Posts by Morgan Booth70

Charles Ross3 said:Here is an edit regarding your latest attempt to twist my words right under my post:

- You went back and edited your original post to change what you actually said. Originally, you wrote, "it told me every single time I got a warning that it was for gender-based insults"... but while I was busy typing my reply, you scrubbed it down to just "to throw out"...

So, are you telling me it told you—and it told you EVERY SINGLE TIME—that you were being warned for violating General Forum Rules due to gender-based insults? 🤣 🤣

What "every time" are we talking about here?
Because from what I can see, you have received one solitary warning with that specific reasoning (which is quite unfortunate, since looking at your post history, you certainly could have racked up many more)!

That pile of trash is your own masterpiece on the topic of the coronavirus in Politics—it really speaks volumes about you and your level of class. It’s just like the vocabulary you use when you're complaining about the Red Cross or the FBI.

It doesn't say anywhere that I am strictly forcing you into the coronavirus thread. I mentioned several other sections too. Why don't you try checking out the women's corner? (The NNNI thread covers the coronavirus pandemic there, too). 🙂

Anyway, bye-bye, Morgan! 👋

And yeah, I mentioned some other users you could talk to instead, but whatever—you won't. You don't want to deal with the politics side of things, since it's all their domain (which honestly, my crowd is too, so it works), and besides, they're just here for the "traffic." And let's be real, traffic is everything—everywhere, even on this forum.🙏

Charles Ross3 said:Here is an edit regarding your latest attempt to twist my words right under my post:

- You went back and edited your original post to change what you actually said. Originally, you wrote, "it told me every single time I got a warning that it was for gender-based insults"... but while I was busy typing my reply, you scrubbed it down to just "to throw out"...

So, are you telling me it told you—and it told you EVERY SINGLE TIME—that you were being warned for violating General Forum Rules due to gender-based insults? 🤣 🤣

What "every time" are we talking about here?
Because from what I can see, you have received one solitary warning with that specific reasoning (which is quite unfortunate, since looking at your post history, you certainly could have racked up many more)!

That pile of trash is your own masterpiece on the topic of the coronavirus in Politics—it really speaks volumes about you and your level of class. It’s just like the vocabulary you use when you're complaining about the Red Cross or the FBI.

It doesn't say anywhere that I am strictly forcing you into the coronavirus thread. I mentioned several other sections too. Why don't you try checking out the women's corner? (The NNNI thread covers the coronavirus pandemic there, too). 🙂

Anyway, bye-bye, Morgan! 👋

Not sure if I should even be stepping foot in this pit of misery—honestly. ☕

Charles Ross3 said:Here is an edit regarding your latest attempt to twist my words right under my post:

- You went back and edited your original post to change what you actually said. Originally, you wrote, "it told me every single time I got a warning that it was for gender-based insults"... but while I was busy typing my reply, you scrubbed it down to just "to throw out"...

So, are you telling me it told you—and it told you EVERY SINGLE TIME—that you were being warned for violating General Forum Rules due to gender-based insults? 🤣 🤣

What "every time" are we talking about here?
Because from what I can see, you have received one solitary warning with that specific reasoning (which is quite unfortunate, since looking at your post history, you certainly could have racked up many more)!

That pile of trash is your own masterpiece on the topic of the coronavirus in Politics—it really speaks volumes about you and your level of class. It’s just like the vocabulary you use when you're complaining about the Red Cross or the FBI.

It doesn't say anywhere that I am strictly forcing you into the coronavirus thread. I mentioned several other sections too. Why don't you try checking out the women's corner? (The NNNI thread covers the coronavirus pandemic there, too). 🙂

Anyway, bye-bye, Morgan! 👋

How many more times are you gonna claim THIS is your last post just because you don't wanna waste your precious time on me? 🤣

Charles Ross3 said:Here is an edit regarding your latest attempt to twist my words right under my post:

- You went back and edited your original post to change what you actually said. Originally, you wrote, "it told me every single time I got a warning that it was for gender-based insults"... but while I was busy typing my reply, you scrubbed it down to just "to throw out"...

