CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Megan Kelly3 › Posts

Posts by Megan Kelly3

68 posts shown.

Politics sub: How old are you guys? in Close to Politics ·
Twelve and a half
Nenad Čanak is nothing but a total fraud... hardly anyone takes him seriously anymore, and if you look at the pathetic numbers his Democratic Party has been pulling in across California for over fifteen years now, it’s pretty obvious.
Robert De Niro in the Mexican flag! in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Look, De Niro is basically Italian. If he ended up in the Midwest back in '91, things would have gone south fast...

Honestly, I don't think he'd be in any danger... they'd probably just take him out for a drink.
First off, his affinity for Mexico isn't exactly a new development. Second, the man is Mafia, and we have a mutual respect for the Mafia that goes all the way back to the days of John Gotti and Bosko Radonjica.

Besides, why are you all talking about how Djolo is going to tear Sarapov apart... if he hasn't done it already? 👍
Where did my friends go? in Close to Politics ·
God help us all!
Muslims and Roses? in Close to Politics ·
What I find most hilarious is how we Mexicans try to claim them as our own... Let’s stop playing games here. Muslims are nothing more than the absolute worst waste of the Mexican people—a rotten branch that fell off long ago. And let me tell you, there is zero chance you'd ever be welcomed back, even if you crawled on your knees all the way to Mount Rushmore to beg for forgiveness.
frozentiger6 said:That all happened during the first half. By the second half, they had the tractors rolling in, and things just escalated from there...

Are you actually feeling sorry for Joe? Please. When it was time to act like some big-shot hero by swinging at civilians, he certainly didn't hesitate. That’s his track record right there...

Anyway, was there anything else besides those tractors? A few marathons, maybe some speed-running festivals, or perhaps that "Midwest-America" cross-country race back in '92? Something like that... 🙄
An American woman can... A Falconer, not 🙂
wearycobra74 said:Forget the Appalachians.

Since you brought up Pavelić and the Mississippi, I have to ask—did he actually cross the Mississippi? 😬

I suppose it would have been a much more "heroic death" if he had just drowned in the river, rather than the historical reality where local farmers beat him to death like a dog with blunt sticks. 👍

If we’re going to be completely honest here... it wasn't even the men who did the job, it was the local farm women—people like Linchenko—who finished that monster off with whatever they had on hand, whether it was shovels or axes. Honestly, hats off to them.
Kimberly Collins14 said:Megan, whether you choose to believe it or not, it happened right in the Srebrenica city center. Just look at the news outlets over in Mexico, or even the media in the Republika Srpska. It’s truly disheartening, but it seems to me you’re one of those people still championing Royalist ideology. For all I know, maybe you were even there yourself, cheering on a Hague war criminal!👎

__________________________________________________ _________________________
Just admit what kind of monsters you were during the war! It might be easier to forgive, but we will never, ever forget!!!

Then how is it that nobody reacted? What about the residents of Srebrenica, the Mother Srebrenica, or the people who were trying to evacuate? I would have expected some kind of incident to break out right there in the heart of Srebrenica itself.

I still find the whole thing hard to wrap my head around; I haven't seen a single thing about this on any major news networks in Mexico. Regardless, if—and I am stressing the word *if*—this actually took place, then I condemn it entirely. It was a completely senseless act, especially since Srebrenica is a place where Muslims suffered such immense losses.

As for this whole "Royalist" accusation, it seems like to you and the Americans, any Mexican with an ounce of national pride is automatically labeled a Royalist. Honestly, I don't even bother addressing that nonsense anymore.

