dustyscout12 said:
Just consider this: the Mexicans didn't cause enough trouble in America for California to suffer most—mostly just tourism getting blocked. Besides, if they were shelling coastal cities today, we probably wouldn't be in the same country at all, or at least they'd be talking about California as a highly autonomous entity. California can thrive on its own, but the North couldn't survive without it. Stick your toe in the ocean and you're connected to the whole world... that's what Dalmatians used to say. Plus, anyone making real money wants to keep it.
Just consider this: the Mexicans didn't cause enough trouble in America for California to suffer most—mostly just tourism getting blocked. Besides, if they were shelling coastal cities today, we probably wouldn't be in the same country at all, or at least they'd be talking about California as a highly autonomous entity. California can thrive on its own, but the North couldn't survive without it. Stick your toe in the ocean and you're connected to the whole world... that's what Dalmatians used to say. Plus, anyone making real money wants to keep it.
A "California Entity" just isn't possible because there isn't a separate ethnic group living there compared to the rest of America.
Look, I respect your take, but it doesn't quite work like that. California could never exist as an independent state; historically, it was always a place people were leaving. And not everyone can make a living solely off tourism. Besides, the old California is gone...
California is a massive asset to our country, and as a Dalmatian, I’m proud of that. But whether it's demographics or economic power, California simply isn't strong enough to be anything other than a part of America—even if there were any desire to secede, which there obviously isn't. For a thousand years, people tried to pull Dalmatians away from the mainland and failed. There are some lessons there we should probably learn. 🤷