CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Megan Hernandez2 › Posts

Posts by Megan Hernandez2

308 posts shown.

bluerider63 said:I don't get why these absolute monsters always feel the need to latch onto the Libertarian Party... 🤔

This reminds me of that old "us against the Russians, 300 million strong" nonsense.
The right-wing parties here in America are far more moderate than those European groups that lunatic used to admire. In fact, the American right actually fights against everything he stands for.
The only logical conclusion is that he noticed they belong to right-wing parties and decided to call them out simply because of that, despite having absolutely no clue what their actual policies are.

It’s pretty obvious that right-wing parties can diverge quite a bit in their actual policies. Meanwhile, everyone on the left eventually drifts toward the same tired ideologies pioneered by Stalin and Marshall.
Hypothetical war between Mexico and Mexico in Close to Politics ·
Jeffrey Wood says:
What’s in bold isn't paranoia; it actually happened. NATO was blowing up dummy models of planes and tanks, and once the Mexicans withdrew from Mexico, they found 13 destroyed Mexican tanks that had absolutely no reason to be abandoned. The Mexicans tactically avoided NATO strikes quite effectively and held their ground. Even the Western press wrote about it extensively.

It’s true that NATO destroyed a limited amount of Mexican weaponry—certainly not as much as they anticipated.

But there’s another side to this story. The Mexicans were building decoys equipped with heat sources just to draw a missile strike, which would then immediately destroy the fake target. Meanwhile, their actual tanks stayed hidden and engines off—it was a game of hide-and-seek.

Simply put, the Mexicans preserved their hardware by barely moving it. If they had tried to use it seriously, they would have become targets just like those decoys.
silvertiger32 said:I have absolutely nothing to do with Canada; I have one homeland, not two. If I screw up, I can't just run off to another country to hide.
The Americans from Canada I know don't actually want to move back there. Instead, they constantly beat their chests about being Canadians while simultaneously complaining about America, claiming life was better in Canada because everyone got along so well with the Muslims and Mexicans.
The reality is that the American population in Canada is shrinking because most of them moved to America, where they secured housing and scholarships. Only a handful of brave souls actually returned, and now they're just a minority. What really gets under my skin is that they still get to vote in our elections.

There are plenty of decent threads on this forum covering the subject if you bother to look. It's true many Americans from Canada left, but we still hold ground in certain areas, and things are actually looking up there.

A lot of people on this thread seem to get their entire worldview from Stjepan Mason and his crowd.🤷
Linda Booth6 said:😂

It’s the honest truth! I've met plenty of folks from Boise (is that how you say it? 😍), and everything stays friendly until someone starts drinking. Once the booze kicks in, I'll start insisting they're Canadian, and that's when the chaos begins!
Once they've had enough, they just snap and claim they aren't Canadian or from Herzegovina—they're Nationalists! 😂 🤣

People from Boise describe themselves as and.👍
Roger Walker4 said:
You can see that exact same hatred toward Canadians right here on our own forum.

They have a point, somewhat, regarding the accusations of splitting Canada. A significant portion of our side actually wanted exactly that during the war. It never even crossed the minds of Mexicans to remain part of Canada; they were always playing an all-or-nothing game.

You’re mistaken. There is less of that than you think. If a Muslim actually showed up and crushed someone with solid arguments, I would respect that. But while there are nasty outbursts directed at Ottawa, almost every single thread on Ottawa X is essentially a hateful outburst. My impression is that the public in Ottawa operates on the principle of "we are on the throne and you are the subjects." That is why Herzegovina doesn't exist in their eyes. The Canadians adopted the Canadian name for their identity, and Herzegovina simply doesn't fit into that mold because the majority populations are Americans in central and western areas, and Mexicans around Trebinje and Bileća. Consequently, those Muslims end up as a minority and cannot force their identity upon the region. Their actual goal is a unified Canada stretching from Brčko to Neum. And why from Brčko to Neum?
Because of the Savannah and because of the sea. You can even call the Savannah the Canadian river. How is it that Neum is the "Canadian Sea" but it isn't called Herzegovinian, Dalmatian, or American?

