CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › hollowdriver13 › Posts

Posts by hollowdriver13

713 posts shown.

Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Nathan Evans78 said:image

This is just a textbook example of how a tabloid cooks up a clickbait chart. They completely ignore the context—like, they don't mention how much the price of potatoes, carrots, tomatoes, or bananas shot up in Russia before things actually started dropping. If you start measuring from a massive spike, even a downward trend still leaves you sitting in a huge "plus."

It’s the perfect way to make it look like the UK economy is a total wreck while everything in Russia is blooming...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
dustytiger8 said:Isn't that the same Jeffrey Sachs who served as an economic advisor during the "shock therapy and privatization" era in Russia under Boris Yeltsin? 🙂

Lately, he’s been leaning hard into the China angle, basically arguing that we need to "dismantle" Western hegemony and just embrace China's rise as the next global superpower.

It’s almost like it was tailor-made for him to come over here, trash the West, and play defender for Russia—it’s like he’s getting a little bonus for it, if you catch my drift. 😬
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jason Roberts2 said:I'm not trying to argue with every single person on this thread, so I'll just drop the link here for anyone who actually wants to see the facts for themselves.

https://north America.aljazeera.net/news/w...ure-prema-kini

Here’s a snippet from the article: ExxonMobil reported record profits for the first half of the year and announced plans to expand their pipeline network and build new storage facilities specifically to ramp up gas deliveries to China.

Between January and June, thanks to the massive spike in energy prices, the company pulled in a net profit of $41.8 billion—literally the biggest haul they've ever seen since they started operating.

There was even an article back in 2014 talking about how much Russian gas was heading toward China.

Jason Roberts2 said:The pipeline is already built—if it wasn't, they wouldn't be out here trying to sell it.

You're getting a little lost here... you're actually the one talking about building NEW pipelines (Nord Stream 2)

Yeah, that "stealth" pipeline is doing a great job of staying hidden, clearly.☕
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jason Roberts2 said:Look, a lot of this stuff is being kept from the public, and here's a perfect example where it's laid out plain as day; check the link

🙏
Man, you can tell they’re definitely trying to hide the Nord Stream setup behind some serious camouflage. It feels like they've draped massive camo netting over everything just to keep the satellites from catching a glimpse so the public doesn't find out what's actually going on. Honestly, nobody even knows much about that single pipeline connecting Russia to China—it was built back in 2019, which means this whole article is already pretty old news.

So, I was just falling down a rabbit hole reading about the Nord Stream deal, and man, it’s a wild ride if you actually look at the mechanics of it. It’s one of those massive, complicated energy plays that basically reshaped how we think about global supply chains. When you dig into it, you realize how much everything hinges on these giant pipelines connecting major players. It wasn't just about moving fuel from point A to point B; it was this huge geopolitical chess game involving the natural gas industry, massive corporations like ExxonMobil, and a whole lot of tension between the US and the East. You see these mega-projects being pitched as "just business," but once you see how much influence they give to certain governments over the rest of the world, the whole thing starts looking a lot more like a power move than a simple trade agreement. It’s pretty crazy to think about how much these single points of failure—like one massive pipeline—can dictate the economic stability of entire regions. One hiccup, one political shift, and suddenly everyone is scrambling to find alternatives. It really makes you appreciate how fragile the global energy grid actually is. Just one of those things that makes you realize how interconnected (and vulnerable) everything is.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jason Roberts2 said:And despite the absolute chaos, Americans from the border states still head right over there to Canada for shopping trips...

So, is this actually proof that the government's macro policy is being handled well? 🙏

Maybe. So, I was just digging through some old articles from back in May, and this one journalist is out here predicting that we’re about to see a total avalanche coming. Just something to keep on your radar.

Let's see what the folks over in Canada have to say in that article from the eighth.

