delija said:Gaudrath: A place where someone spends a lot of time can actually pick up that person's "vibe"...
Exactly. And that idea was actually laid out in a book years ago... along with an explanation of how it even works.
So, here is a partial excerpt from that text: "... But wait, there's another surprise. • The atoms that make up H2O particles—like those forming ice, for instance—are NOT IDENTICAL; they differ in character from the atoms in H2O particles that form clouds, water vapor, liquid water, or standing water... Sure, the number of oscillations within the BEING of inorganic atoms in all these bodies of water is the SAME, but the number of oscillations outside the BEING of those particles changes. (fig. 4) It seems logical to me that atoms forming something rigid (even if they belong to the SAME family) CANNOT be completely identical to the atoms forming something liquid or gaseous. Therefore, we can conclude that the atoms found in liquid water ARE NOT IDENTICAL; they DIFFER from the atoms found in standing water. Essentially, the atoms in standing water will, over Time, CHANGE their Character value outside of being, and through this change in Character, healthy standing water will become SICK standing water. This is one reason why people who spend extended periods above "contaminated" wastewater develop health issues. Basically, as the number of oscillations outside the BEING of the atoms forming the WASTEWATER changes, the Character of that body of water shifts, turning it into "sick" water. The way the vibrations emitted by this "sick wastewater" act upon certain atoms and cells "embedded" within the bodies of people spending time near it, those atoms and cells will also change the number of oscillations outside of their BEING. Obviously, after that, a change in Character occurs in certain parts of those people's bodies. In short, a healthy person becomes a sick person.
I previously mentioned the atoms that form water, but this same law regarding the change in oscillations outside of BEING applies to EVERYTHING in the cosmos—all existing atoms and cells. Thus, I would argue that apartment buildings converted from former prisons or hospitals are "fatal" to the health of the people who live in them long-term. The atoms "embedded" in the walls of a prison or a hospital will, after a certain amount of time, change their "HEALTHY Character" outside of being and ACQUIRE a "character of pain and dying." Naturally, after some time, the atoms and cells "embedded" in a certain number of people moving into these converted buildings will also pick up That character. Meaning, through a change in VIBRATIONS, healthy atoms and healthy cells can become sick atoms and sick cells, even though those atoms and cells remain the SAME type.
Believe it or not, the changes in the oscillations occurring outside the BEING of the atoms and cells embedded in the human body are the MAIN CAUSE of people getting sick. But, fortunately for humans (and other living things), all atoms and cells (with rare exceptions) do not change the number of oscillations outside of their BEING all AT ONCE..."
I've personally seen stuff like this happen more often than I'd like to admit.🙄 I'm wondering, though... is there any kind of "protection" to stop all this "vibe" crap from soaking into you?😕
I've made my way through the entire Resident Evil series, so this worked well enough for me. Honestly, I suspect the sequel might actually be even better. It’s one of those things... strictly for the die-hard fanatics, maybe.😁
👍 👍 is a must-watch Everything about this movie works pretty well. The plot is almost non-existent, and the score is used so sparingly—it’s just a few drops here and there. For a moment, I actually felt like I was watching a documentary🙏, but honestly, everything fits perfectly. It doesn't try too hard to be some flashy Kill Bill clone, either. As far as the violence goes, the dismemberment scenes are actually better than what we saw in Kill Bill; there's none of that pretentious posturing, just raw, brutal cutting.
And look, you know who can actually pull off the samurai vibe, and who's just some um trauma or Tom guz types🙂
Who does he think he is, comparing himself to Jean-Claude Van Damme? Honestly, even if he had a guardian angel, I doubt it would help him at this point.😁
He isn't necessarily the absolute worst actor out there, but he’s definitely hovering somewhere near the bottom of the barrel.
Ugh, honestly? Calling this movie "great" is a massive stretch. It’s absolute garbage. I spent the entire runtime staring at a bunch of obnoxious guys and listening to their mindless, repetitive dialogue—you know, the usual "watch out!" or "shoot him!" nonsense🙏 and stuff like that. Not to mention, nobody in this cast is even attempting to actually act.