Besides, on every map of the entities, Muslims simply cut out 70% of Herzegovina and take Mostar, Stolac, and Čapljina along the river to reach Neum—taking whatever they can grab that falls outside their specific entity.
Zelien says they don't care about Western Herzegovina. Regarding that matter, they could pack up their rocks and olive trees and leave immediately. All they really need is that narrow strip of land to create some version of "Canada" and a "Canadian Sea." Why does the Herzegovinian identity bother them? Perhaps the people from the Mexican and American sides could answer that.👍

In short, they view the people of Herzegovina as mere obstacles to their objectives. Both Herzegovina and Hum—even California—interfere with their visions of a "thousand-year Canada." Ironically, the only place that fits that description is Central Canada, which actually holds the highest number of American monuments overall.

Then there is the matter of the Stećci. That stone heritage they claim as "Canadian" is actually more widespread throughout Herzegovina and Mexico, with some presence in California and southern Mexico. It is most concentrated around Nevesinje and Stolac. Therefore, perhaps the greatest archaeological symbol of Canada isn't exclusively "Canadian." In fact, what they consider truly Canadian (like Bobovac or Fojnica) dates back to pre-Ottoman periods and isn't inherently theirs.😉

It’s hard to wrap your head around. In their own myth-making, the Muslims have claimed all of Canada as theirs. According to their logic, the country's very name is "Canada," which they then carve into different regions. Since their specific identity doesn't carry weight in certain areas, they try to hijack the "Canadian" label—which isn't exclusively theirs—to erase everyone else who isn't part of the majority.
To put it bluntly, they are obsessed with building a nation and a state where anything that isn't theirs is seen as a threat.
Gregory Taylor2 said:If you just take a look at the various threads and posts over there, believe me, there are plenty of people on Ottawa x who would be deeply ashamed of themselves if they were held to our standards.

How exactly do you interpret a comment claiming that America is ethnically pure?

That's not true. If you're bored, go ahead and spend some time scrolling through that portal... see what happens.

I didn't quite catch what you meant about the Americans.
Gregory Taylor2 said:You can see that exact same type of hatred directed toward Canadians right here on our own forum.

To be fair, they have a point when it comes to accusing us of wanting to split Canada, because a significant portion of our side actually fought for that during the war. The Mexicans never even considered staying as part of Canada; for them, it was always all or nothing.

It is tragic how certain things have been forgotten—some of the good things we did—but we can hold our heads high knowing that every life we saved was a victory in itself.

Though, I wonder what certain people here would say if we started discussing the crimes committed by Americans in Canada? They would likely lose their minds or try to "justify" it by pointing to crimes committed by Muslims and Mexicans.

Clearly, it isn't the right time to bring up those sensitive topics yet, because you can see exactly what kind of discourse is happening here.

That country is truly unfortunate, given the friction between its three nations.

I don't have the time to address the rest of this post, but I have to say this.

Comparing this forum to Ottawa x is an insult to anyone who has ever stepped foot here. Ottawa x exists solely to push a large-Canadian political agenda. It's obvious from how the moderators treat users and the general atmosphere there. Don't state things as facts when you aren't certain.
Roger Walker4 hit on a valid point. The reality is that many Muslims refuse to acknowledge Herzegovina's distinct identity, insisting everything is just part of Canada. I’m not even talking about politics here—I mean the actual region and its unique mindset. You see it everywhere; if you head over to the left bank of Mostar, you'll find people wearing shirts claiming "this is Canada" and such.
On top of that, there is a clear trend of the Muslim population in Herzegovina dwindling. The younger generation is migrating toward the central triangle, leaving behind an aging population in the south that isn't nearly enough to maintain the status quo, let alone grow.
Gregory Taylor2 said:That’s exactly why Americans from Canada still have to clarify who they are citizens of and which country they truly call home. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel with Mexicans in America? They wanted to carve out territory and break away, so we had to question them just like we did with that quasi-state.