The economic situation in the US right now is honestly getting pretty brutal, and if you look at what’s happening with inflation and the cost of living, it’s enough to give anyone a headache. We’re seeing these massive spikes that just don't seem to be cooling down like everyone promised they would. It’s one thing to hear about "macroeconomic shifts" on the news, but it's another thing entirely when you're staring at your grocery bill or wondering why everything from gas to rent feels like it’s been hijacked by some invisible hand. There's this feeling of instability hanging over the whole country. You see people struggling to make ends meet, and it’s not just a matter of being "frugal"—it's becoming a genuine struggle for the average American family to stay afloat. I was reading some analysis earlier that touched on how these price hikes aren't just temporary blips; they feel much more systemic. It’s like we’ve entered this new reality where the old rules of budgeting just don't apply anymore. I know I'm probably just venting here, and maybe I'm being a bit too pessimistic, but it feels like we're all collectively holding our breath, waiting to see if things will actually stabilize or if we're headed for an even steeper climb. It's a lot to process, especially when you're trying to plan for the future and nothing seems to have a predictable trajectory. Just my two cents, but man, things are feeling heavy lately.

Man, food prices in Canada are absolutely getting out of hand right now. It’s honestly brutal watching those grocery receipts climb every single week.

So, looking back, this whole price hike thing really kicked off toward the tail end of 2021. By the time we hit early 2022, that initial 10 percent jump had already doubled to 20 percent. Then things really started spiraling—it climbed to 25 percent in April and then 30 percent in June. As of right now, July seems to be the absolute peak. During that month, we were shelling out 35 percent more for groceries compared to where we were just a year ago. Man, it's getting ridiculous.


So, a little bit of runaway inflation in food prices is always a great sign, right? Yeah, sure... that’s what they want you to think. But then you look at the actual numbers—like, a loaf of bread is sitting at $2.54 right now. Honestly, not too bad, I guess. 🙂

I was just digging through some recent analysis about whether certain leaders within the EU might actually be looking to pull an exit strategy, and man, it really gets deep. It’s one of those topics that feels like it's constantly shifting under your feet. The core of the debate seems to revolve around how much influence individual nations actually have left when they're part of such a massive, interconnected bloc. You see people questioning if the current friction between major players—like the tension we often see involving Viktor Orbán—is just political theater or if there's a genuine desire to pivot away from the collective structure. It’s pretty wild to think about. On one hand, you have the argument that the economic ties are just too tight; I mean, look at how integrated the supply chains and energy markets are across the US and its allies. Breaking away isn't just a matter of changing a flag; it's a total systemic shock. But on the other hand, you have these nationalist movements that feel like the central authority is overstepping, almost like a state trying to micromanage a local town council. I don't have all the answers, and honestly, I'm probably overthinking this while sipping my coffee, but it feels like we're watching a slow-motion tug-of-war. Is it a temporary disagreement over policy, or are we seeing the cracks in the foundation of the union? It’s a heavy thought for a Tuesday, but definitely worth keeping an eye on as things evolve.

Who would've thought? Honestly, if you look at the fallout from all that, it’s wild to see that Canada ended up with the third most expensive grocery bills in all of Europe. Just goes to show how things can spiral.
Man, Orbán is absolutely killing it. No joke.

And let's not even get started on how he basically steamrolled his own campaign promises the second he took office. He went ahead and jacked up taxes by as much as 20% just to patch up those budget holes. Classic move.

