frozendrifter7 said:First off, we’re talking about semantics here. A "bomb attack" is fundamentally different from an "airstrike." You have Google at your fingertips—just type in "bomb attack" and see how many results link it directly to airstrikes? Absolutely none.
Second—and this is the crux of it—it’s about intent. A pilot or a munitions expert is targeting enemy combatants or terrorists; they aren't out there looking to slaughter pregnant women, children, or the elderly—the civilians. Suicide bombers and terrorists, however, go out of their way to kill civilians. They couldn't care less if they blow up a commuter bus full of people heading to work, or trap a crowd in a theater with explosives, or—heaven forbid—capture a soldier just to decapitate him and mail his head back to his mother.
You're comparing apples to oranges.
Give me a break.😂You have Google. Just look it up. Nobody here is stupid. By your logic, dropping an atomic bomb is some peaceful, beautiful act, while a single bomb attack is the worst thing ever—even though those nukes killed more Japanese people than there are actual walls left on this planet (and we all know most of those walls are just cheap drywall anyway).
Richard Wilson4 said:Look, I never even brought up Shiites in my post...
Listen, you idiot, he’s literally holding an Iranian flag.😂
Let me set the record straight since you clearly have no clue. The USA pumped more money into the Taliban regime than any single Muslim nation ever did. When those "liberators" showed up, they promised women would finally breathe easy—told them they could ditch the burkas, dress how they wanted, just live free. What happened? Even a few British journalists ended up wearing burkas, and Afghan women are still stuck in them. Take your filthy version of democracy back home to where generals spend years raping their own daughters.
Richard Wilson4 said:Why are Pakistanis such a headache in the UK instead of Indians? Because Indians actually put in the work. They grind, they stick together, and they build businesses. Even if they aren't loaded, at least they're out there hustling...
Back in the day, when Pakistanis were teaming up, it was usually in some underground scene in New York City...
The thing is, Pakistanis are Muslims following Islamic Work Ethics, and they try to hold onto that while living in places dominated by the Protestant work ethic (which you also see in France or certain Catholic parts of Germany).
Down in the Gaza Strip, Israeli settlers controlled about 10% of the land and ran the farms. Once Israel pulled them out, agriculture in Gaza tanked by 50%...
Don't forget that IDF terrorists destroy hectares of olive groves every single day. Confiscating Palestinian property is just business as usual for them—kind of like how Hitler happily negotiated with Zionist fascists about relocating borders in Palestine.
Samuel Brown90 said:Oh, so now we're playing semantics? Anyone with half a brain knows a bomb attack covers any strike involving some kind of explosive...
A pilot targets enemy soldiers? Is that what British pilots were doing when they bombed Dresden? Targeting soldiers? Because their "targeting" sure looked bad when they left tens of thousands of civilians dead in the crossfire...🤣
BTW, what dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombs too. Were pilots just aiming at military targets there?
Looks like there are plenty of candidates for Domanovica here
Nothing here justifies killing civilians in Japan 😂
frozendrifter7 said:It could be madness, a sickness—because, frankly, I don’t think anyone truly sane and healthy can stomach killing children—vengeance, perhaps he lost a family member to a Palestinian suicide bomber on a bus or something similar, and there are plenty of other reasons. Breaking into someone's home and murdering civilians caught in the crossfire is a war crime; I agree with you there, and it absolutely deserves condemnation. But what about these terrorists and suicide bombers lugging around five or six kilos of explosives? To me, they are nothing more than criminals, yet you and people like you view them as heroes, martyrs, or freedom fighters. It sickens me—just as it sickened me two years ago when I watched the Israeli strikes on Lebanon.
Show me where I ever did that. If you can actually point to a time I treated any of them like heroes, then fine, you're right. Otherwise, you're just a liar. I would never, ever support killing civilians, especially children. In our culture, that's a massive sin.
frozendrifter7 said:First off, we’re talking about semantics here. A "bomb attack" is fundamentally different from an "airstrike." You have Google at your fingertips—just type in "bomb attack" and see how many results link it directly to airstrikes? Absolutely none.
Second—and this is the crux of it—it’s about intent. A pilot or a munitions expert is targeting enemy combatants or terrorists; they aren't out there looking to slaughter pregnant women, children, or the elderly—the civilians. Suicide bombers and terrorists, however, go out of their way to kill civilians. They couldn't care less if they blow up a commuter bus full of people heading to work, or trap a crowd in a theater with explosives, or—heaven forbid—capture a soldier just to decapitate him and mail his head back to his mother.
You're comparing apples to oranges.
Oh yeah? Then how do you explain a Jewish criminal breaking into a house and murdering three or four kids for no reason? Did you even read the post about what these Jewish criminals do to children?👎 That can only be called a war crime and genocide, just like what Hitler did to the Jews.
Gregory Kelly3 said:And what exactly do you think you know about the atrocities committed by Zionists against Muslims in Palestine??? What could you possibly know about the crimes committed by the USA against the rest of this planet? (think Iraq, Afghanistan, the USA, Somalia, Sudan, Vietnam, Japan, and so on)
Sure, why don't you just invite those same people into your own house to torment you and the rest of your family (including those arrogant ones mentioned in analogfalcon38's previous post)? Then, you can sit there and comment, "Yes, I deserve this because I dared to resist." Just relax and let them beat you, humiliate you, kick you out of your home, and strip away your access to food, your freedom of movement, and even your basic RIGHT TO LIFE... and maybe then they'll finally STOP!!!! Do you even have the slightest clue what you're talking about???
Do you just enjoy telling jokes? Like, they're installing a missile defense shield right under the Russians' noses and somehow that doesn't count as starting an arms race? Seriously?
