Kyle Rogers9 said:Condensed versions are used during class because there isn't enough time to finish an entire book in a 45-minute period, but for a teacher to actually claim they're reading abridged versions as their primary literature is just stupid.
I don't think so. In class, they usually just go over specific, representative excerpts rather than reading a watered-down version of the whole thing.
Scott Miller4 said:I am honestly so frustrated with this book report assignment.
When she was little, I’d sit and read right along with her. But once she hit third grade, I started pushing her to tackle everything on her own—reading the books solo, answering questions by herself, and doing her own writing. I’d step in if she was getting completely off track, but even then, I wouldn't just tell her what to write. I’d just ask enough questions until she figured out the right answer herself.
She wasn't some star student back then; she mostly just pulled Bs. Honestly, the book reports those other moms were putting together for their kids were just way better executed. And she hated it. She hated reading and she hated writing, and just mentioning a book report would make her totally shut down.
Now she’s in eighth grade, and she actually reads quite a bit. Since fifth grade, she’s been pulling As on these assignments. I won't let her get away with reading those abridged versions. She tried to argue that it isn't fair, pointing out how everyone else gets to read the shortened versions, and claiming it was unfair in earlier grades when I wouldn't write her reports for her, making her feel like she couldn't keep up with the other kids. But I’m holding my ground. I won't let her take the easy way out. I want her to actually read. I truly believe reading is an asset; it builds vocabulary, teaches you something new from every story, and ultimately makes you a more well-rounded person.
The teacher actually gave them the abridged versions though...
Come on, man, explain. What do you mean by "shortened versions"? What kind of books are they even reading like that?
Man, we haven’t said a single thing about LeBron James and all those "experts" lately... nothing positive, nothing negative... but honestly, once the trade deadline hits tomorrow, I don't think we'll even have to talk about it anymore.☕.
redridge13 said:@frupy I honestly can't say that any of my parents' generation actually breathed down our necks about getting into a specific high school. Plus, they ended up scrapping those entrance exams just a few years later anyway.
@svasta nesto Wait, are you seriously questioning whether our teachers and administrators actually have any professional integrity left? 🙂
Never ☕ 🥱
urbantinker8 said:The teacher in question is just holding his ground...
...but I suppose he’ll only be able to hold it for so long before some aggressive parent decides to start putting on a whole theatrical performance, all because they've convinced themselves their kid, Marko, actually knows the material better than the instructor—even if his failing grade suggests otherwise. Then comes the inevitable onslaught where they basically steamroll the teacher, the homeroom coach, and the principal, filing formal appeals against the grades, demanding special committee exams, insisting on testing sessions where the original teacher isn't allowed to participate, and eventually calling in the state inspectors and so on...
Anyway, it’s all pretty intense and interesting to watch unfold.🍿
Fine. So? I get all that, trust me... but I still don't see why the teacher won't just stand by their decision. Maybe there's something they're hiding? 😲
Alright, let's settle this: who actually runs the classroom? Is it the teacher, the student, or the parent? And how exactly does a parent, a student, a principal, or even someone like Peter try to squeeze a grade out of a teacher?
I mean, how can any client—and don't take me too literally here, I'm just making a point—force an expert to act a certain way? Unless, of course, that "expert" isn't really an expert at all. Like, if they don't actually care about the job and are just coasting until their next paycheck or retirement hits? Surely that's not what we're talking about, right? 😒😲
Don't sweat it. I know exactly which school in NYC everyone is already on board with... But they’ll make the final call during the 🤣🤣
Honestly, I still think the experiment isn't going to kick off this fall. Once the debates start, it'll be pretty obvious there's still way too much work left to do...
rowdypanther12 said:I haven't read the book in question myself, so I'll take that with a grain of salt, but since I asked what grade level this is for, I still feel like a 17 or 18-year-old shouldn't be shielded from "normal" literature. By the way, you can find A Song of Ice and Fire in the children's section at most public libraries, which means any ten-year-old could check it out and read it—and that's easily the most explicit book I've come across since reading Marquis de Sade when I was 15.😂
And listen... after a coach rapes a boy while his wife watches and wipes his ass with a sweaty shirt at the end of a story, the drama surrounding the Snow family and their crew seems pretty tame by comparison. Or just think about a guy hallucinating his own father while he's busy violating a five-year-old girl—at that point, Marquis de Sade looks like a saint. Gross. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of censorship, but I'm definitely not okay with this filth either. Not as someone involved in education, not as a mother, and not just as a decent human being. No way. Just stop. There are some things we simply shouldn't accept. Now I'm actually worked up over this....
silentraven6 said:Did you actually finish the whole book? I don't see the issue with the descriptions; they serve as a solid starting point for talking to kids about boundaries—how to spot those kinds of intentions and how to fight back against them. I mean, the Iliad and the Odyssey are absolutely crawling with incest, assault, and murder. Even Judith slaying Holofernes involves her being sexually manipulated right before the act. What's the "lesson" in those classics then? That everything goes in war? These kids might actually get more out of Black Sea land in terms of maturing and learning to resist sexual abuse. It opens up a conversation that might touch on things many of them are personally dealing with. Maybe you'll even help one of them find the courage to report an abuser.