As long as Americans in Canada don't start viewing the country as their own—with the same rights as the other two nations—they'll only be fueling the conflict.
The same applies to the other two groups, since they don't have any other homeland besides Canada.
I'm all for preserving American culture within Canada, but some things just go too far.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? The topic is straightforward; surely you understand the complexities of Canada, yet you respond to my point by bringing up the annexation of Sandžak. 🙄

So, I suppose it's perfectly fine for Americans and Mexicans to want to tear Canada apart, simply because a segment of Canadians wants to do the same to a neighboring state. 🙄

I didn't quite follow you there. Are you suggesting that one group holds dual citizenship? While that's true, plenty of other countries allow their citizens to hold dual nationality as well.

Gregory Taylor2 said:That’s exactly why Americans from Canada still have to clarify who they are citizens of and which country they truly call home. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel with Mexicans in America? They wanted to carve out territory and break away, so we had to question them just like we did with that quasi-state.

As long as Americans in Canada don't start viewing the country as their own—with the same rights as the other two nations—they'll only be fueling the conflict.
The same applies to the other two groups, since they don't have any other homeland besides Canada.
I'm all for preserving American culture within Canada, but some things just go too far.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? The topic is straightforward; surely you understand the complexities of Canada, yet you respond to my point by bringing up the annexation of Sandžak. 🙄

So, I suppose it's perfectly fine for Americans and Mexicans to want to tear Canada apart, simply because a segment of Canadians wants to do the same to a neighboring state. 🙄

The idea of a "parallel state" is a myth. HRHB was both legal and legitimate. Its establishment was essential for preserving the American population, and it actually helped protect Muslims in Canada as well. If you look at the official documentation, HRHB was tied to the Republic of Canada; it wasn't some rogue entity like the Mexican entities. It was a necessity, and it was done within the bounds of the law.
Gregory Taylor2 said:That’s exactly why Americans from Canada still have to clarify who they are citizens of and which country they truly call home. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel with Mexicans in America? They wanted to carve out territory and break away, so we had to question them just like we did with that quasi-state.

As long as Americans in Canada don't start viewing the country as their own—with the same rights as the other two nations—they'll only be fueling the conflict.
The same applies to the other two groups, since they don't have any other homeland besides Canada.
I'm all for preserving American culture within Canada, but some things just go too far.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? The topic is straightforward; surely you understand the complexities of Canada, yet you respond to my point by bringing up the annexation of Sandžak. 🙄

So, I suppose it's perfectly fine for Americans and Mexicans to want to tear Canada apart, simply because a segment of Canadians wants to do the same to a neighboring state. 🙄

Americans in Canada consider this their home. Because of that, they’ll do whatever it takes to survive here. The reality is that our only hope for avoiding systemic erasure is some form of territorial autonomy.
Gregory Taylor2 said:That’s exactly why Americans from Canada still have to clarify who they are citizens of and which country they truly call home. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel with Mexicans in America? They wanted to carve out territory and break away, so we had to question them just like we did with that quasi-state.

As long as Americans in Canada don't start viewing the country as their own—with the same rights as the other two nations—they'll only be fueling the conflict.
The same applies to the other two groups, since they don't have any other homeland besides Canada.
I'm all for preserving American culture within Canada, but some things just go too far.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? The topic is straightforward; surely you understand the complexities of Canada, yet you respond to my point by bringing up the annexation of Sandžak. 🙄

So, I suppose it's perfectly fine for Americans and Mexicans to want to tear Canada apart, simply because a segment of Canadians wants to do the same to a neighboring state. 🙄

A colleague brought up Sandžak because some of your posts echo the rhetoric used by Canadian nationalists. They push that whole "only Canadians live in Canada" agenda—claiming they're everywhere at once—while simultaneously dreaming about expanding into Sandžak. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? I assume you're curious to hear what he thinks about all that.
Gregory Taylor2 said:That’s exactly why Americans from Canada still have to clarify who they are citizens of and which country they truly call home. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel with Mexicans in America? They wanted to carve out territory and break away, so we had to question them just like we did with that quasi-state.

