urbanotter said:I can't help but wonder how people would react if a similar gathering took place right here in America, where politicians, entrepreneurs, union leaders, bankers, judges, religious figures, and various dignitaries all met, but then kept everything strictly under wraps—no details on their discussions, no conclusions shared, and total media blackout on what actually went down at the social.
What do you think? Would the public still feel that "itch" if, following such a meeting, long-standing issues were suddenly resolved or if major decisions affecting the citizens and the nation were finally implemented?
Would the skepticism of the citizenry then just be dismissed as mere "mystification"?
p.s.
Think about the massive uproar that occurred when Kolinda Grabar Kitarović visited the USA without a clearly defined agenda; yet, somehow, a gathering of the most influential people on the planet is treated as nothing more than a conspiracy theory.🙂
Look, there are official meetings and unofficial ones. When it's an official meeting, they’re actually obligated to state what's being discussed. It’s pretty straightforward.
And honestly, I have no idea how you managed to link America to the Trilateral Commission.?!
In our neck of the woods, we hold meetings both publicly and privately, and absolutely nothing ever gets resolved.😁
Regarding the Trilateral Commission, here’s the deal:
The Trilateral Commission is a
private association founded in 1973 to promote closer ties between the USA, Europe, and Japan. Pay close attention to the fact that this is a private group.
And besides that specific group, there are dozens of other similar organizations that meet regularly.