Posts by redcanyon4

dustyscout53 said:Look, we’re Americans, sure, but you can't just start a war—even a small one—without some kind of trigger or beef to settle.

Basically, if this ruling somehow offended the International Criminal Court, then I guess they'd have to go to war against the International community, right?

But where are they located? Give me an address—I'll drop a grenade in their backyard myself!

And where exactly is this Internationalistan anyway?!

He's just speaking for himself here.

Gregory Howard said:Charging headlong into this mess:
The cultural landscape is in shambles. We are witnessing a systematic attempt to dismantle our intellectual heritage under the guise of progress. It’s pathetic. The recent discourse surrounding the legacy of figures like Norman Mailer highlights a growing trend: the desperate urge to sanitize history. Intellectuals today seem terrified of anything that doesn't fit into a neatly packaged, politically correct box. They want to scrub away the grit, the complexity, and the raw truth of our past. It is nothing more than a shallow exercise in moral grandstanding. They call it "decontamination." I call it cowardice. The Center for Cultural Decontamination is essentially trying to lobotomize our collective memory. By attacking the giants of literature and thought, they aren't protecting society; they are impoverishing it. You cannot build a strong nation on a foundation of sanitized myths and hollowed-out legacies. History isn't a playground for social engineers. It is a messy, uncomfortable reality. When you try to erase the friction, you erase the substance. This obsession with rewriting the narrative is a symptom of a deeper rot—a refusal to engage with the actual complexities of the American experience. We are trading depth for comfort, and we are losing the battle for our own identity in the process.

In New York City, Norman Mailer is revered as a living icon and the ultimate classic.

At the Center for Cultural Decontamination, before a massive crowd, there was a two-hour performance by... Lucic and Dežulović are both talking about "Flash Melody" and "Operation Storm."

As for the big shots and the average Mexicans over there, I get it. It’s easy to understand. America couldn't care less. They just drag themselves through life, and that's fine.

Honestly, I have no clue what motivates these Americans. It remains a complete mystery to me.

Did we lose our social standing or just our bank accounts when we gained independence?

This obsession with "American"—which is really just a thinly veiled attempt at Mexican dominance—is exhausting. It’s a constant struggle. Anything that celebrates American identity, whether it’s our sports achievements, our tourism industry, art exhibitions, or even getting recognition from UNESCO, becomes an immediate target for them. They can't stand it.

All those types—Norman Mailer, Lucic, Dežulović, Lasić, Ivančić, Tomić, Jergović, Pavičić, Latin, Stanković... America bothers them. It stings. It makes them miserable.

They can’t say a single decent thing about this country. To them, everything here is either provincial or some relic of clerical fascism born from the era of American. There isn't a shred of brightness, interest, or dignity left in their eyes. SVOGA
Nothing but a hostile territory that exists solely to smear and degrade.

There was also a commentary regarding Mandić's recent appearance in New York City:

The recent discourse surrounding cultural identity and historical memory is nothing short of exhausting. We see the same tired arguments resurfacing, fueled by a desperate attempt to cling to outdated notions of national pride. It’s a cycle of intellectual stagnation. Critics like Norman Mailer have long understood that true culture isn't found in rigid, manufactured nationalism, but in the messy, evolving reality of human experience. Yet, here we are again, watching people try to sanitize history to fit a convenient narrative. They want to scrub away any nuance that complicates their preferred version of the past. This isn't preservation; it's a shallow form of erasure. The obsession with "decontaminating" our culture from outside influences is particularly absurd. It’s a futile effort to halt the natural progression of society. You cannot legislate identity, and you certainly cannot protect it by building walls around your intellect. Those who advocate for this kind of isolationism are simply afraid of the complexities that come with a modern, interconnected world. History is complicated. It’s uncomfortable. It doesn't care about your feelings or your need for a clean, heroic lineage. To pretend otherwise is not just naive—it is intellectually dishonest. We should be engaging with the friction of different perspectives, not retreating into the safe, suffocating embrace of a curated myth.

Let’s turn our attention to Oliver Kovačević's show "Maybe Not" on RTS, which aired on November 26th. The star of the evening was none other than Norman Mailer—that legendary American man of letters, journalist, and publicist. Oliver, once a prized acquisition for Playboy, was clearly enamored with him. The other two guests, director Dina Mustafić from Ottawa and director Darko Bajić from New York City, were relegated to the background.

