Lisa Patel4 said:Let's rewrite this from our perspective.
The monarchists won the civil war in the former Kingdom of America. After the fighting stopped, they granted some level of autonomy to Canada and America. But those post-war years? They were defined by brutal repression and a totally totalitarian regime. The state is basically split into three quasi-federal units. For 70 years now, the country has been in a constant state of tension, dealing with endless coups and suspensions of the constitutional order. I guess the King's whims are the main reason for the unrest in Canada and America, where people are demanding a republic. Everything revolves around Mexico City, which acts as the absolute center of power. Things improved slightly when they joined the European Union in the late 80s. Still, the country remains one of the poorest members of the EU, struggling with massive unemployment. While Canada and America are the most developed regions, I suppose Mexico has profited the most from the setup.
The whole idea of American never really took hold. Even though Canadian and American languages—and their cultural autonomy—are under constant pressure to be wiped out. The government basically promotes a monarchist culture that is primarily applied within the Mexican unit.
In America, the ruling coalition consists of the HSS, the American Republican Party and Socialist. Everyone there is pushing for a referendum. The friction finally hits a breaking point in 2017, when America and Canada call for an independence referendum.
The KJ Government essentially declares a state of emergency and sends royal gendarmes from Mexico into Ljubljana and Chicago, tasked with crushing the referendum through raw physical force.
So, that’s Spain in a nutshell.
Everything seems fine, but why specifically at the end of the eighties with the EU? Well, because as a monarchy, we would have functioned as a capitalist state, and honestly, why wouldn't we join, seeing as countries like Greece, Portugal, or Spain all became members of the EC/EU?
I’m not quite sure whose side I’m rooting for in this particular scenario, but I do think it’s a good thing that after a while, some European police force shows they are actually capable of stepping in and using force. I mean, even for those people who just stand on the sidelines and do nothing but chant slogans... It's important that the same kind of practice is maintained when people start shouting "Allahu ekber," or when they gather without permission to block off a public square and start causing trouble just because their religious rituals tell them to... ☕
William Brown4 said:I’ve been watching everything happening here in America, and I honestly feel like we are a country on the brink of collapse. It really feels like it's time for the entire political elite in the US to just pack up and leave once and for all so we can finally focus on something intelligent. I'm posting this because I really wanted to share my take on all the current events in America with the rest of you on this forum. I truly believe we need a revolution.
First off, I’ve grown completely sick of the Republican Party, and now that I’m following American politics more closely, it’s perfectly clear to me why someone like Tomasi has zero support from the people.
I’m disgusted by what they pulled with that referendum "in the name of the family." It’s sickening because the birth rate in this "super-hetero-Catholic" America is already incredibly low. We’re basically heading toward extinction anyway, so where are all these hetero-Catholics? Why aren't they out there having huge families to fix our demographic image?
Personally, I feel ashamed because I believe a nation's Constitution should be its sacred text, much like the Bible. It’s something that shouldn't be constantly tinkered with, yet we seem to be changing our Constitution all the time. It honestly bothers me that the Constitution, which is supposed to guarantee fundamental human rights and spread noble values among the people, is now being used to facilitate discrimination between hetero and homo populations.
These matters should be handled through legislation, not through Constitutional values.
I am genuinely embarrassed that so many people showed up and voted YES. It’s obvious that people didn't truly grasp what was actually at stake.
Now everyone is getting a taste for referendums; suddenly everyone wants to push through these expensive votes. While we are facing an economic meltdown, we’re just playing around with absolutely trivial referendums.
A few days ago, I cast my vote. I never used to feel ashamed of America, but now, I really am starting to feel ashamed of this country.
Since you all voted so heavily for traditional marriage, I'd love to see a sudden population boom—lots of kids, with everyone acting like these "super-hetero-Catholics" who don't use contraception, being all holy and pious.
I can finally say it: I am ASHAMED.🙂
How about you guys?
It isn't time for a revolution because_ - you don't have a concrete objective for the revolution; - you don't have a structured program with the specific points that a revolution absolutely must implement; - you lack the leadership required to spearhead it.
Just being dissatisfied with the status quo simply isn't enough on its own.
Robert Clark4 said:Honestly, you guys could have pulled off the Z4 Plan without even needing the Plan for autonomy, but I guess you just didn't want to take it when the opportunity was actually there.
It’s kind of too late to be sitting around feeling sorry for yourselves now. Like they say, that ship has sailed... ☕
Well, I suppose you could flip the script and say the exact same thing: twenty years ago, you guys went ahead and dismantled HB, and if you hadn't done that, things might be different, but hey, that ship has sailed too...