So, are you telling me it told you—and it told you EVERY SINGLE TIME—that you were being warned for violating General Forum Rules due to gender-based insults? 🤣 🤣

What "every time" are we talking about here?
Because from what I can see, you have received one solitary warning with that specific reasoning (which is quite unfortunate, since looking at your post history, you certainly could have racked up many more)!

That pile of trash is your own masterpiece on the topic of the coronavirus in Politics—it really speaks volumes about you and your level of class. It’s just like the vocabulary you use when you're complaining about the Red Cross or the FBI.

It doesn't say anywhere that I am strictly forcing you into the coronavirus thread. I mentioned several other sections too. Why don't you try checking out the women's corner? (The NNNI thread covers the coronavirus pandemic there, too). 🙂

Anyway, bye-bye, Morgan! 👋

Ooooh, heavens, imagine that—I made a typo and corrected myself. Groundbreaking. 🤣

Doesn't change the fact that when you're banned, every time you hit reply or use the search bar, it shows exactly what I said. You know, people forget they're banned and instinctively hit reply multiple times a day... which part of "EVERY TIME" are you struggling with? 🤦

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

🤦

nothing left to say—you've had your fill... 🤣

Charles Ross3 said:Here is an edit regarding your latest attempt to twist my words right under my post:

- You went back and edited your original post to change what you actually said. Originally, you wrote, "it told me every single time I got a warning that it was for gender-based insults"... but while I was busy typing my reply, you scrubbed it down to just "to throw out"...

So, are you telling me it told you—and it told you EVERY SINGLE TIME—that you were being warned for violating General Forum Rules due to gender-based insults? 🤣 🤣

What "every time" are we talking about here?
Because from what I can see, you have received one solitary warning with that specific reasoning (which is quite unfortunate, since looking at your post history, you certainly could have racked up many more)!

That pile of trash is your own masterpiece on the topic of the coronavirus in Politics—it really speaks volumes about you and your level of class. It’s just like the vocabulary you use when you're complaining about the Red Cross or the FBI.

It doesn't say anywhere that I am strictly forcing you into the coronavirus thread. I mentioned several other sections too. Why don't you try checking out the women's corner? (The NNNI thread covers the coronavirus pandemic there, too). 🙂

Anyway, bye-bye, Morgan! 👋

You don't even have a clue how this site works🤦

Every time I tried searching for something or just reflexively hit reply—you know, Charles Ross3—it would pop up telling me how long my ban was and give me the reason "sexist insults"☕

Give it a rest and stop embarrassing yourself🤦

Who even mods this place, for God's sake?🤦

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

And yeah, my screen literally said I was flagged for SEXIST INSULTING—it popped up every single time, easy to verify.

So basically, the penalty for a REGULAR INSULT is HIGHER than for a SEXIST INSULT. 🤦

Screw this forum, the rules, and the penalties—you pushed the "sexism" angle so hard, you might as well just hand me a trophy while you're at it. 🤦

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

Since you dumped a mountain of garbage here, I'll just pick out a few things.

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

Go bother Kiss Me and McAucliffe instead...

oh, wait, they don't bother you, ☕

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

The mods are fleeing this subforum, the users are fleeing this subforum, and the entire Red Cross section is drowning in complaints about this specific area, yet you're sending people there—you really have zero shame, do you?🤦

Charles Ross3 said:Honestly, I have to wonder how much effort you actually put into this latest episode of acting like an idiot (which, by the way, is a bannable offense on this forum!) and just how desperate you are to fight for the right to call women "clueless losers" simply because you lack the capacity for constructive criticism or any kind of meaningful contribution to the discussion!

Just to give everyone a little glimpse into your magnificent body of work over on the Politics thread regarding the coronavirus, purely to illustrate the general vibe of your typical
narrative:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=84435139

Quote:>>

Democracy is great, but only the kind approved by the establishment, you clueless loser

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=68

Quote:>

That clueless woman is now openly admitting—and has actually been doing so for a while—that they WERE high numbers, in other words there aren't big numbers anymore JUST BECAUSE I SAY SO.

http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=8...postcount=6943

I think this "unprofessionalism" would just blow her mind, starting with that clueless woman who sees communists everywhere she looks.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9904

I'm not usually one to attack someone's appearance, but I can certainly empathize with people who see a clueless woman in a position of power disrespecting her own credentials and talking in circles.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6111

We said it a long time ago: she's a clueless woman, watch the garbage she spews when she so easily mocks her own degree, career, and authority.

