Nicholas Newman2 said:I’m not hating on Vettel. I wouldn't go so far as to say I dislike him, but "overrated" is probably the best way to put it.
So you think Ferrari didn't have a title contender in 2018? Or maybe they just couldn't squeeze the actual potential out of the car and the race situations!?
It wasn't the car, and it definitely wasn't the team...
Look, you can draw a direct comparison to the 2012 season...
The fastest car was McLaren, no question about it... but it was chronically unreliable and the team was a complete mess.
If you look at the mix of pace and reliability, Ferrari actually had a better car than RB... But there's a massive "BUT" there!
RB was a way more strategically organized outfit, while the guys at Ferrari were predictably clueless and lost.
Basically, Ferrari has been totally lost since Jean Todt and Ross Brawn left, and they haven't recovered since.
They’re totally disorganized, shuffling people in and out constantly, running through the halls and firing people in cycles of two or three years of pure disappointment...
But the real kicker is that the team is a total strategic fiasco at least two or three times every single season because they inevitably screw up big time. Nobody has the guts to make a call, let alone a fast one...
The bosses lack the backbone and authority they should have; under the slightest pressure, the whole lot of them lose their heads together...
And the biggest headache is the Italian media, who start crucifying them and then everyone collectively loses it.
Even when they actually pull off a great strategic race, you can see from the stands that it was mostly just dumb luck rather than any actual planning or intelligence...
Like what happened in Australia last year—they won a race with zero logic or strategy; they basically had no plan and just got lucky.
Then the Italian media starts singing their praises, claiming it was "masterful strategy," and everyone starts hoping they'll win every race that season just by doing nothing or doing the opposite of Mercedes—because apparently, if it worked once, it’s the perfect recipe for success and should work twenty more times.😁
They have seasons where they might even have the best car, but it's still garbage if the team is incompetent...
Take 2008, for example. Most people remember it because Massa blew the title thanks to Glock and all that...
But the reality is he blew the title exclusively because of Ferrari and their absolute, textbook clumsiness.
What they pulled off in Brazil was quite literally a disaster. 😳
In a head-to-head duel between two drivers in two pretty evenly matched title contenders using a 10-8-6 points system...
If you're a Ferrari driver with insanely good pace and you beat Lewis in five races that he was essentially supposed to win based on the car, and you take every other one... that’s a +10 point advantage for you.🎉
Then Ferrari goes and screws up Singapore, and suddenly you’re neck-and-neck with Lewis Hamilton if he pulls off the win there. 😳
Your chances of grabbing a title with a crew like that are basically zero. Even if you have an equal car, or even a slightly better one, it’s still a long shot. Honestly, I’d even question if you could do it with a dominant car...
I’m pretty convinced that if you took this hybrid era, handed Mercedes-Benz's cars over to Ferrari to run, and shoved whoever you wanted behind the wheel...
The real question is whether they’d actually manage to snag even one title 🤦 even if you gave them everything. I’m certain two titles would be the absolute, absolute limit. ☕