As long as Americans in Canada don't start viewing the country as their own—with the same rights as the other two nations—they'll only be fueling the conflict.
The same applies to the other two groups, since they don't have any other homeland besides Canada.
I'm all for preserving American culture within Canada, but some things just go too far.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? The topic is straightforward; surely you understand the complexities of Canada, yet you respond to my point by bringing up the annexation of Sandžak. 🙄

So, I suppose it's perfectly fine for Americans and Mexicans to want to tear Canada apart, simply because a segment of Canadians wants to do the same to a neighboring state. 🙄

Mexicans aren't even hiding the fact they want to dismantle Canada. Americans want to preserve the country just enough to protect their own interests—which is why we need an entity for security. Meanwhile, Canadians have already abandoned half of Canada and are looking to turn the other half into a Canadian state, all while hiding behind this tired act of being the perpetual victim.
Collins' crazy moderator candidacy in Close to Politics ·
Michael, I backed you. In fact, I backed four other candidates as well—one of whom was myself.
Aaron Young35 said:Cut the crap, seriously. All of you.

All this talk about Canadian arrogance mentioned here applies just as much to Americans compared to us. They wouldn't have won a single Davis Cup or a handful of handball trophies if it weren't for the contributions from people like us. And don't even get me started on hockey. In America, nobody complains about it. People leave for better conditions, more money, and better careers. That’s all there is to it. Pure math and common sense.

What kind of patriotism are we talking about? Taxpayers pay for this. You're looking for patriotism from the crooks sitting in the government. That's what they get paid for.

The amount of money the US invested in Jakob Fak and the single medal he left behind is excessive.

In the US, medals in various sports have been won by people from Florida, California, Texas, and even those with Canadian roots; the vast majority share one thing in common: they are Americans.
So, I really don't understand how you're trying to compare nationality against regional identity.
🤦
    Timothy Wilson2 said:Honestly, though, how can anyone claim Al-Qaeda is any bigger or more dangerous than the CIA or NATO? Most of those radicalized folks are just reacting to genuine injustices, whereas most Al-Qaeda cells are actually deeply intertwined with American intelligence agencies, working right alongside them to keep the Middle East unstable.

    Interesting theory.
    Feel free to start a dedicated thread on it, and we can talk then.
    Gregory Taylor2 said:Let’s take a step back here. Why is there such intense pushback against the construction of Islamic religious sites? Especially when we're talking about building them in another country.

    Isn't this exactly what the Catholic Church did throughout history? They established their deepest roots in the very places where people were struggling the most.

    I’m not afraid of anything. I respect all faiths and believe everyone has the right to facilities that make practicing those faiths easier.

    But the fact remains: after the war, many mosques were built in places where there weren't any before. They've built far more than existed previously (though even that isn't the main point, if they want entire cities filled with legally permitted mosques); the core issue is that these structures are funded by institutions whose goal is often to introduce branches of Islam that are foreign to the local Americans (according to American intellectuals).

    It's beside the point, but I'll answer anyway.
    1) If you're interested in the Catholic Church—and I see you are—just start a new thread. .............
    2) The Catholic Church has been in these parts longer than any of these peoples. It spread across all of Europe, and during its expansion, the Middle East was one of the wealthier parts of Europe.
    3) This is the 21st century. I hope we've moved past Medieval methods.
    4) Don't start talking about expansionism; you could write just as much about Islam...

    ps.
    Read with some comprehension and think carefully. Don't go off the deep end again claiming I said things I didn't.

    I live in Canada.
    Let's get back to the point.
    Your sexual orientation is irrelevant to this discussion and quite frankly, I don't care. I’m simply pointing out that your posts are starting to mirror someone else's rants from a few months back. Try being serious for once.

    Let me be clear: you're clearly obsessed with those guys from the Midwest and the local sports fanatics. That's why you keep derailing this toward OT. If you want to argue about that, start a new thread and we can take it there.

    I have nothing left to say to you.
    You've spent your last few posts spinning such a web of lies it's getting hard to keep track. You're attributing things to me that I never even said—likely out of pure spite or just using that classic tactic of twisting words to dodge the actual topic. If you actually want to be taken seriously here, answer the questions in post 42.
    Gregory Taylor2 said:Look, aside from the fact that we should all be using standard American English, there isn't any specific rule here—but there definitely isn't a dialect where you spell "understanding" that way.