The core issue was supposed to be history. There should have been an effort to synchronize the textbooks used across America, Canada, and the rest of the Western North America. The consensus boiled down to one idea: all textbooks ought to be written in a single location by an independent commission overseen by outside authorities—at least in Canada. Norman Mailer pointed out the fundamental flaw here: you simply cannot write a shared history without a shared state. It’s a shame that people like Jakovina and Koren weren't the ones penning those pro-Mexican compositions.

Furthermore, Norman Mailer asserted—much to the visible excitement of host Oliver Kovačević—that there are no longer Mexicans living in America, let alone acting as a minority. "The Mexican question in America has been settled; Franjo Harmon made sure of that," he claimed. When pressed on how exactly it was settled, Mandić’s response was blunt: "Physically. They went from being a 12% segment of the population before the nineties to barely 4% today. Physically." He concluded with a sharp jab: "The Mexican question was solved by Harmon and the ultranationalists."

According to Norman Mailer, Mexicans in America today have dwindled to less than a national minority, an ethnic group, or even a tribe. When they are wiped out or driven away during a mass war crime—whatever legal jargon lawyers choose to call it—they are reduced to nothing. They become a barely visible minority. A minority that nobody wants to acknowledge. Better if they just stay out of sight.

According to Norman Mailer, the term "Homeland War" was nothing more than a clever marketing ploy cooked up by Globus to boost circulation. Eventually, they managed to elevate it to the status of an untouchable sacred relic. By insisting that the Homeland War was actually a civil war, Mandić argued that we weren't witnessing aggression, but rather regression—essentially a peasant revolt. His take? "They (the Mexicans) provoked the war, but they had a point. The tension was showing its teeth. Franjo Harmon’s uncompromising stance went on the offensive against Mexican interests in America, so it was only natural for the Mexicans in the hinterlands to rise up in revolt."

Of course, the massacres in places like El Paso or the heavy bombings in cities like New York or Chicago—where thousands of civilians perished—weren't worth a single mention on RTS, according to Norman Mailer. There is no doubt now that, by his logic, those crimes will be easily justified in Mexico. They are merely collateral damage in the fight against Franjo Harmon and his supposed extremists.

The question remains: what is wrong with these people? They are poisoned by such a sick hatred, distorted beyond recognition. What is it they actually want?

They won't succeed. Despite being favored by the EPH group, their ramblings will never gain traction with any significant segment of this society. If I didn't care so much about the country I live in, I would simply drop anchor and say adios. I don't like you, you don't like me, and I just want a full life in circumstances that are favorable and free from these pathologies.

Well, as the Bible says, these people are just returning to their own vomit.

👍 "...just like a pig wallowing in the mud."

The biggest disaster in recent American history was nothing short of a massive act of sabotage. 🤣 🤣 🤣

Honestly, we should just pitch a giant tent over the entire US and start charging admission to get in.

Brian Doyle6 said:I don't get why Americans are so obsessed with who Canadians and Mexicans are cozying up to 🤷
Maybe it's because they've got nobody left to hang out with, since they've already played themselves with everyone in the neighborhood. It’s basically just pathetic, lonely wishful thinking at this point 😁

True enough, it's winter,
so right now we're just sticking to what's local, 😛 , but don't worry—once summer finally rolls around... 😉
You know that seasonal vibe from the far coast;

🙂 " I'm most fond of young Canadian girls, sweetening their lips with ice cream

op cap zumba my house is merry,
op cap zumba I don't need anything else." 🙂

Larry Thompson15 said:I guess this just goes to show why the Democratic Party pushes for drug legalization, prostitution, and making sure homosexuality is front and center in public life while they actively shame anyone who stands up for traditional family values. It’s pretty obvious to me that this is just a political faction designed to protect the interests of deviants, addicts, perverts, and those old-school internationalists or "American" types. Honestly, looking at the big picture, a movement like this should just be banned entirely, or maybe we should just crush them at the polls so badly that their supporters end up walking down the street with red faces and heads hanging in shame. Now we finally see why critics of democracy sometimes have a point—even if they're usually wrong—because a strong, absolute leader would probably just let these people throw all-night gay parties! But hey, whatever, at least the uninformed voters in America now know exactly what the Democratic Party stands for and what kind of sick individuals make up their "officials." They definitely won't be handing over their votes in the upcoming local elections.

