CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Larry Moore83 › Posts

Posts by Larry Moore83

95 posts shown.

Atheism vs. Spirituality: Zero Tolerance in Spirituality ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:Believers always say that God is love. So, following that logic, is God just a chemical reaction in the brain? Some kind of Endorphin rush? 🍿

Endocrine systems, hormones... it all comes down to biology, doesn't it?☕
🤣

And honestly, give credit where it's due—give the Man some credit for not being Nameless! We wouldn't want him logging in... only to end up carrying the weight of a soul... which, let's be honest, he doesn't even have. 😬
How many grains make a heap? in Philosophy ·
Matthew Chavez said:40 🙂

Do you happen to have two witnesses to back that up, too? 😁
How many grains make a heap? in Philosophy ·
silvergardener152 said:So, we're talking about piles now. My mind immediately drifted toward some chaotic backyard bonfire or maybe a wild, messy festival out in the Midwest where the music is nothing but bizarre, loud country-pop playing on loop. 😁
And honestly, I can't help but picture a spinning carnival ride right in the middle of the madness. 🤣 🤣

As for the actual answer to how many grains make up a pile—well, a pile of grains is logically just... 😁

But wait, let me correct myself—forgive me, my friend—when we discuss a heap, we are strictly talking about things that consist of individual grains. We aren't talking about a pile of dirty laundry, or trash, or even fertilizer... we mean grains! Whether it’s gunpowder, grapes, or sand... it really doesn't matter. 🧐

On top of that, there is a very clear distinction between a "heap" and a "pile"—though, if you think about it, a pile is essentially just what you call it when it fails to be a true heap. ☕

🤣
How many grains make a heap? in Philosophy ·
silvergardener152 said:That’s plenty. 🤔 At least, that's how I see it.

I mean, just think about it—how many ants does it take to call it an anthill? How many birds make a flock, or how many swallows constitute a migration pattern? It’s all so abstract, isn't it?😁

But honestly, why are we even overthinking this? Let's just head over to the local diner and enjoy ourselves instead.😁

Is everyone just piling in at once, then? Or am I just seeing things? 🤣
How many grains make a heap? in Philosophy ·
Larry Walker24 said:If one grain doesn't make a pile, then two grains don't either. Honestly, three isn't doing much for us either.

So, how many grains does it actually take to make a pile?

It would seem, then, that a heap consists entirely of nothing but grains...🙄
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
Gerald Hill said:My point isn't about that specific type of identity; I am speaking about the act of identifying oneself through a label after a certain experience. For instance, saying "I am a fascist, an idealist, a surrealist, a Marxist, or a liberal," rather than simply stating, "I am a human being, and that is that." It is irrational to reduce oneself to such labels. While human reason is certainly important and we must strive to be rational, we must also acknowledge that the human mind is not omnipotent.

I know you’re keeping quiet—and honestly, sometimes that's where the real truth stays hidden, tucked away beneath the surface like a secret waiting for the right moment to surface... isn't it? 😁...which is exactly why I’m bringing this specific example up in the first place.
Is there really any other way to look at it? I’ve been sitting here thinking about this for a while—and I know, I tend to wander when I get onto these philosophical paths—but isn't it true that there simply isn't any identity more identical to who we are than our own identity itself? It sounds like a bit of a tautology, doesn't it? A circular thought, perhaps—but then again, isn't that just how existence works? We try to layer ourselves with titles, roles, or even the clothes we wear, yet all those things are just... well, they're just noise. In the end, you can't escape the core of what you are. There isn't some secondary, "truer" version of us waiting around somewhere else—there is only the self. 😁

