Posts by Gregory Jackson

John Jones3 said:Look, I’ll tell you right now—the light body of a deceased person doesn't look like that picture; it's more like a diminished orb rather than a full aura. And you're calling me a fraud? Fine, whatever—leave it at that. While we're on the subject, have you ever actually seen a "dead man" like that yourself? You don't even need to answer—it's a rhetorical question and I already know the
answer.
As for those glowing bodies clustered in certain locations, you can just chalk that up to the fairy tales told by Lubis. Those places only carry any energetic weight because people have been gathering there to pray for years.
And sure, maybe living like a saint is hard for some—and I say "some" because someone could hit enlightenment at 19 without reading a single book on the subject, while others spend years talking nonsense and stay stuck at the exact same spiritual level.

Also, how do you think an enlightened person wouldn't have time to be on a forum? You'd have to be an alien if you thought enlightenment meant being gone from the world. Even enlightened people make mistakes and take wrong turns—so they can certainly be on a forum discussing how they aren't actually enlightened. It seems nobody here is willing to accept anyone who honestly claims to be.

So, I guess I didn't actually give you the whole story, did I? There were really two different threads going on about this, but you're trying to squeeze everything into one single post, which is probably a bit much, I suppose. Anyway, the thing is, a celestial body is its own thing—we're talking these massive, spherical shapes glowing with this intense golden-yellow light that could be absolutely enormous, like, impossibly huge. Meanwhile, us folks who are still stuck in the middle of an incarnation, we range from being tiny little specks to maybe six feet tall, and honestly, I feel like that physical scale is actually a pretty decent way to tell how much someone has grown spiritually, if that makes any sense.

So, it might feel that way to some people, but I guess we aren't actually a single unified body or anything like that. If we don't reach enlightenment, then once we pass away, things just kind of branch off in different directions, maybe? Like, if someone dies without ever really waking up spiritually, they don't exactly transition into a collective body that moves on to take over a new life or whatever—it’s more like their consciousness just keeps drifting within this specific slice of the aura that doesn't break down. It’s made of this what you might call white bioenergy, which I think makes up about 10% of the whole aura structure. We end up heading off into these specific zones, sort of energetic realms or something, but the tricky part is that you aren't living forever, even though you live for a really, really long time. Those orbs people claim to see? Well, those are probably just those "souls" of the departed or some other weird energetic phenomena, and honestly, there's a ton of that stuff out there. I mean, only the truly enlightened ones who have managed to fully develop themselves get to move forward into that collective body to live eternally.

So, I see you’re really getting into that whole seeing orbs and all that mystical stuff, which is cool, I guess. Honestly, I’ve had my own brushes with energy too—like that one time I saw this super vivid screen of symbols just floating right in front of my eyes and everything. But, if I’m being totally real with you, I kind of view those things as minor distractions, you know? Like, they aren't bad or anything, but they can sort of pull you away from the actual goal, which is reaching true enlightenment. To me, being able to feel energetic shifts is more like a little nudge or a confirmation that you're actually heading in the right direction rather than some massive, life-changing milestone, since anyone can pretty much tap into that if they put in a bit of practice. It's kind of like when you try out some deep meditative breathing or those rhythmic spiritual exercises you might find in a yoga studio in San Francisco; you don't really sit there wondering if Ljubisa or some other guy made the whole thing up, because once you're in the zone, your body just takes over, and your hands and feet start moving to their own rhythm while you're caught in this huge, overwhelming fountain of energy. At the end of the day, I totally agree with you that your own personal experience is the only thing that really matters.

John Jones3 said:Look, I’ll tell you right now—the light body of a deceased person doesn't look like that picture; it's more like a diminished orb rather than a full aura. And you're calling me a fraud? Fine, whatever—leave it at that. While we're on the subject, have you ever actually seen a "dead man" like that yourself? You don't even need to answer—it's a rhetorical question and I already know the
answer.
As for those glowing bodies clustered in certain locations, you can just chalk that up to the fairy tales told by Lubis. Those places only carry any energetic weight because people have been gathering there to pray for years.
And sure, maybe living like a saint is hard for some—and I say "some" because someone could hit enlightenment at 19 without reading a single book on the subject, while others spend years talking nonsense and stay stuck at the exact same spiritual level.

Also, how do you think an enlightened person wouldn't have time to be on a forum? You'd have to be an alien if you thought enlightenment meant being gone from the world. Even enlightened people make mistakes and take wrong turns—so they can certainly be on a forum discussing how they aren't actually enlightened. It seems nobody here is willing to accept anyone who honestly claims to be.

So, that’s exactly what I’m getting at here. You’re out here claiming to be all enlightened and stuff, but honestly, you seem pretty worked up and ego-driven to me, which is kind of funny, I guess. If we actually went by those standards of yours, half the people hanging out on this forum would be considered fully awakened, wouldn't they? Maybe. It just seems like a bit much, you know?

So, I personally know three enlightened souls and maybe one guy who’s getting pretty close, I guess. There are really only three of them, even though I know a huge crowd of people who dabble in spirituality. Some actually do the work, while others just kind of... pretend to "do" it, if you know what I mean. Back in my younger days, I was definitely one of those people who was just "playing" at it. Believe me, none of the real ones have the spare time to even lift their heads from all their spiritual and worldly responsibilities, let alone spend their days trying to convince strangers on some internet forum that they’re enlightened and checking all the boxes. And honestly, none of them would ever go around calling themselves enlightened. You can just tell by their abilities and that sense of purity they carry—you know, judging by the fruits of their labor and all that. They don't exactly jump out at you, either; you might only catch a glimpse of how different they are when you're actually hanging out with them, but even then, you’d probably just chalk it up to their personality rather than enlightenment. I think the sooner someone shakes off the delusion of proclaiming themselves enlightened, the faster they’ll actually progress. Because once you think you’ve hit the finish line, there’s nowhere left to go.

The road to enlightenment is a long one, and we're talking decades here. Sure, there might be exceptions where someone hits a temporary state of enlightenment, but that’s super rare and usually gets mixed up with just having a sudden insight or a momentary understanding of the nature of reality—after which you just sink back into the darkness again.

Places of power are often churches or temples, but honestly, they aren't always. Places like Sedona that have small elements of power are often just ordinary fields. Like, Aphrodite's beach is just a beach, there isn't anything special around it, and the pyramids near Giza aren't religious sites, yet they still have all those energy fields. Even the old airport in Bangkok isn't a religious site, but it is a Major Manifestation point. These MM points have three specific, incredibly strong energy fields that set them apart from places like Sedona.
It’s true that churches are energetically powerful because of the prayers of the believers, but an inexperienced person shouldn't confuse that with a true place of power. Right now, I know about a dozen people across several different cities who are following this path and are able to observe energy and energy fields with extreme precision. When their visions align and match up with a specific feeling of energetic activity, well, there’s just no arguing with it, not even Ljubisa could say otherwise. I even met this group of intense people from a city like Nashville who create an energy field right in the middle of downtown through prayer. It’s still a bit small and undeveloped for now, but who knows where it’ll be in twenty years or so.

Well, you're enlightened, so you'll be the one to know what's what; I certainly won't be the one trying to convince you of anything, heaven forbid!

John Jones3 said:That’s what I said—the path of an enlightened person is endless; some things are simply worth chasing forever.

It doesn't just happen; I can see my own aura, and while it's white, it isn't perfectly pure—certain things are hard to clear out, like future illnesses or childhood complexes.

I already wrote this: becoming enlightened is just a way to give yourself more work—work in every sense of the word.

As for these methods of enlightenment, they're just fairy tales; you can't reach enlightenment through specific techniques like meditation, fasting, or sleep deprivation. How is someone who withdraws from the world supposed to contribute to society? That’s exactly what priests and various monks do—they retreat to their dens and try to reach enlightenment through artificial means. The best way is simply to live as a saint, and that’s it; there is no other way. You can meditate for 50 years, but if your mind is broken, you aren't going to get enlightened.

Gregory Jackson, you would be better off stepping back from just one single system or method of enlightenment; you seem to have latched onto one specific view, which leads nowhere. Half the things that your guy Lubis—or whatever his name is—says are nonsense; he just makes stuff up to stay popular. For instance, you wrote in the thread about Tesla that his glowing body was on some mountain in Greece, but who actually proved that?
How much did Tesla actually say about the light body dispersing and shifting form after death? He wouldn't claim he’s just sitting around waiting at some specific GPS coordinate—that's not how it works. From my own experience, nothing in the paranormal realm is ever strictly tied to a fixed location, whether we're talking about light bodies, orbs, or whatever else. Based on what Ljubisa says, what does a dying person's light body even look like?[/i]

It's true that character acts as a limit. Someone with a solid character basically has no ceiling when it comes to growth.

I kind of feel like you're being a bit fake here, like maybe you haven't actually reached enlightenment and it's more of a wishful thought, if I'm being totally blunt. An enlightened person wouldn't really have the time to hang out on a forum, right? And that whole idea of "just living like a saint" is actually the hardest part and is what leads to enlightenment. That's pretty much the whole spiritual story—how do you actually "live like a saint," and what does that even mean? Saying it that way makes it sound like a total piece of cake, which it definitely isn't. If it were that easy, why wouldn't we all be enlightened by now? Also, I guess there are multiple paths that lead to those two types of states, but there are as many paths as there are people. Neither Ljubisa nor Daskalos nor Jesus nor Muhammad can go on the journey for us, and there are so many wrong turns that anyone can take, even an enlightened person.

Now, meditation isn't some artificial path to enlightenment if you actually understand what meditation is and what's happening during it and why you're doing it in the first place. For example, a bunch of hermits in Kajlas's caves reached enlightenment without ever stepping foot outside. Who knows how many people in monasteries or other kinds of isolation have done the same throughout history. I think you might be mixing up what happens *after* enlightenment. Once you're there, staying isolated would be a huge mistake, but I don't want to get too carried away rambling about that again. An enlightened person needs to use their new abilities to help humanity. Otherwise, they just end up cycling back into society with all the incarnated folks...

John Jones3 said:That’s what I said—the path of an enlightened person is endless; some things are simply worth chasing forever.

It doesn't just happen; I can see my own aura, and while it's white, it isn't perfectly pure—certain things are hard to clear out, like future illnesses or childhood complexes.

I already wrote this: becoming enlightened is just a way to give yourself more work—work in every sense of the word.