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=6591

That clueless woman still acts without a shred of shame regarding her "consistency."

https://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=9411

You just ignore everything and act like some frustrated, hysterical woman who calls the cops the second things get slightly uncomfortable.

Idiots, the whole lot of them—starting with those morons over at the New York Yankees who wouldn't know sense if it hit them, and including that irrational woman too.

And so on, and so forth... there's plenty more where that came from, and as I've said before, this isn't just a one-off fluke or someone "veering off track"—it’s a constant pattern.

Discourse like this doesn't belong on this forum or any public platform; if you want to talk like this, go ahead and do it behind closed doors with people who share your particular level of cultural sophistication.

Your anger regarding moderation and having your posts flagged for violating forum rules is hardly my concern—it’s quite obvious that you persistently break these rules without making even the slightest effort to change, is it not? The fact that you can't manage your own impulses or control how you write and behave is your own issue to resolve, rather than constantly trying to provoke people here, at the Red Cross, or with the FBI.

Your perception is yours alone, but I certainly don't build my own stances based on whether you choose to accept them or not.

I am more than happy to collaborate with people who are significantly more constructive and polite than you are, so please, carry on—just be who you are, but expect the corresponding sanctions on this forum accordingly.

I should point out that there are at least four or five different threads dedicated to the coronavirus on this site: there's the main PDF, the Politics thread, the general discussion area, the women's corner, and likely a few others. Feel free to see how your specific style and narrative are received by the moderators in those other sections.

Furthermore, this will be my final response to you; the little "bait" you keep throwing out to try and prove you're right is far too transparent to warrant any further waste of my time.

There is just one thing I might actually agree with:

Let's see who really deserves the shame: some hyper-aggressive feminist, or me, who earned my ban fairly (though strictly for insults, not on the basis of gender—that would only happen in some parallel universe where every insult against a public figure gets you banned, and we all know that isn't how this forum works).

So you admit you earned the ban, but only for insulting people, not for insults based on gender? 😬

Fair enough: an insult ban carries 45 points and lasts much longer than a ban for violating General Forum Rules, which is what you received, carrying 35 points. Your current ban for rule violations lasts until February 19th, so as far as I'm concerned, rustydrifter10 could easily swap that 35-point ban for a 45-point one that would last you five and a half months. And if that's your preference, since you find "aggressive feminism" so bothersome, I’ll be more than happy to accommodate you in that regard next time.

I was going to say you clearly don't understand English, but you actually understand it perfectly fine—you're just acting exactly how a moderator shouldn't act, playing dumb while picking on me, which is basically what you were quoting and bolding.

Let's see who's actually the bigger joke here—some high-strung feminist or me, just being myself. Got a red card—deservedly so (but only because I couldn't keep my mouth shut).Not based on gender either—unless we're living in some parallel universe where insulting public figures actually gets you banned, which we all know isn't how things work around here.

And this is what’s actually being said.

Let’s see who’s actually more embarrassing—some hyper-charged feminist or me, just being myself. Got a yellow card—fair enough (though only for being a jerk).Not based on gender—and only in some parallel universe where insulting public figures actually gets you banned. We all know that’s not how things work around here.

You’ve got zero shame—honestly, you're just digging your own grave at this point. Don't even worry about your bosses; they don't have any real say in who moderates anyway, since most of the people actually worth keeping have already checked out in front of everyone else. ☕

And yeah—for someone acting all high and mighty, neither she nor her friend thinks it’s okay to call men "primates." ☕

Nakon sto ovaj upit

Quote:

*** Democracy is great and all—but you’ve gotta play the game smart. Sure, speak your mind, but don't be so contrarian that you actually convince people to stop taking care of their health... honestly, only surface-level thinkers would call that discriminatory. *** Democracy is great and all—as long as it’s the kind they actually approve of. Otherwise, beat it, you little jerk. 🤮 So, here’s some quote from one of Anthony Fauci’s assistants—and below that is my take on why I got banned. Here’s how Charles Ross3 explained the penalty: Breaking the general forum rules. General forum rules. So, what exactly is off-limits on this forum? (...) Insulting someone based on anything—race, religion, age, gender, you name it—is just a massive red flag. Question—which part, I mean which EXACT part is on: racial stuff on a national level— 3) religious stuff. 4) age-related 5) external So, basically—just so we're clear—you'd need some kind of formal rule change to penalize someone for insulting a public figure, seeing as how those insults have been totally fine until now—unlike when people start coming for us forum users.