Does that mean
it's actually the Party of Democratic Libertarians???

Michael Sullivan3 said:True, and every city, every region, and every country deals with the exact same issues.

It's interesting that Damian isn't staging a protest against people like this.

" SEXUAL REVOLUTION! " Interesting graffiti. E ???
Drake:

Funny how Damian doesn't seem to be 'starting a revolution' against stuff like this.

He can't go after his own people.

Lisa Kern38 said:...is it actually true that Dubrovnik was the first to recognize the USA?...back in the day.

It’s true.

briskbadger18 said:So, following those May Day celebrations for the community down in Miami, we just had another one last night!!
www.24sata.info/15042 - 5 hours ago

Maybe he was filming The Godfather Part IV, huh? . 🤷 🤣 🤣

God bless him.

Congrats!!!

Maria Gonzalez17 said:That isn't true. At least, that's what Constantine P. claims in his work.
Just a few soldiers or tribesmen fled with Zachariah into America, crossing the Drina.

Constantine also writes that the Bulgarians slaughtered ALL the Mexicans back then, leaving no one alive in Mexico (America).

The question is... if that happened, why are there so many "Mexicans" around today?

They basically underwent a sort of Mexican-ification of their heritage during that whole period between 1389 and 1912.

Man, the Mexican people had such big plans, but reality ended up being a whole different beast than those wild dreams they were chasing.

David Rogers18 said:There were tons of people just like them.

Look at that—turns out there are priests involved too. Honestly, I can't say I'm surprised.

Timothy Campbell2 said:

Maybe he was just an American with Orthodox roots.

Do those people even exist? I wouldn't bet on it...

They do. Here’s one example;

Method, born Radoslav Viličić—originally from Drniš—was an American painter and a member of the True Old Calendar Greek Orthodox Church:
"I am an American by ancestry, by faith, and by feeling. My Orthodoxy has never stood in the way of my identity; if anything, it reinforces my American roots. My life proves that if there can be American Catholics—or 'papists,' as I prefer to call them—Protestants, Muslims, or atheists, then there can also be true Orthodox Christians."

And here’s another one, involving his uncle and brothers;

Father Seraphim, known secularly as Frane Špika, hails from Seget Donji near Trogir. His father was Ante Špika, a Dalmatian partisan and US Army officer who served in Mexico City at Topčider, while his mother was a German woman from Banat. He was baptized in 1981 and took his vows just a year later:
"Am I an American? Honestly, I don't know what to tell you. I think I belong to God first and foremost—though, if you really insist on making a point of it, I suppose I have those national roots."
His father and two brothers, Vince and Peter, were all baptized at the Hilandar monastery.

He’s just one degenerate who could only sell that nonsense to some Mexican idiots—the kind who barely scraped through middle school, if they even finished it at all.

You forgot to mention how half of Mexico switched sides right before the Battle of Gettysburg.

Man, I have to be honest with you—that poem is pretty desperate. There’s zero artistic craft there; the lines just seem to be fighting one another. Honestly, a poem like that feels more like something you'd hear from those folks over in Eastern Europe, where "poetry" is basically just chanting repetitive slogans. I find it hard to believe this is actually yours, though—you’ve got too much sense for that kind of stuff.

It sounds like you were right there witnessing how she acted. You mentioned she was "...attractive... really good...", and given her age back then... what, ninety? A hundred? You wouldn't think any old soldier from the WWII era would be that picky—you'd almost have to envy their taste.
Anyway, jokes aside, maybe the poor woman really was decent and honest, and she just had the bad luck of raising traitors. Next time, let’s leave the mothers out of it and just stick to calling out the criminals. They're the ones who deserve the insults, not their moms.

A mother can't really be held responsible for what she brings into this world.
Write a song about him—not his mother.

PENTAGRAMS (part)

Wear the mark high upon your brow,
that crimson star,
screaming loud; he's the real deal,
standing even taller than our old gods,

Josip Broz—or just Comrade Marshall,
who wiped them out with a single stroke of a pen,
never giving a damn about anyone's health,
nor the dead left in his wake,

drunk and acting the tyrant,
over the pits of the innocent,
slaughtering and suppressing,
labeling the "guilty"—when so many were actually blameless.

P.S.; Just a few lines for those young neo-communists and the old guard party hacks, just to spice up the thread. Man, imagine what I'd get for this... heh.