Which US sportsbooks actually offer a sign-up bonus where I don't have to deposit a single cent first?? I'm looking for something where if I hit just one bet, I can actually withdraw the cash without having put my own money on the line in the first place.
I see DraftKings is doing $50 BetMGM offers $25 FanDuel has $100 Betway is showing $200
It’s been ages since I picked up a game on Amazon. Last time I actually went through the trouble was forever ago, but if I recall correctly, I used my Bank of America Visa. You should give it a shot.
4/10. This movie is painfully dull—honestly, I don't think it gets any slower than this. Nothing happens for the first 15 minutes, then another 15 minutes of absolute nothingness. It’s a total disaster. If Brad Pitt hadn't been in this, I'd be embarrassed to have even watched it. And they blew a $15 million budget on this mess?
urbanmoose37 said:I wouldn't take my eyes off Ginica for even a second. I've been following her since her early days in the UFC, and honestly, she just caught my attention from the very start.
I didn't even realize he was training in UFC and Muay Thai. Honestly, that exchange caught my eye—neither of them would have backed down from each other if I'm being real. As for the movie? Total waste of time. Banderas and Douglas barely had ten lines of dialogue between them. They were completely useless to the plot.
I’m rocking a Lachesis myself. Honestly, I don't even have much to say about it—nine buttons is plenty for now. Just ask me if you need anything. NAGA has 18 or more, so why do you even care about having that many?
The new Logitech G300 also comes with nine buttons.
So I'm looking at installing this on Windows 7 x64, but what’s the actual payoff here?? Is it just faster boot times?? Does it actually bump up my FPS in games?? Or does it just kill off all those useless background processes clogging up the system??
i5 2500k—don't even bother looking lower than that. you planning on overclocking or what? because if you aren't, that basic Intel stock cooler will get the job done just fine.
Jeffrey Wood said:Picked up The Lord of the Rings - extended version back in the USA maybe four or five years ago. Since then, I’ve gone back to watch them every once in a while, but strictly and exclusively the extended versions. I honestly can't stand—and don't even have the patience for—the theatrical cuts anymore. The more detail you get, the better everything is explained, and the logic actually makes sense. I could go on all day.
Part one—The Fellowship of the Ring—is an extra 30 minutes longer. Part two—Two Towers—runs about 42 minutes longer. Part three—The Return of the king—is an additional 48 minutes.
That adds up to exactly 120 minutes, or two full hours of extra footage. It’s basically like having an entire fourth movie tucked in there.
And the best part? You can't even tell where they tacked stuff in compared to the theater versions. The integration is masterclass level, just like the rest of the trilogy. All that extra footage was shot with the same top-tier quality as the original scenes. It looks seamless. If you're a fan of this series, you seriously need to grab the extended versions of all three movies—the whole set.
Word on the street is they might finally drop the Blu-ray extended version later this year.
Maybe we should just download it. I’ll try to guess where they buried the files.
Honestly, I'm drawing a total blank here. No clue what to say. Maybe Gandalf is heading toward Mordor? I see a gap there, which is probably where he managed to track them down. Join us, Undead army! It’s a massive hole, and they're jumping right out at you from a pirate ship.
My god, what a disaster of a movie,🙂😱🙂,6,9/10 😂😂,the actual film is a total 0/10, but since I’m feeling generous, I’ll give it a 1/10. What an absolute slog. This was hands down the most boring, soul-crushing drama I've ever sat through. I actually need to say a prayer just to recover from this one.
The movie is a joke. Freddy looks ridiculous, and the kill scenes are so predictable you can see them coming from a mile away. Everything about it was totally formulaic. Still, I felt obligated to sit through it—even though I knew damn well it was going to be a waste of time.
Go with the MSI Radeon HD5850 since it's the newest and fastest option on the table. If you actually look at the performance gaps in the reviews, there's no contest—I'm picking the 5850 every single time out of this lineup.
I keep telling them we need to run a poll, you know, just get a clear bill so we can decide on donations. Every $3.25 x 3000 members is basically $10000 enough to upgrade to a better server or maybe $6.75 go even bigger with .
Jeffrey Hill5 said:Hey! I want to overclock my Intel Celeron 2.53 GHz up to 2.9, so I'm wondering how to pull that off. The frequency is 133 and the multiplier is 19. The motherboard is an ASRock 775VM800.
Look, just crank up the N/A. Honestly, whether this Celeron runs at 2.5 or 3.5, you aren't going to see much of a difference. I personally clocked my P4 from 2.4 to 3.4 and only gained about 1000 points in 3DMark 03. Total waste of time if you ask me.
The landscape is shifting weirdly. We’re all praying Windows 7 finally hits this year, and honestly, I bet SSD prices stay sky-high for at least another year before they dip. For me, the real turning point will be when those new Intel Core processors actually get affordable, along with cheaper DDR3 memory and the next wave of GPUs hitting the market.