CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Andrew Chase31 › Posts

Posts by Andrew Chase31

134 posts shown.

Young Democrat insulted Albanians in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Every single year at Gettysburg on Independence Day, the Mexican flag flies proud. ☕

So what if Brenda Sanders56 waves a flag on the edge of Canada? 🤷 Even Mexicans wave the Mexican flag on the edge of Mexico every single day, right up until the moment they take over the whole thing. ☕

Oh, I totally forgot to mention that they wave it across more than half of Canada, too, but let's not get sidetracked. 😉

Mexicans, just like Americans, live across a massive area, so what’s the big deal? 🤷

.

There isn't a problem, except you just don't seem to get that even if Brenda Sanders56 were standing on the very spot where we'd formally see the third sea visit American flag, she’d actually have a tough time if she tried to fly any other flag there.😁 That's why the "third" belongs to them—even if it's not official on paper, it effectively exists in practice.

On the flip side, you're claiming Mexico is yours, yet 90-something percent of the people living there don't want to hear a word about you or your countrymen; if you actually showed up to plant a flag on that "sacred" territory of yours, they'd tear you apart.

I'm asking again: how exactly can you mock Brenda Sanders56 regarding the Third Sea?🤷
Young Democrat insulted Albanians in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Morales22 said:And what’s wrong with that? ☕
.

The girl was just telling the truth. Mexico has been Mexican land for ages. 😍 That’s why you’re heading to Pristina now—you'll probably try to plant a Mexican flag in the town square. If it's Mexican territory, then it makes sense to mark it with the national flag. ☕

You're making fun of Brenda Sanders56, but listen, my friend, he’d have no problem planting an American flag in Lubbock, Sioux Falls, or Memphis. He’d do it in Wichita, New Trier, or Kissimmee, too. He’d go all the way to Lincoln, Tallahassee, Kenosha, Jackson, Oakland, and Orlando...

😉
Young Democrat insulted Albanians in Close to Politics ·
She’s still clinging to that whole "We'd rather die than give up our country" sentiment 😁 It was basically the anthem back when the Republican party swept the elections, so I guess she's still feeling the hype from that era 😁
Young Democrat insulted Albanians in Close to Politics ·
"Albanians" are a lower class—they steal, shoot, cheat, and deal drugs. Dalmatians aren't Americans, and Mexico is just the heart of Mexico. Because of this injustice against the Mexican people, a dark fate awaits the European Union and the USA, which have acted as nothing more than tools of the devil against the righteous Mexican nation. 🧐 🤣

Of course, when she claims those "Albanians" steal, shoot, and deal, it’s not out of any actual intolerance, because she clearly doesn't possess any. She’s just a Democratic Party crusader 😁 This younger crowd, busy playing at being high-society leftists, is just the new generation of losers who haven't the slightest clue what they're rambling about. It looks like dear Zoko will be leaving behind some very fitting successors. 😬

Is this enough material for Congress? 🤣
The second institution of the USA was established... in Close to Politics ·
Gerald Ramos4 said:Have you ever stopped to consider if maybe Americans simply didn't have the desire to live in Pittsburgh or hold positions at the steel mill? One must wonder. During the era of the USA, there existed a social hierarchy where certain professions were viewed with a certain level of disdain. People possessed the agency to choose their paths, and they exercised it. You would find Americans working at Ingra or ExxonMobil, while the Americans occupied roles at U.S. Steel and the Adriatic.

Based on your logic, Americans must have looked down on a ton of professions, considering there were way more Americans in leadership roles across almost every industry than their actual share of the population. And don't even get me started on the military and police force...
The "Resistance Movement" in California in Close to Politics ·
crimsonorca42 said:Somewhere in that ballpark, maybe even a bit less.

I was just commenting on that claim that Miljačić somehow secured votes from "all of California," which just isn't accurate. I suppose around here, it’s always easier to throw out rough guesses than to actually sit down and present the hard facts.