If someone had encouraged me to open up back then, my life might look a lot different today. If teachers understood how breaking a taboo can actually be healing—how they could use it to truly support their students—maybe my homeroom teacher would have actually responded to my essays once upon a time, instead of just fearfully noting that I had "too much imagination" or that she didn't understand what I was writing and that I should "tone down my expression."
We read The Glembays, The Registry, Crime and Punishment... they're all full of killers and twisted personalities and vivid, intense descriptions. We even have Louisa May Alcott in lower elementary grades... So what's the problem? Is it just facing the proximity of the taboo?
Nabokov?
Such a great work for comparative analysis and debate.
Yeah, I read the entire book. I don't half-ass things like that. Do I seriously have to quote the book for you to get why this is a problem? You need to see the difference between how Kovacic describes Ferkonja and Laura versus what this guy is writing while we're telling kids to face taboos. Get real. I honestly cannot believe there are parents or teachers out there who would actually hand this book to their kids to read. I just can't fucking believe it.
Nah, that's Black Sea territory. It’s meant for high schoolers. Summer, you really think grade level matters here? I honestly haven't been able to get it out of my head since I read it. Believe it or not, that text actually haunts me. And there's more. This is easily the most extreme example I've stumbled upon while digging through books on my reading list that I hadn't touched before. Seriously. Just wow.
I honestly thought it was just about the bone too, until I hit that passage where the coach assaults the boy. Does that count as comparative analysis and cognitive suitability for students?
The issues: 1. Picking people from classrooms, like you mentioned. For instance, most of them are based in Los Angeles because of travel costs. Someone from San Francisco can’t be an expert because flying in for meetings is just too expensive. Then there’s the political stuff—satisfying publishing lobbies and various interest groups. That’s how we ended up with these "expert" working groups. 2. We dove into American language studies, and I pointed out two linguistic absurdities that they actually plan to teach. Based on your posts, it seems like you deal with language in some capacity, so you should get why this is such a mess. 3. Using the "stool" metaphor to describe unselective, uncritical, populist reading material and analysis. And everything else written on the subject... the death of intellectual effort, etc. Etc. 4. Just going through the motions, like checking off project days... 5. Copying someone else's curriculum and kissing whatever ass is available... All of this illustrates the problem. We could go on forever like this for every single subject, grade level, and domain..
And we could keep going... But the core issue is pure incompetence when it comes to something this serious.
And look, I didn't quit teaching. I quit the educational system. I'm not an educator, but maybe I'll become one once the heatwave passes.
Lyanna, where on earth did you see me bringing up Marulic? And when did I say people wouldn't be reading? If that's how you interpret texts at your university, you should probably be glad about the current credit system.
Look, I am an expert. But only for the sake of this discussion. In real life, I'm not really in that world anymore. After sixteen years of schooling and fifteen years of trying to actually make a difference in different ways, I just quit the American education system. So yeah, I'm unemployed now. Honestly, it beats sitting around listening to and watching a bunch of half-informed hacks draft reforms based on whatever the daily political news cycle dictates.
The only place a real reform can actually happen is in the classroom. The only person who can pull it off is a teacher. Not Jokic. If we kill off every bit of intellectual effort, if we just lock ourselves in schools until June because we're checking boxes or running some "project week," and if we keep blindly copying someone else's curriculum without understanding it... man... anyway, I've got stuff to do.☕
Stouffer is just the tip of the iceberg! I’m honestly proposing we just strip everything out of schools that requires actual effort from students or teachers. If it doesn't align perfectly with what our kids find fun or easy, get rid of it. We could solve the whole school year length issue too—two weeks should be plenty to cover whatever's left. We don't even need to worry about the weather or anything else.