As for these methods of enlightenment, they're just fairy tales; you can't reach enlightenment through specific techniques like meditation, fasting, or sleep deprivation. How is someone who withdraws from the world supposed to contribute to society? That’s exactly what priests and various monks do—they retreat to their dens and try to reach enlightenment through artificial means. The best way is simply to live as a saint, and that’s it; there is no other way. You can meditate for 50 years, but if your mind is broken, you aren't going to get enlightened.

Gregory Jackson, you would be better off stepping back from just one single system or method of enlightenment; you seem to have latched onto one specific view, which leads nowhere. Half the things that your guy Lubis—or whatever his name is—says are nonsense; he just makes stuff up to stay popular. For instance, you wrote in the thread about Tesla that his glowing body was on some mountain in Greece, but who actually proved that?
How much did Tesla actually say about the light body dispersing and shifting form after death? He wouldn't claim he’s just sitting around waiting at some specific GPS coordinate—that's not how it works. From my own experience, nothing in the paranormal realm is ever strictly tied to a fixed location, whether we're talking about light bodies, orbs, or whatever else. Based on what Ljubisa says, what does a dying person's light body even look like?[/i]

I suppose anyone striving for enlightenment can't really walk five different paths at once. You really need one main path, and I personally have maybe two or three secondary ones that just help clear the way for the primary one. I mean, I like having extra paths too, but then you end up like a guy digging shallow wells in ten different states and never actually finding water. I've gone into detail before about this "single system" thing and the experiences you gain, but I'll just keep it brief for now, though I know what I'm talking about. Connecting with energies is a pretty normal thing for you and anyone else pursuing spiritual growth, even if people aren't really aware of it. So, what's wrong with shedding light on it and knowing what you're doing, even if you only sort of know where it's leading? When you study Daskalos and Barbara Brennan and so many others, you see a ton of the same elements that Stojanovic discovered too; it's just that the methodology and the terminology are a bit different.

So, I’m basically saying this again, because it feels like it bears repeating, I guess. When someone truly reaches that peak level of enlightenment—you know, when you’ve fully developed that luminous body, or if you’re more into the mystical side of things, you might call it the "higher self"—that’s when consciousness actually transfers into this indestructible energetic structure. It’s essentially what all those religions have been trying to tell us about achieving "eternal life," though they frame it a bit differently, maybe. Now, these specific types of bodies, or conscious structures, tend to cluster around certain "power spots" across the US, and there are maybe a hundred of them or so. I think I actually did a whole long-winded post about this a while back, but yeah, we're talking places like Mount Shasta, the Vatican, Westminster Abbey over in London, the Hagia Sophia, or even Aphrodite's Beach... well, let's just say iconic sites like those. There are only a handful of these major hubs in the Western world, really. I’ve personally made the trip to most of them quite a few times, except for that one beach spot. The thing is, if you’ve actually put in the work and gotten spiritually fit, you won't have any trouble when you visit these places; you'll be able to pick up on the energetic shifts, and honestly, you might even actually see the energy moving around, if you catch my drift. You’ll probably notice that in the days following a visit, everything just feels... different. Like, your spiritual practices start clicking better, and your meditations get way deeper, too. At that point, you won't even need someone like Ljubisa to come along and explain things to you, you know?

So, when you go around asking "who actually proved that," I kind of wonder how you go about proving things to yourself, you know? Like, how do you validate what you’re seeing and feeling deep down? I mean, I guess it should be pretty obvious that you can't exactly use material evidence to prove the spiritual dimension, right? It's not like you can grab a piece of it and put it under a microscope. It’s more about witnessing energies, having these experiences that probably have endless variations, and just feeling that steady progress in your own spiritual practice as you try to, I don't know, live a life more aligned with saintly values. The whole path toward enlightenment through working with energy is such a unique journey—kind of like what you noticed in that other post—where certain laws start to reveal themselves while others just get totally demystified along the way.

I guess you could say that Tesla isn't just sitting around waiting, you know? He’s more like this spiritual entity now—or maybe even a universal body—that can basically reach out and talk to whoever he wants, whenever he feels like it. It’s kind of like how other massive enlightened figures operated, too. I mean, most people don't have a clue about this stuff because, honestly, to even pull off those kinds of connections, you have to be incredibly spiritually advanced, and you really need to establish contact with your own universal body first. There were tons of enlightened souls back in the day who probably had this ability to communicate with different planes of existence, but they might not have even realized it was an option, or maybe their interests were just focused on totally different things altogether.

So, there’s this one weird exception, though I guess it’s hard to say exactly why, but Plato isn't actually hanging out where all the heavy hitters and power players usually congregate; instead, he's just chilling near the amphitheater in that ancient city of Dion right at the foot of Mount Olympus. He actually lived there for a stretch of time, and now, well, it’s all just archaeological ruins and stuff, which is kind of wild when you think about it. It’s funny because he always had this knack for isolating himself from everyone else while he was still around, and honestly, it seems like even now, he’s still doing the exact same thing. 🙂

So, I’ve got this one totally wild story involving Tesla and Stojanovic that I just have to share, because it’s honestly kind of mind-blowing if you think about it for a second. There was this group of people practicing this specific system who actually stumbled upon these free-floating energy bodies out in some small rural town near Asheville, North Carolina—there were about eighteen of them, which isn't exactly a massive power center, but more like a specialized hub for a very specific purpose, I guess. Anyway, after one of Stojanovic's lectures, a few of them approached him and were like, "Hey, Ljubisa, we really need to talk to you about something serious." But instead of jumping right into it, he just holds up a hand and tells them to hang on a sec because he wants to play a recording first. He hits play on his dictaphone, and suddenly, they hear Stojanovic's own voice saying, "Today, a group of your seminar students will come to report a discovery..." It was wild! These guys were absolutely floored, just completely caught off guard. You see, back then, Stojanovic was basically in constant communication with Tesla through deep meditation—which, honestly, is just one more reason why meditation is such a big deal—and he was coming back from those deep, low brainwave states and just saying things out loud so he could record them later. So, technically, those were actually Tesla's words coming through. He eventually ended up writing that whole book, *Conversations with Tesla*, back in 2004, and ever since then, that little area around Asheville has become this soft spot for people who just know how much this practice helps them.

John Jones3 said:That’s what I said—the path of an enlightened person is endless; some things are simply worth chasing forever.

It doesn't just happen; I can see my own aura, and while it's white, it isn't perfectly pure—certain things are hard to clear out, like future illnesses or childhood complexes.

I already wrote this: becoming enlightened is just a way to give yourself more work—work in every sense of the word.

As for these methods of enlightenment, they're just fairy tales; you can't reach enlightenment through specific techniques like meditation, fasting, or sleep deprivation. How is someone who withdraws from the world supposed to contribute to society? That’s exactly what priests and various monks do—they retreat to their dens and try to reach enlightenment through artificial means. The best way is simply to live as a saint, and that’s it; there is no other way. You can meditate for 50 years, but if your mind is broken, you aren't going to get enlightened.

Gregory Jackson, you would be better off stepping back from just one single system or method of enlightenment; you seem to have latched onto one specific view, which leads nowhere. Half the things that your guy Lubis—or whatever his name is—says are nonsense; he just makes stuff up to stay popular. For instance, you wrote in the thread about Tesla that his glowing body was on some mountain in Greece, but who actually proved that?
How much did Tesla actually say about the light body dispersing and shifting form after death? He wouldn't claim he’s just sitting around waiting at some specific GPS coordinate—that's not how it works. From my own experience, nothing in the paranormal realm is ever strictly tied to a fixed location, whether we're talking about light bodies, orbs, or whatever else. Based on what Ljubisa says, what does a dying person's light body even look like?[/i]

So, the subtle body, both before you pass away and after, basically looks like this:

And honestly, it’s just superintelligent. I guess you could think of it as your third parent. It’s the thing that handles all those overflows, it’s responsible for your intuition, and it keeps track of everything from your previous lives, too. It kind of manages your karma and carries out your entire genetic program from the moment you're a baby until the day you die... just a really cool entity, I suppose...

And it’s totally true that nothing is limited by space, even if it isn't necessarily defined by it. I mean, there are specific places where things are located, but most of the time, that stuff can communicate without being stuck by spatial limits. You might want to look at those places as this massive external support system provided by the Creator to everyone.

John Jones3 said:Not really—I consider myself enlightened, and I haven't "ridden" anywhere.

Modern society is exactly what you described, but global peace and stability could actually stem from mass enlightenment. Just striving and devouring spiritual books is worlds apart from actually living it—that’s where people trip up—too much reading and not enough actual work on oneself. That seems to be the core issue today.

So, if you're basically declaring yourself enlightened, then I guess that means your whole journey toward enlightenment is pretty much wrapped up, right? I mean, we’ve definitely talked a ton about what enlightenment actually looks like, but honestly, there's just so much noise out there, so I figured I'd dig up one of my older posts where I was rambling on about those two different types of enlightenment. If any of that stuff resonates with you, or if you feel like you've already tapped into it, then maybe—just maybe—you've finally made it.

So, I was just sitting here thinking about it, and I guess there are basically three main things you really need to pull off reaching enlightenment, right? It’s kind of a big deal, I mean, it's everything, but if you break it down, it feels like there are these core requirements that just have to be met first...

I mean, I guess you could say it’s like being totally wrapped up in some kind of big, beautiful humanistic idea, you know? Like, just being completely devoted to that whole vibe of human potential and stuff. It’s a bit of a trip when you really think about it, maybe even a little overwhelming sometimes, but there's something just so incredibly uplifting about it all, I suppose.
So, I was just sitting here thinking about how we all struggle to get our nervous systems actually working the way they’re supposed to, you know? Like, reaching that state of perfect functioning where everything just flows... it feels like such a massive goal sometimes, I guess. It's kind of wild when you think about it, because our nerves are basically the electrical wiring for everything we do, and if that's off, everything else feels a little bit wonky, maybe. I feel like we spend so much time focusing on other stuff, but if you can just get that internal circuitry balanced out, life might actually feel a whole lot smoother, or at least that's my theory, anyway. It's a big undertaking, for sure, but man, imagine how much better things would be if we could just hit that sweet spot of total neurological harmony.
So, I was just sitting here thinking about how anyone can actually go about reaching those top-tier, like, totally wild paranormal and spiritual powers, you know? It’s kind of a trip when you really get into it, I guess, but there’s definitely a path toward tapping into that whole realm of high-level spiritual energy if you're looking for it.

