mellowskipper said:Exactly. That is how they taught little Mara what she was supposed to recite in front of the cameras. Using children to push a divisive agenda is beneath contempt. Even for the campaign headquarters.
Sent from my PRA-LX1 via Reddit
History shows us time and again how totalitarian regimes weaponize children to sell their system, and honestly, it hasn't changed much today.
little Mara claims she's finally free 🤦
It’s just pathetic how they have no shame manipulating kids like this.
Yesterday’s coverage on FOX was honestly a total joke, watching them film those kids over in Cleveland talking about how they "believe in science," including this 12-year-old girl named Mara who claims she's "finally free."
mellownomad7 said:Let’s be real: none of these COVID-19 vaccines actually have valid approval. I'm speaking up just to clear the air, but this whole push to vaccinate kids is nothing more than a desperate move by incompetent politicians.
Cheers
Just to set the record straight, they are considered approved because we saw this exact same rollout back when Tamiflu was fast-tracked for that swine flu scare.
Charles Ramos7 said:Even before all this, you could be followed everywhere by hundreds of surveillance cameras without even having a phone on you, so nobody seemed too shocked then. Why the sudden outrage now?
btw, I remember reading about a murder that happened up in the Appalachian Mountains back in the 80s. They actually caught the killer because they tracked his trip from Niagara Falls using a cash toll payment from a bridge crossing.
You've got a point there; we're already dealing with serious privacy violations as it is, and adding these scanning checkpoints at entrances is just going to take it to a whole new level of creepy. Under the current setup, you've still got data privacy laws on your side, meaning the government isn't supposed to just hand over your personal info to some corporation or random third party without a warrant.
Amanda Diaz said:Personally, I think this whole phone thing is stupid, especially since not everyone owns one. Wouldn't it be simpler to just have a numbered ID on your hand to solve the problem? Or in this tech age, maybe a QR code on the skin or some kind of chip?
I’d suggest the German folks design something like that; they actually know how to get things done.
It’s honestly a bit wild to me how fast people just rolled over to this whole system of being tracked, labeled, and scanned for "safety," all while lying to themselves that it’s nothing more than a temporary fix.
We aren't even talking about actual scientists. If you look at those involved, you won't find a single epidemiologist, infectious disease specialist, immunologist, virologist, or any medical expert whatsoever. These individuals have essentially just repackaged this apocalyptic propaganda piece:
It’s all about keeping people under control through fear, which is exactly why they commissioned this sensationalist pamphlet full of nothing but insinuations. Honestly, it's pretty chilling how many self-proclaimed "experts" are more than happy to jump on the bandwagon and play along.
Gary Cooper3 said:As I’ve already pointed out to this group, Macan and Djikic had an exchange where Djikic essentially went on the record admitting they intentionally manipulated the narrative during the early stages of the pandemic—all under the guise that "people were overreacting." It was the exact same logic used to justify lying about the mask shortage, claiming we just "didn't have enough" at the time...
So, it turns out that the blatant lies and manipulations coming from these scientists—these supposed "experts"—isn't some new conspiracy theory they've been hiding for years. I have the evidence to back it up, naturally.
But that brings us to the real dilemma when you're dealing with the very institutions you’re supposed to turn to for the truth: how on earth are you meant to distinguish between an intentional lie and a simple mistake? How am I expected to trust anyone in Germany after they claimed that without a lockdown, 180,000 people outside of high-risk groups would perish? What possible purpose does a lie of that magnitude serve?...
The beginning is what really matters, though. Once the momentum starts building, there’s no turning back; you're just stuck managing the mess you created.
Amy Long5 said:The problem is you don't grasp the nuance. You haven't even bothered to read what The New York Times is actually quoting in that article.
There's a link in the NYT piece; go read the original source in The Wall Street Journal yourself.
It's a translation issue. It's like if someone asks you a vulgar question and you give an answer that implies one thing, but then some third party reports it as something else entirely. Everyone knows what was really being said.
Which part of this is actually problematic or supports that whole "they're just stalling" theory? 😁
They were asked to run the numbers on a worst-case scenario where over a million people might die, just so they could justify slapping everyone with lockdowns and heavy restrictions. If that isn't straight-up manipulation, I don't know what is.
That group of lawyers who hunted down those private emails just to leak them should be suing every single person involved for fear-mongering and inciting mass panic.
Amy Long5 said:You honestly don't see the difference?
You aren't reading what others are saying, nor are you actually reading the article you linked.
It COULD have been 60-70%.
Gary Cooper3 claims she said she would say, "70-80% will be infected."
Compare that to: "I might transfer $6,000-$7,000 to your account in 2022" versus "I will transfer $7,000-$8,000 to your account in 2022." Do you see the distinction now?