    Your attempt at writing in American is pretty pathetic; if you can't manage it, well, you have two other options from your own homeland. 😁

    So, how does that unwritten rule of yours work? There aren't any prejudices in your posts concerning the Islamic Center, nor regarding Wahhabism (those guys with the beards, since you don't seem to have the vocabulary for it), which certainly isn't anything "new."

    That's a tough one to answer, so let me simplify it for you: Are you a loyal citizen of Canada?

    The mere fact that you hold prejudice against one part of your own people is enough sign for me that you aren't fond of this country. Honestly, you're just another one trying to flex an identity that your family hasn't even seen in centuries, unless it's on a map from the era of the Antiša poglavnik.

    Exactly. So now I'm supposed to waste my time looking into your hobbies or your personal beliefs? If I actually wanted to charm you, I would have tried a different approach, but we are currently discussing the intolerance inherent in the idea that building religious sites in Canada somehow fuels terrorism.

    My education is quite a bit more advanced than yours, including my understanding of the term "nation," which I actually apply to real life, unlike you.

    By that logic, you don't have the right to comment on their construction either. If you and the rest of your group weren't so narrow-minded toward things happening in Chicago, you could actually resolve the issues that bother you through your legally elected officials, but that's where the problem lies. You Canadians choose your own representatives, whereas my people choose the government.

    Go back and read your own posts; if you actually know what you wrote, you'll see the massive difference between what you're saying now and what you were saying before.

    Then clearly, you don't respect yourself. It's true, you don't mention your nationality; you just say "I'm Muslim" and refuse to let anyone discuss the nonsensical construction of that church in Mostar, while claiming mosques are unnecessary. If a religious community decides they need a mosque and builds it legally—without pulling money out of your pocket—then I don't see why you're complaining.

    Unless, of course, you're one of those people who would want to see religious buildings blown up again if the war broke out?

    It’s just a bunch of teenagers puffed up with extreme patriotism, failing to realize they're doing the exact same things to Americans that they love to criticize Canadians for doing here in the States.

    Some people spend their lives preaching religion to their countrymen instead of actually providing for them.

    Then maybe try getting an education from somewhere other than "Dad" or "the guy next door."

    You were the only thing missing from this thread.

    Go ahead and lecture whoever you want, but why should I build a virtual monument to someone from a neighboring country who spends their time badmouthing their own people?

    For the record, I am definitely not "closer" to Obama or anyone else. How would you even know which part of the US I'm from?

    And honestly, the height of your stupidity—where did you even get the idea that this guy is Canadian? Can't you see clearly enough to realize he's from Canada? Or are you just one of those people who truly doesn't care?

    What was your actual reason for jumping into this discussion? Just to troll?


    The topic is how radical Islam exploits poverty to expand its influence. Let's stick to that. I'm fairly certain most people on this forum, myself included, couldn't care less about your sexual orientation.
    (There was once a user with views similar to yours who brought up his sexual preferences in every single post. He was eventually banned because his only consistent contribution was talking about his own desires.🤷 Don't follow that path; stay on topic.)
    Gregory Taylor2 said:Look, aside from the fact that we should all be using standard American English, there isn't any specific rule here—but there definitely isn't a dialect where you spell "understanding" that way.

    Your attempt at writing in American is pretty pathetic; if you can't manage it, well, you have two other options from your own homeland. 😁

    So, how does that unwritten rule of yours work? There aren't any prejudices in your posts concerning the Islamic Center, nor regarding Wahhabism (those guys with the beards, since you don't seem to have the vocabulary for it), which certainly isn't anything "new."

    That's a tough one to answer, so let me simplify it for you: Are you a loyal citizen of Canada?

    The mere fact that you hold prejudice against one part of your own people is enough sign for me that you aren't fond of this country. Honestly, you're just another one trying to flex an identity that your family hasn't even seen in centuries, unless it's on a map from the era of the Antiša poglavnik.