But seriously, ladies, have you actually thought about what the curriculum experts are saying? Like, they’re claiming the learning outcome is basically just mastering prepositions or something? Or is the goal for fifth graders just to learn how to mash words together? I’d love to hear from any of you who actually step into a classroom or are involved as parents. Otherwise, you're just talking for the sake of it. Has anyone actually sat down and read the curriculum? I highly doubt it. It’s way easier to just throw out criticisms based on vibes. The American English curriculum is a total mystery—it's vague and poorly defined, as usual. But instead of looking at that, the whole country is obsessed with specific book lists, and now everyone is picking sides over Stouffer. They threw out the bait, the little fish bit, and here we are. Though I guess I shouldn't even mention Preradovica... wouldn't want to start a whole new wave of drama.
urbantinker8 said:Man, thank goodness, someone else who’s just as crazy as I am.😬
I suppose because there are some really good ones out there, though they seem incredibly rare. Most of the time, you’re looking at former teachers who probably should have been sent to an oversight board first.😳
But even if there were a vision, there isn't any money. There isn't money for basic supplies, so where on earth would you find funding for something like that?
I agree. The only—and arguably most mindless—thing those inspectors do is comb through paperwork. As far as they're concerned, if everything looks right on paper, then everything is fine. Period.🤦
I suppose I agree with you on certain points, though only in a limited capacity. High school graduation exams are honestly such a massive pain.🙂 It seems like the questions are getting progressively easier year after year, and I guess the passing threshold keeps dropping right along with them, too. I guess I’m just sitting here wondering why, really. It feels like one of those questions that doesn't have a straightforward answer, though maybe I'm overthinking things again. It's hard to say without knowing exactly what we're aiming at, but I suppose there's always a reason behind the chaos, even if it's buried under layers of sheer randomness. I suppose, if we’re being honest, it all really comes down to making sure both the parents and the kids actually walk away feeling satisfied.🙄
I mean, those competitions can get pretty brutal sometimes, I guess, and that’s really where you see who actually knows their stuff versus who's just winging it. I suppose there’s a bit of a distinction to be made here, though it's subtle; whereas something like a Mature certification is basically designed so that everyone can just breeze through it, actual competitions have this inherent, elimination-style nature to them, which I guess allows for a much more genuine way to evaluate and compare one person's work against another's.
urbantinker8: I was thinking about what was said earlier, and I guess if you look at it from a certain angle, maybe there's some truth to it, though I'm not entirely sure. It feels like one of those situations where everything seems straightforward until you actually sit down to parse through the details, which, as it turns out, are rarely as simple as they appear on the surface. I suppose I might be overthinking things, but I can't help but feel that we tend to overlook the smaller nuances that end up making all the difference in the long run. It’s funny how that works, really. Anyway, I just wanted to add that bit of perspective, even if it's a little bit rambly.
And now, all those professional development courses are just sitting in my browser cookies because, well—once again—there’s just no money in it. It’s been happening more often lately, I suppose, that none of my specific courses have actually offered a seminar in a major city like Chicago for three or four years running. It’s a bit of a strange pattern, I guess, though maybe it isn't entirely unexpected given how much things have shifted recently.😲 So, it looks like we’re facing that same old situation again where seminars outside of the city are on the table, but there's just zero budget for it. I was talking to the director, and apparently, out of the five of us on the executive team, they're saying only one person can go—or maybe absolutely nobody at all, depending on how the math works out. It's a bit much, I guess.🙄 The ZSV situation is just a total disaster, honestly. I don't even bother counting them when I'm looking at how much progress is actually being made in this field.🙂
As for the whole debate over working versus just coasting through the day... I suppose every profession has its share of people who actually put in the effort and those who sort of just drift along, and I imagine education is no different in that regard. It kind of gets under my skin, I guess, whenever people start whining about this supposed "lazy majority" that supposedly does absolutely nothing all day. I mean, I guess those are just silly, unfounded prejudices, if you ask me. It’s kind of in the same vein as those people who claim that most clerks at the DMV are perpetually rude, or that most judges are inherently corrupt, or that most cops are just plain dim, or even that most doctors have developed some sort of massive superiority complex. I guess it all falls under that same general category of cynical generalizations, maybe.🤷
What's the point of these brutally difficult competitions that (at least in the subjects I follow closely, which I have to since it's my job) just test dry, academic facts from college? I'm not ashamed to admit that I sometimes struggle with a question, even after being in this game for a long time. High school finals are garbage.
There’s no money for real reform, no money for training, but there is plenty of money for things like those multi-day Huroš-Evski ramblings, among other nonsense. Sure, the budget is tight (I wouldn't say it's always zero), and what little we have gets spent insanely. But it's not just about the money. You can improve professionally just by reading a book published after 1812 (not just me, obviously), or by getting just enough tech-literate to use the internet and suddenly... you're practically in Finland. Look at that method versus real, true, useful competence, or real integration and all those other buzzwords they throw around... But nope. Even if you try to serve teachers something new, you hit a wall of resistance... because if I want to teach a new English text, I have to write a whole new lesson plan. And given my salary and those hooligans calling themselves students... you get the point and the irony, right?
