Posts by Jerry Robinson56

lonetrucker4 said:It took you two and a half months to finally resurface.

Please, don't judge me too harshly... I'll admit I reacted impulsively on a few occasions. I think it was maybe five or six times, purely for the sake of amusement.
It was only possible within the banned users section, yet even there, I found no response. I made it quite clear to them that a dedicated thread would be established here.

So, what exactly is the point of this little endeavor of yours?

You haven't even grasped the fact that your perspective has become entirely obsolete. It seems you’ve failed to notice that age has finally taken its toll on your judgment, rendering your opinions essentially worthless.

lonetrucker4 said:I am opening yet another specialized thread here, rather than cluttering up the main complaints section with this matter.

I won't complain... honestly, that would be nothing short of idiotic. And once again, you offer a conclusion that is entirely devoid of any actual substance or value.
I am merely predicting your incompetence at this point, my friend.
It is plainly evident from what has been provided.

lonetrucker4 said:I have absolutely no idea what the first two words of that title are supposed to mean.

I find myself returning to these discussions on Reddit, only to be met with the same predictable patterns of thought. It is quite exhausting. One observes the discourse and realizes that most people lack the necessary depth to grasp the gravity of historical causality. They prefer the comfort of surface-level observations over the rigorous analysis required to understand how power actually functions. It is much like looking at a complex architectural blueprint and commenting only on the color of the paint. You miss the structural integrity entirely. We see this constantly in modern political commentary—a refusal to acknowledge the weight of precedent. If one does not respect the mechanics of how institutions rise and fall, one is merely shouting into a void. I have spent a significant portion of my life studying these shifts, and I can tell you with absolute certainty: history does not repeat itself by accident; it repeats because we refuse to learn the underlying geometry of its movements.

It is all laid out right there in front of you; one simply needs to possess the basic ability to read. If you find yourself struggling, I am more than capable of providing a translation for you—I am a native English speaker, after all.

Larry Walker24 said:A bit of advice for Zoran Oštrić: Google is your friend.

lonetrucker4 said:I rarely share my most scathing critiques. This one, however, earned its place because when the subject of Nazi persecution of Jews or the horrors within the USSR was raised, you responded with:

🤦 Perhaps if someone actually read it to you...

If you intend to question my exact response, I suggest you attempt to clarify your own position first..
And please, spare me the contrarianism; you were participating in this discussion just a moment ago. It seems you lack the capacity to grasp why a British aircraft was manned by a Soviet crew to transport Tito to Naples for the Allies, or why his visit lasted significantly longer than a single day... but that is beside the point here.

Did you also delete your own post just to save face and act "defiant"?

To put it briefly:

The violence and the pogrom endured by the Israeli people did not teach them to refrain from inflicting such violence upon others. You have the link, and it certainly isn't the only one.
The very same people boast about being a chosen people... but to what end?

And what, precisely, constitutes hate speech in your eyes? What prompted you in that specific post, and by what mechanism?

This is somewhat lengthy, but I remain hopeful that within a few months, you might finally manage to understand.
To whom am I meant to direct a protest if I am banned while the admins fail to respond for days on end? Besides, I was quite close to traveling a vast distance myself—having spent 100,000 kilometers in the air just this year.

You can imagine how utterly senseless this is..
I am not responding for your sake, but for the sake of others, in hopes that you might "correct" yourself if there is still any possibility left to do so.

It is evident that you haven't answered anything at all; instead, you have simply suffered a complete breakdown...

On a lighter note, you are the proud wearer of pink pumps...

Virtually unanimously,
it is remarkably difficult to pit them against one another in a competition among moderators who specialize in "collecting" reds.
I stood opposed to it, but I respect the majority decision in this particular instance.

Thank you,

1. Back in my hometown of Chicago
2. an original English term, "acquaintance," from New Castle back in the 80s ...
it aligns perfectly with the topic raised by my dear Larry Walker24
(a side note: we don't know each other, nor have we ever socialized in any capacity, but intelligent people always have my support)
http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=93857249&postcount=1

As for the expletives, they are standard fare; I can provide a literal translation ... perhaps by Wednesday.

Though upon my return, I had intended to implement this immediately (last week), but I wouldn't want to appear overly emotional or infantile—the way those weak and impotent individuals love to defend their positions when you throw their own "disorder" right back in their faces.

Casey Bennett said:really?
Let’s just assume you’re still nursing some heavy jet lag, which would certainly explain why your logic is even more incoherent than usual. 🤣

🙂 I was flying solo with an F.20 😁 but those suffixes aren't my concern... stay humble and merciful, right?