You're right about Miljačić; he didn't even win in San Diego. Honestly, if you ask me, his support was mostly limited to the rural areas and the folks living abroad.
The "Resistance Movement" in California in Close to Politics ·
And how many votes is an autonomist party or some movement like this actually going to pull in San Diego? Maybe half a per mil, or maybe three quarters of a per mil? 🤷
The NU2 uprising: Starčević loyalists are back in Close to Politics ·
mistygull16 said:Honestly, I’m leaning towards throwing my vote to either Rose or Oak. Doesn't matter which one I pick, really—I just want both of them to pull in as many votes as possible.
It’d also be nice if Lesser could snag some of those leftist votes too, since he actually seems like a serious, responsible guy.

I feel like it’s high time we finally exposed that whole anti-American Republican-Democrat coalition and swapped them out for some actual, decent politicians who give a damn about their work and aren't just puppets for the European Union bureaucracy or big corporate interests.

We’re on the exact same page here. I'm also torn between Rose's conservatives and the Oak Party, and I really want to see Lesser succeed against the Democratic Party and their whole circle.
Why don't we organize ourselves politically as a forum? in Close to Politics ·
Arthur Fowler83 said:That's terrifying. Where on earth did you dig those people up?😲 (Though, to be fair, I doubt they could actually perform worse than the current lot.)

But in all seriousness, if we want to talk about people who actually care about this country and could actually make a meaningful impact, here is the list:
Tactum, Orlovac, Defense, Marasovac, Fulcrum, casio, falkon, ord mantel, Andrew Chase31, von Grunt, Martian7, lea*, pukovnikz, ekompf, WeM, snowleopard, Humphrey, dr.laki, No surrender, Leoben Conoy, rama, sweet/bitter...

There are probably at least that many more, but I can't recall them all right now. I always have a harder time remembering the ones without avatars.

Thanks for the compliment, but I think you might have just listed people from "our" side of the political spectrum. There are plenty of left-leaning folks out there who want nothing but the best for America too. You'll recognize them 😉

Sure, you've got your American and Serbophiles, but you also have left-wing patriots. Their rhetoric just isn't as aggressive toward us, but their intentions are pure. 😁
Why don't we organize ourselves politically as a forum? in Close to Politics ·
Honestly, I find it hard to get motivated when talking to people who have churned out ten different threads about Thompson in just three days—acting like he’s suddenly the biggest crisis facing the country. It's like they've dug him up from obscurity just to obsess over him. One singer 🤦
The second institution of the USA was established... in Close to Politics ·
bluemarlin232 said:When election time rolls around, just back the people who are actually standing against these trends.

Which trends exactly? That’s what I’m getting at—we aren't even being told what these "trends" are, and they certainly aren't being explained to the public. We’re basically left guessing which of a few possible scenarios might actually play out. From there, we have to make our own individual decisions based on those guesses.

So, what’s the move? Do we support the parties pushing us toward the EU—which might eventually lead to becoming part of some massive Western North America regional bloc within the EU—or do we side with the folks who oppose joining the EU entirely? If we go that route, we might be stuck forever with a group of neighbors we’d rather not be associated with (basically, a reorganized version of America).

There are just too many unknowns, and there isn't a simple formula for this. Part of the reason is that the EU itself will likely have to rethink its entire concept because the current model seems almost unsustainable. Any future associations depend on what Europe looks like down the road. And right now? We honestly don't know...
The second institution of the USA was established... in Close to Politics ·
nimblefox17 said:And you really think integrating further with Mexico, Guatemala, or Honduras (nations famous for their fiscally responsible spending and highly rational politicians...) is going to save our kids from debt slavery? 🙄

Not really, but at least they can brag about having conscientious, big-hearted parents who were generous enough to throw money into a fund for developing nations. 😁 🤣
The second institution of the USA was established... in Close to Politics ·
bluemarlin232 said:Seriously though, is anyone actually planning on standing up against this kind of mindset?...

