until my thirties that I truly learned how to value myself.
I finally let go of the hatred.
But the scars remain; there is no way to erase them. You can only learn to dull the edge.
I never forgive betrayal.
That cost me my marriage.
But I have never—never—raised a hand against my children or belittled them.
On the contrary, whenever I saw them struggling, I made sure to build up their confidence and
their self-esteem. I teach them that within every mistake, there is a path to doing better and being better.
Yet, even now, though both of my parents are dead,
there are still shadows from my childhood that strike like venomous snakes, catching me off guard. I can still hear that abused child crying, waiting for someone to come to her aid!

And I will not back down from my opinion: all child abusers should lose their heads!
To be or not to be... a father? in Philosophy ·
[QUOTE=adriatic;

It’s pretty obvious you aren't satisfied with the answers you've received...
but if you ask me—nobody can give you a straight answer to a question framed like that...

I mean, why would a man want to be a father? At the end of the day,
any guy is only going to provide an answer that makes sense to him personally...
and frankly, his reasoning doesn't have to be "acceptable" or even make sense to another man.
To be or not to be... a father? in Philosophy ·
Raymond Taylor7 said:I’m honestly not even sure if this thread is strictly meant for guys' opinions,

but let's be real, we see these kinds of discussions all over the internet and they always spiral into the exact same thing—people who don't want kids judging those who do by calling them shallow or saying they're just slaves to their biological urges

I guess I find that whole mindset pretty discriminatory and frankly just arrogant, because the people choosing not to have children obviously can't possibly know what it feels like to actually want them

It’s like everyone has suddenly become some kind of enlightened genius overnight, acting like wanting a family is somehow low-class or beneath them

👎

There are so many threads like this that they could all be condensed into one single question: to be a parent or not to be.

Those who judge others simply because they choose to be fathers—
I consider them completely unprepared for the realities of life, and frankly, selfishness is their defining trait.
If they hold these convictions, then by all means, they should go reject their own fathers—the very people who brought them into this world—
especially if that man was an irresponsible father who serves as their primary role model.

Calling parenthood "low" or "dirty" is nothing more than a hypocritical excuse—a convenient cover for pure selfishness and materialism. These are people incapable of sacrificing anything—anything at all—besides their own immediate comfort, just to give their lives some actual direction. And most often, their go-to justification is: "I can't afford to raise a child!"
But there is a certain poetic justice waiting for them: ending up alone in some lonely house,
where not even the neighbor's dog bothers to visit them during their lifetime or at the moment of their death—and that is precisely when the regret over not having children begins. And I'd bet 99% of them will feel it.
Regardless of what those children might have been like, the mere thought that they exist is the only comfort left.
Should we get rid of the "useless" ones? in Philosophy ·
Melissa Rivera5;
I was just thinking—given how many people die from injuries now said:


Look, if you want the best results, you need organs from young, healthy people—think accident victims or people who take their own lives without using toxic substances.
But if we actually followed your logic,
I can already see the movie playing out in my head...
It would basically turn into a free-for-all hunt for "ideal" donors...
You'd have SWAT teams tearing down the interstate in high-speed chases,
intentionally causing pileups... while somewhere overhead, a medical helicopter just hovers there, waiting for the dust to settle.
Is it a bit extreme? Sure. But hey, if someone provides even a half-baked excuse for it, people will jump at the chance to pull it off.