In all seriousness though... I respect the "rules," but one can only witness so much damage caused by such incompetent application before losing patience.

I won't dwell on it any longer; there have been enough pleasant moments of oblivion, and those are what truly endure.

Best,

I wasn't grading you; I recognized your intelligence immediately, and frankly, people rarely have issues when dealing with me.

The inquiry was perhaps whether you perceive something that eludes my view... a way to assist me so that I might subsequently apologize to the "Ministry of Love and Truth" for my rather crude language.

And as for that man... yes... I owe him nothing, yet he suffers regardless.

Besides, you aren't some global icon, just a local player. 😉

Once again, I have wandered off course while lost in my own thoughts...

It isn't the mistakes he has made that matter, but rather the ones he is destined to make. ..It is patently obvious he is on a downward trajectory.

Best regards,

P.S. You didn't write "perhaps"; you wrote "certainly," and quite rightly so. Those who cannot see it simply do not know. It isn't a confession; it is a statement of fact.

Alexander Thompson said:"Angry wounds breed angry grass," as they say. Is that your take, Perma?

There was simply no basis for calling that a "friendship"... that is an undeniable truth. I won't elaborate further, but as an anarcho-communist, I find such an association on your part to be fundamentally pathological. If one meets force with force, isn't there always the risk of a dangerous escalation? You really ought to read the entire piece—or at least a significant paragraph—to grasp the context, the underlying concept, and most importantly, the core message: evil is evil regardless of its label. However, evil does not emerge from a vacuum; it has causes, just like everything else in this world. Dictatorship might serve as a temporary corrective to provide direction, but it is a disastrous long-term guide.
As Pythia once suggested, one shouldn't cling to the law like a drowning man clings to a straw.
By the way, you should look into the history of the fascist movements before that patient and criminal Pavelić seized power.

Just pulling something out of a hat here.
https://otporas.com/zasto-je-kako-je...u-ljuta-trava/

The inquiry specifically concerned the "chosen people"...

Besides, there is no need to clutter this polluted section of Reddit with more posts from the moderators.

It isn't about me... I simply seek the truth, rather than the delusions of an ignoramus wielding moderator authority.
Could you perhaps clarify your vision of where the hate speech lies here?
You wouldn't believe it, but every once in a while, those in power actually bother to correct an injustice.
Though at this point, it seems entirely irrelevant how penalties are applied, doesn't it?
However, if the intelligent constantly yield, then fools will rule the world.
Does it not strike you as being precisely the case?
The beauty of such a statement is its ambiguity; much like the prophecies of Pythia, almost everyone assumes they are the clever one...

When looking back at all the bans—specifically those four permanent ones—it becomes clear they were based on animosity toward a truth that I perceived before anyone else. But ego and pretension are far more powerful in those who realize they aren't quite as brilliant as they think, given there is always someone sharper lurking nearby.

But what you might not realize, though it is evident from my signature... there are those of "us" who collect both cardboard and bans...
We play a game, and for "us," the moderators are merely fellow users... a bit kinky, really... we seek out intelligence.
Among the users, there are some truly intelligent individuals...
And ultimately, why should I "have to or want to write here" at all, or even be permitted to, when this is their playground?
The problem is that I respect their rules, yet it remains utterly inconsequential.
I am not important in any meaningful sense... it is sufficient that someone intelligent reads what is being written, or has been written.

Regardless of what I have "received," they will not receive anything, yet they will feel it... for a very long time...
just as I warned him sufficiently early.

Casey Bennett said:I was a bit taken aback. 😁
You’ve confused me with someone else. I don't have a son. I have mentioned my daughter quite frequently across various topics.
As for anything else, I won't bother, since this isn't actually about me, dear. ... 😬
Though I did suspect this would turn into a tedious ordeal. 😉

Oh, so you aren't who I "assumed" you were—though your protective tone caught me off guard at the time, leading to my initial assumption, which was clearly a double error on my part. Regardless, I suppose "Athens" will simply sweep this whole mess away with a broom.
(It is unfortunate that I don't "follow" your contributions, even when I notice your posts appearing at the end of a thread... I only engage when the subject turns to me, particularly after that rather emotional display of yours during our previous encounter regarding wearybison63—where one forum member actually interpreted my input with genuine insight, unlike your reliance on ad hominem attacks and offers I have zero interest in, given that I laid out my proposal long ago regarding whom one should "return," accompanied by a most generous offering as a gesture of mercy.) I am not providing an exhaustive breakdown just so others can "witness" the clutter...

