US Grand Prix 2010
in Formula 1 ·
Code:
One of these has to work if you want to kill it.😬
One of these has to work if you want to kill it.😬
4456 posts shown.
cosmicridge5 said:Why don't you just stream it via BBC online? 😁
Frank Collins85 said:then nobody 😍
and neither does anyone for me😢
Frank Collins85 said:which is exactly what I'm rooting for, along with McLaren 🙂
Joshua Newman2 said:Yeah, you're right. My bad—I miscalculated. Those 2008 qualifying sessions are actually about 2.3 seconds faster, not 1.3.
Since there wasn't even a race in Canada last year, and let's face it, it's not exactly a high-grip circuit, times should jump significantly once they get some rubber on the asphalt.
What I don't know (and honestly, I can't be bothered to check) is whether qualifying was faster last year or the year before. With those weird cars we had last season, maybe they were lagging behind or just plateauing compared to the 2008 stuff. That might be why we're seeing such steady improvements over last year's times this time around. 🤷
I'm guessing the best qualifying time will settle somewhere around 1:15.400-1:15.500. ☕
Joshua Newman2 said:Here are the FP1 results:
McLaren looks strong as expected, and Mercedes is surprisingly quick—definitely encouraging. Kubica spent most of the session at the top before Rosberg and Vettel snatched it away in the final minutes. Vettel practically kissed the wall during that last flying lap (I don't know if he actually hit it, but if even a fly had been between him and that barrier, he would’ve lost his mind). Ferrari is trailing the leaders (Alonso), and Massa is way back. Webber is also lagging significantly behind.
The best time is about a second and three-tenths slower than the 2008 qualifying times, so we can expect some serious speed increases tonight and tomorrow. .s
Michael Lee4 said:Great, but I'm still sticking to my guns: instead of wasting cash on DirecTV or whatever, you're better off just getting a satellite receiver and paying for card sharing. It costs the exact same as a subscription, but you get a million more channels...
Joshua Newman2 said:If Vettel moves to Ferrari, it’s only logical that stormybadger8 starts rooting for.
Honestly, this whole thread is getting way too OTT. Let's just focus on the race. Everyone’s expectations are sky-high because this GP is always a classic. But do I really need to hear everyone's predictions for the teammate battles? Webber vs. Vettel? Alonso vs. that crybaby? Hamilton vs. Button? Schumacher vs. Nico Rosberg? Kubica vs. Petrov?
Nicole Reyes97 said:Well, we saw that. :rofl : :rofl : I’m really hoping he doesn't end up there 😁 but if he does, 😳 I honestly want to know who you're going to root for then. 😁
Nicole Reyes97 said:Just let the cars and drivers race. ☕ Save your hatred for Ferrari for somewhere else. 😉
cosmicridge5 said:Red Bull Racing 1,2 🙏🙏🙏 😁
silvercobra68 said:Damn soccer and whoever came up with the idea
silvercobra68 said:Plus, Mark Webber just ate Fettel alive again, so my comparison to Jacques Villeneuve was actually an overstatement. Fettel is looking more and more like Rubens Barrichello.
stormyviper11 said:It’d be interesting to see what timeframe we're actually talking about here.
For example, Jenson Button has a pretty rough stat sheet, but it would be worth looking at how he fared once he actually matured—or even just focusing on the seasons where he had a decent car. A huge chunk of his stats probably comes from just fighting through traffic in the back of the pack, and let's not forget that back in 2007 and 2008, the guy was stuck in one of the absolute worst cars on the grid, which naturally leaves you wide open for those kinds of incidents. That also explains why Lewis Hamilton looks relatively "clean" by comparison; he rarely had to spend his Sundays grinding through the back of the field.
I remember digging into stats for old-school drivers once. It blew my mind that Emerson Fittipaldi—if I recall correctly, out of roughly 150 races during a wilder era of F1—only finished out of a race due to a crash or spin four times. Meanwhile, Fangio, if I'm not mistaken, didn't DNF for something like that even once (granted, he had that serious accident during qualifying for the Italian Grand Prix in 1952). It just reinforces my belief that he was the Greatest of All Time.
I don't know what you're trying to say. You're just typing random letters. Get to the point. kaže:
Yeah, I have to agree, it’s unfair to Mark Webber. But honestly, that’s his own fault for being filed away in most of our minds a long time ago as one of those guys who pulls off a perfect race once or twice a year—kind of like Gerhard Berger, David Coulthard, or even Ralf Schumacher. (Though, if we're being real, I think Rubens Barrichello was more consistent and generally better than that bunch.) I still remember the days when even a lineup of Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost, Nelson Piquet, and Nigel Mansell couldn't touch Gerhard Berger, back when Michael Schumacher was actually in his prime. 😬He looked pretty mediocre compared to David Coulthard... But those kinds of days were rare, just occasional flashes. It’s the same story with Mark Webber; he still hasn't convinced me he can turn those brief moments of brilliance into actual consistency. Honestly, if Jenson Button were driving for Red Bull Racing, I think he’d be leading the championship right now. 😉 Look, I’m not saying he’s definitely going to defend the title. But if the rest of the field keeps shooting themselves in the foot—maybe they'll even take each other out at some point—he could honestly coast his way to it just by being consistent.