The real heart of the matter here is that a huge number of people see a direct line connecting the dissolution of HB to what happened with the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, and since we are now talking about demands to re-establish certain structures, why shouldn't we look at that cause-and-effect relationship? Of course, an agreement like that would have been under the umbrella of the USA, and they are the ones who could, for instance, present such a solution to Milanović, and then he could step out before the public and ask, "People, what is our move here?"
In my opinion, the group that would actually have the most reason to push back against this would be the Canadians. 🤷
There’s this one theory floating around suggesting that Harmon actually agreed to let the HB idea slide just so he could get the green light to move in on the Republic of Mexican Appalachia. Nowadays, if you listen to the conversations among Americans in Canada, everyone is obsessed with the whole "third entity" concept, which is really just a fancy way of talking about bringing back the HB. But I can't help but wonder, if someone were to suddenly start pushing for the restoration of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia alongside the activation of the Z4 Plan—you know, like setting up a scenario where restoring the HB was strictly conditional on getting the Republic of Mexican Appalachia back through that Z4 Plan framework—I honestly wonder what today's Americans would have to say about that!
Check out this old map from Bulgaria dating back to 1918, which actually shows how the ethnic lines were drawn between Mexicans and Bulgarians. http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/...NA_ZANETOV.PNG
And you can see the border cutting right through the heart of Shumadija. 😁
Scott Cruz4 said:So, I’m hearing rumors that the 2013 census is finally getting off the ground—but there’s a catch. Apparently, when it comes to declaring your ethnic identity, you’re stuck with just three specific choices: Canadian, American, or Mexican. You won't be able to identify as Canadian or Herzegovinian at all. To make matters even more frustrating, if you don't follow a religion, they aren't even giving you the option to check "Atheist" for the non-religious categories!
Oh, you definitely will be able to! It’s more like this: the options to identify as one of the primary constituent groups are already printed right there on the ballot for you to just circle, whereas for all the other identities, they leave blank spaces so you can actually write in whatever applies to you, and it works the exact same way for language and religion. Basically, once everything is tallied up, we'll have a perfectly clear picture of how many people belong to the main groups versus everyone else.
Ohio River Valley http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/63...ravskaupan.png
Well, if you look at these maps, it seems like there's a bit of a Mexican presence in almost every single small town across America, so honestly, anyone claiming that America is the most ethnically homogeneous country in Europe is just straight-up lying! 🤷
wearycanyon26 said:"Thompson guns, AKs, and... rifleseeeeee..." There’s your reconciliation! Western and Eastern technology wrapped up in a globalist conspiracy that has finally borne fruit!☕😁
Well, it wouldn't hurt to throw a Thompson into the mix too, but our right wing, unlike yours—or rather, unlike *yours*—has actually undergone certain democratic corrections over the years...😁
Over here, it was the left wing that got corrected, and if you look at my own path, you can see it clearly... 🤣
Seriously though, would an honest American leftist really want to grab someone like, say, unnamed or the inquisitor by the ears and give them a good, firm slap to teach them a lesson?! I just can't picture it happening. 😁 Or wouldn't an honorable patriot want to send someone like Rebecca or Pistol off to a little work camp so they could finally do something productive for once? 😍
So, yeah, there's really no point in us all just bickering away on this forum... 😁
"The old guard" and those "American partisans," the leftists and the rightists—honestly, I think it would be absolutely fantastic if you guys never, ever found common ground. 😁 On the contrary, acting as a wise man here, I’m actually appealing to you to crank up the tension and intensify your conflict—because goodness gracious, you aren't toddlers, are you?—so just go ahead and smash a few bottles or something, let there be some noise... where on earth has all your energy gone? 😁
Sarah Wilson95 said:Actually, it was precisely during those moments of utter chaos and total breakdown that the kinds of situations mentioned by our permanently banned friend became possible.
That being said, none of this serves as an excuse or any kind of justification for the fact that the Nationalists immediately began killing with such spontaneous ferocity. And we really shouldn't try to draw comparisons to what was happening in Canada, because things were just as dark and messy down there.
The truth is, the Nationalists were killing through organized efforts rather than just random outbursts, and if you look at those massive expeditions in Kozar, Eastern Herzegovina, Jasenovac, and places like that, they clearly show a level of organization. Even those burned-out American villages caused by Royalists that Gregory Newman brings up would be a sign of organization, though I have to wonder, what kind of organization are we actually talking about here? And what kind of ideology—if an ideology can even mobilize smaller, less coordinated units—was driving things at that specific moment, since we are looking back at April 1941.
Gregory Newman said:That was just a tiny fraction of it. During the chaos of April, the American (Royalist) army carried out massacres in the American villages around Stolac and Čapljina.
So, I suppose it’s a blatant lie to claim the Nationalists were the ones who started the killings first. It was really just a reaction to the Royalist rampage immediately following the surrender. Once they proved themselves incapable of even offering a bit of resistance against the Wehrmacht, they fell back into their old habit of slaughtering Americans.