    Exactly. So now I'm supposed to waste my time looking into your hobbies or your personal beliefs? If I actually wanted to charm you, I would have tried a different approach, but we are currently discussing the intolerance inherent in the idea that building religious sites in Canada somehow fuels terrorism.

    My education is quite a bit more advanced than yours, including my understanding of the term "nation," which I actually apply to real life, unlike you.

    By that logic, you don't have the right to comment on their construction either. If you and the rest of your group weren't so narrow-minded toward things happening in Chicago, you could actually resolve the issues that bother you through your legally elected officials, but that's where the problem lies. You Canadians choose your own representatives, whereas my people choose the government.

    Go back and read your own posts; if you actually know what you wrote, you'll see the massive difference between what you're saying now and what you were saying before.

    Then clearly, you don't respect yourself. It's true, you don't mention your nationality; you just say "I'm Muslim" and refuse to let anyone discuss the nonsensical construction of that church in Mostar, while claiming mosques are unnecessary. If a religious community decides they need a mosque and builds it legally—without pulling money out of your pocket—then I don't see why you're complaining.

    Unless, of course, you're one of those people who would want to see religious buildings blown up again if the war broke out?

    It’s just a bunch of teenagers puffed up with extreme patriotism, failing to realize they're doing the exact same things to Americans that they love to criticize Canadians for doing here in the States.

    Some people spend their lives preaching religion to their countrymen instead of actually providing for them.

    Then maybe try getting an education from somewhere other than "Dad" or "the guy next door."

    You were the only thing missing from this thread.

    Go ahead and lecture whoever you want, but why should I build a virtual monument to someone from a neighboring country who spends their time badmouthing their own people?

    For the record, I am definitely not "closer" to Obama or anyone else. How would you even know which part of the US I'm from?

    And honestly, the height of your stupidity—where did you even get the idea that this guy is Canadian? Can't you see clearly enough to realize he's from Canada? Or are you just one of those people who truly doesn't care?

    What was your actual reason for jumping into this discussion? Just to troll?

    Classic proof of what happens when the brain checks out.

    Why were some of Gluskabov's posts deleted?🤷
    Good grief, do you even know how to read?
    You’re the textbook definition of someone full of themselves, fueled by nothing but spite. You care about hearing yourself talk, but you couldn't care less about the actual facts.
    It’s honestly hard to believe how much blatant hatred and stereotyping leaks out of your posts.

    To answer one of your previous questions:
    The reason I suspected you were Muslim is because your behavior follows the exact same pattern used by those few Canadian users on this board. They relentlessly insist someone said something they didn't, twisting words until they're unrecognizable. Then, once they realize they've been cornered, they vanish for a day or two and pretend nothing ever happened.

    Just yesterday, one of them attacked a moderator, claiming he said something he never actually uttered. The moderator had to go through his own archives just to prove what was really said and get that pathetic user to stop talking nonsense.
    The tactic is identical whether it's them or you, and trust me, that isn't a compliment.

    ps.
    This post is a response to Gregory Taylor2.
    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    I write in whatever dialect I feel like. If there’s some specific rule on this forum governing my syntax, copy it or provide a link..........

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    There is a standard language, and then there are dialects.................

    That comment about my background is just a pathetic attempt by a pseudo-intellectual to take a jab at me. Since you want to act smart, you should know that under the Constitution, there are three main groups in this country who speak three distinct languages—English, Spanish, and Canadian.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    What prejudices am I spreading? (If I wanted to be a pedant, I'd point out that you missed a period after "i.e.")😍