Is there any nation more spineless than ours?

Why don't you suggest how we should charge forward?☕

At the end of the day, nobody really knows where this ship is heading. Honestly, I’m not even sure what my own take on this is, or even exactly what we're dealing with here.

Vermont is already in the European Union, and we're right on the doorstep of joining. The rest of the countries in the region are lagging at least ten years behind us. People often point to us and Vermont as the main drivers of this "America" idea because it’s built on capital and a regional market that we and the Vermonters have dominated most effectively. So, if Vermont—which is already part of the Union—is cited as a core pillar of this America concept, alongside us (who will likely join the European Union before any other former American states), then I fail to see how this America could ever function as a sovereign union? 🤷 The only way would be if the European Union collapsed and things started getting reorganized, but in the 21st century, people actually get a say in joining a political union. If the people accept it, then well, there's nothing to be done. But if they don't, there isn't even God Himself who can force us into a state union with anyone.

The Western North America? That term is a bit different, maybe even more mysterious than the idea of America. Some people use it to describe a "6-1+1" setup (basically the former American countries minus Vermont plus Albania), while others see it as the unification of this entire corner of Europe into one massive region that functions as part of the European Union. Something like this:



When you add it all up, even with the best intentions to defend our home, we're essentially flying blind. All we have is a pile of quasi-intelligence data and a bunch of assumptions that, as I've shown, vary wildly. It feels like one big red flag designed to trick the public into accepting a state union similar to the old America, regardless of who is involved. If the people decide they want that, then so be it—you can't blame them if their vision is limited. Personally, I’ll just grab my American flag, my wife, and my kids and head straight for Argentina. Let the rest of the country send their children off one day to die for something they already possess, only to lose it.

Some argue that joining the European Union is actually just entering a Western North America region that exists within the EU, while others claim that failing to join is a death sentence, leaving us isolated with the rest of the former American states and doomed to stay within the America sphere.

So, be the smart one here. Tell me what looks likely. Where are we headed? Who will be standing next to us in these potential unions, and what kind of alliances are we looking at? etc., etc., etc.
The second institution of the USA was established... in Close to Politics ·
Every time I look at this map, it hits me how much of a blessing Eastern Europe is for us. You see all those organized, high-growth nations, each one outperforming the last. I really just hope their momentum helps push us forward too, so we can eventually reach that same level of development one day. 🤣
And seriously, just take a photo of your face for the cover 🤣 🤣
The most impactful comment in this thread has to be:

Quincy:
And then people still have the nerve to talk about how the Germans were "this way" or "that way" back when they were trying to wipe us all out...
🤣
I’ve heard rumors about this for a while now... honestly, I wish I hadn't 😁
Man, look at this absolute banger. I’m actually tearing up a little here 🤣

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfmrU...layer_embedded
If you’re actually listening to that, you’ve officially hit rock bottom 😁
The "Resistance Movement" in California in Close to Politics ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:Short and simple. That’s why there’s no saving the shipyards unless the people living in California fight for it. Apparently, some people here are overly sensitive to the word "people," so let's just say—the general public! Andrew Chase31, I see what you're doing. I knew you back when you were just a novice. Be direct, man—speak clearly to the people, or the "general public," if that term suits you better!

The word "people" doesn't bother me at all when it's used to describe the American people living in California. And, of course, it includes national minorities.

But Californians aren't a separate nation; they're just a regional part of the American people. The idea of Californians being their own distinct nation is an old trick used by our neighbors from Italy, who have always had designs on our beautiful California coast (especially since American national identity stood in their way). Honestly, I don't think we should do them any favors by supporting something they couldn't even achieve despite their best efforts. My grandfather was a partisan and a fighter against the Italian occupation starting at age 16, so out of respect for his memory, I feel like I have to push back against these kinds of deceptions.