But yes, we are not the topic at hand... not entirely.

That said, are you interested in a son? 🕺

wearybison63 said:I fail to see where the issue lies if Elon Musk truly were gay.🤷

Welcome aboard.
Well, that’s just it. Larry Walker24 The issue at hand isn't actually about Nikola Tesla; the problem lies entirely with some other degenerate. 😉

A few months back, after I pointed out the sheer inability of the individual mentioned above to connect basic facts—I have the evidence ready if anyone actually cares, though I was banned three times for no reason just so he could flex his newfound authority—the man had the audacity to label me an antisemite. He then saw fit to award himself a staggering 500 points for such a pathetic outburst.

The administrators failed to respond to my pleas—pleas that struck such a chord with me that I eventually grew weary and decided to seek answers on the other side of the world.

We find ourselves thrown directly into the fray, without the luxury of a slow build or a gentle introduction. It is the classic *in medias res*—plunging headlong into the thick of the action while the dust is still settling from the previous explosion. There is no preamble here, no polite handshakes or lengthy expositions to prepare the mind. We are simply dropped into the center of the chaos, forced to make sense of the wreckage as we go. It is an efficient, if somewhat jarring, way to exist, but then again, that is the nature of reality, isn't it? Life rarely offers us a graceful entrance; it usually just shoves us into the deep end and expects us to swim.

Dear Jerry Robinson56,

I have been issued an infraction on Reddit.

Reason: Hate speech

(for ban) If you harbor an antipathy toward Jews, I suggest you keep those sentiments to yourself.)

I find myself returning to this particular thread on Reddit quite often. It serves as a grim reminder of how certain historical narratives are meticulously constructed and then presented as absolute truth. One cannot simply look at the facts of the past without acknowledging the heavy hand of propaganda that shapes our collective memory. It is quite exhausting to witness the constant attempts to sanitize or distort significant events. There is a certain cynicism required to navigate these discussions without losing one's grip on reality. People tend to cling to their biases like life rafts, even when those rafts are made of nothing but falsehoods and half-truths. History isn't just a collection of dates; it’s a battlefield of perspectives. And frankly, most of the battles being fought in these online forums are won by whoever has the loudest voice or the most convincing lie, rather than whoever holds the actual truth. It’s a wearying cycle, but one we seem destined to repeat indefinitely.

Even within the entries of Britannica, you will find that specific terminology which members of the Jewish community frequently employ themselves.

Can someone please point out exactly where the hate speech is?
It is quite a curious realization that I am actually younger than this particular moderator, especially considering he goes around presenting himself as a professional journalist. 🤦
I should probably remind him.

The question of who truly holds the reins of power remains one of those persistent, nagging ambiguities that keeps political analysts up at night. Looking at the current landscape, you have to wonder if we are witnessing a genuine shift in authority or merely a sophisticated rebranding of old hierarchies. It’s easy to get lost in the noise of daily headlines, but if you step back and look at the structural mechanics at play, the picture becomes much more cynical. Power isn't just about who stands behind the podium; it's about the institutional inertia and the shadowy interests that dictate policy long after the cameras stop rolling. We see these patterns repeating throughout American history—a constant cycle of perceived leadership versus the actual levers of control. It's a wearying realization, but one that anyone paying attention should eventually reach.

Who exactly bears the responsibility for the massacre in Sabri and El Shat?
The massacre at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in mid-September 1982 stands as one of the most egregious acts of barbarism in recent history. During that period, several hundred unarmed women, children, and elderly individuals were systematically slaughtered.

Someone needs to educate him, because he clearly lacks even a basic grasp of the significant historical events from the distant past—events where direct evidence isn't easily accessible because the records remain sealed. However, through simple logic, one can easily discern the reality of the situation. It is patently obvious that he hasn't the slightest clue how these operations actually function. By mere coincidence. There were several instances of aerial bombardment during exercises conducted by the Royal Yugoslav Air Force under the patronage of the RAF... specifically targeting the El Shat refugee camp.

P.S. I truly hope that... Dear It isn't personal...

Allow it, because I love you.
It is summer, after all. People are bored, and despite all the various troubles and inconveniences currently plaguing us, I suppose we could all stand to have a laugh once in a while. Kisses.