I guess when you finally hit that point, a person's aura just becomes, like, perfectly pure or whatever. And honestly, I don't think you even have to be aware that this goal exists just to reach enlightenment; it’s kind of wild when you think about it. Like, so many different types of people—you've got your scientists, writers, artists, all those deep religious thinkers, and just general intellectuals—they’ve all reached enlightenment without ever even realizing there was such a thing. They just lived their lives, focusing on positive thoughts and doing good work, which eventually brought their aura into that pure state, and I suppose that's really the whole prerequisite for hitting enlightenment in the first place.

I mean, I guess you could say that when people actually hit that level of enlightenment, things start changing in a really, really massive way, you know? It’s not just some little tweak here or there, but like, a total overhaul of their entire existence, I suppose. Everything shifts.

I mean, if you look at it from a purely physical standpoint, it’s like your whole body just gets this massive surge of life, you know? Like, everything starts revitalizing all at once, and I guess you could say you actually start feeling younger again, which is pretty wild. Your physical capabilities just kind of skyrocket, and maybe even those nagging chronic issues you've been dealing with just sort of back off and disappear. You end up feeling totally tireless, almost like you have endless energy, and honestly, you probably won't even need more than two or three hours of sleep a night because you're just so wired and ready to go.
I guess you could say that from a purely psychic standpoint, you eventually hit this really calm, almost blissful headspace, mostly because all those irrational fears and constant worries just kind of evaporate when you start seeing things coming before they actually happen, which I suppose basically eliminates any chance of being caught off guard by anything at all.
So, when you start looking at how much someone's paranormal abilities can actually shift, man, the changes are honestly pretty massive, I guess. Like, once someone reaches enlightenment, they aren't just seeing things differently—they’re clearly seeing the past and the future all at once, and they can basically pinpoint exactly why someone is sick and what kind of energy work is needed to fix it. It’s wild. And then there’s all these different powers that pop up depending on what a person is naturally tuned into—you know, like reading minds, seeing stuff from miles away, telekinesis, even levitation, or just having this deep, intuitive grasp on how all energy works (though, to be fair, sometimes even the enlightened folks don't fully realize just how much they can actually do). I mean, if you think about it, the whole reason they have such incredible wisdom and insight is probably because they're constantly tapping into those continuous connections with spiritual beings and that big, unified field... you know, the Creator.
I mean, when you look at what they’re actually capable of doing, there really isn't anything that's beyond their grasp, I guess. Like, they basically have a handle on everything from a total mastery of how the human body works and the deep complexities of the psyche, all the way down to fixing massive economic headaches or figuring out how to scale up food production. They could probably even influence the masses in a good way, maybe boosting tolerance between different groups and nations, which would go a long way toward actually securing some peace in the world, if you know what I mean.

I guess the whole point of being an enlightened person—if you can even call it that, maybe I'm overthinking it—is really about making the absolute most of those new abilities you've picked up, you know? It’s like, once you see the light, you kind of have this duty to step up and help push human civilization forward, because at the end of the day, the ultimate goal has to be getting as many people as possible onto the path of the Creator. I mean, that's just how I see it, anyway. Because honestly, if we don't do that, then all the hope the Creator has for us, along with all that intense effort spiritual beings poured into a person to get them there, plus all our own hard work... well, it wouldn't really bear any fruit, would it? It would all just kind of go to waste, which would be a real shame.

I mean, I guess this kind of applies to that whole "mainstream" version of enlightenment that everyone seems to think is the only way to go, you know? Like, there's this one specific path people always point to and act like it’s the absolute gold standard, but honestly, it feels like such a narrow view of things if you really stop to think about it for a second.

So, I was just sitting here thinking about how there are basically two main ways or paths you can take toward enlightenment, and honestly, the whole thing really comes down to the specific route you decide to wander down. There’s that one path everyone seems to talk about all the time, you know? It's probably the most famous one, especially since it's what you see being pushed by all those Eastern religions and philosophical traditions over in Asia, where they basically frame it as the "correct" or standard way to reach that enlightened state.

So, I guess if you look at how they approach things, their whole path toward enlightenment is really more of an inward journey, right? It’s all about finding that deep spiritual peace, just being totally relaxed and blissful, and basically scrubbing away any negative thoughts or anything else that might mess with that inner quiet. Then, once you’ve got that peace, it kind of clears the way for this super pure aura and aligns your own thoughts with the will of the Creator, which I think is what finally opens the door to those high-level paranormal abilities. But here's the thing—it seems like when these enlightened folks use their intention or desire to manifest stuff, they're tapping into these spiritual energies that stay sort of tucked away in the background. It's almost like they're hidden from people who are just looking to grab some power for themselves without actually bothering to study the energy or the mechanics behind how it all works. So, in my opinion, it's like they were definitely utilizing certain effects or possibilities, but they weren't really "controlling" the energies in a technical sense, you know? They weren't exactly managing the flow or engaging in deep contact with the energies or testing out all their extra potential... they were just letting it happen.

So, there's this second kind of enlightenment, which I guess is actually pretty rare—maybe only happens in like 10% of cases? It’s this totally different vibe where you're just completely wide open to the universe and all those energy possibilities out there, which basically lets someone fully soak up and utilize every bit of energetic potential available. Usually, the folks who end up hitting this specific type of enlightenment are the ones who already have this deep thirst or a real affinity for exploring those kinds of phenomena.

The outward stuff you see with this version isn't quite as obvious as it is with the more common type, I suppose. For starters, you don't really get that total, perfect stillness or bliss—you know, that whole Nirvana thing—and some of those classic traits like reading minds or spontaneously seeing auras might be way more subtle or even missing entirely compared to the mainstream version. But then again, some things are super similar in both types, like how physical traits might gradually revert back to how a thirty-five-year-old looks, or just having this incredibly sharp grasp on economics, politics, or whatever science the person is actually into.

I mean, if there's a "better side" to this second type, it's probably the amazing potential for further growth because these people are so tuned into spiritual energies and they actually figure out how to use them—not just to grab power, but to help solve or ease certain big global issues that they care about. Most of the time, though, this kind of work goes totally unnoticed by everyone else since they usually just do it quietly in the background.

Anyway, I guess the actual quality of the enlightenment itself is pretty much equal in both cases.

Jeremy Alvarez5 said:I guess I was being a bit vague there. I think what I was getting at is that when people experience astral projections or whatever, they usually expect to see glimpses of the future first. Honestly, the idea kind of creeps me out—I feel like that path leads straight to obsession. But then again, maybe there's a positive side to it, like using those flashes for creative brainstorming or doing some mental dry run to make something happen. I guess what I wanted to ask is: do you ever wonder if those images—which are partly glimpses of the past—are actually just products of your own desires? Or maybe they're tied to old traumas? Like, could intense emotions or certain past hurts be conditioning us to focus on specific scenes, making them stick in our minds more easily than other things, whether we want them to or not? I also wondered if, when you see these past events, you notice the visions changing, expanding, or adding new details over time. Our memories, especially the ones we try to recall under hypnosis, might be partially manufactured by how our brain processed those experiences in the first place...

Speaking of false memories, I think Nikola had a brother, maybe named Dan or something similar? Apparently, his brother passed away as a child, and during the whole chaos of it, he was accused of pushing Nikola down the stairs. Little Nikola didn't even remember doing it, so maybe that's a case of false memories—or just huge gaps in memory, I guess.

That’s super interesting to think about, both from his brother's perspective and Nikola's. I mean, childhood jealousy and those sudden outbursts among siblings aren't exactly rare, right? Kids sort of condition each other in those ways...

It also helps explain this: "despite breaks in his education due to being sickly and dealing with the heavy psychological trauma caused by the death of his older brother Dan, Tesla continued his studies at the University of Graz in Austria."

Nikola was also pretty sick quite often; if I remember correctly from a lecture I heard, he was on the verge of death a few times. If he carried any sense of guilt regarding his brother's death, maybe that's why he tried so hard to leave his mark on the world in the present moment—to ensure he stayed, rather than someone else... Either way, that doesn't sound like a fact anyone would want to carry around in their head, and from a standpoint of weakened immunity and health issues, it seems like a pretty big clue.

If I remember right, his brother fell off a horse or got kicked or something like that. But honestly, if you want to hear the truth about Tesla straight from the man himself, you should just pick up his book My Inventions. It covers all of that—his health struggles, those early visions he had in his head, and all the crazy experimenting he did before he ever built a single model. It’s such an easy read, really, just a great, engaging writing style. You can tell when a truly enlightened person is writing...

Jeremy Alvarez5 said:I’ve heard somewhere that older folks usually sleep less too, and that they tend to be more sensitive to noise.

Maybe it isn't just a result of spiritual enlightenment, but could it also be because they aren't doing heavy physical labor anymore—you know, trading intense workouts for long walks and mental gymnastics instead?

Some religious orders actually try to cut their sleep short on purpose; I think some nuns wake up every four hours just to pray, if I remember correctly. But honestly, trying to force yourself to sleep less sounds like a recipe for disaster. I once saw someone who looked like they were barely holding it together during the day, eyes looking totally glazed over. If this kind of sleep deprivation isn't happening naturally, I don't think forcing it is a good path toward enlightenment—it feels more like a fast track to some pretty serious health issues.

It’s not something reserved strictly for the enlightened, but for them, it seems almost like a given. By getting by on those short bursts of sleep, they end up feeling totally refreshed, which is wild compared to us folks who drag ourselves through eight hours and still feel wiped...

Jeremy Alvarez5 said:Hey, Gregory Jackson 👍, I was wondering... is that the same Mount Gora where humans aren't even allowed to set foot? Also, out of all those glowing spirits, do any of them whisper in a female voice, maybe telling me how to sign up for a subscription with her 😍?

Hey Paul! Yeah, unfortunately, it's totally off-limits. But honestly, if you're looking for spiritual growth, you don't actually need to step foot on the mountain itself. See, the astral body is this spherical energy structure that basically represents the consciousness of an enlightened being—someone who isn't coming back to the USA anymore. So, instead of this physical body, consciousness just shifts into this indestructible form called the astral body. Kind of a clunky way to put it, I guess.

