Posts by Nicholas Nguyen

Regarding that, praise me, oh heavens.

Topuria absolutely dismantled Mitchell.
I've been tracking him since his early days in the UFC, and honestly, I think he'll be ready for the big stage in a year or two.

Lawler is out

shadowcobra89 said:The fact that they don't provide health insurance is staggering to me.🙏

It’s pretty straightforward: give the fighters more rights and better pay. If the organization is actually as successful as they claim to be, these expenses shouldn't be an issue...

On top of that, beginners are walking in with a $10,000 minimum per fight.
After you settle up with the IRS, pay for the gym, coaches, sparring partners, physical therapists, and everything else, there's nothing left.
And when you factor in that most of these guys only compete once or twice a year...

You'd make more money flipping burgers at McShit.

Absolutely nothing 😲

It’s an impossible mission unless someone decides to go rogue. They’re essentially shielded from the Mediterranean bear

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:My only real wish is that the boss would just drop this whole ridiculous ideology he’s clinging to and finally bring some actual democracy to the forum... It's a pretty wild thought, isn't it? 🙂

Exactly.

I think Larry Walker24 has a better shot at winning Eurovision than he does at getting a pardon on this forum.

Frank Foster6 said:I really should return the favor to bluecyclist64 for the lovely compliments he regularly showers me with every time I post a card, even though he’s nowhere to be found in those specific forum debates...

The guy is one of the most aggressive trolls and time-wasters on this board. It's hard to pin him down because he contributes absolutely nothing—at least not to the history PDFs I follow. He acts more like some pundit commenting on daily news, using a "polite" vocabulary that would get most regular users permanently banned if they dared to engage in discussions with that kind of tone...

In the five or six years I've been tracking his presence in my threads or within the history PDFs, this user hasn't once provided a single link, a PDF, or a peer-reviewed paper to back up his claims. As I mentioned, his views are mostly just personal musings on daily life that have zero connection to the topics at hand, or perhaps touch upon them by a mere fraction of a percent...

He's a poor contributor who offers nothing but grand, pseudo-intellectual conclusions that are forgotten by tomorrow. Day in and day out, it's the same thing. Honestly, I think it's time we did him a favor and issued a permanent ban. Let's bring in a new commentator to take his place so we can finally move on from this endless cycle...

bluecyclist64, I hope you aren't offended by my choice of words, and please, try to be gentle when you respond...

This is a perfect description of the situation.

Exactly

Great film. One of my all-time favorites...

What did you honestly expect from a woke forum?

The approval came from an incredibly ideological and politically driven group of moderators on this platform.

Look, I’m still going to vote for him, but this pathetic, biased moderation on this and other threads is absolutely disgraceful.

James Harris34 said:This year, they’re going out of their way to make sure the awards are split perfectly between men, women, Black people, white people, Asians, Jews, the dead, the living, the old, and the young. Who cares about the actual quality of the film?

It's predictable. Once the far-left took over Hollywood, they started calling all the shots—essentially "canceling" anyone who doesn't fit their mold. 🤣

A masochistic pest (Larry Walker24) targeting a sadist (the moderator):

Larry Walker24: Strip me down and show me some clips from the Grammy Awards
Moderator: No.

Casey Bennett said:If everyone is ignoring you, it’s because they all think you're just making a scene for nothing.
Reporting a post doesn't result in an automatic penalty.

Sure. It’s clearly about WHO gets reported. If you don't have status, you get handed a red card immediately. 👍

Still nothing new on this forum.

The moderators clearly don't grasp the concept of free speech. They think they can ban anyone whose opinion doesn't align with their own—targeting perfectly decent users—while simultaneously letting trolls run wild, jump down people's throats, and toss out insults.
I won't even get into the moderators' ridiculous excuses on the first page, their absurd analogies, or how they constantly derail the conversation to go off on tangents.

Well done, Brenda Johnson65. 👍
Everything said here is spot on. Some moderators have completely lost the plot; they fail to grasp that their personal opinions as users aren't the same as their official stances as mods. Not to mention how often they go out of their way to provoke people just so they can hand out bans and kick anyone who doesn't toe the line.

This film is pure genius.

Aferim!

...it’s nothing but excessive moderation and overzealous oversight just to get my partial access to the PDF policy revoked.
I'm not as active on this forum anymore, but I'm getting tired of being constantly logged out whenever I want to read an interesting thread about some corrupt local mayor.