Got rejected from the women's corner—so now I’m asking here: is there actually any real difference between hardcore chauvinism and hardcore feminism?

Nothing.

That annoying brand of feminism is showing through loud and clear with the moderator, Charles Ross3.

She basically took what was written and decided it was some kind of sexist insult—honestly, she's reaching. 🤦

Let's see who's actually the bigger embarrassment here—some hyper-charged feminist or me. I deserved the ban—no regrets. Just for venting, obviously—not gendered or anything—and only in some weird parallel universe where trash-talking public figures actually gets you banned. We all know that’s not how things work around here.So, let's dive into how moderation actually works—and once again, point out the blatant hypocrisy.

What's the word on the American news portals:

I can't even begin to deal with this right now.
Definition.
female dog; bitch, female
2. A pejorative term—basically describes a woman who’s always stirring the pot and playing dirty behind people's backs.Damn, what a bitch.

So... First off—let’s actually define what we mean by "animal."And then—well, that's about it. So, basically... how do you even define an insult? It’s all subjective—depends on who’s doing the offended part, I guess.

So, moderator Charles Ross3 wants to stretch the definition of things—fine—so now she’s turning it into an insult based on "GENDER." Okay, sure, totally legitimate.

Let's take a quick look at what that same site is saying about the masculine version.

Monkey.
Basically just a zoo primate—the most advanced brain in the animal kingdom, supposedly.
2. trans. pejor. a. someone who mimics people or things like a primate—you know, basically just being clumsy as hell. b. How dumb can one person be? — like, seriously, brainless level.

Pretty much the same thing—first you define the animal, then you use it as an insult.
Honestly, calling someone "stupid" hits a little harder than just saying they're shady or prone to drama—kind of like how that assistant to Anthony Fauci tried to play games with democracy.

How many times do you think male public figures have actually been punished on this forum for gender-based insults—especially considering what Charles Ross3 claims this place stands for??

Hey Charles Ross3, you have any idea what the fine percentage usually looks like for stuff like this?
Honestly, isn't it kind of embarrassing to play the feminist card when you're acting worse than the biggest chauvinist—especially since you see that exact same garbage in politics every single day and just... don't say anything?

Just a few examples here—ranging from journalists to scientists who got tossed out. Posted by the women's corner of the forumI used the term exactly how an American dictionary would—as a straight-up insult, not some weird gendered thing.

Looks like Klaus is starting a war against Zoki... what an absolute clown.

I can't believe people actually fall for this stuff—honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing. It's like they just want to be lied to at this point.

I hope someone hijacks your plane mid-flight, you absolute primate—with or without weapons.

I can't believe people actually fall for this stuff—it’s honestly embarrassing. We’re all just sitting here watching the circus while everyone acts like it's totally normal.

Just a monkey that evolved from a human—classic.

Fair point, though it’s a little politically incorrect—mostly because we're actually insulting primates here. The idiot keeps insisting he's "not a descendant of monkeys" anyway.

I can't believe people actually fall for this stuff—it’s honestly kind of embarrassing. Just another day of watching everyone lose their minds over nothing.

How many cardboard boxes do you guys actually see here?

Me, a zero.

Zero.

They used a primate as an example—but honestly, you could find enough examples to make even a cardboard cutout blush.

So, people just casually trash public figures in politics without any consequences—it’s wild.

Look, I’m not asking for any favors—I just want fair and decent moderation. It’s ridiculous that they send over mods who are basically on probation to nitpick my punctuation and invent some fake gender-based insult, all while the big shots are hanging out in the same subforum. Meanwhile, the higher-ups at Reddit can't see the massive issues staring them right in the face.