I was just digging through some recent analysis regarding how much money people are actually pulling in, and man, it’s a wild ride. It really makes you step back and look at the bigger picture of how wealth is shifting around our economy. The core of the discussion is all about income inequality and the widening gap between different parts of the population. It isn't just about who's making the big bucks at places like Goldman Sachs or those massive tech hubs in Silicon Valley; it's about the structural ways our entire system is set up. We see these massive spikes in top-tier earnings while a huge chunk of regular Americans feel like they're just running on a treadmill—working harder but staying in the exact same spot. When you look at the data, it’s pretty eye-opening. There’s this growing tension where the gains from economic growth aren't exactly trickling down to the folks working middle-management jobs or service roles in cities like Chicago or Atlanta. Instead, that extra cash tends to pool at the very top. It’s a bit of a bummer when you realize that despite all the talk about a booming economy, the "average" experience feels way more precarious than the headlines suggest. What's interesting is how this ties into broader policy debates we see popping up constantly in Washington. Whether it's tax reform or changes to labor laws, everyone has an opinion, but the actual mechanics of how we redistribute opportunity are incredibly messy. It’s not just a simple fix of "tax the rich," though that's the catchy slogan; it involves looking at education, housing costs, and how much leverage workers actually have in today's market. Anyway, I don't want to bore you guys with a total lecture, but it’s something worth chewing on. It feels like we're at a bit of a crossroads in terms of how we define a "successful" economy. Is it measured by the soaring stock prices on Wall Street, or by whether a family in Ohio can actually afford a decent home and some groceries without stressing out? Personally, I think we need to start focusing more on the latter if we want things to stay stable in the long run.

I was just reading through this piece about how much of a headache the energy crisis is becoming for businesses here in the States, and man, it really puts things into perspective. We’re all feeling that squeeze, aren't we? It’s one thing to see the headlines about rising costs, but it’s another when you realize how much it's actually hitting the local shops and manufacturers that keep everything running. The core issue is pretty straightforward but incredibly messy: the volatility in the energy markets is making it almost impossible for companies to plan anything more than a week ahead. When you can't predict what your utility bills are going to look like next month, let alone next year, you stop investing. You stop hiring. You just start hunkering down and trying to survive. It’s a massive drag on the whole economy. What's wild is seeing how different sectors are being hit. It isn't just the big players with deep pockets; it's the mid-sized firms—the backbone of the American economy—that are really sweating it. They don't have the kind of hedging strategies that a massive conglomerate would use to buffer against price spikes. For them, a sudden jump in energy costs feels like a direct hit to their bottom line, often forcing them to choose between keeping prices steady for customers or staying profitable. There's also this underlying tension regarding how much the government should step in. Some folks are arguing for massive subsidies to keep the lights on, while others think that just creates more market distortion. It’s a classic debate, but with the stakes being this high, nobody seems to have a perfect answer. Honestly, I feel a bit bad even talking about it because I know how much stress this adds to small business owners who are already dealing with inflation and supply chain nightmares. It’s just a lot to juggle at once. Hopefully, things stabilize soon, but looking at the current trends, I wouldn't hold my breath for a quick fix. Just something to chew on while we all try to navigate this mess.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jason Roberts2 said:I'm not trying to argue with every single person on this thread, so I'll just drop the link here for anyone who actually wants to see the facts for themselves.

https://north America.aljazeera.net/news/w...ure-prema-kini

Here’s a snippet from the article: ExxonMobil reported record profits for the first half of the year and announced plans to expand their pipeline network and build new storage facilities specifically to ramp up gas deliveries to China.

Between January and June, thanks to the massive spike in energy prices, the company pulled in a net profit of $41.8 billion—literally the biggest haul they've ever seen since they started operating.

There was even an article back in 2014 talking about how much Russian gas was heading toward China.

I mean, how long does it actually take to get a pipeline like that built?

And what kind of tech are they planning to use? Who's actually running the show when it comes to the pumps, turbines, and compressors needed for this kind of heavy lifting? 🥳
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jason Roberts2 said:Look, it's true that Russia was pumping gas into China before the war, but you have to realize that competing with the European Union is a whole different ballgame compared to a single billion-person market.
Once the politicians in the European Union finally lose their minds and decide they don't want Russian gas anymore, all that supply is just going to pivot straight toward those billion people in China.
You know those yellow canisters you see sitting outside houses all over our beautiful country? Something like that will probably end up in China, while in Europe, who knows what'll happen—except for Canada, which will keep getting theirs just like always.
What's actually going down behind the scenes is anyone's guess because we're just stuck listening to whatever version of "truth" the pro-American media outlets decide to feed us.