You can actually have your aura infused by the energy from those glowing bodies while riding a tour boat circling Mount Olympus, because the mobility of the astral body in that area reaches a few hundred yards out from the shore. I mean, I've only been on land once, but I've been out on the boats two or three times, and everything works great. I just take whatever I can get in the moment, you know?
It's not like these crazy, spectacular things happen all the time, but I remember one instance during a boat ride—I think it was back in 1998—where this guy, a doctor who was traveling with a group of other spiritual seekers, suddenly regained his sense of smell after losing it for fifteen years. He was so shocked and overwhelmed with gratitude that he just sat in a corner and started crying. And then, well, he spent the rest of the trip smelling every woman on the boat 🙂

One of those telltale signs you see in people who have reached a higher state of consciousness is that they only need about two or three hours of shut-eye.

"Yeah, I only get about two hours of sleep a day,
but whenever I do crash,
I sleep incredibly well—it's almost like an art form,
since I truly believe sleeping is an art,
kind of like mastering deep breathing...
which is something you really have to learn how to do.

It’s one of those ancient Eastern secrets...
though, if you ask me, it isn't really a secret at all.

Once I wake up, even if it was just a quick nap,....
I find I have to do some mental exercises
just to stay centered and balanced ....
with all that fresh life energy I've just taken in."....

( Nikola Tesla )

Jeremy Alvarez5 said:Nikola Tesla was easily one of the most legendary figures to ever walk the earth, and he’s earned so much respect over the years. His life story isn't even *that* long ago, so I guess you could say people have already started weaving all these myths and legends around his biography.

Since he was such a famous inventor, even the tiny, mundane details about how he lived really fascinated people. If I recall correctly, he might have even kept a journal at some point. I’ve spent quite a bit of time looking into his life—watching documentaries (like those special feature CDs you’d get with magazines from the Tree of Knowledge, or just random TV specials), reading a book that was part of a high school curriculum back in the old days of the US, listening to lectures from the New Acropolis, and just browsing around online.

There’s a lot of talk about how he barely slept, or how he absolutely hated going to doctors, even when he actually had health issues. He used to obsessively count distances he walked or whatever, and he would basically build his entire inventions in his mind before ever touching a tool. He was also a huge advocate for world peace, never married, and apparently, because his work pace was so intense, he just couldn't find anyone who could actually keep up with him. He’d host a press conference once a year and stuff like that. One thing I found particularly interesting in his biography was how, despite sleeping so little, he mentioned dreaming or visualizing himself traveling all over the place right before drifting off (he was a big reader, too). He’d sometimes wait for these mental images to appear, noting that if they didn't show up, he knew he was in for a long, restless night.

I’m actually really curious about that part from a spiritual perspective. Could anyone weigh in on this based on your own experiences with meditation or anything similar?

»Every once in a while, maybe at these really rare intervals, a massive spirit of discovery descends upon Earth to drop some kind of secret meant to push humanity forward. It picks out the most prepared, most deserving soul and whispers that truth right into their ear. This precious knowledge hits you like a sudden flash of light. Once you finally grasp the hidden meaning, the chosen one experiences this incredible shift where everything looks totally different—like a whole new world is unfolding right before their eyes. And it’s not just some fleeting illusion or a trick played by a wandering imagination that’ll just fade away. These miracles, even if they seem impossible, stay real. He knows it deep down, there's zero doubt in his mind, because he can feel it with every fiber of his being: it's the Great Idea.«

Nikola Tesla in “Beleška on Kabaneljasov patent no. 164 995”

If you ask me, Nikola Tesla is basically the ultimate example of a highly enlightened person, which is pretty rare to see in human history, I suppose. According to what Ljubiša Stojanović has found, Tesla was actually what the Indian spiritual traditions call an "avatar." You know, like these incarnations of spiritual energy sent down specifically to help move humanity along its path.

It seems like the spiritual essence of Nikola Tesla has incarnated multiple times throughout history, always showing up during these huge turning points for the human race. His first big task back then was teaching people how to handle fire. In that life, he was probably that primal ancestor who had the guts to walk up to a lightning-struck tree and bring that flame back to the cave to save his terrified kin. Then, in the next phase, he was likely the one domesticating wild animals or teaching agriculture and crop cultivation. Even before we knew him as the great scientist Nikola Tesla, he might have been a technician or engineer who gave James Watt that crucial bit of advice when he was stuck on a major problem with the steam engine. Finally, in this most recent life, born into a family of priests and living as an American citizen under the name Nikola Tesla, he came up with a ton of groundbreaking patents—though, honestly, many of them never even saw the light of day because, I guess, humanity just wasn't spiritually evolved enough to actually use them.

The spiritual entity of Nikola Tesla is actually one of the energies that has been passing down wisdom to Ljubiša Stojanović for over ten years now, through these deep meditative states where he receives messages that are super important for the future of people and the planet Earth. That’s basically how the book »conversation with Tesla« came to be. Most of these recent insights are about receiving help from space via thermal energy, wireless power transmission, and even some practical spiritual advice.

The luminous essence of Nikola Tesla is located at the power center of Mount Gora, which is like the strongest energy spot in Europe, containing 472 luminous bodies of great enlightened souls—mostly ancient Greek thinkers and scientists like Pericles, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Archimedes, and a bunch of others. There are even some smaller groups of luminous bodies dating back to before the Greeks arrived in the North America. There's also a larger group there belonging to great figures from Russia, Ukraine, and Bulgaria.

wearyhawk83 said:My post was written from the perspective that there is no inherent "point" to existence, which I know most people find impossible to wrap their heads around.

P.S. Hey, when you're quoting someone, it's way easier to read if you include the full block. That means you shouldn't strip out the parts with the angle brackets. For example:

If you want to quote someone without including their name, just highlight the text you want and hit the quote icon in the toolbar right next to the bold and italic options. It's the 15th icon in the row. You can also just manually type after it.

What you're talking about now is a different beast entirely. It might not be a direct pivot from my original point, but the subject matter is definitely different.

I'll weigh in on that, too. Playing a game for four days straight while being "conscious" is not the same thing as what you're describing. You're assuming that how "deep" someone is is directly tied to how much awareness they have, which ignores intention or motivation—and those are massive factors. In fact, they're everything.

Playing games consciously for four days is mostly just a reflection of having too much free time, nothing more. On the flip side, killing people while being fully conscious for four days would be a reflection of pure malice, not "spiritual depth."
Being a spiritual person through your actions requires more than just being aware. There's a whole element of love involved, but since people seem to miss the mark on that, I won't dive into it right now.

We keep talking past each other, like we're arguing about nothing important, so maybe it's better if we just leave it at that.

casualeagle82 said:You guys talk about spirituality like it’s some trendy fad you pick up over a weekend—one day we’re all Zen, the next we’re heading to a Lakers game.
Spirituality—since it's such a vague concept anyway—isn't something you achieve by trying. You live it. It’s easy to just sit here and churn out endless sentences like Larry Wilson5 and Gregory Jackson do, acting like the rest of us should think you're somehow enlightened.

But honestly, the whole "guru" thing? Ridiculous. This guy’s been "spiritual" for 20 years? A "powerful figure"? What does that even mean? Did he play Lines? Who is he going to be a guru to? Does someone need to tell you when you're actually satisfied with your life or not? Is a guru just a coach? And that "powerful figure" bit... please.

Spirituality, however you want to label it, is just how you see the world and interact with it. We’re all spiritual in our own way, and no guru is ever going to teach you that. For me, fulfillment comes during the rough patches. When things go sideways, I don't sit around crying; I head out for a long run outside the city limits until I've worked every bit of tension out of my system. My head clears, the world's problems vanish for a few hours, and those moments define who I am. I didn't "develop" that, and some "FRAUDULENT GURU" didn't lecture me on how to do it. It’s just part of being me. It’s part of our nature. You don't learn it; you just are.

Stay cool, man 🙂

Well, I guess if you're laughing, then mission accomplished, right? We're out here trying to spread some good vibes. Since this debate seems to be going nowhere fast, maybe we should just pivot back to gaming—for instance, I've always been a huge fan of Civilization, which is pretty much why I used to drop so much cash on new PCs back in the day, plus stuff like Heroes of Might & Magic and Starcraft too. But, I don't know, over the last couple of years, my free time has basically dwindled down to nothing...

wearyhawk83 said:Gregory Jackson, if you're struggling to see my point, it's because you're lacking a bit of critical thinking—and honestly, maybe a little awareness right now too.
In your last post, you basically identified with your teacher and felt this massive need to defend an obvious lie by trying to pass it off as something normal or even "spiritual":

my ex guru spent four days and four nights continuously playing Lines, you know, that simple game where you line up five colored beads.

On the flip side, you totally missed that I wasn't even trying to shade the guy, I was just calling out his poorly worded response, basically, how incomplete it was.

Just because someone isn't eating, sleeping, or living in total harmony with nature—staying awake 24/7 while doing things that seem pretty useless—doesn't mean they aren't spiritual or acting from the heart, like people love to say. You've gotta separate the essential from the trivial and know how to recognize the right time, place, and way to act.

So, yeah, that’s just my way of paraphrasing the general vibe of it. But, man, I see people just don't get it, so let me try explaining again: the quality of your consciousness—which is, I mean, a pretty undeniable sign of someone's personal growth—doesn't actually depend on specific actions or things you're doing in the moment. Most of the time, we're just unconscious, or we aren't really "there," just kind of running like machines following some pre-set program. And when we're in that state, we end up creating all this psychological mess, tension, and pain for ourselves. If you can actually maintain awareness—that state of expanded consciousness where your thoughts, mechanisms, or reactions don't cloud what's actually happening—then you can do that in any situation. Just... I don't know, try playing a video game for four days straight without stopping, or try working at full capacity with total awareness for that long. It's a brutal spiritual challenge. And just so I don't have to deal with anyone else misunderstanding me: honestly, staying conscious for even fifteen solid minutes is a huge feat, let alone trying to do it for four days while doing anything at all.

wearyhawk83 said:Honestly, I stay far away from that kind of "spirituality." That isn't spirituality; it’s just pure suggestibility. He was just trying to use "consciousness" as a cheap excuse for his gaming addiction.
It’s like saying I can justify a gambling addiction by claiming I’m in a "high state of consciousness" while hitting the casino, or heaven forbid, while committing a crime. His answer is totally incomplete, especially since he barely even touched on the idea of integrity.

