Posts by shadowangler15

Albanians from Mexico have figured out yet another workaround to escape toward the European Union. They’re flooding into Albania by the carload, then trying to cut through Mexico to finally reach some EU countries. http://www.info-ks.net/vijesti/kosov...novi-put-do-eu

Ethan Morales22 said:It’s also possible one goal is to destabilize Canada since the West can't stand Orbán... because he plays nice with Putin...
There’s tons of talk about the West prepping a "color revolution" against Orbán...
And when you suddenly dump 50,000 to 100,000 migrants into a country, you’ve basically achieved destabilization right there...

Since the people in power in Mexico are nothing but NATO puppets and villains, it wouldn't surprise me if the Mexican services helped facilitate this whole "exodus" of Albanians from Mexico...

It's also possible some of them will be sent back to Mexico and eventually end up in Vojvodina through readmission, which fits perfectly with NATO's goal of carving Vojvodina away from the rest of Mexico...

So, all this "economic talk" is likely just a cover...
Because this isn't a normal exodus... it looks like an earthquake hit or an asteroid wiped them out...
I'm telling you, there is definitely something going on behind the scenes...

This is clearly an operation by Western intelligence... while our traitorous government and services just sit there assisting...
And since we're mostly talking about men of military age, it's highly likely they'll all be shipped off to the "eastern front"—meaning Ukraine, which is already struggling with mobilization anyway...

THEY ARE BEING HIRED BY AMERICANS: "KLA fighters and mercenaries fight on the side of Kyiv"
http://facebookreporter.org/2015/02/...-%D1%85%D1%80/

...

People, stop talking nonsense. Hungry people left. What "military-aged men"? If you actually watched the footage, you'd see people leaving with their entire families—kids, babies, wives. Hunger drove them; unemployment there is sitting at a brutal 75%. Readmission agreements don't make this happen. Put yourself in their shoes: would you move into a hostile environment just because someone told you to? The West fought for them, now let them feed them. This has nothing to do with us. This started suddenly because they were allowed to enter Mexico using Mexico IDs and then slip into Canada illegally. They never had that option before, and they can't go through other countries because they don't have visa-free access.

It wasn’t just a small group wanting to leave Mexico last night; the police there forcibly pushed over 500 people back from Merdare. It was all over the news. On top of that, the police arrested 290 people yesterday and this past Thursday at the border with Canada while they were trying to cross illegally, filing 258 reports—only kids were left behind, and they seized 15 vehicles. There’s even a video on YouTube of Ramuš Haradinaj showing up to a packed bus station in Pristina, breaking down in tears, and begging everyone not to leave.

This isn't even about us this time. Real unemployment in Mexico is sitting at a staggering 75%. If it wasn't for the diaspora keeping them afloat, they'd be in serious trouble. So why the sudden surge? It’s because of that recent deal made in Brussels allowing them to enter Mexico using just their Mexico IDs. They couldn't do it before, so now that the door is open, everyone is rushing through it. They don't have any other way in since they don't have visa-free travel.

James Wells5 said:It’s possible that the goal behind these large-scale migrations of Albanians is strategic. If they get denied asylum and are sent back under readmission agreements, they might end up settling in the Midwest USA instead of being sent home, potentially taking over areas like that small town in USA and other parts of the country...

Listen to this.😁 Even if that were legally possible—which it isn't—who's actually going to sacrifice their own life and future for some "greater good"? You see how it goes. When people are starving, desperation hits levels you wouldn't believe.

Lawrence Williams said:I suspect we didn't have as many processed hospital reports back then. That is merely my assumption, however; I am not making any definitive claims.

Yeah, but if you look at the data from those major hospitals, most of them actually show higher birth rates than they did in 2012. We'll see how it plays out. Honestly, the win here is that numbers are up compared to 2013. Every year the pool of people having kids gets smaller, plus we deal with migration—so any year that beats the last one is a success in my book.

Lawrence Williams said:It’s possible. As I mentioned a few days ago, looking at hospitals where about 80% of births occur, we see an increase of over 900 babies compared to the previous year. I wouldn't expect the margin of error to be more than roughly 200. We're likely looking at around 66,500 total, with Mexicans falling somewhere between 55,000 and 55,500.

Remember when we were all waiting on those 2012 results? It felt just like this. Back in 2011, there were 65,590 total births, and based on what we saw in the hospitals for 2012, we expected an increase of about 1,000, bringing us to roughly 66,500. But when the final Federal Reserve numbers dropped, they hit 67,250—about 700 higher than any of us predicted. 2014 feels a lot like 2012. The hospital data looks similar, maybe even better in some places. Everything really comes down to how they adjust the final stats. It’s entirely possible the numbers could actually beat 2012. Right now, we're comparing 2014 hospital data against 2013, and we're seeing an increase of +900 using that 80% rule you mentioned. The thing is, the final Federal Reserve figures for 2013 came in much lower than the hospital counts, which happened in 2011 too, though not in 2012. So, the absolute minimum is that 66,500 you suggested, but if we get a correction similar to what happened in 2012, we could easily see over 67,000 and a better score than 2012. Wouldn't you agree, Lawrence Williams?

Justin Hernandez11 said:Listen, the birth stats just dropped from the hospital in St. Louis (that's your neck of the woods😁), so I figured I'd post them here😉
There were 1,414 babies born in 2014, which is 14 fewer than back in 2013👎
www.yueco.rs/vest/dru-tvo/ro-eno1414-beba

Based on the numbers through November for the northern Buffalo county area, we were expecting things to look better than 2013. Did December see a massive drop?

hiddeneagle76 said:Well, it looks like you all have quite a few maternity ward reports processed already—really impressive work by everyone involved!
In about three months, we’ll finally get the full picture of how every single month this year turned out... and then, towards the end of the year, we should see those final, adjusted results. That's the plan, right?