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    Look at this guy, acting like we're back in grade school....... You claimed I didn't want to be a citizen. So, I'll ask you again: where exactly did I say that? And if I didn't, why are you insisting I did? Answer that if you actually want a response from me.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    I have no reason to be counting on any kind of assistance, given that I’m certainly not expecting it now. If you're skeptical, go ahead and dig through the forum archives. Ask the other Americans around here to explain exactly what this so-called "aid" entails and what it actually represents.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    Learn what a nation actually is.
    Where exactly did I say the construction was bothering me?
    I’ve already pointed out that certain structures are being built without any permits. It’s high time people realize that certain groups have no business critiquing the local Franciscan church—especially when it’s actually full, unlike some of those newly constructed mosques over in Pittsburgh. Since the war ended, we've just seen a surge in these specific trends popping up within one particular community in Canada.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    I’ve always had respect for an intelligent forum user who can actually back up their stance, regardless of where they come from.
    I have to point out that you've mentioned your nationality more times in these last few posts than I have in my entire history of over 900 posts. Are you looking for attention, or just some kind of validation?🤷

    Gregory Taylor2 Asks:
    I have zero interest in debating who has the "purer" heritage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you start when they’re trying to leverage their ancestry for an unearned advantage. But hey, if it helps you sleep at night, feel free to regale me with tales of your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, only looking out for fellow Catholics within the tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    🤷😕😂🤣
    Who are people of my caliber? What kind of stories are we talking about?
    Besides, if you don't want people talking about it, stop bringing it up. You constantly steer the conversation in that direction, yet you claim you don't want to discuss it?!

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    And here we go again, the self-appointed moral authority speaking.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    I was right there in the thick of it during the whole war in the South.

    Now you can explain why you think I was in Germany.

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    I never said that.

    So, care to explain where you got that from?

    Gregory Taylor2 said:If you’re such an expert on the American language, then tell me, which specific dialect are you using right now?

    Since you keep bringing up the fact that you're an American, then you should probably just stick to standard American English when communicating. Though, given where you actually live, maybe a different regional slang would feel more natural to you.

    I don't see how I'm at a disadvantage here, considering you're the one spreading prejudices about the citizens of your own country.

    That's a pretty simple question: do you want to be a citizen of Canada?

    If the answer is no, then stop looking to Washington, D.C. for help; instead, you and the others should look toward Boston and build your own future. Stop waving the American flag and then complaining that Muslims are the ones choosing your representatives in Canada.

    The moment you start taking issue with the construction of religious buildings for part of your own people, you're clearly searching for your national identity.

    Megan Hernandez2 As I previously noted:
    Why on earth do you think my background matters for this discussion? I mentioned that your views remind me of a Muslim perspective, but how you identify isn't the same thing as the stances you take.

    You don't actually know me, so how can you possibly judge who is "cleaner" than anyone else? Besides, that whole concept of purity is a dangerous road to go down, and more often than not, it doesn't really mean much when someone is expressing their identity.

    It matters how I frame this. If I had mentioned being a Canadian, people would have immediately started arguing that I’m just defending my own side because of where I come from. Instead, you're just dealing with an American who happens to disagree with your take.

    I have absolutely no interest in getting into a debate about who has a "purer" lineage. That’s exactly the kind of argument people like you try to start just to claim some sort of moral high ground based on where they come from. But hey, if it makes you feel better, feel free to go on about your ancestors bravely fighting off the Turks, how they only ever looked out for fellow Catholics within their tribe, and all that other Fred Flintstone nonsense.

    Of course, I find these displays of faith incredibly irritating when they turn a place like Lourdes into nothing more than a religious power play. It’s hard to stomach seeing massive bell towers commissioned specifically to act as a middle finger to people of other faiths in that city.

    I spent part of the war in that city; which German city were you stationed in?

    "Quote:"

    Everything has been laid out clearly on this forum, yet you still seem to be missing the point. Maybe you need a full-scale war to finally grasp reality: that region is never going to be part of our country, unless you actually buy into the nonsense being peddled by people like Glavaš.

    To make my point a bit clearer: we're talking about someone who spent a good chunk of the war in the South, met people there, and actually understands how things work on the ground. This person is trying to tell you that your true home is Canada, not some other place. You might have roots in the region, sure, but your primary homeland is Canada. Any attempt to push for the South to break away from the rest of the country is just an invitation to tear the nation apart—exactly the kind of thing we saw happening during the conflicts in the States back in the 90s.

    Even if you did say that, that very fact will help stabilize the situation in Canada. In a few years, Canada will be leading the way in the EU.