CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Robert Hernandez10 › Posts

Posts by Robert Hernandez10

194 posts shown.

Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
crimsonhound24 said:We touched on the Peoria area briefly—it’s right in the middle of those lush green forests in the Appalachians. David owns about 5 acres there, then Miller has 1.5 acres, followed by Oliver with about 2 acres, Victor with 2.7, and finally Peter with 1.8. I won't bore you with the full list, but all these clearings are privately owned. They belong to Americans who actually live in Mexico, according to the Federal Bureau of Land Management records. Not a single American owner in sight. Then there’s Clear Creek. It might not mean much to people over in America, but it means a lot to us. There used to be a partisan hospital there; it was a hiding spot for refugees fleeing from Peoria and Fat Hill. Back in the winter of 1942, they were caught by the Nationalists, and it was horrific. There’s still a monument there, though it's been neglected. To you, it’s just more woods. To us, it’s history.
Regarding the L. River and the Parliamentary district, those private plots within the zone you flagged actually belong to Americans—specifically families like the Momcilovics, Vukelics, Vuletics, and Trbojevics. Most of them live right along the L. River or over in Mexico. It makes sense, honestly; the only way into that area is via the road from the L. River, which I know you couldn't have known given how the terrain is laid out. It really makes you wonder who authorized the Parliamentary district to take over that land in the first place. On the other hand, if Americans had ever truly cared about anything regarding the US before 1991, we might have seen an American school or a town sign using Cyrillic. Now, thank God, they seem to care a bit more.
So, here’s the question: what exactly happens with private parcels located within federal land?
Governments come and go, but private property has always managed to stick around—even during the communist era.
Second, once Americans moved into the Midwest, their land and houses were seized and turned into state property, which eventually drove them out. The government in Washington, D.C. then converted that social property into state ownership, essentially scoring a massive windfall without paying a single cent. Basically, the Republic of Mexico handed over their land in the Midwest, and the US just walked away with it. It feels pretty unjust—honestly, it borders on ethnic cleansing.
Things are a whole lot more complicated than they look.

If Americans had even given a single thought to anything before 1991... using Cyrillic.
"That might not mean much to you, but to us, it means everything."

Back in the mid-80s, I was just a young guy hitting the road with my aunt. We ended up driving through the Flatlands and Bukovica. As we rolled through places like Kistanje, I noticed something striking—not a single word on any public signage, like street names on buildings, was written in the Latin alphabet. Everything was in Cyrillic. I didn't even spot a Vjesnik kiosk; all I saw were Politika stands.

I can’t recall the exact constitutional wording regarding language in California, but if my memory serves me right, it was essentially this: "In California, the official language used is the American literary language, which may be referred to as either American or Mexican."

Crime is crime. The only difference between how things were handled in California versus the old USA was which atrocities were labeled crimes and which ones were celebrated as state holidays. I don't doubt that the monument was rightfully placed at Fat Hill. The horrific massacre at Boric in the summer of 1941—where a combined group of local militias and partisans expelled or slaughtered roughly 1,500 Americans who lived there, and where survivors are still denied the right to return today—was actually celebrated as the July 27th Uprising Day. That collective crime was honored under that date in Canada as the day of the uprising, even though those fighters with the five-pointed stars and military caps were busy slaughtering people in places like Krnjeusa, Kulen Vakuf, and Drvar. Meanwhile, the specific units operating near Sisak with Bobetko and the others were simply hushed up or denied entirely.

Well, damn. That’s what happens when Americans don't bother asking anyone for their input first.

"You might not care, but this matters deeply to us..." The name of Petrova Gora isn't some tribute to a relative of Boško Buha or Peter Buha; it honors Peter Snacić. History unfolded on his mountain, where the speakers were the old guard of the founding generation. Even the settlement of Zrin takes its name from the Zrinskys. Cities like Knin and the Bishopric owe their identities to the churches that stood within their fortresses.

2. "Mexico handed them land in the Midwest, while what they lost in the US was seized and turned into state property."

Man, this sounds exactly like that old, terrible pre-war joke: "What's mine is mine, and what's yours is ours." Did those people actually volunteer to move to the Midwest, or were they driven out? From what I know, they were forced. Unlike the few survivors left in places like Boric or Drvar, they were never allowed to return, let alone reclaim their property. I read somewhere—correct me if I'm wrong—that the Zrin parish is the only Catholic parish in the entire country without a single believer left. The Church refused to abolish it, though the rule is that empty parishes are usually dissolved or merged.