It drives me crazy watching a supposed "lazy majority" that does nothing. And I'm not just talking nonsense or making things up. If I've personally interacted with, let's say, 1,000 teachers who teach a single subject—when there are only about 2,000 of them in the whole country—and then observed similar samples from closer or further distances... I'm not exactly lacking insight here. Good grief.
urbantinker8 said:I honestly think it might be time for parents to stop acting like experts on everything and blaming the local school district for every little thing that goes sideways.🙂
At the end of the day, it’s really on them to raise their kids properly, I suppose—to actually spend quality time with them whenever possible, to have a decent grasp on what they’re actually doing during class or in their free time, and to maintain some kind of realistic expectations about what a kid can actually achieve.
It’s just a shame that so many people lose their way in certain areas or hit a wall at some point, and then they just start frantically pointing fingers at whoever happens to be on duty.
That's facts. Couldn't agree more. But this doesn't fix the education system; it's a home upbringing issue. Honestly, parents need some parenting lessons themselves.
urbantinker8 said:I can't speak for everyone else, but I think I know exactly why I get so defensive whenever someone brings up the idea of "teacher performance reviews."🙄
First off, you always see parents pushing for these evaluations for all the wrong reasons—usually because they’re frustrated with mediocre grades, a lack of actual knowledge, or disappointing SAT scores... because, naturally, any failure their kid experiences gets dumped squarely on the shoulders of some supposedly incompetent teacher.🤦
Then there’s the issue of who would actually be doing the evaluating. Most of them would probably be school counselors, and let’s be honest, there are plenty of amateurs in that field. You have people who haven't stepped foot in a classroom in over twenty years; they've completely lost touch with how students learn today, what the curriculum looks like, or even how grading works, yet they're more than happy to play judge and jury.
Thirdly, nobody actually has a concrete plan for how this "assessment" would even work in practice. Just looking at standardized test scores doesn't prove anything. And trying to organize formal peer observations for every single teacher every few years? That's practically impossible because it would require an immense amount of money and time—resources our Department of Education certainly doesn't have to spare.
Personally, though, I don't really have an issue with it, and I'm certainly not worried about someone dropping in on my class or giving me some clever little suggestion, especially since my students consistently perform great on their exams and in competitions.🙂 What really gets under my skin is when people who know next to nothing about the education system, specific subjects, or even kids in general, try to insert themselves into conversations where they don't belong, loudly claiming that schools are failing, teachers aren't doing their jobs, and innocent children are just caught in the middle.
I totally agree about the parents pushing for this. I worked in a school for a while, and I had this one mom—a dentist—come in and try to condescendingly tell me it was time for a test because there was "too much material" to cover. I basically told her to calm down, take a seat, and let me finish pulling a tooth...
And regarding those counselors—you put it lightly. I’d say they need even harsher evaluations than the teachers.
It's not true that nobody has a vision. There are plenty of people in education who understand the system and have great ideas, but they aren't working for the Department of Education or that ridiculous agency. Just popping into a classroom to check a gradebook or flip through endless piles of pointless paperwork isn't an actual evaluation.
Standardized tests, and especially competitions, aren't everything.
But honestly, most teachers don't put in the extra work. They don't bother with professional development (and those little workshops aren't really "development"). They bust their backs just to avoid getting mocked by kids or parents, their pay is garbage, they have zero resources, and the job itself becomes a joke... blah, blah, blah. There are so many excuses you can make that you don't have to do anything at all. You get a teaching job and just coast until retirement. Again, I said *most*. There are exceptions. It's just sad that those exceptions are the rare ones instead of the rule.
I’m usually not one to jump into these threads, but this title grabbed me by the throat... 😁. Regarding the recent posts: yeah, kids have to actually study if they want to pass anything. A teacher could be a literal magician, but if the kid isn't hitting the books, it's not happening. But honestly, I’ve been wondering for years why almost every public school teacher gets so incredibly defensive the second you even hint at evaluating their performance. It’s pathetic. I’m not just guessing here—it’s my job to know exactly what these educators are doing. And frankly, looking at how things work, I’d move across the country in a heartbeat before my kid ever had to deal with the mess that is the American public school system. So, bottom line: no massive federal funding overhaul or fancy new policy initiative is going to fix this. We need a total overhaul of the bureaucracy and the cronyism. That would be a real starting point.