Casey Bennett The user states:
It is truly remarkable when someone who spends their entire existence condescending to everyone else—insisting that we are all nothing more than uneducated barbarians—suddenly manages to stumble into an idea so profoundly idiotic that even they should be embarrassed. It’s almost impressive, in a deeply pathetic sort of way. 🙏

This isn't about me, my dear. When I’m writing at lower levels, I find it incredibly difficult to adhere strictly to "someone else's rules." However, I see that an era of intelligent design has finally begun to take hold, given that you have started your sentence with a lowercase letter. :smack:

Casey Bennett said:I am simply sitting here, waiting for someone to churn out at least two full pages of dense prose just to twist my words and insist that I misunderstood them. Because, clearly, I am uneducated and incapable of basic comprehension. Naturally. His intellectual peaks are quite something. I suppose I should address this matter directly. It seems we have reached a point where certain truths can no longer be ignored, regardless of how much one might wish to evade them. One cannot simply bypass the inevitable consequences of our current trajectory. It is, quite frankly, exhausting to witness such persistent avoidance. Dammit. I fail to grasp the point. 🙂

Just you wait. 😁 It isn't a matter of lacking an education; rather, it is a failure to properly apply the knowledge one already possesses. In essence, you have the capacity to act, yet you simply choose not to.
Perhaps you will actually find a way to apply the knowledge you possess.
And then there is the matter of the residue. One cannot simply overlook the leftovers of any given endeavor, no matter how trivial they may seem at first glance. It is the persistent, often overlooked accumulation that defines the true nature of an outcome. Most people rush toward the conclusion, eager to celebrate the finish line, completely oblivious to the sludge left behind in the wake of their progress. They fail to realize that the residue tells the real story—it is the evidence of what was truly expended and what was wasted. It requires a certain level of discipline to account for these remnants, yet most prefer to sweep them under the rug and pretend the process was cleaner than it actually was. In my experience, if you aren't looking at the residue, you aren't looking at the whole truth.I am at a loss for words regarding this particular matter. It seems we have reached an impasse where even my most measured observations fail to grasp the sheer absurdity of the situation. One can only stare into the void and wonder how we arrived at such a point. We can reach an agreement, provided we maintain a certain level of mutual respect throughout the process.

Casey Bennett said:For the most part, it’s the honest truth. Though, frankly, I doubt he even recognizes his own rhetoric when he revisits his older posts. It seems clear enough that he is somewhat homophobic. 😬

You are quite remarkable. 😁 I am certainly not homophobic. In my estimation, homosexual individuals are, for the most part, exceptionally talented people.
And I suspect you actually find it quite agreeable that I am this way.

Just a side note: I don't actually read what I write; I simply commit it to memory. 😉

No, there is simply no point in arguing... that moderator is utterly incompetent. You have no idea how many times I actually stepped in to defend him via private message whenever others tried to warn me about his little outbursts. There is a certain level of solidarity among the forum members, after all, but even my patience has its limits.
One might be tempted to file a formal grievance regarding this particular moderator’s utter incompetence. Frankly, acting as a moderator seems to degrade a person's character, especially when they supposedly deal with patients—though, if we follow your logic, characterizing forum users as "patients" once they depart is quite telling. It mirrors the atmosphere in psychiatry, does it not?

And so, a final farewell to my lady.

Imagine form
of a polar diagram... don't just settle for a single orientation... there.
Everything will become significantly clearer to you. I am documenting the truth within a margin of ±3dBw
(included), regardless of how bizarre it may seem.
I have written somewhat more than I originally intended, not because of you or myself, but because of your exceptional son.🙂

P.S. ... yes, I appreciate the time you've devoted to me; I have a profound appreciation for intelligent women.
(a reminiscence on the transience of all things)

Arthur Smith15 said:Before you start lecturing others on how to "study the meaning of an expression," perhaps you should first address your own incoherent, ungrammatical, and frankly illiterate nonsense such as the following 😁 ...

... 😁

The subject isn't me ...
though one cannot ignore that habitual, masochistic craving for a verbal slapping you seem to have developed once again.
However, I shall spare you ... have a pleasant day.

🙂a game is just a game

Review: Correcting Chronic Misquotations

lonetrucker4 said:Furthermore, there is a blatant violation of subforum etiquette here: making apodictic assertions without providing any supporting evidence.

You really ought to study the actual meaning of the expressions you use, because the sheer scale of your ignorance is catastrophic.
Your manufactured indignation reeks of exclusivity... once you finally get your driver's license, perhaps you'll grasp reality.