The only thing worth noting was that ridiculous scene where they're just fooling around, and when he says something like "we're living life to the fullest," man...😁 what an idiot.😁
Look, I don't have anything against Black actors personally, but there is such a thing as going way, way too far.
The movie is just a mess within The Matrix. Pure garbage.
I’ll tip my hat to the special effects, I suppose, but they can’t make this film timeless for me or anyone else. So, here’s the deal: it failed because it's just a pile of revolutionary crap stacked on top of more crap—it's basically a disaster waiting to happen.👎 😁 And what’s even worse is how much it actually fails. But the absolute worst part? There are people out there actually sighing in admiration over it.😛
Because the movie is just absolute garbage and has nothing to do with the actual lake🙏 But hey, that's just my two cents
Anyway, just try to look like you aren't a total mess and let me know😁 You have to sit through the trash to actually learn the difference between what's pure garbage and what's just slightly less terrible. Right?
To movie was nothing special, hand on heart. The stunts didn't move me at all. The plot failed to grab my attention. The score left me cold too. The acting? Forget about it.
Tarantino definitely has better stuff out there. Maybe it’s just because I’ve seen it all before, but it honestly just left me feeling empty.
Still, I suppose I’ll watch the sequel.😁
And seriously, what kind of ***** people decide to split a story like this? Just to squeeze more money out of us? It seems like splitting movies into sequels is becoming some sort of trend lately. 😠
Now I have to wait, and when the next one finally drops, I’ll either have to refresh my memory or rewatch the first part—and frankly, I don't feel like doing that.
Most people just choose to forget. They push away the bad things they’ve done or experienced, treating those moments like weird little exceptions to their own rule.🙂 It's because we all have this hunger to win, I guess. We want to be right, to look like the good guys in everyone else's eyes... but for us to win, there has to be someone on the losing side. Someone who's wrong. Someone who's the villain. I suppose it's just a byproduct of society and our collective obsession with dominance, rather than some innate drive toward being "good." If there weren't a system—if there were no government or laws at all—life would be a nightmare. Not necessarily because people are naturally evil, but just because it's easier to survive if you're ruthless. Or whatever that word implies. People don't actually strive for evil, nor do they strive for good. They just end up labeled as such because of certain actions taken out of necessity or survival. It's just life, I guess. Humans basically invented the concepts of good and evil, but in reality, it's all one tangled mess that's nearly impossible to untangle. If anyone could truly tell where their goodness ends and their darkness begins, maybe they'd reach some kind of perfection. Though, I'm not talking about pure, raw evil. If true, primal evil exists, it probably only exists in some supernatural sense, which is a whole different conversation. If a person were purely evil, they'd likely destroy themselves immediately.
Labeling "bad" people as sick or insane is often just a failure to understand them—their thoughts, their goals, or their motives, assuming they even have any. Personally, I don't believe anyone does something out of pure, unadulterated malice. At most, they do it for the thrill, which is still just another goal or outcome. You don't always need a deep psychological reason to explain an action. Evil has always been around, and it always will be. Maybe the real issue is that nobody ever admits to being the bad guy. If people were honest about it, perhaps "evil" wouldn't even exist anymore. But then again, lies are quite convenient.🙂 When it comes to ourselves, we are the very last people to admit our faults. Yet, when it's someone else, we're incredibly quick to judge.
We’re all inherently flawed; it’s just a matter of degree, I suppose. There isn't a single soul on this planet who hasn't been a little wicked at some point. But then again, we aren't exactly eager to admit that, are we? (Though, I guess there are exceptions to everything)🙂 What does it even mean to be "evil," really? Most people go through life treating others poorly while firmly believing they're the good guys. To me, the real question is whether we actually realize how much darkness we carry, or if we all just know deep down and choose to pretend it's no big deal. Maybe we just minimize it. The truth is, our capacity for good is always mirrored by our capacity for bad. I find it hard to believe anyone is purely saintly or purely demonic in this world. It all comes down to perspective, I think. Some of us are just more malicious than others, maybe.