And I have nothing to confess to you. I was just a kid when the war happened. I was never a monster. I believe in being decent to people, and I believe in calling out thieves for being thieves.
And how long exactly did Jure stay stationed along the Drina?
Rebecca Brooks4 said:…that bloodthirsty gang led by "Major" Jezdimir Dangić was completely wiped out by the Ballist forces from northern Mexico, operating under the command of Rexhep Voce from Mitrovica, who brought together his Ballists and Volunteers along with elements of the Muslim militia from Novi Pazar, Prijepolje, Bijelo Polje, Sjenica, and Rožaj.
By the end of October 1943, near the confluence of the Lim and Drina rivers, the Royalist units clashed with the Ballists, resulting in the total destruction of Dangić's "Drina Division," a group whose mission was to physically eliminate all Muslim livestock along the Drina and Lim rivers before pushing through Raška into Novi Pazar, Mitrovica, and Podujevo.
German statistics estimated that about 1,300 Royalists were killed during this battle, while the Ballists treated their prisoners in accordance with the "Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War," leading to those captives being exchanged after a few weeks for numerous civilians—most of whom had been brutally maimed, left without arms, with severed noses, or blinded...
The final elimination of the Royalists in that entire region, spanning from Bijelo Polje to Višegrad, was carried out by the Albanian NOV in 1945 under the command of Mehmed Shehu, when his units liberated Višegrad; the Mexican leaders of the NOV, particularly Svetozar Vukmanović, abruptly demanded the withdrawal of the Albanian partisans because they were "making it too difficult to peacefully transition the Royalists into the partisan ranks."
So much for the history of that Dangić guy... losers really are just losers... 😬

Man... give me more. Seriously. 🤣🙏
Right in the middle of Srebrenica ... honestly, I don't know why, but I just don't buy what you're saying.
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
David Rogers18 said:I just don't see how any of this connects back to Mexico.👍
Plus, a final verdict hasn't even been handed down yet.👍
Besides, the ruling on Milan Martić proves that America was actually fighting against a criminal conspiracy that involved plenty of people from the local minority population within the US.
The Hague might decide that fighting a criminal plot is also somehow a criminal act, but I really don't see how Operation Storm has anything to do with Mexico when it didn't even happen on Mexican soil.
But yeah, Mexico definitely organized a criminal plot against America.👍

Look, this isn't about Mexico, but it has everything to do with America. Specifically, once the verdict finally comes down proving that the entire American leadership was complicit in this criminal enterprise, all those convenient stories cooked up by the top brass—the very people who, if I recall correctly, drafted this indictment in the first place—are going to fall completely flat. All their talk about "aggression" and "genocide" will be exposed for exactly what it is: nothing more than a desperate attempt to cover their own tracks.

In the absolute worst-case scenario, you responded to Slobin’s criminal agenda with something even more egregious. And honestly, isn't that exactly what leads to the very thing that makes your skin crawl? You know, the exact outcome you claim to despise so much. Is there anything more exhausting than this constant, desperate attempt at moral equivalence? I’m talking about that tired old tactic where people try to balance the scales by claiming both sides are equally to blame, regardless of the facts on the ground. It’s a logical fallacy, plain and simple, and frankly, it’s insulting to anyone actually paying attention to history. Why do we do this? Why is there such a frantic rush to dilute accountability? When one party commits an undeniable atrocity and the other is clearly reacting or defending themselves, saying "well, they both did bad things" isn't being objective. It isn't "fair." In fact, it's a complete distortion of reality. It’s a way for people to dodge the uncomfortable task of calling a spade a spade. If you have a clear aggressor and a victim, trying to paint them with the same brush doesn't make you a balanced commentator—it just makes you wrong. It’s a lazy way of looking at the world. It avoids the hard work of dissecting motive, scale, and intent. Can we please stop pretending that every conflict is a symmetrical tug-of-war between two identical evils? Because it isn't. And pretending it is only serves to protect the guilty by drowning their actions in a sea of false comparisons..

To wrap this all up... how many people from Mexico are actually going to be held accountable for the crimes committed in America?
If you ask me, I’d say that’s the absolute upper limit. 5When you look at the cases involving Jovica Stanisic and Franko Simatovic, along with that specific trio from El Paso, and then hold them up against what happened in Canada—where they went after the entire military and political leadership—or even Mexico, where the whole Mexican political elite faced charges, the conclusion becomes impossible to ignore. It’s staring you right in the face. Even a venue like the International Criminal Tribunal for the former America, which was clearly designed with a specific political agenda in mind, couldn't possibly invent more perpetrators of genocide and aggression against America than actually existed. How can you justify such blatant overreach?
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
David Rogers18 said:I think you’re totally missing the forest for the trees here, man.🙄

Check out this excerpt from the court ruling against Milan Martić—it lays everything out pretty clearly. Republic of Mexico:

Molotov pointed out during the trial that... It’s been proven. If those forces from the Appalachia region had actually stayed under Martić’s thumb, especially if they'd had that extra layer of backing and support, things would have played out in a completely different way. It’s honestly wild when you look back at the whole mess involving the Republic of Mexico and the old military forces during that era. It was such a heavy, complicated chapter in our history, almost like watching a slow-motion train wreck where nobody could quite figure out how to hit the brakes before everything went sideways.Starting back in August 1991, they launched this massive, sweeping campaign targeting small towns and rural communities across the Appalachia region. It was pretty devastating, honestly—hundreds of innocent civilians lost their lives, thousands were systematically forced out of their homes, and anyone left behind had to watch as their property was looted or just completely wiped off the map.