Elon Musk was certainly a scoundrel by nature, given how he left debts everywhere and lacked even a basic sense of stability.
He pilfered others' ideas and passed them off as his own. There are plenty more examples if one cares to look.
Elon Musk was undoubtedly homosexual, but that is irrelevant; it was his choice.

And he wasn't some subpar "inventor," but recognizing that requires an actual education, rather than merely scavenging through other people's texts to create a veneer of intellect.

http://www.energetika-net.com/vijest...eksualac-20036

Anthony Szigeti... vanished without cause... but that is a separate matter entirely.

https://medium.com/belover/the-queer...a-2809416d79c9

lonetrucker4 said:If you had intended to engage in a civil discussion, we could have actually debated the sexual orientation of Elon Musk.

You should take that up with homosexuals... it is quite obvious you find the topic appealing.
(I assume I shouldn't have to provide a link to document your obsession.)

Michael Jackson10 said:The same thing happened to me once; the unit just sat there overnight and then suddenly functioned again. It is a common misconception that high-voltage capacitors in a power supply drain "in 10 seconds" just because you toggle the power button. That is an urban myth. It simply does not work that way due to how the signal pins behave; you have to wait until a stable input and output voltage is established on the lines. Sometimes, one must simply exercise patience—provided, of course, that you aren't opening up the power supply to forcibly discharge a capacitor with a load.
In my other experience, the PC was dead, and replacing the power supply solved it. There was likely a power surge that bypassed the internal protections and fried a component.

Not quite... you absolutely can drain them by toggling the power on the PC to bleed off current. That is precisely how they are engineered. The power supply cannot distinguish whether it is connected to a live grid or not, but it retains enough energy—depending on the capacity and quality of the capacitors—to bridge the gap for a few milliseconds, which is often just enough time for a relay to switch contacts. Some UPS units don't even use relays, but that is a different conversation entirely, much like military-grade circuitry designed to draw almost nothing in standby yet engage the system instantly upon activation.

Michael Jackson10 said:To return to the root cause: did you flip the switch on a power strip and then hear the circuit breaker trip?
If that is the case, that cheap power strip is the culprit. It is hardly healthy for a computer to deal with constant arcing through a low-quality switch. The build quality is abysmal; you get sparking, erratic current flow, and those cheap metal contacts in the sockets are notoriously unreliable. Modern electronics are becoming increasingly delicate.
Alternatively, consider what else was plugged into that strip. Something might have tripped the breaker—for instance, a laser printer in standby mode can pull a massive instantaneous load when it wakes up. Something is fundamentally wrong there. This issue with the PC is merely a symptom, not the primary cause.

🙂 Electronics are sufficiently robust, though we do see a trend toward minimizing that durability. 😉

P.S. ... It eventually powered up because enough micro-arcing occurred during those failed attempts to finally establish a solid electrical contact.

Daniel Robinson59 said:I’ll attempt an explanation, assuming it makes sense.
I have a power strip plugged directly into the wall. My computer, monitor, and internet router are all connected to it. Then, another power strip is daisy-chained from that first one, which holds my PS5 and other gear.
The moment I shut down my PC, I hit the switch on the second power strip to turn on the PS5. Immediately, the circuit breaker in my house tripped. After flipping the breaker back on, I spent an hour trying to get the PC to boot—and look, I am certainly no novice when it comes to hardware.
I even opened the chassis to ensure everything was seated correctly, vacuumed out the dust, and double-checked the connections. Nothing worked; I couldn't get it running until this morning.
That specific power strip wasn't cheap; I paid about $50 for it, thinking a high-quality unit would be worth the investment. However, I noticed a couple of months ago that the switch seemed faulty. It wouldn't stay off, for instance, when I left for vacation; it would just spring back without clicking into place. Then, suddenly, after I returned, it started working normally again.
But it seems the issue lies within that switch, so I won't be using the toggle at all moving forward.

Precisely. That is exactly what happened. Switch contacts are often poorly manufactured. When you engage them, the resulting surge can cause arcing, which damages the contacts and creates transients due to poor or incomplete contact. This extends the duration of the surge, which is more than enough to trip a circuit breaker reliably. There is also the matter of timing. Since current follows a sine wave, if you happen to hit the peak of a cycle when engaging the switch, you trigger an enormous current spike. You may have heard old stories about light bulbs exploding under similar conditions; this is essentially the same phenomenon.

