CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Nicholas Myers › Posts

Posts by Nicholas Myers

1304 posts shown.

restlessangler said:I’m looking for someone to give me a layman's explanation of those two terms (in bold).
I have an appointment with the immunologist in a month. My cytology results will likely be ready by then, so I'll ask the doctor, but I'm curious what "hyperechoic" and "hypoechoic border" actually mean.

Thanks for the info..

Ma'am,

did you transcribe the entire Abdominal Ultrasound report, or just a portion of it?

To put it simply(!), these terms describe how light or dark parts look. It means the center of the lymph node appears brighter while its outer edge looks darker. A normal lymph node on an ultrasound shows a hyperechoic center (the hilus) and a hypoechoic border (the cortex). That's why I'm asking if there was anything else noted in the report.
Tuberculosis awareness in Health ·
In cases like these, you generally see the Democratic Party resurface after about an 8-week period.
Tuberculosis awareness in Health ·
redraven11 said:Hey everyone, I wasn't quite sure where this would be the best place to ask, so I'll just drop it here 🙂
basically, I took a Democratic Party test last Friday (Sept 12th) around 3:00 PM—and as of today, Sunday (Sept 14th), I still haven't seen any kind of reaction... absolutely nothing at all. I was wondering if anyone might have some insight or perhaps a thought or two on the matter... feel free to share...

Thanks in advance

How old are you, and what was the reason for the testing?
Rheumatism help/advice? in Health ·
Regarding the title "rheumatism," it’s a bit too vague. Are we talking about rheumatoid arthritis or something else entirely? People often throw around the term "rheumatism" to describe degenerative joint issues—essentially wear and tear on the cartilage—which is a completely different beast. Please clarify the specific diagnosis so we can make sure this thread ends up in the right section.
blueraven23 said:I was diagnosed with mononucleosis last week. I had some blood work done yesterday and the results just came in, but I'm currently away from my doctor and don't have anyone on hand to help me make sense of them. I’m not qualified to play doctor with my own data, so if there's a kind soul here who understands these numbers, I would truly appreciate the help.

Mononucleosis testing results came back:

EBV VCA IgM - negative.
EBV VCA IgG - positive - 110 AU/ml (positive >= 20)
EBV EA IgG - negative.
EBNA IgG - positive - 25 AU/ml (positive >=20)
CMV IgM - positive - 10.4 index (pos > 1.1)
CMV IgG - negative.

Blood work and liver enzyme results from yesterday are attached below.

http://upload.slike.com/slike/2014/0...x-Untitled.jpg

To whom it may concern,

Based on everything here, we’re looking at infectious mononucleosis. However, the serology suggests the culprit isn't Epstein-Barr virus. Usually, that's the main driver, but since your EBV VCA IgG and EBNA IgG came back positive while the EBV VCA IgM and EA IgG were negative, it indicates you've already cleared this specific infection—likely sometime in the past.

It’s likely that a different virus is behind your current symptoms—specifically Cytomegalovirus. Since your IgM came back positive but the IgG was negative, that points toward a recent infection. CMV isn't the most common culprit for mononucleosis, but it can certainly cause it, which seems to be what's happening in your case.

Take these results to your attending physician.

Greetings. 🙂

Maria Gray45 said:I saw my doctor, and she ordered a urine culture. The results came back sterile. She prescribed me Sinersul Forte, 800 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. I’m sitting here wondering if there’s actually any point in taking it.

To whom it may concern,

Nowadays, doctors aren't really prescribing Sinersul (co-trimoxazole) for acute urinary tract infections without an antibiogram first. Resistance rates among the most common pathogens have climbed too high for guesswork. It’s shifted more toward prophylaxis—using it to prevent recurrent infections rather than as a primary strike.

If that unpleasant odor in your urine persists alongside frequent trips to the bathroom, it’s time to push for further diagnostic testing.

Jesse Torres13 said:Could someone help me make sense of these lab results? I'm trying to figure out if my hormone levels are actually fine, aside from the TSH—which is the only thing my OBGYN flagged. I would be incredibly grateful for any insight.

P.S.: Sorry for the long post. :-)

Everything else looks fine and falls within the standard reference range. Your progesterone levels are elevated, which is expected given you're currently on Utrogestan.

wanderingowl19 said:I'm 22. A few months back, my Bilirubin spiked, and it hasn't settled down. If the normal range is roughly between 5 and 30, mine is sitting at 40 or 45. My doctor claims it’s nothing serious, but sent me for a battery of tests just to be safe. I’ve tested negative for HIV and hepatitis, and my jaundice markers came back clean—nothing like that going on. An Abdominal Ultrasound showed everything looks fine too. Now there's this Coombs test on the list, and I have no idea what that entails. Can anyone explain it? Also, it’s driving me crazy that my sclera are yellow. From what I gathered from the doctor, it's because my metabolism is sluggish. There was a phase where they were yellow, then they cleared up, but now they're back. The doctor suspects Gilbert syndrome, but the yellowing is still getting to me. Any advice on how to get rid of the yellowness? Thanks.