Any kind of extreme behavior is a million miles away from being spiritual.

Come on now, you really can't jump to those kinds of conclusions based on just one little episode, I guess. He wasn't even playing before or after, so there's nothing to talk about regarding an actual addiction. There is way more going on here—staying alert, "fighting" through the fatigue, "battling" the boredom... all of those things actually require total awareness and wholeness and some pretty serious mental work. But I suppose to someone looking in from the outside, it probably doesn't look that way at all.

So, I’ve got this one old story for you—my former mentor once went on this wild streak where he played Lines for four days and four nights straight without even blinking. You know, that super simple game where you just try to line up five colored balls in a row? It was honestly kind of intense; they basically just kept him fueled up with food and water while he was totally locked in. Now, this guy is seriously enlightened—we're talking twenty years deep into this stuff, a really powerful presence. Anyway, when he caught a glimpse of what I was thinking about earlier, he made a point similar to one of those posts above, saying that it’s really all about the quality of your consciousness and how whole or integrated it feels, rather than the specific act itself. I guess what he meant was you could be in a state of total meditation while standing in line at a Target, or you could be in the middle of absolute chaos and still be "meditating." So, yeah, it doesn't really matter if you're playing Lines or whatever else; whether you're actually being "spiritual" or not just comes down to the depth and integrity of your awareness while you're doing it.

Daniel Castillo11 said:Here is how the early Church Fathers and theologians described the nature of God:

Tatian the Syrian

“Our God knows no beginning within time. He is Himself without origin, acting as the very fountainhead of all existence. God is spirit, existing entirely apart from matter; rather, He is the architect of the material spirits and the phenomena that manifest within the physical realm. He is the invisible Father of both the perceptible and the unseen” (Epistle to the Greeks 4 [A.D. 170]).

Athanasius

“I have demonstrated sufficiently that we are not atheists, for we acknowledge one God—unbegotten, eternal, invisible, unchanging, incomprehensible, and unbound. He is a being known only through intellect and reason, enveloped in light and beauty; He is spirit possessing indescribable power, through whom all things were created and ordered by His Word, and through whom they are sustained in being” (Apology for Christians 10 [A.D. 177]).

Irenaeus

“The Father of all things remains far removed from these earthly affairs, from the fleeting emotions and passions of men. He is simple, lacking any composition or structure, being identical only to Himself. He is pure intellect, pure spirit, pure thought, and pure reason... the very essence of light and the ultimate source of every good; this is how the pious and religious have always spoken of God” (Against Heresies 2,13,3 [A.D. 189]).

Clement of Alexandria

“Consider the hierarchy of substance: first, there is that which exists purely in itself, much like a stone is defined as a substance. Second is the substance capable of growth, such as a plant that flourishes and then decays. Third is the animated, sensory substance, like an animal or a horse. Fourth is the animated, sensory, and rational substance, found in mankind. From this, we see that each of us is composed of elements of the whole, for we possess an immaterial soul and mind, which serves as the image of God” (Excerpt from On Providence [A.D. 200]).

“Being resides in God. God is the divine Being, eternal and without beginning, incorporeal and limitless, the cause of everything that exists. To be is to persist completely. Nature is the truth of things, their inner reality. For some, nature is merely the product of what has come to be; for others, it is God’s providence, which causes being and provides the mode of existence for all created things.” (Ibid).

“What is God? ‘God,’ as the Lord says, ‘is spirit.’ Spirit is a specific, incorporeal, and indescribable substance. Incorporeal means that which possesses no body, whose existence is not defined by breath, length, or depth. And indescribable refers to that which occupies no space, yet dwells fully within all things, and within each thing entirely, while remaining perfectly itself.” (Ibid).

“No one can truly express Him in His entirety. Because of His sheer magnitude, He is defined as All, and He is the Father of all creation. There are no parts to which He could be assigned, for He is One and indivisible; thus, He is also infinite. We do not speak of Him in terms of being incomprehensible, but rather in terms of His sovereign, dimensionless, and boundless nature. Therefore, He is without form or name (Miscellaneous 5,13 [A.D. 208]).

Origen

“Since our own minds are inherently incapable of perceiving God as He truly is, we recognize the Father of all creation through the beauty of His works and the elegance of His handiwork. Thus, God is not regarded as a bodily being or one who inhabits a body, but as a purely intellectual Being, acknowledging that there is no addition or composition of any kind within Him” (Fundamental Truths 1,1,16 [A.D. 225]).

“John writes in the Gospel: 'No one has ever seen God,' clearly stating to all who have understanding that there is no nature through which God is visible—not because He might accidentally be seen by the eyes of a perishable creature, but because it is impossible by His very nature to be seen” (Ibid 1,1,8).

Athanasius

“God, however, since He has no parts, is the Father of the Son without division or change. For there is no beginning derived from His incorporeality, nor does anything enter into Him as it does into man. Simple in His nature, He is the Father of the only Son” (Letter on the Council of Nicaea 11 [A.D. 350]).

I suppose I should start by saying that there are times when one feels a bit lost in the shuffle of things, much like wandering through a dense fog without a compass, though perhaps even more aimlessly than that. It’s an odd sensation, isn't it? To feel as though you are drifting through life without a clear sense of direction or purpose, almost as if the very ground beneath your feet were made of shifting sand rather than something solid and dependable. There was this one afternoon, years ago, while I was sitting in a quiet little café over in Seattle—just watching the rain hit the window and thinking about how unpredictable existence can be—that I realized just how often we find ourselves stumbling blindly through our own decisions. We try to make sense of everything, to build these elaborate structures of logic and reason, yet we often end up feeling quite sightless in the face of true uncertainty. It’s a heavy thought, certainly, but one that seems to weigh on many of us as we navigate the complexities of being alive in this great, sprawling nation.

"God is simple, uncomplicated, and purely spiritual in nature; He possesses neither ears nor any physical organs for speech. He is pure essence and infinite, existing without being composed of numbers or constituent parts" (Holy Spirit 35 [a.d. 362.]).

Hilary of Poitiers

One must first hold fast to the realization that God is entirely incorporeal. He isn’t some collection of physical parts or a composite of various limbs and organs that might make up a biological body. If we look at the Gospel, it is clearly stated that God is spirit—invisible, eternal in nature, immeasurable, and completely self-sufficient. It is written that a spirit lacks the flesh and bone that define our physical existence; God’s very substance requires none of those earthly components. Yet, even though He lacks a physical frame, He remains omnipresent, dwelling within all things—all-hearing, all-seeing, all-acting, and the ultimate sustainer of everything in existence.

Basil the Great

“God’s actions may manifest in a thousand different ways, yet His essence remains beautifully simple” (Letters 234,1 [A.D. 367]).

Ambrose Milanski

God is essentially simple in nature; He isn't composed of parts, nor is He a collection of different elements. You can't really add anything to Him to make Him "more" than what He is. In His very essence, He possesses only that which is divine—it is the quality that fills everything entirely. He doesn't mingle with or get entangled in anything else, yet at the same time, He permeates all things. While He flows through everything, nothing can ever penetrate or intrude upon Him. It is a bit like how light might fill a room without being changed by the objects it touches, except much more profound. He remains perfectly complete and present everywhere all at once, whether we are looking up at the heavens, walking the streets of a city like Chicago, or staring out at the most remote reaches of the Atlantic Ocean. To the human eye, His true nature remains utterly beyond our ability to fully grasp or communicate.

Evagrius Ponticus

To those who point a finger at us and claim we are teaching a doctrine of three separate gods, let them understand that we confess only one God—not in terms of quantity, but in essence. You see, when we speak of something being numerically one, that doesn't necessarily mean it is absolutely singular or simple in its very nature. It is a concept widely accepted by scholars and theologians alike: that God is simple and not composed of various parts.

Gregory Jackson

There will never be—nor could there ever be—any dogma within the Church of God that would attempt to prove that the simple, indivisible nature of God is anything other than what it truly is. To suggest that He is multifaceted, shifting, or somehow composed of conflicting elements is simply a fallacy. The sheer simplicity found within the dogma of truth serves only to reveal the true essence of God exactly as He is.

John Chrysostom

When we look at how Paul approaches his understanding of God, he isn't suggesting that he possesses a fragmented view of the Divine essence—as if he were holding one piece of a puzzle while lacking the rest. That wouldn't make much sense because God is fundamentally simple, a singular and undivided reality. Rather, when he uses the term "partially," he’s really just acknowledging the vast, unbridgeable gap between human perception and the actual nature of the Creator. He knows, with absolute certainty, that God exists; he recognizes the presence of the Divine in the world around him. But as for what God truly is in His essential being? That remains a mystery beyond the reach of our limited intellect. It is less about knowing only a fraction of the truth and more about recognizing that the full magnitude of God's essence is simply too immense for us to ever fully grasp.

Why does John insist that "no one has ever seen God" (John 1:18)? I suspect he’s making a distinction regarding our capacity for true, perfect comprehension—that deep, intimate knowledge of the Divine essence. If you look at the various instances in history where people claim to have had visions of God, you'll notice a pattern of inconsistency. It’s almost self-evident that none of those individuals actually caught a glimpse of the pure, unadulterated essence of God, because if they had, their experiences wouldn't be so wildly different from one another. You see, God is fundamentally simple, undivided, and without any physical shape or composition; yet, the visions people report are all varying shapes and forms.

Augustin

When we look at the world around us—this swirling, ever-changing landscape of physical things—we have to make a distinction between what a thing actually is and how it simply appears to be in a given moment. In these shifting, created realities, if we aren't describing the core essence of a thing, we are merely talking about its accidents—those fleeting qualities like color, shape, or position that drift and change as time passes. It’s much like how a car might be red one day and blue the next after a repaint, or how a house might feel warm in the afternoon and cold by midnight; the "redness" or the "warmth" isn't the house itself, but just a temporary state of being. However, when we turn our gaze toward God, the entire framework shifts. There is absolutely nothing in Him that can be categorized as an accident. You won't find any fluctuations or passing whims there, because there is no change within the Divine. Everything we can possibly say about Him doesn't just describe a temporary quality or a passing mood; rather, everything spoken of Him pertains directly to His very substance. He is constant, unchanging, and entirely whole in Himself.