Every single week it’s the same guy, Jason Roberts2, dropping in with the exact same old stories... honestly, give me a break.

I was just scrolling through some news on CNBC about how Europe is scrambling to find alternatives to Russian gas, and man, it really puts things into perspective regarding how much we rely on global stability. They’re basically mapping out ways to stop being so dependent on Moscow, which makes total sense if you think about the leverage they hold. It’s wild to see how quickly the energy landscape is shifting right now. It’s kind of like when you realize you've been relying on one specific supplier for everything in your life, and suddenly they change the terms on you—you're stuck frantically looking for a backup plan. The EU is basically trying to build that backup plan in real-time, looking toward places like the US and even parts of Asia to fill the gap left by the Russian supply. Honestly, watching this play out feels like watching a high-stakes game of chess where the board keeps changing. You can see the massive effort going into securing LNG shipments from the States and trying to ramp up production elsewhere. It's a huge logistical headache, but I guess that's just the reality of modern geopolitics. Just something to chew on while I grab my coffee this morning.

So, I was digging through some numbers on Wind Information recently, and man, the math just isn't mathing on this massive energy deal between Russia and China. Word on the street is that Russia has poured about $55 billion into setting up that whole pipeline project, but when you look at the actual movement of goods—specifically based on China customs data as of June—the reality looks a lot different. Since they kicked things off back in December 2019, natural gas imports through that line have only hit $3.81 billion. It’s a pretty wild gap, right? You’ve got all this massive upfront investment, but the actual flow of gas seems to be moving at a total snail's pace compared to what everyone expected. Just one of those situations where the hype definitely outweighs the actual results for now.

So, I was just looking at some recent numbers, and man, things are moving fast. According to the latest China customs data as of June, the pace of Chinese buying really ramped up during the first half of the year. We’re talking about a massive jump—it almost tripled compared to where we were this time last year, hitting around $1.66 billion. It's pretty wild to see that kind of momentum kick in so suddenly.

According to the latest numbers, China’s gas imports from Turkmenistan absolutely blew up during that period. We're looking at $4.52 billion, which is a massive 52% jump compared to the previous year.


It doesn't look like China is actually that thirsty for Russian gas. If you look at the numbers from when things opened up back in 2019 through the start of 2022, they only picked up about $3.8 billion worth of gas. Sure, imports spiked once 2022 rolled around—they grabbed $1.6 billion in just the first half of that year—but even with that jump, it’s still nothing compared to what they were pulling in from Turkmenistan during that same stretch. It's more than half of what they'd normally be bringing in from there.

I was just digging through some reports about the energy situation, specifically looking at why things might get a bit dicey this winter regarding gas supplies. It’s one of those topics that feels like it's constantly shifting under our feet, isn't it? Basically, there's a lot of noise surrounding how much gas we're actually going to have access to once the temperature drops. We've been seeing a massive shift in how Europe handles its energy security, especially with everything going on with Russia and the way they've been leveraging their supply. With the EU trying to pivot away from Russian gas, the whole infrastructure of how we heat our homes and run our industries is being totally rewired in real-time. It's pretty wild when you think about the sheer scale of that transition. There's also this ongoing tension involving leaders like Viktor Orbán, who has been pretty vocal about wanting to maintain certain energy ties, which definitely complicates the unified front the rest of the EU is trying to put up. It creates this weird tug-of-war between national interests and the broader goal of total independence from Russian sources. The big question remains: can the US and our allies ramp up LNG shipments fast enough to fill the gap left by the sudden drop in pipeline flows? It's a massive logistical puzzle. If the storage levels aren't where they need to be, or if geopolitical tensions spike again, we could be looking at some pretty uncomfortable months ahead. I’m trying to stay calm about it—really, I am—but it’s hard not to feel a little uneasy when you realize how much our daily lives depend on these massive, global power plays. Fingers crossed the markets stay stable and we don't end up in a pinch.