A direct Coombs test (done via bloodwork) checks for antibodies that attack erythrocytes—your red blood cells. Essentially, if those antibodies are present, the body is destroying its own red cells. Once they break down, Bilirubin levels climb, which leads to jaundice.

If we're talking about Gilbert syndrome, there isn't really a "fix" for the yellowing. It's just how things work. You can read more about it in this thread.
Losing my sight due to a pituitary tumor in Health ·
James Myers65 said:We've consulted several ophthalmologists and neurologists, yet none could provide an explanation for these symptoms.

If she couldn't get answers from the specialists at Johns Hopkins, you aren't going to find them anywhere else in America. That's the gold standard for neuro-ophthalmology.
Maria Gray45 said:Has it been happening more often lately? I've been dealing with frequent wetness, my urine has an unpleasant odor, and I'm seeing mucus quite often. Everything seems fine from a gynecological standpoint, so my OB-GYN suggested I get my urine checked out.

It would be wise to perform a urine culture with an antibiogram. Those symptoms can definitely point toward a urinary tract infection.

Patrick Sanders91 said:I'm wondering if I could be prescribed a strong reserve antibiotic via IV to just clear everything out once and for all?

Hello,

In your situation, we're likely looking at a complicated urinary tract infection. Since previous treatment attempts haven't yielded results, an interdisciplinary approach would be best—essentially, having a urologist and an infectious disease specialist work together.

Dz1, I've moved your inquiry to the Heart and Lung X-ray thread.
Capsule Endoscopy in Health ·
George Sanchez59 said:Are you perhaps referring to an video endoscopy capsule?

I've merged the threads. Thanks for the suggestion! 🙂
wiredotter12 said:Stupid question... honestly, I'm not sure about this one 🤷

Does HLA-B27 mean I definitely have HLA-B27, or does it mean it's undefined (ND)—meaning it's uncertain if I have it or I don't have it at all?

Asking because three different doctors have misinterpreted this result... thanks.

I believe you have HLA-B27.

As you can see, each HLA marker has two slots, resulting in two numbers. You have "one" HLA-B which is 27, while the "other" HLA-B is undefined. One comes from your father, the other from your mother.

If they couldn't define which HLA-B you had, it should have been listed as HLA-B27.

How did they interpret it, and were they specialists? In what field?

Maria Gray45 said:I got my urinalysis back. Since my doctor at the annual checkup won't tell me, can anyone explain exactly what this means?

What was the reason for requesting this test?
Rebecca James2 said:I'm curious about what might cause such high levels of Urobilinogen in urine. 😕

Thanks in advance! 🙂

To whom it may concern,

Just redo the urinalysis. If everything comes back normal, there’s really no reason to worry. A Urobilinogen test can easily trigger a false positive—it could just be a reading error since you're basically judging the color of a strip. It happens.

Greetings. 🙂
Steven Lopez77 said:I'm curious about this last part. If my stool consistency is normal and my urine looks fine, I assume there shouldn't be any issues with service or bacteria? Hopefully, I've phrased that correctly.

Thanks!

Any issues with urination? Did you clean the genital area before providing the sample? And did you make sure to catch the midstream urine?
Rachel Vaughn85 said:Basically, you go to your primary care physician, get a referral, and mention how difficult it is to breathe through your nose just to see if there's an actual issue or if everything is functioning normally.

I would appreciate it if this Health PDF—especially when children are involved—didn't suggest, whether explicitly or implicitly, that one should withhold the truth from their doctor, regardless of the situation.
Death-of-Art, your post has been moved to the thread Heart and Lung X-ray.
Sandra Gray56 said:My prolactin, cortisol, and ACTH levels are all elevated.

My doctor ordered a Bromergon test, an overnight blockade using 2mg of dexamethasone, and both MRI and PET scans. After I asked about ten times what exactly this means or what she’s actually suspicious of, she still hasn't given me a straight answer. Not even close. 🙂
If all else fails, can someone walk me through what those test results actually look like? I'm talking about the layout, the data, etc.
Thanks.
😁

Because those pituitary hormones came back elevated, your doctor suspected there might be an issue with the pituitary gland itself, which is why you've been referred for further testing.

Regarding how to perform the bromargonski test, there was already some discussion about this in the pituitary gland thread. You should give that a careful read. This is getting ridiculous. postove.

The overnight dexamethasone suppression test works like this: you take the dexamethasone tablets in the evening—say, around 11 PM—and then head in the next morning, usually around 8 AM, to have your blood drawn to check your cortisol levels.

restlesstrucker15 said:My apologies if this isn't quite the right spot for this question, but I was wondering if there’s anywhere else I can get my blood type and Rh factor checked besides Petrov in Chicago. I need to complete some pre-op testing—some through my primary care clinic and others at the hospital—and I'm trying to minimize the running around. Dealing with a bad lower back makes all that extra walking a real struggle, not to mention avoiding unnecessary needle sticks.

I believe you might be mistaken—Dubrava Hospital houses the American Red Cross, but they also have access to Merkur Hospital and Sister Rosalia Kaslik Medical Center.

rapidcyclist9 said:Can someone please explain what these results mean for my son?
Amino acid excretion in the urine is generally elevated. Thanks.