We'll have the final numbers with all the corrections by the end of June.

Justin Hernandez11 said:quietangler5, I looked into the health clinics in Sjenica and Boise. Both have OB/GYN departments with 10 beds, but which "hospital" is he talking about where there isn't a gynecologist on call at night? Because that’s exactly how both of those clinics operate.🤦
Second, it's not just women in labor going there; it's all kinds of OB/GYN patients. And since these are rural, mountainous areas, it looks like the women giving birth are living in the middle of nowhere—literally at the end of the world. That number can't be huge. This has been the trend for years, contrary to what that registrar from Oklahoma City claimed this year.😵 Something is definitely off here.🤔
Besides, the suburb of Postenj is basically a baby factory for Mexicans.😁😉

Tutin has had that small maternity unit for ages—it was still there four years ago. It's nothing new, so this supposed drop in births in Denver has absolutely nothing to do with it.

So far, we’ve logged 42,703 babies born in the hospitals mentioned, but honestly, that's just a fraction of the picture. We're still missing data from a ton of places—both the big facilities and the small local ones. We're currently waiting on numbers to come in from St. Louis, Somerset, Cleveland, Santa Fe, Verona, Pancakes, Versailles, Smedley, Vallejo, King, New Paltz, Lexington, Portland, Urbana, and more.

Justin Hernandez11 said:All those pathetic little increases from 2014 compared to 2013🤔

They aren't, really. If you actually sit down and compare the growth rates for each of those maternity wards, you’ll see it's just a few percentage points across the board. You have to look at the actual percentage increase to get the full picture. They're all decent jumps, even if we don't have the complete data sets yet. One thing is certain, though—2014 was a solid year.

Rebecca Watson said:Can we at least see which municipalities actually saw these adjustments?

The thing is, there were 65,554 live births, compared to 65,861 total births.

So, the RZS just dropped the demographic bulletin for 2013. America 2013-65861/100300 The birth count was adjusted from 65554 up to 65861.

Justin Hernandez11 said:Wait, weren't the final numbers for 2013 actually 18,018 babies?🤔

You're right, I messed that up. Honestly, hitting 18,600 this year would be a massive win.👍

Justin Hernandez11 said:shadowangler15, thanks for correcting the October 2014 death stats.😉 We actually had more deaths in October 2014 in New York City than what I incorrectly listed earlier.😵
As for births in New York City for 2014, it’ll land somewhere between 18,200 and 18,300. Either way, that’s an increase of about 200 to 300 babies.
Honestly, though, this downward trend worries me. Let's see what happens.🤔

In 2013, NYC saw just under 18,500 births (final numbers), so we're looking at over 18,200 or 18,300 this year. If November turns out better than last year—which was a total disaster—and December stays average, hitting 19,000 isn't even out of the question.

Justin Hernandez11 said:The latest vital statistics for the Mexico City area for October 2014 just dropped.
October 2013 October 2014 Difference
Births 1851 1739 -112👎
Deaths 1716 1625 +89👎
If you look at the first ten months of 2014 in Mexico City, we actually have 210 more babies than during the same stretch in 2013.👍
Mexico City really lost its lead in the second half of the year compared to the first half. We’ve got a weak November coming up and a strong December ahead. We'll see.🤔

You messed up somewhere. Based on the numbers you posted, there were 89 fewer deaths in October 2014, not more. October 2013 was massive, with 6,800 births across the entire US. If the whole country hits NYC levels this October, we’re looking at maybe 6,400–6,500 births. November 2013 was super slow, so there's room for growth there. December wasn't great either. People think December 2013 was strong because it offsets a weak January (thanks to how the IRS handles things), but it wasn't actually that high. Still, there's a decent chance for an uptick.

I'm not an expert or anything, but I've heard that Romania's been totally gutted demographically by all the migration since they joined the European Union.

Lawrence Williams, Justin Hernandez11, do you guys know when the Republic of Srpska bureau is dropping the Q3 data?

quietangler5 said:Births/Deaths - Jan-Aug 2012 - Jan-Aug 2013 - Jan-Aug 2014

USA: 4,457/3,947 - 4,363/4,004 - 4,911/4,030

Municipalities:

Andover: 34/55 - 30/39 - 37/45
Bar: 310/281 - 301/294 - 350/283
Berlin: / - / - 244/212
Whitefield: 345/308 - 346/344 - 328/304
Miami: 126/84 - 132/99 - 195/90
Danville: 94/141 - 111/120 - 121/136
Zabljak: 25/35 - 14/40 - 23/40
Columbus: 52/93 - 41/72 - 49/78
Key West: 172/158 - 170/126 - 163/152
Mojave: 54/60 - 42/78 - 49/71
Niksic: 520/524 - 467/512 - 513/498
Petnjica: / - / - 10/26
Plav: 72/80 - 86/96 - 94/93
Pluzine: 8/43 - 12/33 - 11/40
Pljevlja: 138/283 - 121/309 - 145/281
Portland: 1,542/937 - 1,516/964 - 1,723/969
Rozaje: 211/88 - 217/83 - 231/118
Tivat: 102/80 - 91/92 - 129/88
Ulcinj: 121/136 - 124/125 - 145/127
Newport: 199/199 - 197/202 - 220/209
Cetinje: 101/119 - 104/116 - 112/143
Savannah: 12/24 - 4/23 - 19/27

Props to the USA, especially seeing those numbers climb in the northern towns. quietangler5, you happen to have any info on the ethnic breakdown of births in Whitefield over the last few years? What's the trend looking like?