So, we’ve basically got two different types of animals that everyone on here seems to label people as. Public figures—calling a woman a bitch, calling a man a primate.

The forum's been punished, so the ladies can run wild now.

I’d love an official explanation from the higher-ups on why being a "primate" is treated differently than being a "bitch"—why one gets a strike and the other doesn't?

Fine, take my strike, take my points—fair enough—but let's clear this up and see just how deep this hypocrisy goes.

So, a male user gets slapped with an insult label based purely on gender, while the women get a free pass?

Is this what passes for equality here, under this moderation team??

I'm waiting for an answer, obviously, rustydrifter10,just so we can watch the head mod pull some more mental gymnastics to justify her colleague's decision.

And don't even try telling me I'm digging up old posts, BECAUSE YOU TOLD ME IN DMs—AND ON THE BOARD TOO— that posts live forever and mods have the power to flag anything from a week ago to a year ago, which I dealt with recently.

Honestly, I'm just dreading how they'll spin these examples too.

So, rustydrifter10, why is it that calling a woman a bitch in public life is such a big deal, yet letting male primates slide in public life is totally fine here on the forum?
Is that the kind of "equality" you're fighting for?
If so, put your name on it.

Charles Fox10 said:Obviously that's a banable offense—and you know it too—but you just don't care since you keep doing it.

Last warning: stop commenting on moderation.

Cuca, come on now...

Look, we both know you've got a massive chip on your shoulder regarding me.

Say whatever you want.

Funny how everything always seems to blow up on my account, isn't it?

Check this out:

12:30

ecobarbarus said:These two guys literally repeat the exact same lie every few pages—it's clearly intentional—and I've reported it multiple times, yet I don't recall anyone ever getting a ban for it. Fine, whatever, go ahead and hand me a ban for talking about the mods.

you show up at 12:46 and write

Cuca said:And now it's time for a mod warning.

Try debating other users by focusing on their arguments rather than attacking them personally. If someone is getting under your skin, either skip them or just ignore them.
We all get it—this whole pandemic situation has everyone on edge and some people are losing their cool—so just chill out a bit. It's not worth catching a ban when you could easily avoid it.

So it's "time for a warning" now? Since Morgan Booth70 isn't involved, why not everyone else? Don't treat people like idiots, alright?

What’s this even about?

https://i.postimg.cc/6qMrHgJz/Untitled.jpg

I'm guessing we're just going after the mods now—is that how this works?

Just wondering why it's totally fine for people to call us racists, Nazis, junkies, or jobless losers wasting our lives on social media and forums with hundreds of posts a week, yet I get slapped with 30 points...

Hmm, interesting...

Meanwhile, the post where they were insulting you is still sitting there, untouched.

Would love an answer. Thanks.

Charles Fox10 said:You don't even need a private archive when we have everything you wrote right here—and you said this:
and for that pretty rude attack, you got a pathetic 30 points just because I clicked the wrong house icon.

Anyway, let's not drag this out—this is your final warning in Politics, because if you do it again, you're banned.

Attack on who?

What exactly offended her little moderator ego—specifically Chuck?

The words "dick, dick, pussy"?

"You don't know shit" is what you classify as an attack? 🤣

Show me one single post from any user where someone used an expression like that toward another user and actually got a warning...

There isn't one—and you know it. You've got zero shame, honestly.

I said a long time ago that the moderation here basically consists of counting swear words—that's their peak achievement. :cerek:

What, because I told some girl she’s as obedient as a German girl and should think twice?

Is that the issue? Since this forum went downhill thanks to all the mediocrity, most of these listed moderators aren't even moderating anymore—their names are just there for decoration, and no new people are crazy enough to notice (ask yourselves why).

Obviously, the fewer quality moderators there are, the closer the quality drops to rock bottom. Logic. :cerek:

So, what exactly was I breaking in that post to get hit with a 30-point penalty and a three-month ban—especially since everyone else doing the same thing seems to be getting a free pass?

https://postimg.cc/cvddBnWC

Thanks

Charles Fox10 said:Did he get a card for being toxic? Yep.

Did he get banned? Yep.