It would be helpful to know the child's age and the specific reason these tests were ordered.
Asthma Management in Health ·
Post by Raymond Castillo5 has been deleted. Reason: violation of the Health forum rules. Discussion or testimonials regarding alternative "healing" methods are not permitted here. We invite anyone interested to share their experiences over on the Alternative Medicine forum instead, as this specific board is strictly dedicated to conventional medicine. Thanks for understanding.
coastaltiger7 said:Thanks so much for the reply. I'm trying to stay off Google as much as possible because even without searching, I'm pretty shocked and scared :-D The surgeon who referred me for the biopsy didn't have an opening until October. Should I try to book something sooner? Then again, I've had this lump for quite a while now, so maybe it's already too late? :-(

If you've noticed this change over a long period and it hasn't grown significantly, it’s unlikely to be a sarcoma. Generally speaking, sarcomas are aggressive tumors that grow and spread very rapidly. In this situation, it's far more probable that we're looking at a completely benign growth made of connective tissue. Given your history—specifically the fact that the surgeon didn't seem concerned during the exam (if they were worried, they likely would have recommended immediate removal rather than just a biopsy, and wouldn't have pushed you out to October), combined with the cytology report which noted a mass of connective cells rather than malignancy—I'd say it's most likely a harmless, benign growth.

That said, for your own peace of mind—and because you can never be too careful—I suggest taking your results to a surgeon for an earlier appointment. It doesn't have to be the same doctor. Any competent general surgeon can weigh in on the next steps, so find someone who can see you sooner.
slylynx26 said:Does anyone know why only this specific value is elevated while everything else looks fine?

I find myself agreeing with my colleague regarding the recommended tests. However, if blood persists in the urine upon retesting, I would personally suggest adding a three-part urine cytology to pinpoint whether those erythrocytes are originating from the upper or lower urinary tract.

Darker urine during physical exertion can stem from several different sources. There is a phenomenon known as exertional hematuria where, for reasons not yet fully understood, blood appears in the urine following intense activity, typically clearing spontaneously within 24 to 48 hours. If that is the case, one recommendation is to avoid completely emptying the bladder before activity and to increase fluid intake.

Furthermore, the discoloration could be due to what’s called march hemoglobinuria. This is a form of hemolysis—essentially, during strenuous activities involving heavy leg work (like running) or arm movement (think drummers), some red blood cells break down, releasing hemoglobin into the urine. Finding Urobilinogen in the urine alongside normal serum Bilirubin would support the idea of hemolysis. In cases of march hemoglobinuria, the back discomfort you mentioned is also a documented symptom.

Finally, dark urine after exercise accompanied by muscle soreness might indicate myoglobinuria, which occurs when muscle breakdown products are excreted through the urine.

Of course, there is always the possibility of an entirely different underlying cause. It is certainly necessary to follow the diagnostic path suggested by my colleague—with my addition of the three-part urine cytology—to determine whether a referral to a nephrologist or a urologist is warranted based on the results.

Best regards. 🙂
coastaltiger7 said:It’s about a puncture biopsy of a lump on my leg.

Puncture - subcutaneous mass
The puncture yielded a small subcutaneous mass on the left lower leg. Cytology smears showed abundant peripheral blood alongside elements of fatty and connective tissue, featuring individual oval mesenchymal cells and some secretion.

Conclusion: Mesenchymal lesion

Could this be a sarcoma?

Dear lady,

If I were to offer an unofficial take on these results: the cytologist who reviewed the puncture didn't explicitly state the nature of the lesion itself. This is likely because they didn't have enough material to work with—cytology has its limits when it comes to making definitive diagnoses. In strict pathological terms, the phrase "mesenchymal lesion" can refer to either benign or malignant changes. While people often colloquially use it as a synonym for something malignant, like a sarcoma, that isn't necessarily the case. A mesenchymal tumor is simply a tumor of the connective tissue; it can be composed of various cell types and isn't inherently a sarcoma. You can find more detail on this by typing the term into Google.

My informal opinion is that a biopsy might be suggested next—specifically an excision of the entire mass followed by a histopathological analysis to determine its true nature. I must emphasize that this is merely an unofficial opinion, as this specific field falls outside my primary area of expertise.

Best regards. 🙂
frozenharbor40 said:...and now—since everything was such a frantic, crowded mess, I’m just not sure if I should take her word for it. People make mistakes, especially when they're overwhelmed by everything going on.

You can use this link to check whether you have coverage or not. Just plug in the required info (like a Social Security number) and you'll see. If it comes up blank, then you'll need to contact the Social Security Administration.
Post-op recovery: Any tips? in Health ·
What kind of procedure are we actually talking about here? You’ve provided plenty of words, but zero specifics.
Dear members, please refrain from mentioning any illegal substances on this thread. Moving forward, posts containing such references will be removed. If you are looking for information regarding the application of specific alternative treatments, please head over to the Alternative Medicine forum, where there is a dedicated thread for sharing experiences. This particular topic and the Health forum are strictly focused on conventional medicine. We don't permit discussions on alternative or illicit products here, regardless of how much someone might believe they are a lifeline. I appreciate your understanding.