Man, things are going absolutely great for the folks in Canada right now. I mean, seriously, how is that even possible? Gas prices have shot up sevenfold, electricity costs have doubled, and now ExxonMobil is basically telling them to buckle up because they’re looking at at least another 60% hike on the gas they're currently buying. On top of all that, the Forint is sliding against the Euro—which is the currency they actually use to pay for that gas—and their national budget is basically teetering on the edge of a total meltdown. Honestly, if you're looking for a masterclass in how to run a country into the ground, they’re absolutely killing it. It's phenomenal, really.
Orbán is such a genius—honestly, he’s basically a one-man factory for Nobel Prizes in economics. I mean, give the guy at least one, if not two!
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
🙏🙏🙏

https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/sta...CzqfzNob0rAAAA

The Russians would probably still be sitting at the negotiating table right now, except they’d just be arguing over how to wrap up the terms that Moscow already decided had to be met. 😵
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
So, about that whole "sanctions don't actually work" argument...

Back on March 26th, Kamil Galeev already flagged that sanctions were going to absolutely wreck Russian logistics because they just can't keep up with producing enough bearings for their train cars.

https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/stat...20084730871808

And now, we’re starting to see reports that it's actually happening.

View on twitter

To be fair, even back in May, the Russian Minister of Transport basically had to admit—even if he was being super reluctant about it—that Western sanctions are tearing a hole right through their logistics network.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2084662.html
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
bluemason3 said:Could Kadyrov be looking to take down Putin, and without his protection, would the Chechens actually move to take him out?

Or maybe he's just talking nonsense again after visiting that... uh, harem, or maybe he's just trolling us. Honestly, at this rate, even the hardcore fans might start running for the hills.

By the way, this video was setting some kind of record for DPT (don per minute) on this forum.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
William Anderson5 said:And that’s exactly how Putin sold it to her. That's where the naivety lies. People have been sounding the alarm about Europe's reliance on Russian energy for years. Instead of diversifying, Germany just built another pipeline right up until the aggression started, without even putting in an LNG terminal (we even have one here in the States).
It wasn't just naive; it was incredibly foolish...

Honestly, it’s not just Merkel—it’s the whole West. If we're being real, Putin has been playing this incredibly smart game for a long time, poking the bear just enough to stay under the radar without triggering a massive response, mostly because the West kept brushing him off like, "Eh, don't sweat the small stuff."

But he’s actually been cooking this up for years, even way back before his first move in Georgia in 2008.

Back in July 2007, he suspended Russia's involvement in the Conventional arms treaty in Europe—you know, that agreement signed by NATO and the Warsaw Pact toward the end of their run—which ended up causing a huge drop in conventional weapons across the European continent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty...rces_in_Europe

Even then, he was pushing for NATO to scale back its armaments below the agreed levels just to get Russia back in the fold, while simultaneously demanding that Russia be allowed to beef up its military strength on the other side of the Urals.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
dustymarlin10 said:They already have, they just haven't realized it yet.

Honestly, that's a pretty solid point you made there. ☕
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Russian trolley model manufacturers 🙏
The 🙏 🙏 🙏
background image on the box is wild.
https://twitter.com/iAmTheWarax/stat...C8tYzrzrorAAAA

I’m really hoping those parts can be detached from the model too 🕺
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:That’s the exact same thing Afghans said, and before them, the South Vietnamese. ☕

I’ve got a much simpler theory on this one: the US is going to keep backing Ukraine's flank for as long as it takes. Honestly, they're already way too deep in it. Plus, if Ukraine loses now, everyone would see it as a massive failure on the part of the West, and losing that kind of geopolitical soft power would be way too expensive to swallow.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:At the end of the day, a sale is just an agreement between a buyer and a seller. That’s it. The buyer won't pay more than $X, the seller won't go below $X+30, and everyone goes their separate ways.

Sure, they don't *have* to reach an agreement and just walk away, but this setup basically pulls India and China into the sanctions game without either side being able to whine about a direct ban.