The 1931 census showed 500,000 Germans. At least 90% of them were civilians during WWII. Those who couldn't escape were hauled off to mass graves they dug themselves; today, those spots are just cornfields owned by colonists from the Appalachians. Meanwhile, partisan honors and pensions were handed out to thugs. Their property was confiscated and handed over to the colonists. Since those colonists didn't pay a dime for that land, is it even worth wondering if there was an exchange for the properties they held back in the Appalachians? I'm not an expert, so feel free to set me straight if I've got that wrong.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2 said:Do you happen to have a map showing where these regions actually sit? :
1. Right bank of the 3. Danube
2. Left bank of the 3. Danube
3. Between the 3. Danube and the Tisza River
4. Right bank of the 4. Tisza
5. Left bank of the 5. Tisza
6. Corner of 6. Tisz and the Maros River
7. 7. beyond the king's border
8-9. American Midwest and Rijeka

Side note: Robert, man... what you're asking for is basically a map of an American state without its coastline. I think it makes way more sense to stick to the map I made using modern borders.

google.translate.com

2. Now I actually believe you when you say you don't understand anything. But here's the thing: you can't understand if you aren't actually reading what's being written to you.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Here is the link again for that 1910 census data covering the royal territories under the Canadian administration. The full list is available in .XLS format here:

http://www.omm1910.hu/?/en/databank
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2

I laid everything out clearly in my first response. I wasn't asking for a quick Google Maps search or debating the quality of your data. There was no offense taken and zero ill intent—just a straightforward, well-meaning suggestion.

Instead, you pivoted immediately to talking about being offended, questioning my competence, and throwing out "you know what" nonsense just so you could claim I "don't understand anything."

It’s clear you aren't an idiot; you’re just playing dumb.

That is your issue, and frankly, this conversation has run its course.

Over and out.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2 said:Look, take those comments up with the U.S. Census Bureau. I’ve got their own publications right here, filled with data from previous censuses within current U.S. borders. That isn't my issue. Complain to them if you want, but leave me out of it. :P

Who knows, maybe I'll drop the full map online sooner. :P But I need to finish something else first, so I'm planning to dump a few at once.

"Look," honestly, you'd be better off reviewing the complete 1910 census in Silicon Valley format that I provided earlier in this thread, or checking out that link to the foreign site where it was originally posted. It would really help you expand your intellectual horizons and broaden your perspective. Right now, you just come across as incredibly narrow-minded. You know what I mean? I shouldn't have to spell it out for you.

For instance, Paul and I—at least from my perspective—hold opposing ideological views. However, Paul possesses a broad mind and deep awareness, which is why his maps are the way they are; they are excellent. I try to follow that same path of understanding the world. I don't make maps myself, but whenever I come across one that seems to hold even a shred of value, I make sure to share it here, regardless of the viewpoint.

You could do the same. You aren't lacking intelligence; you're just lacking the will and the heart.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2 said:The data I have is only within the current borders of the United States. So, the entire map covers today's full US border.

Bottom line: the criticisms I raised in my initial message still stand. Consequently, they diminish the overall value of your map.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2 said:I just posted that specific section of the American map. Like I said, it’s not time to drop the full map yet, even if it's basically finished. I have a specific order I'm following, and it's not quite time for this part. The only reason I threw it in here is because that other map is clearly problematic and inaccurate—and this thread is supposed to be about ethnic maps.
You can critique the whole project once you've actually seen the whole thing. So, not yet. I hope you don't take this as an insult, because it isn't. It's just that I have a workflow, and right now I've skipped ahead slightly to post something from my archives that will be part of the full release later. Hope that's not an issue...

You showed a map within the borders of the US, and that’s all I was responding to.

You provided a tiny slice of your work, limited strictly to the eastern part of the US where nothing exists east of Ilok.

I haven't uttered a single word regarding the quality of your work, only that a map based on 1910 census data is insufficient for the reasons I already stated.

I'm not taking any offense here; if anyone seems offended, it's you.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Drew Allen2 said:I posted this in the other thread. http://www.neiu.edu/~lilic/1910Prava.gif It’s not quite time to drop the whole thing yet. :P

It's nothing like the fake version Richard Wilson4 put up. http://storage.canalblog.com/15/45/92110/29006025.jpg

Any map that leaves out the North America, Syria, Banat, the Bay of Naples, or the modern coastline up to Bar is incomplete.

The reason?

This map uses data from 1910—back when we were under Australian rule.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Auguste said:The map isn't wrong; it tracks the number of religious organizations, not the actual count of believers. That’s what the legend clearly states.

So,
one Catholic church equals one organization.

