Suggestion for the mods - Service Unavailable
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Service Unavailable is becoming way more common than
47 posts shown.
silenteagle11 said:Look, we all see the reality: Islamic Iran is fast becoming a nuclear superpower, while the population of Muslims surrounding Israel continues to swell unchecked. It’s forcing the Israeli government to think long-term about their survival👍. Israel joining NATO actually makes sense—it carries far more weight than showing up at the Eurovision Song Contest or some European sports tournament. From what I can gather, non-Muslims don't seem to have an issue with Israel joining NATO; it’s just the Muslims who are gritting their teeth, though they aren't speaking up openly. Why is that? That's the question🙂?!
Liberals, please. The IDF didn't level that Muslim village because the IDF is a military with high moral standards 👍, unlike your people over there, who would probably flatten a Jewish village in a heartbeat if given half a chance 😳
silenteagle11 said:Look, we all see the reality: Islamic Iran is fast becoming a nuclear superpower, while the population of Muslims surrounding Israel continues to swell unchecked. It’s forcing the Israeli government to think long-term about their survival👍. Israel joining NATO actually makes sense—it carries far more weight than showing up at the Eurovision Song Contest or some European sports tournament. From what I can gather, non-Muslims don't seem to have an issue with Israel joining NATO; it’s just the Muslims who are gritting their teeth, though they aren't speaking up openly. Why is that? That's the question🙂?!
Liberals, please. The IDF didn't level that Muslim village because the IDF is a military with high moral standards 👍, unlike your people over there, who would probably flatten a Jewish village in a heartbeat if given half a chance 😳
Ronald Booth3 said:I'm 100% behind this. Joining NATO and the European Union is the move. It's one way to stabilize the region around Israel and finally secure a normal life for Israel.
silenteagle11 said:Why bother walking into a village when you can just level it? Anyway, this probably belongs under the Israel-Palestine conflict tag. This thread is about Israel joining NATO.Are you in? Why or why not?😉?
silenteagle11 said:Why bother walking into a village when you can just level it? Anyway, this probably belongs under the Israel-Palestine conflict tag. This thread is about Israel joining NATO.Are you in? Why or why not?😉?
silenteagle11 said:Nonsense. Israel doesn't need any help from anyone; they have more than enough cash to just hire their own Foreign Legion. So, what do you all think about the idea of America and Israel essentially joining forces within NATO🙂?
Sean Hernandez13 said:The big word isn't supply, it's CONTROL over those oil fields... if it were just about supply, they'd just write a check and call it a day... I mean, Americans have plenty of cash, right?...
silenteagle11 said:🤣😂
And what about the other 29%😂?! Let me help you out: it starts with the letter M.😉 I’m literally explaining to you right now that there is no war without Muslims.
Every single one of these Muslim countries caused wars through their own Islamist actions (read: Islamic terrorism). Add in the wars where Islamists fought against non-Islamist authorities within Muslim countries, plus the rising Shia-Sunni conflict,😉 and you get exactly what I’m talking about.
Kenneth Jackson30 said:Nobody's probably going to answer this one; I suspect they'll just try to change the subject.☕
silenteagle11 said:Has anyone else (especially the forum's resident Muslims😉) noticed that it seems like nobody else on this planet is fighting wars anymore except for Muslims. 😁I realize Islam can't function without jihad🙏, but even jihad should probably take a back seat once in a while. 👍Don't you think🙂?!
nimbleranger19 said:And which ones would those be?
goldenmason172 said:liberals say:
That’s right—Al Qaeda is out there killing people in Iraq while your Americans are busy planting flowers over there!
You made a valid point initially, though I certainly never claimed anyone was out there planting flowers; however, if that is your perspective, I see no reason to argue against you.I’m not sure about the denial part, but I do know there was an offer of $5,000,000 to anyone who could actually prove the Holocaust happened—so Stanley, here is your chance to strike it rich!
Well, you’ve laid it all out perfectly yourself; honestly, why would a certain Bush ever want to be associated with such a vile individual?He's just talking, whereas your Joe is actually putting it into practice!
I think you might have things a bit mixed up; he isn't actually implementing anything, he's simply trying to ensure that Osama number two doesn't get any bright ideas.
goldenmason172 said:I'm struggling to understand what makes this person a terrorist—is it because Al-Qaeda is killing civilians in Iraq? I honestly can't wrap my head around what kind of debate could possibly happen between him and a man who denies the Holocaust or someone who openly advocates for the total erasure of a nation from the map.🤔 🤷
goldenmason172 said:I'm struggling to understand what makes this person a terrorist—is it because Al-Qaeda is killing civilians in Iraq? I honestly can't wrap my head around what kind of debate could possibly happen between him and a man who denies the Holocaust or someone who openly advocates for the total erasure of a nation from the map.🤔 🤷
goldenmason172 said:I'm struggling to understand what makes this person a terrorist—is it because Al-Qaeda is killing civilians in Iraq? I honestly can't wrap my head around what kind of debate could possibly happen between him and a man who denies the Holocaust or someone who openly advocates for the total erasure of a nation from the map.🤔 🤷
goldenmason172 said:Who grants them that right? They grant it to themselves; they don't need permission from you or me. Personally, I support their stance because the global goal should be reducing nuclear arsenals, not expanding them. Furthermore, the latest news regarding Iran agreeing to cooperate with the IAEA seems to be the strongest possible rebuttal to critics like you, essentially proving that the USA was ultimately correct in its position. As for World War II and the dropping of atomic bombs, I think that topic is best left untouched, as I refuse to debate such matters with someone who lacks a fundamental understanding of the history. 🤷
A truly wise leader would have found a way to lift those sanctions off his country's neck and jumpstart the economy, but since Mahmud failed to do exactly that, I find it pointless to call him anything other than what he clearly is: not smart.
goldenmason172 said:I’d love to see just how "brilliant" Mahmud really is; he seems so incredibly wise and intelligent that he fails to grasp how much danger he is actually placing Iran and Iranians in. A truly smart man simply wouldn't act this way. 🤷
goldenmason172 said:That is a textbook comment coming from someone like you! 🙏 Tell me, why didn't you include one of those ridiculous moments from George W. Bush? If you had, then we might actually have a fair comparison; as it stands, you’re the one looking a bit silly by trying to compare two things that aren't even in the same league! 😂
boldgardener93 said:If he’s really as brilliant as everyone claims, then why didn't he step up to Nedzad's challenge for a televised debate? Maybe he isn't actually as clueless as people think; I guess he knows Nedzad would just tear him apart like a toddler with a rattle.🤣