Cyril of Alexandria

By our very nature, we aren't exactly simple creatures; yet, the divine nature—which is perfectly simple and lacks nothing by design—holds within itself an absolute abundance of all perfections and requires nothing more from the outside world.

"The very essence of the supreme God, being inherently simple and indivisible, can never be split into two parts" (The Riches of the Holy Trinity 11 [a.d. 424]).

When you encounter Divine Scripture speaking of God through the lens of physical actions or bodily descriptions, try not to let your mind get bogged down in those literal, tangible details. It is so easy to fall into the trap of visualizing the material world when we read such passages, but I find it much more fruitful to look past the physical imagery used as a metaphor and instead step into the profound beauty of the underlying concepts. Rather than fixating on shapes, quantities, specific descriptions, or any other physical attributes that define our earthly existence, one should strive to contemplate God—even though He remains far beyond the grasp of our limited intellect. We simply cannot speak of Him in truly human terms; after all, there is no other way for us to conceptualize things that so vastly transcend our own understanding.

Thanks so much for sharing this, it’s honestly such a beautiful little reminder. Just to circle back to what I mentioned in my first post regarding spiritual energies:

This force is the creative one, you know? It’s what allows for the generation of energies, and then from those energies comes matter—both the living kind and the dead stuff. I guess the most accurate way to describe this energy is simply as the Creator or God the Creator. This energy is all-pervading, and it possesses an unimaginable intelligence along with all knowledge and power. Since it’s all-encompassing, maybe it can't be entirely homogeneous, so it probably consists of its own partial elements.

Angela Cox said:Gregory Jackson, look, here is my take on this: I found myself getting boggedrightarrow stuck on those Faraday cage frequencies and who knows what else—mostly because you brought up certain frequencies yourself and I bit the bait. But honestly, it is a triviality. It is much like how I operate my computer; I understand the hardware exists and I know which components are inside, yet I do not dwell on the mechanics while I am actually using the machine. That is precisely how one should approach the spiritual realm. You utilize it. Why bother worrying about the underlying mechanics? Practical application exists on a plane far superior to mere operational principles.

Since everything in this universe is energy, one could argue that the limitations we impose upon ourselves are simply energy vibrating at specific frequencies. Think of it as a mental Faraday cage, trapping our creative energies and preventing them from escaping. The only distinction between a physical cage and a mental one is visibility; the essence remains the same. We need to purge this "energy of limitation" from our minds—to dismantle the internal cage that creates these blockages. Once that barrier is removed, truly anything becomes possible.

It really is just a cage made of our own thoughts, our attitudes, and all those social or moral norms we live by. It's a mix of stuff we force on ourselves and stuff society pushes onto us, which we eventually just swallow whole until we don't even see the bars anymore. Some of the things we're talking about here seem totally wild if you try to measure them against what people currently "know" or what the mainstream consensus says. But then again, back in the day, the idea of flying was considered absolutely impossible too, and look how far we've come.

Angela Cox said:Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Honestly, it doesn't even matter if you're inside a Faraday cage or something. These energies—well, I guess you could call them energy waves—are just built differently, so physical barriers don't really stop them from doing their thing most of the time. I mean, I have seen some interference before, though! Like, when my group goes out to visit these high-energy sites, we actually leave all our electronics back at the hotel during the activation process. It’s because these spiritual energies basically told us that having gadgets around might mess with the flow, since everything we're doing happens out in the open air. And then there’s the whole situation with those power spots in Japan... oh wait, I should probably say the legendary energy centers over there. Apparently, the luminous beings actually abandoned those places right before the atomic bombs were dropped, fleeing instead to Mount Fuji, and a good chunk of them haven't even made it back to their original spots yet—maybe like 30% of them are still hanging out around Mount Fuji. It makes sense, I guess, because they had to escape those massive energetic shifts caused by the bombs just to keep from being damaged. Out of those three main power locations, one is near Tokyo, and the other two are tucked away around Kyoto.

Angela Cox said:Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Haha, you’re pretty sharp, I gotta give you that! There’s actually this whole thing about corrections, almost like there’s a specific kind of energy dedicated just to fixing things. I guess you could say celestial bodies act like these massive structural mechanisms designed to recalibrate different energies and processes within both the energetic and material universe. They basically step in to correct any deviations from the original program that God set for a specific energy or body—though those deviations happen all the time, usually because of some messy, unwanted interactions. Like, if you look at Earth, its aura is incredibly sensitive to waves of negative thought, and because of how its aura is specifically structured, one of its layers is actually pretty damaged right now. The celestial bodies try their best to patch up those holes, but honestly, there just aren't enough of them to keep up with the damage caused by all our conflicts, fighting, and wars, which just pump out an overwhelming amount of negativity and fear.

I mean, if you think about it, because the universe is just so incredibly complex, you end up getting these totally unintended or unpredictable interactions between different kinds of energy and physical matter, which basically trigger these massive cosmic catastrophes—kind of like how a chemical reaction happens when you mix two substances that just don't play nice together, I guess. So, because things can get so chaotic so fast, having timely corrections is absolutely vital, which is why I feel like those cosmic bodies are just totally indispensable, maybe?

Angela Cox said:Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Personally, I really believe it’s dualistic in nature. I mean, spiritual energy practitioners don't usually talk about it that way, but I once had contact with an energy that introduced itself as coming from the Anti-Cosmos, whatever that might actually signify.

Angela Cox said:Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Yeah, it totally is "encoded." Energies are incredibly intelligent and they definitely know their target; you can find that happening right under our feet in the US even as we speak. You just need to be uniquely identified somehow, like being the brother of someone famous like John Smith, or having your specific image stored by whoever is firing those "arrows," or some other way like that. This idea of a cosmic computer... man, I love that. I honestly think you’d really dig this kind of cosmic physics if you ever got the chance to truly tap into it.

Angela Cox said:Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Yeah, yeah, that is a realization. It’s just like a thought pops into your head, and you just *know* it isn't yours. Once a person reaches a high level of development, communication with energies happens primarily through these realizations (though, I guess, misinterpretations or consciousness interference are possible too). It’s very likely that was your higher self talking; that's our main point of contact, most likely. Think of it like this: the Creator comes to you like the CEO of a massive corporation; He doesn't deal with us directly, instead, we're busy dealing with the lower-level managers (our higher self, local energies, and fields) and the middle management (spiritual energies).

wearyhawk83 said:So, what exactly is a rock specialized in?

I mean, is it even good for anything? Like, just sitting there? Or maybe it's meant to turn "non-believers" into stone or something? Haha, I guess I'm pretty new to this whole topic, so...

Brenda Cook4 said:In a strange sort of way, that’s actually a perfect way to put it... being specialized for nothing, just drifting along until you occasionally stumble into that wretched abyss 😬... though there are other abysses out there, too. Take Boehme's abyss, the *ungrund*—that primal void where the eternal divine will is first conceived... an abyss that serves as the undifferentiated Father...

Honestly guys, I really feel like humans are just specialized for spiritual growth. It’s basically our one true calling, right? We're the only ones who can actually reach out to the Creator and fully live up to everything we're meant to be. It's just a shame that most people end up tossing that specialization aside to go do everything else they weren't even designed for.

Angela Cox said:Everything I have previously articulated regarding communication on specific frequencies assumes a linear understanding of the universe. If we follow that logic, communicating via signals traveling through space is an impossibility within a finite cosmos. However, if we consider communication with omnipresent energies that permeate our very being, then frequency becomes irrelevant. These omnipresent, intelligent energies serve as the mechanism by which our thoughts propagate through the universe in ways we cannot yet grasp. Essentially, they act as our primary communication channel for connecting with anything in existence; under the current linear model, they are our only gateway to the rest of the universe.

Let us pivot to a different perspective: Back in 1979, I had the opportunity to observe how holographic photography functions. A table was set with various objects, including a magazine and a large magnifying glass positioned above it. Once the objects were removed and the holographic recording was viewed, the image was indistinguishable from the original. When looking through the magnifying glass from various angles, one could read the enlarged letters in the magazine just as if everything were still physically sitting on the table. Most fascinatingly, when the "plate" containing the image is broken into numerous fragments, even the smallest shard still contains the complete image of everything that was on that table.

If we conceptualize the entire universe as a hologram, then every single part of the universe contains the whole—including ourselves. Everything occurring in the vastness of space is simultaneously occurring within us, and by inversion, everything occurring within us is occurring throughout the entire universe. Consequently, all communication with omnipresent, intelligent energies happens within us, much like in the linear model, rather than externally. The distinction is that in a holographic universe, direct communication between individuals becomes possible without the mediation of these pervasive energies, regardless of cosmic distance, because there is no loss of signal intensity over space. Therefore, no amount of modern electronics designed to probe the nature of reality will ever uncover its true essence, because our technology remains shackled to the linear model. We will reach actual results only through the advancement of spirituality, just as Tesla once remarked. It appears that in a holographic model, or something akin to it, almost anything is possible, whereas the linear model offers very little.

I shall attempt to illustrate my viewpoint using this image:


I am aware that the image is symbolic; I would have drawn it differently to facilitate a clearer presentation, provided I had additional explanatory notes. On the left side of the image, the cloud and the air should be placed within the reclining figure. Similarly, on the right side, the tree and the dashed line should be contained within the standing figure, rather than existing outside of them.

Honestly, I really have to hand it to you for trying to break this all down, and if I’m being real, I think you’re actually getting pretty close to the heart of it. Personally, I don't think we're ever going to get our hands on the nitty-gritty details—you know, like the actual raw data or whatever—but I feel like we can definitely grasp the underlying principles or the general concept behind it all. It might sound kind of wild, maybe even totally absurd, to suggest that spiritual energies are actually steering us away from certain types of research, but I guess it's more like they're nudging us toward spiritual growth first? Like, if that's the ultimate goal of life anyway, then once we've leveled up spiritually, we'll naturally find our way to those high-level sources of knowledge where everyone can dive deep into whatever they're passionate about based on their own vibe. It’s almost like there's a cosmic filter, because if someone explicitly tells you a specific path of inquiry is just a total dead end, then you aren't going to find anything there, right?

Angela Cox said:Everything I have previously articulated regarding communication on specific frequencies assumes a linear understanding of the universe. If we follow that logic, communicating via signals traveling through space is an impossibility within a finite cosmos. However, if we consider communication with omnipresent energies that permeate our very being, then frequency becomes irrelevant. These omnipresent, intelligent energies serve as the mechanism by which our thoughts propagate through the universe in ways we cannot yet grasp. Essentially, they act as our primary communication channel for connecting with anything in existence; under the current linear model, they are our only gateway to the rest of the universe.