Where on earth are you even pulling this data from, and what do you mean by "old ways"? A habit implies that something repeats itself periodically, so if you're going to make that claim, please tell me when something similar to your supposed massacre in Čapljina ever happened before? Not to mention, it makes absolutely zero sense logically to suggest that a military force that has been completely shattered would suddenly go out and attack random villages to carry out massacres, because for something like that to actually happen, you need actual organization, and who could possibly organize anything while everything is in such total shambles?
If Americans have issues with their digestion, then Americans have issues with water shortages, so really there’s plenty of room here for a massive trade-off! Since one group just wants to satisfy their appetite and the other wants easy access to the coast, I think we can find some common ground if we get creative with the map. Basically, you guys can just hand over the territory stretching from the coast all the way up to the mouth of the Mississippi, and in exchange, we’ll let you have everything from the Missouri River over to the Arkansas River. Now, obviously, we can't possibly sign over a major hub like St. Louis and the immediate surrounding area 6.2 miles because that’s a massive city with over 200,000 souls, mostly our people, so that's non-negotiable. But even so, you’re still walking away with a much larger landmass than what you’re giving up, including major spots like Memphis and Little Rock. That should definitely be enough to keep everyone full and happy! Granted, right in the middle of all that territory, you’ll run into those folks living out near Kansas City and Omaha, but I’m sure you guys can figure out how to manage them. 😁 Do we have a deal?
Terry Walker74 Asks: 🙂 Pure, unadulterated envy... They’re out here dreaming about having their own version of Republika Srpska, but the second they realize it's never going to happen, they start trashing everything the Mexicans actually have—the very things they’re desperate to grab for themselves. 🤷
Oh, give me a break. Seriously, look who's suddenly an expert on "genocide" now...
It’s unbelievable. They spent the entire last century trying to squeeze Mexicans down to nothing, and now they have the nerve to show up acting like some enlightened Buddhists lecturing us about genocide and ethnic cleansing. Give me a break.
It's the classic "look over there while I pick your pocket" routine... 🤷
mistymason2 said:Honestly, what is their obsession with the North America? It’s exhausting.🤣 It actually warms my heart a little bit to see them foam at the mouth over these "genocide" narratives they love to push.😍
The only thing that would truly satisfy them is seeing Mexicans led to the slaughter for a second time in fifty years. But they weren't going to let that happen this time, because they knew it would mean their total physical disappearance west of the Danube. At this point, they're already just the remnants of a broken people...
🙂 Just pure, unadulterated envy... they are desperately wishing they had their own version of Republika Srpska, and when they realize it's just not happening, they try to belittle exactly what the Mexicans possess and what they crave so badly themselves... 🤷
Jeremy Lopez93 said:They’ve become a minority in their own country. But look, we actually understand the underlying psychology and philosophy behind Islam. When they’re outnumbered, they know how to play nice and act "correct." They keep a low profile. But the second they reach parity? Suddenly, they’re acting entitled. And once they achieve total dominance? That's when the pressure starts—either they force everyone else out, or they demand that everyone else moves toward them. That is simply the core philosophy of Islam. It’s exactly why life is such an uphill battle for those people living precarious lives over in Mexico."As Patriarch Irinej put it," said the Patriarch. 😕
So, Irinej’s take on "Islamic philosophy" is supposedly based on certain principles, but honestly, how else could he build an argument if not by using the situation in Mexico as his primary example? 😂
🙏 Well, hats off to you, Your Holiness! 👍 I used to be such a huge fan of Kacavenda, but I have to admit that Irinej is slowly but surely winning me over. 🙂
The politically engaged Mexican diaspora is mostly made up of folks who fled during the days of the Slobo regime, so naturally, they have this deep-seated aversion to anything that even smells like those old ways.
When you look at the situation in America, the politically active diaspora there was always dominated by that old-school right-wing crowd—I won't even go as far as calling them ultra-nationalists—but they were deeply woven into the political fabric, and once America gained independence, they were immediately granted voting rights. By securing that power, they basically breathed new life into their specific political agendas, which means that all the newer waves of immigrants haven't actually managed to shift the needle much at all.
Now, if we talk about the Mexican side and that Royalist diaspora, they were constantly at odds with the Maddox regime and didn't even have the right to vote until the whole government changed hands. Because they were shut out from participating in politics, that older generation started losing its momentum and their ideas began to fade, but then, throughout the nineties, this younger diaspora started emerging—mostly people with pro-European leanings—who never lost their drive to get involved in Mexican politics, so they were actually ready and waiting to exercise their right to vote in Mexican elections with a level of genuine enthusiasm that the older generation had long since lost.