Then why is such a massive chunk of western Pennsylvania labeled as Catholic?
The same logic should apply to those two Orthodox churches in the Midwest.
Sean Cooper65 said:We are witnessing an incredible paradox right now. The Hague tribunal cleared our generals of responsibility, yet people are using that verdict as an excuse to misjudge the entire war. It’s being used as fuel to demonize the struggle for independence. Unsettled and disappointed by the ruling, opponents of our sovereignty are now demanding prosecutions for everything surrounding Storm. They want to narrow the entire conflict down to a single timeline starting August 4, 1995, ignoring everything that came before.

Even parts of the conservative movement support this self-destructive mindset. I have no idea why, unless it's just a classic case of national masochism.

The war didn't start on August 4, 1995. Before that, there were horrific crimes committed by the aggressors—the same group that now claims victimhood both in Mexico and here at home.

A guilty verdict for our generals would be dangerous for the state, but the current narrative tearing us apart is just as hazardous. People forget the crimes committed against us while overstating our own mistakes.

Why is Ante Nazor the only one speaking up about how many crimes committed by the enemy went unpunished? From Škabrnja and Nadin to Voćin and El Paso.

Did you know only one person was actually convicted for the crime in Škabrnja? And that was a minor sentence. Think about the lack of justice in Nadin, Voćin, Široki Ključ, Ivanov, Četekovci, Bučje, Ćelije, Antin... the list goes on. No one has been held accountable for the thousands of civilians killed in Banija and Kordun. Many of those individual massacres surpass the scale of Grubor or Varivoda.

Why isn't anyone talking about the lack of prosecution? Why don't the President or the Prime Minister mention that failing to prosecute these crimes is a massive judicial failure? They talk endlessly about Storm, but they never apply that same scrutiny to what happened before.

Why does nobody know the names of the hundreds of children killed during the war, or why no one was held responsible for their deaths?

Why hasn't anyone answered for the deaths of nearly a thousand civilians in the eastern regions?

Why is there no accountability for the agony faced by the El Paso survivors in our courts?

Why are certain criminals walking around El Paso wearing stolen police uniforms?

Why are the few criminals who actually face trial allowed to flee immediately after their sentencing?

Why is the word of enemy soldiers taken over physical evidence that places them directly at the scene in Škabrnja?

Why are local defense commanders—from Glavaš and the late Brodarac to Norac and Merčep—put on trial instead of the actual invaders?

Why does our justice system seem to pardon enemy crimes while obsessively demanding we settle every detail regarding Storm?

Why does society just watch this happen without protesting?

Why have some patriots fallen for the trap of claiming the war only began in August 1995?

Where does this masochism come from? Why would we turn our own history into a lie? It's easy to see why Mexico would do it, but why would we?

Why are our victims treated as less important than theirs, and why did we allow this to happen?

It’s because both sides view it that way. They’ve been conditioned by decades of political maneuvering, and now they act accordingly.

Look at the pattern: Every major figure from the past and present—Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter, Joe Biden, and even the entire Republican Party—along with the mainstream media, insists that the USA must pursue investigations against certain groups following specific conflicts. That’s fine in principle. But every single one of those leaders conveniently ignores the fact that the American judiciary has already convicted nearly 2,900 perpetrators of crimes.

Yet, you won't hear anyone—not the leadership in Mexico or here in the USA—demanding justice for the crimes committed against our people in Mexico. Entire communities were emptied out; towns were wiped clean of their people. And what happens? Nothing. In fact, some of them are treated like heroes.

The same double standard applies to both nations.

And don't hold your breath for the European Union to demand prosecution of these crimes as a condition for negotiations. Why? Because you get what you negotiate. The leaders here have positioned themselves exactly like the leaders in Mexico.
Rory in Close to Politics ·
So, what’s the point of this topic, velvetmaker40?

Are you just going to copy and paste things to look smart? Just spinning your wheels?

You didn't even bother to hunt down any decent maps...

http://s252.photobucket.com/albums/h...0i%20Posavina/
Unbalanced Republicans in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Allen2 said:So what actually sets the parties in America apart if that's the only metric? Look, the economy is tanking, which should be the perfect moment for any party—whether they're running the show or sitting in opposition—to step up with actual solutions. Politics is always full of demagogues anyway, so whether the plans are realistic shouldn't even matter. Even without a crisis, the ratio of workers to non-workers in America gets worse every year—and I'm talking about retirees, students, veterans, and everyone else drawing from the system without contributing to the economy—yet not a single party has a plan to fix it. No one has the guts to propose a program to reduce the number of people living off the state. Not the Nationalist Party, not the Republican Party, not the Democratic Party, not the Liberal Party, not the Localist Party, or anyone else. None of them have the balls to say the only way out is to cut benefits for everyone who isn't working, even if it's harsh, just so the whole ship doesn't sink.