Don't go confusing professionalism—and all that baggage that comes along with it—with actual competence. It’s a fine line, isn't it? One could easily get lost in the shuffle of looking the part... or acting the part... while missing the point entirely.I am terribly sorry—please forgive me.It really comes down to nationality—and by extension, that sense of national identity—which inevitably shapes how we see things. Is it possible that our very background dictates our perspective before we even realize it? It’s a complex thought, isn't it? One cannot simply separate who they are from where they come from, especially when those cultural roots run so deep into one's core...I’m sorry—did I miss something? My apologies if I stepped in mid-conversation without realizing it....and so forth—plus the TSL stuff.
You really are... I suppose we're talking about the characters—the people involved in this whole situation. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? Who are they really, behind the personas they project to the world? It’s easy to get caught up in the labels, but when you actually start peeling back the layers... well, that's where things get interesting. They’re all just out there making things up—you know, this whole "I did this" and "I did that" routine... they're honestly just tripping. 😉
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
Gerald Hill said:I would have to disagree; I believe it does exist. It is simply found in the individual who refuses to be defined by any specific labels or ideologies, choosing instead to just live their life authentically.

Do you really think it's all about identification?! 😁
It’s inherently tied to identity—take someone like Larry Moore83, for instance. You can't really function without some form of identification; it’s just how things work. A person can certainly define themselves through their career, I suppose, provided they stay within the established norms and boundaries. Otherwise, you end up with those professionally distorted types—people who seem to be musicians by calling rather than by actual profession. You know, the pop stars, the actors, and so on... 🤣

One simply needs to remain rational, and that should be enough. 🙂
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
There exists just enough ism that doesn't truly belong to any single individual—it just sort of drifts there, doesn't it? 🙂
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
Forgive me—it’s pure masochism.
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
That’s just... a woman. 🤣
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
A class enemy?
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
Gerald Hill said:No, it appears I am not the one.

And honestly—it’ll be hard to recognize him, even if you actually ran into him, unless you can spot him by his own nature.
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
Have you tried looking in a mirror lately?
Is it possible to not belong to any subculture? in Philosophy ·
It’s essentially just the reverse of being in front of something. ☕
Rambo: Last Blood in Movies ·
Frank Moore4 said:...How would one even begin to capture the most striking and... well, let's call it "visceral" footage possible? I've been sitting here thinking about it—really digging into the mechanics of it—and it strikes me that there's a massive difference between just hitting 'record' and actually capturing something that sticks to your ribs. Is it all about the lighting? Or is it that raw, unpolished grit that makes you feel like you're standing right there in the middle of the chaos? It’s a fascinating question, really. To get that kind of impact—that sense of being truly present—you have to move past the technicalities and tap into something more primal. You need that tension, that slight discomfort that tells the viewer, "Hey, this is real." But then again, how much of that is controlled by the director and how much is just pure, beautiful luck? Is it even possible to find something truly realistic anymore? I mean, really think about it—where does the line actually sit between what we see on screen and the messy, unvarnished truth of our own lives? It’s a question that keeps me up sometimes—wondering if we're just chasing shadows. Has anyone actually sat down and watched a Rambo film lately? I mean, really sat down with it? It’s funny how those movies stick in the back of your mind—just drifting there like a half-remembered dream—and you realize you haven't revisited them in years. I was thinking about it the other day, wondering if they still hold up, or if we’ve just grown too old for that kind of raw, unfiltered intensity. Does anyone else feel that way?

It seems like we’re finally seeing the true face behind the mask of Rambo...🤦
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
rapidbear65 said:just working on some spiritual healing for the body🥱

Right... typical... me doing all the work, while the team just waits to be "elevated." 🤦
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
It’s honestly quite baffling—how does it work that my body just decides to break down on its own, yet somehow refuses to fix itself? It’s like I’m stuck in this endless loop of wear and tear, despite all the sunshine and good intentions!
🙂
🤣
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
rapidbear65 said:Hey man, can someone break down what this "making yourself sick" thing actually means? Thanks!

It's essentially the polar opposite of self-healing.
You're very welcome.
Does faith in miracles make God? in Spirituality ·
Self-healing isn't any more bizarre than the idea of choosing to be sick, is it?
And honestly—I don’t quite grasp the whole concept of miracles at all. 😁
What on earth did Joe Biden screw up this time? Honestly, the guy—I mean, really—he hasn't delivered a single thing worth mentioning. 😁