CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Brandon Castillo4 › Posts

Posts by Brandon Castillo4

748 posts shown.

Fahrenheit 9/11 in Movies ·
Moore did a decent job here, even if he was being incredibly biased. He tore Bush apart from top to bottom, which honestly makes for much more compelling viewing for Americans who were misled—first by the elections and then by dozens of other ways—than it does for us. The documentary keeps the scope somewhat localized, and while a few segments are genuinely fascinating, others are just plain morbid. I wouldn't bet money that everything in there is 100% factual, either. How should I put it? One anecdote is a fluke, two make a pattern, but anything beyond that feels "too good to be true." Just typical American business.
What's next after the White Button? in Music ·
Disciplin A Kitschme 🙂 👍
What if I'm pregnant? in Health ·
What if I'm pregnant?

Then you could end up having a kid.
The dangers of sitting at a desk all day in Health ·
Look, nothing's actually happening to me, but I'm not messing around here. I've been glued to a computer since I was a kid. My vision is perfect, and honestly, I don't deal with any physical symptoms from screen time—well, except for my back acting up when I'm *not* at the desk, but thank God, sitting in front of the monitor doesn't cause me any issues. At most, I just feel a bit drained after a solid 10-hour stretch. 😁
Arthur Barnes said:What on earth is "Neven's ointment"? Are you talking about Neven Ciganović? 🙂

😂 😂 🤣

Anyway, hope you feel better soon, Arthur Barnes👍 🙂
Brandon Castillo4~ said:Based on how things kicked off, I’d probably lean toward a 3-1 scoreline.

🙏 🙏 😁
Kate Bailey2 said:🙂

the game kicks off at 2:45 AM 😁

I'm definitely tuning in 🙏 👋
Chloe Palmer2 said:Brazil pulled it off in the shootout. Ronaldinho is playing like an absolute beast right now. Honestly, the whole Brazilian squad looks incredible, except for Belletti—that guy can't even find a spot on the Barcelona roster, let alone here, so he's struggling. And what’s the deal with Cafu? Why isn't he getting any playing time...?
I haven't even noticed Ronald is missing; Robinho is stepping up and playing out of his mind.

I'm with you on Belletti. He’s just not on my level. As for the rest of them, 👍

They're broadcasting Argentina vs. Brazil this Wednesday.🙏

🙏 🙏 🙏
Brazil had two massive scoring opportunities there, but somehow the Paraguay defense just managed to clear the ball. What’s your take on how this match is going to wrap up?

I'm hoping for a 1-1 draw, but looking at how things started, I'd probably bet on a 3-1 finish.

Come on Gaucho, give us a few legendary plays! 🙏
image
BRAZIL: Dida, Belletti, Lucio, Roque junior, Roberto Carlos; Emerson, Ze Roberto, Kaká, Ronaldinho gaúcho; Robinho, Adriano. Coach: Carlos Alberto Parreira.

image
PARAGUAY: Villar, Canizza, Gamarra, Cáceres, Paulo da Silva; Boneta, Ortiz, Paredes and Torres; Roque santa Cruz, Cardozo. Coach: Aníbal Ruiz.

Look at that Brazil lineup... Kaká, Lucio, Gaucho, Adriano, Robinho, Dida.

😲 😲 🙏

But I've gotta root for the Paraguay guys. 👋
Since the game is airing on our other channel anyway, we might as well get together and actually break this down properly.🙂

Who’s actually tuning in?

Just look at that Brazil lineup 👍. With Ronaldinho on the pitch, it’s going to be absolute magic.

But honestly, I find myself pulling for Paraguay here. They’ve been my absolute favorite squad since that World Cup back in '98.

LET'S GO PARAGUAY!! 👋
The only frustrating thing is that I can't help but root for Brazil 😁. If this were Argentina vs. Paraguay, I’d be going absolutely nuts cheering for them.😁
Starbucks in Health ·
Stop whining, Kraft isn't even that great. Honestly, it's starting to get on my nerves.

I'm heading over to grab a drink now since there's nothing else left in the house.🙄 😠
Brenda Scott14 drinks like a fish 😍 ☕
Starbucks in Health ·
silvermason16 said:I started checking the ingredient labels on everything I buy,
so if I spot E 330 or something like E 124, I’m just not touching it.


😂 😂 🤣 😂 😂 👍
Check out this latest shot taken from orbit using what looks like alien tech:

image
nimblemarlin17 said:That's because those two photos aren't capturing the exact same millisecond. In the actual shot, William Gallas has already jumped into the net, which is why his leg—which is clearly mid-air and not planted on the ground—looks closer to the line. It’s all about hundredths of a second. Besides, if the goal were actually valid, you'd see it clearly on any standard video replay.

You think YOU would have seen it?😁

Look man, no offense, but I think you're overthinking this. They ARE the same moment. And honestly, who even cares? On the REAL photo, you can clearly see where his foot is, and the other one is definitely inside the goal unless you pulled six ribs out of him and hid them under your pillow.☕

Anyways, what's your take on Milan vs Juventus tomorrow? My money is on a 0-0 draw and everyone goes home happy.😉
If he’d been playing with eleven men and sitting out on a red card, I doubt Chelsea would have even stood a chance. BUT::

I hear you, it's not the same thing, though I’m still sticking to my guns that the ball definitely crossed the line.
I’d love for you to explain the massive difference between these two images:

Look, I get it—you aren't exactly a fan of Liverpool FC and their run to the final, and honestly, I don't blame you. They haven't exactly been playing some perfect fantasy football up to this point, but let's be real here: why are these two images—the Comcast graphic and the ACTUAL photo—so wildly different? Why is William Gallas's foot shown at least 15 cm away from the line on the Comcast graphic, when in the REAL photo, it looks almost EXACTLY on the line (or at least way, way closer)?

image

image
You claim you've got two eyes... well, my two eyes (and hopefully they're working fine 😁) are telling me there is a VERY HIGH PROBABILITY that the ball crossed that line.
Even if it wasn't a goal—and looking at the replay, that seems highly unlikely anyway—we’re totally ignoring the fact that Chelsea would have spent 92 minutes playing shorthanded without Petr Čech in the net. They wouldn't have even been able to set up a defense because there's a massive chance Liverpool would have just buried a penalty. Honestly, if that had gone in, I bet we’d be looking at a 3-0 or 4-0 blowout for the home side, and all these pointless debates would have died right then and there.
nimblemarlin17 said:Well, the verdict is finally in today—it wasn't a goal. So here we are, looking at a finalist who hasn't managed to find the back of the net in three straight games. Fantastic work, everyone! Cheers to that. 🙄

Who exactly "decided" this? Did The Sun call it? Or was it some official over at the Arena?

Honestly, though, who actually gives a damn...👋
Fox News said:Look, he's your leading scorer. If you don't want to talk about him, then fine, let's just open up a whole new thread about Cissé.👍

No, this guy is enough. And since this discussion has devolved into nothing but cheap provocations for a while now, I'm closing this thread. 😉👍