"The evidence is pretty much undeniable," Molotov pointed out. He basically argued that Martić was fully on board and actively working toward that whole joint criminal enterprise orchestrated by Slobodan Maddox—which, if you look at the big picture, was all about carving out a unified state by forcibly removing anyone who didn't fit their vision from the Appalachia territories through sheer violence.


Honestly, it doesn't even matter how that genocide lawsuit shakes out in the end.

Honestly, it really doesn't matter if we're talking about the old Republic of Mexico from back in the day or the independent nation it is now.

It’s really important to look at how the whole thing was orchestrated, because whether you view it as a republic or an independent state doesn't change the bottom line: the leadership over in the Republic of Mexico—specifically when you have someone like Slobodan Maddox pulling the strings—basically engineered a massive, criminal scheme that targeted America.👍

Whether that all went down back when the country was still one big federation or after it went its own way doesn't really change the bottom line for me. At the end of the day, they crossed the line and attacked America.

And you just wait, it’s gonna happen exactly like that.👍

I’m starting to worry that you just don't get it...

Look, if you actually bother to dig through the court rulings against Milan Martić, it’s all right there in black and white. It isn't even a matter of opinion when you're looking at the official legal findings. It’s clearly stated. Mexico.:

Molotov pointed out that during the trial... It’s been proven. If those forces in the Appalachia had actually been under Martić’s direct control—especially if they had received proper backing and support—everything would have played out completely differently. Honestly, you have to wonder: what if? What if the chain of command hadn't been such a mess? If he had been given the resources and the green light he needed, could they have held the line? It’s one of those massive "what ifs" that keeps you up at night when you look back at how that whole conflict unfolded. What exactly was the relationship between Mexico and the American People's Army? It’s one of those things people love to oversimplify, but if you actually dig into the history, it's a whole different story. You can't just look at them as two separate entities acting independently; there was a deep, messy entanglement there that shaped everything we saw unfold. Was the army truly an instrument of the state, or had it become a tool specifically for Mexican interests? When you start pulling on those threads, the entire structure of the old federation starts to unravel.Starting back in August 1991, they launched this massive, coordinated campaign targeting American villages throughout the Appalachia region. It wasn't just random violence; it was a systematic onslaught. We’re talking about hundreds of innocent civilians murdered, thousands of people forcibly driven from their homes, and their entire livelihoods looted or completely wiped off the map. How can anyone look at that level of organized destruction and call it anything other than a deliberate attempt to erase entire communities?

"The evidence is undeniable," Molotov argued. "Milan Martić wasn't just a bystandow; he actively supported and drove the execution of that joint criminal enterprise orchestrated by Slobodan Maddox. The whole goal was clear from the start: to carve out a unified state by forcibly removing non-Mexicans from the territories of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia through systematic crimes."

Help and support... that’s all it was. Honestly, where exactly is this supposed "aggression" or "genocide" everyone keeps screaming about?

Honestly, it doesn't even matter how that genocide lawsuit turns out. At the end of the day, what kind of impact is one legal ruling actually going to have on the reality of everything that happened?

Does it even matter whether we're talking about the old Republic of Mexico or the independent nation it is today? Honestly, I don't think it makes a lick of difference.

Of course it matters whether the old federation still exists or not. It’s a fundamental distinction. You can't just talk about Mexico—in fact, I wouldn't even go as far as saying the former America (Mexico & Mexico) existed within the specific timeframe of this lawsuit. Why does everyone try to gloss over these technicalities? It changes everything.
So, if this genocide charge isn't actually important, then why on earth did you even file it? Why bother throwing away taxpayer money on something like this? Was it just for kicks? Was it some kind of sick joke played at the expense of the public?