What's the issue here??

I guess you were expecting a trophy after all those posts picking fights with the mods—as if you’d ever learn not to do that. Well, newsflash: we aren't changing the rules just for you, and if you keep this up, things might actually get a lot more expensive for you.

This thread should probably be locked.

And no, it shouldn't be locked. I'll admit I'd bail right now if Nico would just confirm it's totally standard procedure to give a measly 24-hour ban for:

- being rude to a patient

- calling someone a moron

- calling them an idiot

- being a complete jerk

- telling someone to buzz off, you clown

...when the penalty is only a single day...

If Nico writes out that this is the "normal procedure" for such blatant insults all in one post, then fine—I'll back down.

Charles Fox10 said:What’s even the issue??

I honestly can't wrap my head around how someone can be this much of a hypocrite—trying to lecture me about my account status when I haven't even complained about it, but hey, I guess that's all you've got left :rigo:

If I were to write:

- rude patient

- what an idiot

- moron

- jerk

- get lost, loser

I'd probably catch a month-long ban instead of just 24 hours

but then you start acting all offended when someone points out that certain users clearly have special privileges

unbelievable :rigo:

Charles Fox10 said:Did he get a card for being abusive? Yep.

Did he get banned? Yep.

What's the issue??

I guess you expected a trophy after all those posts complaining about the mods—as if anyone’s ever going to learn to stop doing that. Well, newsflash: we aren't changing the rules for anyone, and it'll just cost you more if you keep this up.

This thread should probably be locked.

Having trouble reading?

Where am I even complaining about my own ban????

Learn English.

He got a 24-hour ban!!!!

FOR BEING STRAIGHT-UP ABUSIVE!!!

but criticizing the staff gets you 48 hours? Nice job!!!

I critiqued the mods and got two days?
while he gets one day for actual insults?

Does the mod who decided this have any shred of dignity left?

Of course not, we established that a long time ago ☕

Who handed out that card and only gave him 24 hours, Aryna?

Yeah, I see now, Aryna, I never doubted it for a second 😁

Let's recap:

- rude patient

- total jerk

- absolute idiot

- moron

- screw off, loser

One day for all that?
Seriously?

How much longer are you going to hide your incompetence and hypocrisy behind heavy-handedness?

I'm assuming most of the mods haven't even seen the stuff above, so here's the question:

Which one of you can actually stand up publicly and defend the decision to give 24 hours for all those insults, but 48 hours for just commenting on the moderation?

Nico?

Sabaa?

Anderson?

Charles Fox10? NO SHAME AT ALL :rigged:

the edge?

DJTcro?

KLCCLK?

klonka?

Amazing Pudding?

Come on, whose hands aren't shaking while they type, "Yeah, I stand by my colleague's decision to give 24 hours for that abuse and 48 hours for criticizing the mods"?

Just a quick recap of everything this forum regular said to me last Friday at 1:41 PM:

- rude patient

- you moron

- you idiot

- idiot

- fuck off, dummy

https://i.postimg.cc/ZqJgqQ2m/bjesomar.jpg

He was posting away without any issues until late that night—his last post was Friday at 11:13 PM. So, if he actually got banned, it happened sometime early Saturday morning. It’s Sunday now, and here he is, posting again...

So, all that verbal abuse earns him a ONE-day timeout, but because I pointed it out, I get TWO days? Makes perfect sense.

https://i.postimg.cc/Hs2bgPwX/post.jpg

Which part of my explanation explains why a blatant insult deserves a lighter penalty than me calling it out?

Thanks.

hey, what's up—can someone walk me through this? 😍

Well, good morning, North Korea 🙏

Just scrolled up and realized my post with the working links got nuked 🤣

So, what gives?

Since when did linking to CNN, Fox News, or the NYT become a crime?

https://www.cnn.com/2009/10/30/world/propaganda-news

https://www.foxnews.com/news/politics/breaking-news

https://www.nytimes.com/news/breaking-updates

Waiting on an explanation 🙏

Still waiting on an explanation from the authorities—how long does it take you guys to actually get on the same page?

Chris Myers said:Sam Alvarez4 is a woman, btw.

my bad, sorry