Let us pivot to a different perspective: Back in 1979, I had the opportunity to observe how holographic photography functions. A table was set with various objects, including a magazine and a large magnifying glass positioned above it. Once the objects were removed and the holographic recording was viewed, the image was indistinguishable from the original. When looking through the magnifying glass from various angles, one could read the enlarged letters in the magazine just as if everything were still physically sitting on the table. Most fascinatingly, when the "plate" containing the image is broken into numerous fragments, even the smallest shard still contains the complete image of everything that was on that table.

If we conceptualize the entire universe as a hologram, then every single part of the universe contains the whole—including ourselves. Everything occurring in the vastness of space is simultaneously occurring within us, and by inversion, everything occurring within us is occurring throughout the entire universe. Consequently, all communication with omnipresent, intelligent energies happens within us, much like in the linear model, rather than externally. The distinction is that in a holographic universe, direct communication between individuals becomes possible without the mediation of these pervasive energies, regardless of cosmic distance, because there is no loss of signal intensity over space. Therefore, no amount of modern electronics designed to probe the nature of reality will ever uncover its true essence, because our technology remains shackled to the linear model. We will reach actual results only through the advancement of spirituality, just as Tesla once remarked. It appears that in a holographic model, or something akin to it, almost anything is possible, whereas the linear model offers very little.

I shall attempt to illustrate my viewpoint using this image:


I am aware that the image is symbolic; I would have drawn it differently to facilitate a clearer presentation, provided I had additional explanatory notes. On the left side of the image, the cloud and the air should be placed within the reclining figure. Similarly, on the right side, the tree and the dashed line should be contained within the standing figure, rather than existing outside of them.

So, look, I was thinking about this image, and honestly, it’s just so symbolic, you know? It shows this super spiritually evolved person—maybe like a healer, or a shaman, or some kind of mystic—who’s basically reaching out to this massive spiritual energy that looks all tangled up like these intertwined vines. They're praying to it to help heal someone who's lying there sick. And I guess what's happening is that this request, almost like an energetic arrow, shoots straight toward that energy. Then, the energy starts analyzing everything, right? Like, it's checking if the request actually aligns with the Creator's will, and whether the person asking even has the right spiritual level to get an answer, or if they're even ready for it. It also looks at how intense the response should be based on their vibration, and maybe even checks if they've had any past connections with this energy before. Once the energy "makes a plan," it sends back this response that looks like a cloud of energy descending toward the patient, or maybe just pouring through the air until it dissipates. So, I really think it’s kinda wrong when people say, "Oh, so-and-so healed me," because, well, that person was just the one making the request! They might not even truly understand the root cause of whatever illness the person is dealing with. I mean, no single human being actually has those kinds of healing powers on their own, but I guess if we all work on our spiritual growth, the whole universe kind of steps in to help us out. Even Jesus, I mean, He had all that support from the exact same kind of energy you see right there in the picture.

That whole "everything is within us" thing... honestly, I’m just sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out what that even means. I don't think anyone actually knows how to put it into plain English, you know? It's all so vague.

Angela Cox said:Everything I have previously articulated regarding communication on specific frequencies assumes a linear understanding of the universe. If we follow that logic, communicating via signals traveling through space is an impossibility within a finite cosmos. However, if we consider communication with omnipresent energies that permeate our very being, then frequency becomes irrelevant. These omnipresent, intelligent energies serve as the mechanism by which our thoughts propagate through the universe in ways we cannot yet grasp. Essentially, they act as our primary communication channel for connecting with anything in existence; under the current linear model, they are our only gateway to the rest of the universe.

Let us pivot to a different perspective: Back in 1979, I had the opportunity to observe how holographic photography functions. A table was set with various objects, including a magazine and a large magnifying glass positioned above it. Once the objects were removed and the holographic recording was viewed, the image was indistinguishable from the original. When looking through the magnifying glass from various angles, one could read the enlarged letters in the magazine just as if everything were still physically sitting on the table. Most fascinatingly, when the "plate" containing the image is broken into numerous fragments, even the smallest shard still contains the complete image of everything that was on that table.

If we conceptualize the entire universe as a hologram, then every single part of the universe contains the whole—including ourselves. Everything occurring in the vastness of space is simultaneously occurring within us, and by inversion, everything occurring within us is occurring throughout the entire universe. Consequently, all communication with omnipresent, intelligent energies happens within us, much like in the linear model, rather than externally. The distinction is that in a holographic universe, direct communication between individuals becomes possible without the mediation of these pervasive energies, regardless of cosmic distance, because there is no loss of signal intensity over space. Therefore, no amount of modern electronics designed to probe the nature of reality will ever uncover its true essence, because our technology remains shackled to the linear model. We will reach actual results only through the advancement of spirituality, just as Tesla once remarked. It appears that in a holographic model, or something akin to it, almost anything is possible, whereas the linear model offers very little.

I shall attempt to illustrate my viewpoint using this image:


I am aware that the image is symbolic; I would have drawn it differently to facilitate a clearer presentation, provided I had additional explanatory notes. On the left side of the image, the cloud and the air should be placed within the reclining figure. Similarly, on the right side, the tree and the dashed line should be contained within the standing figure, rather than existing outside of them.

So, I guess in a way, they "pass through" because they're occupying the same space as us. I mean, from what I understand, we generally can't really connect with energies that aren't part of our specific slice of the universe (there might be some exceptions, but I haven't really figured out why yet). But, you also have to keep in mind that a lot of these energies probably don't have any interest in chatting with humans; they've got their own stuff going on and we're just not on their radar. It's only when we start growing spiritually that some of them might be open to—well, occasional and limited—communication. At first, it usually shows up as answers to prayers during healing sessions or things meant to lift our spiritual level. Only much later can you get to a point where there's actual conversation, starting with intuition and eventually moving toward something more audible.
I'm not sure if I'm explaining this right, but that kind of "conversational" communication is basically just our consciousness—or our brains, I guess—co-vibrating at the exact same frequency as that energy or that specific energy center (those fixed energetic complexes, if you want to get fancy). You know, if you want to sound like an expert or whatever.

Angela Cox said:As for why I feel compelled to speak: I am from a technical background, and the frequencies discussed in this thread have piqued my interest. I possess certain personal experiences regarding the "unreality" of the world around me—specifically regarding my own "distorted perceptions" of it—but I won't delve into that now. Instead, I want to comment on high frequencies based on what I studied in school, purely to assist your reasoning if you are interested in approaching this from a technical perspective: A prerequisite for communication is an oscillating circuit and an antenna (roughly speaking). The simplest antenna is a wire with a length equal to a quarter wavelength of a given signal. An oscillating circuit alone is sufficient, though the signal range becomes significantly limited without an antenna. In electronics, an oscillating circuit consists of a capacitor and an inductor connected in series or parallel, vibrating at a specific frequency determined by the capacitor's capacity and the inductor's inductance. A standard resistor acts merely as resistance at low frequencies, but at high frequencies, it functions as resistance, inductance, and capacitance simultaneously. Consequently, at a certain high frequency, it becomes an oscillating circuit, causing frequencies to "scatter" in all directions. Similarly, at high frequencies, everything living essentially functions as some type of oscillating circuit and antenna of varying efficiency. This is precisely why high-frequency components in radio equipment are meticulously engineered and shielded (using a Faraday cage) to prevent high-frequency signals from interfering with other circuits operating at lower frequencies.

Regarding the human aura you mentioned, I have no idea, though I can approximate what it might look like. In my view: the human body lacks antennas, but it possesses numerous "oscillating circuits" (consider the principle used in MRI imaging) that vibrate at high frequencies, scattering them in every direction around the body. Low frequencies cannot scatter around the body due to their massive wavelength; they simply cannot achieve resonance, much like how a resistor behaves at low frequencies. This leads me to conclude that the "arrows" you refer to may simply be high frequencies shooting through the aura.

Shifting toward spirituality, one thing comes to mind: we might agree that a thought is a frequency traveling somewhere. But what of emotions? Are they also frequencies? I ask because when I direct a question toward the omnipresent, intelligent energy of the Creator, the thought feels somewhat dry unless it is "colored" by an emotion. If emotion is a frequency and thought is a frequency, then they must travel together. This raises the question: is the thought modulated by the emotion, or the emotion by the thought? Regardless, high frequencies scatter them everywhere. The wave serves as the carrier, like an "arrow," while the harmonics—the sums and differences of these frequencies at lower intensities—act like feathers to stabilize the arrow's flight. I am inclined to say that emotion carries thought to unfathomable distances, regardless of the underlying mechanism. One should think at a higher level rather than exhausting oneself with technicalities; you are right in that regard, much like how a programmer writes in a high-level language rather than machine code—it is far simpler. And if so, it would mean that the theory about flying teddy bears mentioned by Ken is entirely correct.

I give up. I won't continue, as I will likely never understand the technical mechanics of how this illusion of a life actually functions.

Thanks so much for that little nudge, seriously. It actually got me thinking back to my school days and how much I used to love physics, even though it was honestly pretty frustrating at the time because some of those teachers just couldn't explain anything worth knowing, you know? But man, what really blows my mind when I dive into spirituality and trying to figure out how the world works is this whole concept of energy and these different energetic entities. It’s wild to think that they can all basically occupy the exact same space without bumping into each other or getting in each other's way, mostly because their fields are vibrating at such different frequencies. So, I guess it means that in one single spot, you could have the Creator, four major global energies, Angela Cox's aura, maybe even Gregory Jackson's aura, and who knows what else, all just hanging out together in the same place at once. It's pretty crazy when you really sit with it.