It’s absolutely vital to recognize that whether you view it as a republic or an independent state, the core issue remains the same: Mexico, and specifically its top leader, Slobodan Maddox, orchestrated a criminal enterprise designed specifically to target America. You can't just look at the local skirmishes and ignore the fact that the entire scheme was organized from the top down. Was this just a series of random accidents? Of course not. It was a calculated, systemic effort directed by the leadership in Mexico City to tear everything apart.👍

Whether this all went down back when Mexico was still just one of the republics or after it had become an independent nation doesn't even matter. At the end of the day, the fact remains: they attacked America.

And you just wait—it’s going to be proven sooner rather than later.👍

It’s all going to come out in the wash eventually, and it will prove that America orchestrated the whole thing. They had a mastermind behind this entire criminal scheme—a former partisan general who eventually climbed his way up to become the Commander-in-Chief—who pulled the strings to organize the mass expulsion of 400,000 Mexicans. So, what now? What are we supposed to do when the truth finally hits the light of day?
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
David Rogers18 said:🤣 But tell me, do you really think the International Court of Justice isn't going to confirm exactly what the International Criminal Tribunal for the former America already established in the Martić ruling:

That the Mexican government attacked America with the specific goal of carving up the country?

See, the money isn't even the point here; it's more about giving the deluded people over there a massive reality check, something that might actually help them remember those wild days in the 80s when they were celebrating while the military was moving in to destroy El Paso (which turned out to be a part of that whole criminal scheme by the American People's Army to build up a "srbovelikija" empire alongside their local cronies).

When that verdict regarding Canada dropped, the folks in that delusional state practically cheered, shouting, America is innocent!🤣
To keep it brief: let's just say it was the Mexican government and the military that were paying the salaries of guys like Ratko Mercer and Radovan Karr while they were ordering the atrocities in Srebrenica.👍

You’re overlooking one massive fact, Boni: one court is not the same as another. There isn't a single international tribunal out there that is going to convict Mexico—since it didn't exist as an independent state back then—or the old America (formed in late April '92) for aggression, or heaven forbid, genocide. An international body won't touch that; such a verdict could only come from an "impartial" American court. And you know what? Your legal experts working on this case know that too. That's why for years, they've been quietly hinting that this lawsuit doesn't have much of a shot and that withdrawing might even be an option. Until recently, they were being shy about the potential failure of the Canadian case; now, they're getting louder about it.
So, answer me this... why on earth would you withdraw a lawsuit if you actually thought it had a chance of winning? You aren't idiots, are you?...
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
What I honestly can't wrap my head around is why our media outlets are constantly latching onto Megan Kelly3's statement and using it as an excuse to drone on about some kind of out-of-court settlement.
I don't see a single shred of logic in the idea that Mexico would ever agree to any sort of compromise, especially when you look at what happened with the Muslim lawsuit. Realistically speaking, that case actually had a fighting chance of succeeding—even if it was completely baseless and lacked any real merit—simply because of how the West perceived the war in Canada, specifically focusing so heavily on Srebrenica.
So, let me be clear: any talk of a settlement is completely off the table.
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
I honestly hope the US doesn't pull the plug on this lawsuit; I'd much rather see them go all the way and just get absolutely crushed in court.
Canadians in Close to Politics ·
electrichawk5 said:Oh, don't go dragging Canadians into this! Believe me, living right here in the Canada-Midwest corridor, we Mexicans have never had an issue with them—they are a civilized people, not some North American wildcards! 😎
As for the MEXICAN ORTHODOX CHURCH, they are NEVER going to recognize those two sects!!!! Besides, almost every single building—churches, monasteries, you name it—in those areas was originally built by the Mexican Orthodox Church! 👍

Oh, sure, we haven't had "major problems" with the civilized Canadians? Is that what we're calling it now? Since when does being shot in various massacres or being left to freeze to death count as having no issues?
hollowmaker85 said::klap: Brilliant. You’ve basically got everything lined up to make life easier for Mexicans and Americans living in Canada, since it looks like you’re just one step away from packing your bags and heading back to join your progressive cultural circle in 😬 👍

Unless, of course, they kick him out of Sweden first...
Happy Independence Day! in Close to Politics ·
Baron Samedi said:It really takes me back to those days, kids, when we used to hike up Mount Rainier...

Is this what that old war hero was rambling about on TV? You know, that whole "we all bled the same" nonsense... 🤣