Motherboards rarely die simply because a power supply fails. It is highly improbable that the secondary diodes fail that quickly. Usually, the fuse is over-engineered to blow first, or perhaps a transient protection component like a FET or a sacrificial resistor takes the hit instead.😁 (transient - FET) or a protective resistor.

Replacing the switch is a straightforward task and should only cost you about $5.00.

wearymason4 said:Modern power supplies utilize both a bridge rectifier and electrolytic capacitors at the input stage. This setup causes a significant current spike during startup while the capacitor charges up. If you have several devices plugged into a single power strip and flip the switch, the combined total of those inrush currents can easily trip a circuit breaker.

🙂 precisely so; you’ve hit the nail on the head, though one should also account for transient phenomena. Every switching power supply employs a bridge rectifier.
Inrush currents can actually exceed the rated maximum consumption by as much as ten times, even if they only persist for a few milliseconds.
Higher-end power supplies often incorporate circuitry to slow down this charging process—specifically the initial filling of the main reservoir capacitor—for the express purpose of mitigating these sudden surges.

John Cook72 said:when there’s a sudden power outage on the grid (potentially accompanied by voltage spikes or oscillations), some static voltage lingers within the power supply—likely trapped in certain capacitors or transistor circuits—and then the unit simply refuses to kick back in. I don't have the circuit diagrams for the PSU or the motherboard handy, but this is just an observation from practical experience.

I pull the power cord directly from the back of the power supply for about ten seconds, then plug it back in.
Most of the time, it starts working again and responds to the power button normally.

You actually have to unplug it at the source; if you just flip the switch on the wall outlet, the impedance of the cable itself continues to affect the power supply.

The phenomenon you experienced is perfectly normal, but your explanation isn't quite accurate, given that you aren't an electrical engineer. Energy only remains stored in the capacitors, but what happens is that the starting conditions become disrupted, preventing the protection circuit from engaging properly.

Any power supply equipped with a soft-start button rather than a hard kill-switch remains active, albeit at a significantly reduced power state when turned off. It is common knowledge that when things go haywire, as you described, one should unplug the cable from either the computer or the wall outlet for a few seconds to allow the capacitors in the PSU to discharge before attempting a restart.
And please, refrain from mentioning impedance; it is utter nonsense in this context ...as I stated, do not speak on subjects beyond your expertise. With power cables, the contact point is the most critical factor. Inductance, capacitance, and resistance are negligible here. Besides, we are dealing with a frequency of 60 Hz. I assume you are familiar with Omega and its relation to Xc and Xl

If you have actual questions, feel free to ask... there is no prestige to be gained by pretending in electronics.
It is a matter of pure, elegant logic.

analogbear40 said:Topic: Album titles consisting of two words—where the first is an adjective and the second is a noun.

01 Duran Duran - Big Thing

02 Deep Purple - Perfect Strangers

03 The Rolling Stones - Emotional Rescue

04 Depeche Mode - Black Celebration

05 U Škripcu - Nove godine

06 HAUSTOR - Treći svijet

07 AZRA - Filigranski pločnici

08 Prince & The Revolution ~ Purple Rain

U Škripcu - Nove godine (1983)

HAUSTOR - Treći svijet (1984)

(1982)

Purple Rain · prince & The Revolution (1984)

analogbear40 said:Topic: Album titles consisting of exactly two words—an adjective followed by a noun.

🙂 You failed to specify whether we are looking for singular or plural titles 🙂

01 Duran Duran - Big Thing
02 Deep Purple - Perfect Strangers ... on some beach out in Malibu

Deep Purple - Perfect Strangers (1984)

i know i must remain inside this silent well of sorrow 😉

Subject: Song or band titles featuring famous athletes

01. Deep Purple - Maybe I'm a Leo / Lionel Messi
02. Suzanne Vega - My Name is Luka (Luka Modrić)
03. Oliver Dragojevic - spavati Katarina (Katarina Witt)
04. Bob Dylan - Sara (Sara Kolak)
05. Franz Ferdinand - Michael ( Michael Jordan)
06. Steppenwolf - Magic Carpet Ride (Magic Johnson)
07. queen - Somebody to Love ( Wagner Love
08. Michael Jackson - Ben (Ben Johnson)

Topic: A song title or band name must feature a famous athlete's name

01. Deep Purple - Maybe I'm a Leo / Lionel Messi
02. Suzanne Vega - my Name is Luka (Luka Modrić)
03. Oliver Dragojevic - spavati Katarina (Katarina Witt)
04. Bob Dylan - Sara (Sara Kolak)