Look, that warning was about your writing style in general, not just specifically regarding this one topic. I honestly have no idea what gave you the impression that you could just go around trolling through the rest of the PDF.
Keith Lee2 said:I received my last strike on August 11, 2011. The warning came later, on January 23, 2012.
So, there weren't any actual strikes issued after that warning. Does that mean the whole thing is a lie?
🙈
Actually, those aren't the strikes listed in that PDF. My bad, I misspoke.
But honestly, even if we look at the warning, it clearly stated that you’d face a partial ban if you kept trolling—and you definitely kept right on trolling. So, regardless of the technicalities, the partial ban is totally justified.
Keith Lee2 said:It’s a total lie to say I was just ignoring the warning—I actually made a conscious choice to stop going back and forth with @Wand.
Every single warning, every single yellow card—it all counts as a heads-up. But for you? You're already looking at a failing grade on the midterm, and honestly, it’s been coming from a mile away.
It’s a total lie that I just sat around collecting cardboard boxes, because honestly, the only thread I actually jumped into was... I’ve just been hit with a ban, and honestly, that's the whole story right there. I don't even have the bandwidth or the headspace to dive into the topic because I don't have a single thread left to post in!
Look, you didn't just get a passing grade because of one single topic; it was about the overall quality of communication throughout the entire PDF document. It wasn't just about one specific point, either—it’s the way everything was laid out from start to finish.
Look, let me be crystal clear about this: the whole claim that I broke the rules is nothing but a flat-out lie. It’s a total lie to say I just tuned out when they first announced this penalty.
Nakon Alright, let's get the ball rolling—here are the upcoming game previews!Look, you’ve racked up quite a few penalties yourself lately, so I definitely wouldn't go as far as calling that a lie.
Keith Lee2 said:I’d really love to get a "second opinion"—you know, some input from another responsible party who handles complaints.
Look, to start with, one admin’s word is plenty; there's honestly no need to go hunting for a second opinion. That goes for this situation specifically, and it’s how things work in general here.
Plus, you were already warned about the partial ban. The mods laid out exactly what would happen if you didn't fix your attitude on the forum, which you clearly didn't do, so the partial shouldn't have come as any kind of shock. After repeatedly ignoring those warnings—even after racking up strikes and basically tuning out the heads-up about this penalty—there wasn't really any other way to handle it. At the end of the day, the moderators have to maintain the quality of this board and protect the community, even if that means cutting off access to people who just won't follow the rules.
Here’s the PDF for you guys , but hey, let's just give the moderators a chance to move the threads around and set some ground rules before everyone starts diving in headfirst. 😁
Just having a link in your post doesn't count as off-topic. I rarely hand out penalties for that kind of thing; honestly, I wouldn't even think about issuing a warning unless someone is being a total spammer and won't take the hint.
So, when we talk about a partial ban, what that really means is you've lost the ability to actually write on that specific PDF. You can still pull it up and read through it just like a guest or someone who isn't logged in, but the writing privileges are totally stripped away. These kinds of restrictions don't have an expiration date—they're permanent. That said, in some pretty rare cases, if enough time passes and it’s clear that a user has genuinely turned things around and fixed the behavior that got them flagged in the first place, those restrictions might be lifted.
Arthur Flores2, I’ve got that partial grade for your religion class uploaded as a PDF. Mod was supposed to shoot you a message to let you know it was ready, so I am really sorry you didn't get that heads-up.
Matthew Anderson said:Just wanted to point out that Satan actually holds a stake in this sub, but as you can clearly see, he’s been using a sockpuppet account to post all over the place.
Honestly, offenses like that deserve a permanent ban. There is absolutely no way Satan is getting unbanned, because even if people were calling for a permaban, he more than earned it through constant trolling and provocation—and now, by using a fake account to post on a board where he already has an interest.
Momimgay, it’s honestly time to stop manufacturing these imaginary little dramas. Regarding the situation you keeps bringing up, everything that needed to be said has already been settled, and we aren't going to sit here and relitigate old news every single time you decide to stir the pot. Look, since your entire contribution to this community seems to revolve around hunting for fights, starting arguments, and opening threads that have absolutely no business being here—especially considering you've racked up nearly 600 activity points—the next logical step would easily be a permanent ban if you don't make a massive shift in how you carry yourself.
Please, take a moment to really think about this and decide if you actually want to remain an active part of this community. Because, frankly, if you keep acting the way you have been, you won't be able to stay much longer. This forum isn't a dumping ground for venting frustrations, making baseless accusations, or leaving spiteful comments; our whole job is to protect our users from exactly that kind of toxicity.
Jack Bishop94 said:She reported it right away, and she didn't even get hit with a penalty, though she definitely deserved one... I'm still sitting here waiting for some kind of response to my PM, but nothing...
Logic dictates—people are actually talking and debating here... doesn't even matter who started the thread...
Jack Bishop94 said:Ah... okay. I assumed the other admins had seen it and just hadn't acted yet... since you aren't the only one running things, I figured they'd check too. 🤷 Thanks 🙂
Jack, would you mind doing me a huge favor and forwarding those reports from vranin to my forum email? Specifically the ones you received that haven't been logged yet. I've got a few old ones from when she reported another user and action was actually taken, but I don't have anything recent or any cases where someone hasn't been sanctioned.
Jack Bishop94 said:She reported it right away, and she didn't even get hit with a penalty, though she definitely deserved one... I'm still sitting here waiting for some kind of response to my PM, but nothing...
Logic dictates—people are actually talking and debating here... doesn't even matter who started the thread...
I just checked my inbox and I don't see any report from her. I did respond to yours, though.
Ethan Hayes2, please, go ahead and report it again.
Just a quick heads-up for everyone: please don't go sharing any private details about other members here unless they've already made that information public themselves. That includes any speculation about who might be running multiple accounts or acting as someone's "clone." Let's respect everyone's privacy and keep things chill.
Ethan Hayes2 said:And what about that thread on the bulletin board titled "Where Has Romantic Love Gone?"
There was this author writing all these flowery pieces about romance, but the moment it became clear the whole topic was just a troll setup—and that the author was actually trolling us—they decided to slide into my DMs with physical threats and personal insults.
The thing is, the thread is still sitting there, visible to everyone, even though the author has already been sanctioned.
If someone is hitting you up with threats or being abusive in your inbox, you should definitely report them.