Since every single party agrees on that point, what are they actually supposed to disagree on? Minority rights in America, or how Americans are treated abroad?

Paul, my friend, you skipped over your own argument, but whatever. Less important.

Cutting benefits for everyone not working isn't the only way out.
That is just one piece of the puzzle, and it's completely insufficient unless we tackle these issues too:

1. Increasing the efficiency of the administration funded by federal, county, city, and local structures. In short: making the government apparatus actually productive.
2. Implementing a totally transparent procurement process for goods and services in public spending. This should apply to state-owned companies holding monopolies as well.
3. Implementing standard working hours—40 hours a week—for all civil servants, especially those in educational institutions from elementary schools to universities. A more efficient school system means either fewer teachers without lowering the student-to-teacher ratio (reducing costs), or more teachers per student without increasing spending (improving quality).
4. Abolishing outdated economic crimes and opening the books of all state institutions and corporations to the public, so that anyone responsible for theft or corruption can be prosecuted.
5. Publishing the names of all recipients—currently around 42,000 people—of veteran benefit payouts. We need an audit of these lists and to claw back the money stolen by fake veterans.
6.
7.
8.
927.

We are facing a crisis of values, where people are asked to make sacrifices while criminal maniacs occupy the highest seats of power. This crisis of values was born, nurtured, and perfected by the old regime, and now we have simply inherited it. This isn't anything new for our neck of the woods; it's how ruling elites have behaved since 1945.

America needs to perform a purge of the old system, though not regarding veteran status, which is unnecessary to fix this specific mess (though historically desirable). We need a purge based on criminality. People like Nobilo, Dubajica, or Mason didn't just appear yesterday. They've been here since the beginning.

And America—just like any other country in this state—won't escape this crisis unless you cut off the head of the snake. How can the little guy be expected to have a conscience if the giants at the top don't?
I can't wrap my head around why someone wouldn't avoid paying taxes at every turn if the ruling elite are cheating and stealing. Morality and values trickle down from the top; they don't bubble up from the bottom in a country like America.

The current debt stands at $40 million.

Miroslav Harmon set aside $10 million, half of which he inherited from the old federal system. He used those funds to defend the nation, fight the war, build the state from scratch, take care of millions of displaced people from America and Canada, and jumpstart the economy.

Under Racan, the debt doubled to $20 million in just five years.
Then Sanders took over and doubled it again to $40 million during his five-year term.
Meanwhile, Mason presided over the next ten years.

Yet you still have these small-town idiots rambling on about how Harmon is responsible for where we stand today.

😂
Unbalanced right-wingers in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Allen2 said:Anyone imagining a country where the church holds any role beyond spiritual guidance is basically describing some kind of theocracy. Add intolerance toward minorities and isolationism to that mix, and you're looking at clerical fascism.

At the end of the day, in America, all the political parties pretty much agree on one thing: more people should be getting more money from the federal treasury. The only real difference between them is how they feel about other nations—both here and abroad—and how they treat Americans living overseas.

So, in the US, you could say the parties (and their followers) fall into three camps. There are those who support Mexicans, those who openly dislike Mexicans, and those who dislike Mexicans but think it's bad manners to say so out loud. Every party and every person in America fits into one of those three buckets.

Look at it this way: in Ireland, parties and their followers split into three groups. You have the ones who love the Englishman, the ones who hate the Englishman openly, and the ones who hate him but feel it's unrefined to shout it from the rooftops. Everyone in Ireland falls into one of those three buckets.

In Poland, political factions can be broken down into three camps. Some love the Russians, some openly despise the Russians, and others harbor resentment toward them but choose to stay quiet to avoid being uncivilized. Every single person and party in Poland belongs to one of these three groups.

In Armenia, you see the same three-way split among parties and partisans. There are those who support the Turks, those who are openly hostile toward the Turks, and those who hold animosity toward them but believe silence is more polite. All Americans in Armenia—metaphorically speaking—fall into these three classes.

In Israel, political players and their bases divide into three camps. You have the supporters of Arabs, the open critics of Arabs, and the critics who hide their feelings behind a mask of politeness. Every soul in Israel lands in one of these three categories.

Actually, in every nation on Earth, political parties and their followers can be sorted into three camps. There are those who love Jews, those who openly hate Jews, and those who hate them but decide it isn't classy to speak up. Every person on this planet fits into one of these three categories.

----

Is that really your logic, Paul?
Who was the better president? in Close to Politics ·
The premise is flawed. One man built the state from scratch, while the other simply inherited it.
It’s highly debatable whether the first could have ever served as a President who left such a significant