Angela Cox said:As for why I feel compelled to speak: I am from a technical background, and the frequencies discussed in this thread have piqued my interest. I possess certain personal experiences regarding the "unreality" of the world around me—specifically regarding my own "distorted perceptions" of it—but I won't delve into that now. Instead, I want to comment on high frequencies based on what I studied in school, purely to assist your reasoning if you are interested in approaching this from a technical perspective: A prerequisite for communication is an oscillating circuit and an antenna (roughly speaking). The simplest antenna is a wire with a length equal to a quarter wavelength of a given signal. An oscillating circuit alone is sufficient, though the signal range becomes significantly limited without an antenna. In electronics, an oscillating circuit consists of a capacitor and an inductor connected in series or parallel, vibrating at a specific frequency determined by the capacitor's capacity and the inductor's inductance. A standard resistor acts merely as resistance at low frequencies, but at high frequencies, it functions as resistance, inductance, and capacitance simultaneously. Consequently, at a certain high frequency, it becomes an oscillating circuit, causing frequencies to "scatter" in all directions. Similarly, at high frequencies, everything living essentially functions as some type of oscillating circuit and antenna of varying efficiency. This is precisely why high-frequency components in radio equipment are meticulously engineered and shielded (using a Faraday cage) to prevent high-frequency signals from interfering with other circuits operating at lower frequencies.

Regarding the human aura you mentioned, I have no idea, though I can approximate what it might look like. In my view: the human body lacks antennas, but it possesses numerous "oscillating circuits" (consider the principle used in MRI imaging) that vibrate at high frequencies, scattering them in every direction around the body. Low frequencies cannot scatter around the body due to their massive wavelength; they simply cannot achieve resonance, much like how a resistor behaves at low frequencies. This leads me to conclude that the "arrows" you refer to may simply be high frequencies shooting through the aura.

Shifting toward spirituality, one thing comes to mind: we might agree that a thought is a frequency traveling somewhere. But what of emotions? Are they also frequencies? I ask because when I direct a question toward the omnipresent, intelligent energy of the Creator, the thought feels somewhat dry unless it is "colored" by an emotion. If emotion is a frequency and thought is a frequency, then they must travel together. This raises the question: is the thought modulated by the emotion, or the emotion by the thought? Regardless, high frequencies scatter them everywhere. The wave serves as the carrier, like an "arrow," while the harmonics—the sums and differences of these frequencies at lower intensities—act like feathers to stabilize the arrow's flight. I am inclined to say that emotion carries thought to unfathomable distances, regardless of the underlying mechanism. One should think at a higher level rather than exhausting oneself with technicalities; you are right in that regard, much like how a programmer writes in a high-level language rather than machine code—it is far simpler. And if so, it would mean that the theory about flying teddy bears mentioned by Ken is entirely correct.

I give up. I won't continue, as I will likely never understand the technical mechanics of how this illusion of a life actually functions.

I mean, honestly, I really don't know for sure, but maybe it works like this... an aura is basically just this energetic envelope surrounding your body that vibrates at around 20.6 Hz, I guess. You can't really have a body without an aura, and you definitely can't have an aura without a body—at least when we're talking about physical beings, anyway—so it feels like you can't really say one is more important than the other, you know?
So, I was thinking about how the whole thing with the aura starts, and it’s actually kind of wild because it's like this genetically programmed process that kicks off the very second an egg is fertilized. Basically, these little energy structures start forming around it—they look sort of like hollow, dried-out twigs, I guess? And these are actually the beginnings of the acupuncture meridians where one of those two types of aura energy, you know, the white bioenergy, flows through. It all starts vibrating at 4.7 Hz, which is pretty crazy when you think about it. Then, once it hits 4.8 Hz, these little "twigs" start turning their thicker ends toward each other. After that, they begin pulling in particles of white bioenergy and then just pushing them out into that central space between them, which eventually sprays them out into the area surrounding the egg at 4.9 Hz. By the time we hit 5.0 Hz, these branches really start growing and developing, and eventually, there are twelve of them in total. This creates this visible center between them called the "Energy Stabilizer"—sort of like an energetic heart—which basically functions to collect any extra white bioenergy and redistribute it back into the aura, which is what it keeps doing throughout our entire lives, I suppose. At this frequency, the embryo finally gets its recognizable shape, and that’s also when the seven-chakra channel forms, drawing grey bioenergy from the open space at the bottom and venting it out through the top. In the next step, the embryo shifts, and what will eventually become the spine aligns itself perfectly with that central chakra channel. By 5.5 Hz, the aura has all its main parts and functions ready to go, and by the time someone is born, it’s vibrating at 11.5 Hz. Then, after about six months, it reaches 20.6 Hz, which is apparently the frequency it stays at for the rest of your life. Pretty intense stuff, right?

Angela Cox said:As for why I feel compelled to speak: I am from a technical background, and the frequencies discussed in this thread have piqued my interest. I possess certain personal experiences regarding the "unreality" of the world around me—specifically regarding my own "distorted perceptions" of it—but I won't delve into that now. Instead, I want to comment on high frequencies based on what I studied in school, purely to assist your reasoning if you are interested in approaching this from a technical perspective: A prerequisite for communication is an oscillating circuit and an antenna (roughly speaking). The simplest antenna is a wire with a length equal to a quarter wavelength of a given signal. An oscillating circuit alone is sufficient, though the signal range becomes significantly limited without an antenna. In electronics, an oscillating circuit consists of a capacitor and an inductor connected in series or parallel, vibrating at a specific frequency determined by the capacitor's capacity and the inductor's inductance. A standard resistor acts merely as resistance at low frequencies, but at high frequencies, it functions as resistance, inductance, and capacitance simultaneously. Consequently, at a certain high frequency, it becomes an oscillating circuit, causing frequencies to "scatter" in all directions. Similarly, at high frequencies, everything living essentially functions as some type of oscillating circuit and antenna of varying efficiency. This is precisely why high-frequency components in radio equipment are meticulously engineered and shielded (using a Faraday cage) to prevent high-frequency signals from interfering with other circuits operating at lower frequencies.

Regarding the human aura you mentioned, I have no idea, though I can approximate what it might look like. In my view: the human body lacks antennas, but it possesses numerous "oscillating circuits" (consider the principle used in MRI imaging) that vibrate at high frequencies, scattering them in every direction around the body. Low frequencies cannot scatter around the body due to their massive wavelength; they simply cannot achieve resonance, much like how a resistor behaves at low frequencies. This leads me to conclude that the "arrows" you refer to may simply be high frequencies shooting through the aura.

Shifting toward spirituality, one thing comes to mind: we might agree that a thought is a frequency traveling somewhere. But what of emotions? Are they also frequencies? I ask because when I direct a question toward the omnipresent, intelligent energy of the Creator, the thought feels somewhat dry unless it is "colored" by an emotion. If emotion is a frequency and thought is a frequency, then they must travel together. This raises the question: is the thought modulated by the emotion, or the emotion by the thought? Regardless, high frequencies scatter them everywhere. The wave serves as the carrier, like an "arrow," while the harmonics—the sums and differences of these frequencies at lower intensities—act like feathers to stabilize the arrow's flight. I am inclined to say that emotion carries thought to unfathomable distances, regardless of the underlying mechanism. One should think at a higher level rather than exhausting oneself with technicalities; you are right in that regard, much like how a programmer writes in a high-level language rather than machine code—it is far simpler. And if so, it would mean that the theory about flying teddy bears mentioned by Ken is entirely correct.

I give up. I won't continue, as I will likely never understand the technical mechanics of how this illusion of a life actually functions.

I honestly feel like there’s this deep, constant interaction happening between our emotions and our thoughts, kind of like how you described it earlier. It’s almost like our feelings leave this sort of energetic footprint in our aura, maybe appearing as a 180° arc right above the head and shoulders. I guess if you look back at history, energy readers used to see this as that halo effect around the heads of saints—you know, the kind of thing we still see in old paintings today just out of habit, I suppose. It seems to me that you could actually tell what someone is feeling in any given moment just by looking at the color of that energy field within the aura. Like, when we’re feeling really good and totally chill, I imagine these misty pinkish-yellow tones start to take over. But then, red might pop up if someone is dealing with aggressive vibes like anger, or maybe some greenish tones show up when sadness kicks in, and I guess a pale blue might signal a bit of dissatisfaction. If we’re just totally exhausted, a dark gray probably dominates the field. Even sadness might show up as a pale yellow, while fears could be more of a dark brown. It’s wild to think about, but if that color in the aura shifts, our mood probably shifts too, and vice versa.

So, I was thinking about how you actually get to that kind of rosy, golden-hued state of mind—you know, that glow where everything just feels right—and I guess it all comes down to this deep spiritual growth, which basically shows up in how you process things. Like, instead of just playing guessing games or constantly looking for someone to blame when things go sideways, you start focusing on actually solving the problem, which I think aligns your headspace with the Will of the Creator. And then, if you’re lucky enough to maintain decent health and can embrace the wisdom of just letting go of those impossible problems that aren't worth your energy, that’s probably the real guarantee for keeping that emotional stability steady, I suppose.

I guess you could say that stress and having a totally warped mindset—you know, like when you're obsessed with pointing fingers instead of actually fixing what's broken—are really the main culprits behind creating this nasty emotional field that basically shifts colors depending on whatever mood is taking over at the moment. It's kind of wild, but I think those toxic thoughts that pop up because you've been stressed out for way too long just end up making that whole emotional atmosphere even more unstable. And then, well, that instability starts pushing back against our own consciousness, which I suppose just triggers a whole new wave of negative thinking, creating this sort of endless loop.

I mean, I guess if you really stop to think about it, our feelings are just totally inseparable from our thoughts and everything else going on inside us, you know? It's like they're all tangled up together, and honestly, they end up driving almost every single one of those massive, life-altering decisions we have to make.

I guess emotions don't necessarily have to be the star of the show when you're making a big life call, but man, they definitely pull a lot of the strings behind the scenes, right? It’s kind of impossible to ignore them, and honestly, I feel like they’re probably the biggest reason we end up doing what we do most of the time. But that’s really where the trouble starts, because human feelings can flip on a dime, you know? One minute you're fine, and the next, you're hit with this wave of anger, sadness, fear, or just straight-up frustration, and suddenly those negative vibes start clouding everything, which might lead you to make a choice you'll totally regret later. That’s why I always think it’s super important to try and stay in that "rose-gold" headspace—you know, that calm, mellow zone where you're feeling relaxed and nothing is pulling at your sleeve. When you're in that sweet spot, you can actually think clearly without all that emotional noise getting in the way, so your decision ends up being the right one. I mean, I'm sure you've been there before, where you make some huge, impulsive move while you're caught up in the heat of the moment—like, maybe even rushing into a marriage with someone you barely even know because the sparks are flying—only to look back once you've settled back into that rose-gold "normal" and realize, "Man, what was I thinking?"