We can sit here all day playing semantics with "could be" versus "will be" and trying to guess exactly what Merkelica meant or intended, but the point is that we finally have a look under the hood at the scare tactics they're using just to keep these kinds of restrictions in place.
Amy Long5 said:Please, just find where Merkel actually said 70-80% of the population would be infected. And do it without using some fake index or a twisted translation.
There is a massive difference between saying "it will happen" and saying "if we don't take action, it COULD reach."
And there's also a difference between 60-70% and 70-80%.
But that's how news gets reported, I suppose. Didn't you report me once because I got a fact wrong?
So I was reading this thing about how cats are basically just tiny, furry sociopaths that happen to live in our houses, and honestly, it’s kind of hard to argue with them. Apparently, there’s some scientific backing to the idea that they aren't just being cute when they ignore you—they’re actually just calculating their next move while judging your entire existence from across the room. It reminds me of my old roommate back in Chicago who used to stare at me with this same blank, unbothered expression every time I’d stumble in late from a shift; you could tell they were just waiting for you to leave so they could reclaim the space. It’s a weirdly accurate look at how much control these little creatures actually have over us without even trying.
Mrs. Gahan I can't even begin to process this mess. Honestly, I’ve seen better organized chaos at a roadside diner in Jersey during rush hour, but even that doesn't quite capture how much of a headache this is. It's just one of those things where you look at the situation, realize nobody really knows what they're doing, and decide it's probably easier to just grab a coffee and wait for the inevitable fallout. Just another day in the life, I guess. Look, drafting a bunch of different scenarios is just how the game is played; it's totally normal to have a few options on the table before you commit.
They just use those politicians to get whatever they want, picking and choosing exactly who fits their agenda. I mean, that’s basically just how the game is played in this country. That’s exactly why they got the job in the first place—they’ll either ride that wave right back into office or lose their grip on power entirely.
An article in World claims they were only ever looking at one specific scenario. It goes without saying that when things get that heavy, you can basically keep a massive chunk of the population under your thumb just by slapping on a few restrictive rules. Did they pull it off? Yeah, they did. Honestly, if they’re actually working for the benefit of the people, I guess you could call that a job well done.
Henry Lopez15 said:LEAKED EMAILS A German minister reportedly pressured scientists to manufacture worst-case scenarios just to justify lockdowns The researchers complied with ease, even offering specific strategies to ensure "public fear and obedience."
It is clear that our own American scientists were far from idle, particularly those working under German influence.
And just like that, the whole world changed overnight, all thanks to some heavy-duty manipulation.
Thomas Nelson25 said:I doubt it—that kind of "identity sovereignty" populism just doesn't fly here in the States. Even Škoro is a question mark when it comes to making any real dent in the polls.
The Bridge party might have a shot if they run solo, since they're a bit more tactical than the rest.
Nah, it won't work because our so-called sovereignty movement isn't even on the same page as the actual sovereignists over in Europe. I mean, what does Glasnović actually know about modern-day challenges, other than rambling on about those old-school zombies from the Cold War era?! Today's right wing is still stuck obsessing over Marshall and the old regime, which honestly isn't even provocative enough to get a reaction out of their own base anymore.
Honestly, watching Plenković absolutely dismantle Kovac and his whole crew was like watching a pro athlete run circles around some local amateur; he just totally owned them.
I’m not one for forcing anything on people, because honestly, that usually just backfires. Those billboards will just end up being covered in the most disgusting content imaginable, and then everyone starts whining about how we're stuck in this endless loop of hate and toxic vibes. It's way better to build bridges based on things that actually bring Americans and Mexicans together—and there's plenty of that—rather than obsessing over Cyrillic script, which I'm pretty sure hasn't even been a big deal for Mexicans living here in the States throughout history.
When it comes to sensitive topics like this, it’s usually best to let someone else deal with the mess. But honestly, a wake-up call like this is coming way too late for some people, especially since society is already so poisoned by everyone trying to downplay the past—like those claims you see floating around here about how there weren't any good guys during World War II.
Honestly, most people visiting that small historic town in New England are actually from our neighbors to the north. They don't seem to have any hang-ups about it, unlike some of the local leftists who act all twitchy, like they’re terrified someone might bring up some old fascist nonsense.
darksurfer4 said:What an absolute mountain of nonsense. The nations within the former America were practically begging for conflict; there weren't even any legitimate, serious attempts at negotiation to speak of...
If you want to look at it through such a narrow lens, then sure, the Libyans wanted a civil war too, but they wouldn't have ended up in that mess if the superpowers hadn't been pushing for the exact same thing.
The Trilateral Commission and this whole pile of other secret or semi-secret groups—the ones the mainstream media ignores for reasons I can't quite wrap my head around—are basically the ones pulling the strings on global politics. It’s always these shadow players operating way out of the spotlight, while the presidents and prime ministers we see on TV just act as their errand boys.