I think the Palestinians need to stop stalling and actually start the final showdown with the occupiers. They need to get more fighters and RPGs on the ground right now 👍to finally kick those hated occupiers out, though we all know they’ll just keep acting like they're being hit by lightning, just like they always have. 👍
Ronald Booth3 said:Children are victims of their parents—those who mostly voted for the terrorist organization known as Hamas. An organization that the entire EU, Japan, Canada, America, Australia, and others have labeled as terrorist. Therefore, Hamas and their supporters—aka the parents—are responsible for the deaths of those children. Israel bears zero percent of the blame here. Once they stop terrorist attacks on civilian targets in Israeli cities, they will get electricity. Terrorist attacks on civilian targets in Israeli cities happen every single day. This needs to end once and for all, and this is a solid attempt at doing just that. We will see if they value their people's lives more than their terrorist actions against Israel. You reap what you sow. Anyone who pities them should join them.
That’s exactly how Hitler thought when he was being threatened by walls. Camps, casualties, too many personalities. I read somewhere that hatred becomes hereditary in people who suffer; the victim turns into the criminal, and so on.
northernbison63 said:First, they’ll slap the "terrorist" label on them, then the mighty US Army will just flatten them into the dirt, tossing anyone left over into concentration camps. And you know what? Clinton will probably stand there praising how "democratic" the whole operation was while expressing his deepest, most heartfelt regrets over the tiny, practically non-existent amount of collateral damage—you know, the 95% of people who didn't make it.🤣
Cut it out. Things were going just fine for Native Americans for the whole time those Europeans were around. 😂 🤣 ☕ They didn't kill them. They didn't rape their women. They didn't seize their land by force. And worst of all? They never forced them out. People actually wanted to be relocated against their will, and they were moved to other territories by force. 🤷 They can never be the villains in their own story. They’ll never admit to a single dirty massacre, and don't even get me started on the genocide. So what's their problem now? Why are they suddenly whining? 🙄 😢
The other day, a woman killed her four kids—just totally sane, no mental illness involved. She did it on a whim. Purely out of spite. Sadly, these kinds of horrific cases happen all over the US.
Adding to what David Newman50 posted, check out this statement from Ehud Olmert. He’s clearly reacting to those massive protests happening in Israel over the negotiations. His take? A Palestinian state has to happen, because without one, neither side is going to survive. 👍Finally, someone is actually saying it—if they keep pushing this "ten for one" policy, they're digging their own graves. Plus, with Iran knocking on the door, it's better to take the win we can get right now than chase a fantasy later.
I’ll quote what plenty of Muslim leaders who won't even show up to these conferences—acting like nothing more than sold-out Zionist puppets—have said: "This whole conference is just about building Walls, not helping Palestinians." ☕ The fake smiles are gone and the mask has slipped. The agony continues for the Palestinians, just like it does for us Americans. The Palestinians have one massive advantage: they're surrounded by a Muslim community, no matter how flawed it might be. Meanwhile, we're stuck surrounded mostly by enemies of Islam.
I honestly hope those Danish caricaturists draw some ridiculous cartoon mocking the walls next, since they're on such a roll. Of course, they’ll probably play the victim if they do—we all know how that works. Let's not forget that this "hero" who insulted basically 1.1 billion Muslims worldwide was actually just a total Jew.
Sarkozy is getting a divorce, and here is what French law says about it This is pathetic:
Yesterday, the White House confirmed the news reports regarding the divorce of Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife Cecilia. Two French law professors, Norbert Foulquier from the University of Evry and Vincent Valentin from the Sorbonne, used an issue of Libération from the other night to try and interpret how this upcoming divorce fits under Article 67 of the French Constitution. That specific law forbids any legal proceedings being brought before the President if they interfere with his official duties. According to them, a divorce counts—because you can't get divorced without appearing before a judge. The article was titled "Cecilia, the impossible divorce." And who's to blame that Cecilia has to wait until the end of her husband's term just to get a divorce? Exactly. Islamists.
The authors don't even wait until the second sentence of the article to reveal the Islamist threat lurking within Article 67 of the Constitution.
"The President's wife cannot divorce. An order from an Islamist regime? No, rather the result of criminal law changes initiated by Chirac..." So, what was the writer hinting at with that allusion to "Islamists"? The "oppression of women" in Islam? Trying to show off that he knows Islamic law too? The only thing they managed to do was act like total hacks because divorce is actually permitted in Islam. It's hard to sway the emotions of a French reader by pointing out facts like how divorce wasn't possible in Italy until 1970, in Brazil until 1977, or in Ireland until 1997—a situation we can thank the Catholic Church for, given how hard they lobbied against those laws for years.
Charles Davis88 said:Here’s the actual article—which the OP has interpreted VERY FREELY: http://www.lefigaro.fr/france/200710...ercorbeau.html
Basically, someone sent out an anonymous mass email to hundreds of addresses claiming various French politicians (mostly Jewish, but not all) are Mossad agents and other nonsense... now the French police are trying to track down the sender, and they're looking at the far-right... The main takeaway is that the usual anti-Semites are absolutely terrified right now...
Give me a break. Jews aren't members of Mossad. It's not like they're aliens or something. Every Jew who leaves Israel gets an offer from Mossad to cooperate 👍 What does that "cooperation" even involve? Let me guess: wholesale apple sales, smuggling cars, or flipping bulk cheese from Wisconsin or Greece. 😂
What’s goldenmason172 going to come up with now? 😂 I see the crowd supporting apartheid in the Middle East isn't saying a word. Honestly, even without this, we already know exactly who that Zionist duo is going to target to drag France into the mess.