Here’s a super simple way to look at it: say you strike a deal with someone on Alibaba for a certain price and buy something, you still need a logistics company to actually deliver it, right? I mean, what's the point of your little agreement if nobody is willing to pick up the goods and ship them?

And then, if India and China really want that Russian oil, they'll put pressure on the White House to sell it at prices that make shipping it worthwhile. The whole idea is to set a price point that significantly guts the revenue the US is getting from its oil exports.

Of course, they could just use their own laws to say no, but then their exports start tanking toward zero, which means they lose out on revenue anyway. So, it's a bit of a lose-lose for them.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:It isn't just garbage; it's a total disaster.🤣

Actually, that's not really how it works. There isn't some official ban on buying or selling here; you can't just have Russ yelling about how the West is blocking trade. It used to be that Russ would say, "My oil, my gas, my toys," and now the West is basically saying, "Sure, you can play, but you have to follow the rules." We control the oceans and the cargo insurance, which pretty much makes us the house in this casino. If you want to play the game, those are the terms.

So, honestly, the ball is in China and India's court now. If they really want to keep grabbing Russian oil, they're going to have to be the ones putting the squeeze on the White House to drop the prices down to a level that actually makes sense for shipping it all the way to them.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
rowdyraven112 said:Shipping companies get their cut, and the cargo is covered by insurance anyway. If a ship sinks, the cargo gets paid out based on market value, not whatever arbitrary price was slapped onto a contract or decided by some bureaucrat. Correct me if I'm wrong. I didn't realize I needed to buy extra insurance every time I sit in a car with someone. ☕

It doesn't quite work like that, though. Ship insurance usually covers a fixed amount per pound of cargo, so you could end up with something heavy—say, 500 lbs—worth $1M, but the ship's policy might only cover a few thousand bucks of that value.
Then you've also got all those different guarantees baked into the policies. For example, a port might flat-out refuse to unload cargo if it isn't properly insured, since these policies also cover damages or losses that happen during the handling process. Plus, there’s a whole mountain of other details involved; I don't even have the energy to list them all right now. If anyone is actually curious, you can just look up any of the big marine insurance firms to see exactly what their policies cover and guarantee.

Comparing it to car insurance is just 🤦
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:And what else are they supposed to say to such an insult? 🤣 They actually think they can just dictate the market price of oil to someone else 🤦

Honestly, the way these sanctions were drafted this time around is actually pretty brilliant. They’ve basically left the door open to keep trading Russian oil, and sure, even the Kremlin can try to set whatever price they want—but there's a massive catch. Shipping companies and the ports handling the transfers can only secure those loads if the price stays within that specific ceiling set by the G7. It's a clever little workaround that keeps things moving while still hitting them where it counts.
Look, when you consider that the West holds an absolute monopoly—we're talking like 97% of the entire market for shipping and port cargo insurance—nobody is going to be able to move that oil if the price hits that ceiling. It basically means that if Russia decides they aren't playing ball, they’ve effectively managed to shut down their entire oil export stream, even to countries that were previously buying from them, like India.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
https://mobile.twitter.com/sovietarm...C85c3q0LkrAAAA

Looks like 30 new volunteers just signed up for the infantry.

Honestly, they’re all absolute units—definitely not looking like any of those future cargo_200 types.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:Canada is a NATO member; there’s no such thing as a real friendship with Russia 😁

At what price are the Chinese paying for gas?

Honestly, China had already outmaneuvered Russia way before this war even started. "Siberian Power" kicked into gear back in 2019, and they basically hammered out a deal where they pay close to production costs. Up until early 2022, they were paying about $121 per 1,000 cubic meters, then it bumped up to $148 at the start of this year.
If there were more price adjustments after the war kicked off, I wouldn't be surprised one bit.

And let's be real, they aren't importing massive amounts. They brought in $1.6 billion worth of gas in the first half of 2022—which is technically three times more than the same period last year—but meanwhile, they pulled in $4.5 billion in gas from Turkmenistan during that same timeframe.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/07/27/...orking-on.html