What are the rules/guidelines for posting?
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Joseph Watson3 said:Doesn't matter. Say I owned a house in the USA, right? Then I'd be worried. ☕
Since you don't live in America, I hope you get red-carded.
130 posts shown.
Joseph Watson3 said:Doesn't matter. Say I owned a house in the USA, right? Then I'd be worried. ☕
Joseph Watson3 said:Personally, I’m sticking with Katolibani Jamahiriya Rvatistan.
Hope that ain't illegal or anything. Don't want the religious police knocking on my door. ☕
Emily Patel64 said:Spamming the daily thread. The way this forum is acting reminds me of that whole spam wave we saw with the local news sites a while back. You could see it coming from a mile away once that trend really took off. 🙄 It was cut short, and honestly? I’d say there was a good reason for it. I'm fine with how it went down.
I honestly don't have the energy to reply to the rest of this.
Emily Patel64 said:I backed him up ages ago because I honestly think he did the most to let people be total JERKS by legitimizing ZgSash along with his pitbull buddies
at least we aren't constantly dealing with him inciting tank invasions on downtown plazas, or letting massive amounts of chauvinism slide under the radar like an aircraft carrier or whatever
but anyway, back to the point
this whole mess started because that spammy site launched some LIES again—the same old users always latch onto them, followed by a bunch of trash that takes days to clean up
why not just put up a disclaimer or something at the start so you can shut down that idiot content before it even starts?
northerntiger said:I'm really curious how people would post here if there was no anonymity—if you had to give your full name and Social Security number just to join.😁
Would granitefalcon26 still be acting all tough about being anti-communist and hating the South like he is now?😁
northerntiger said:Basically, they want five or six people to stop bullying a thousand members just because they started a witch hunt against Ryan Vaughn7 and some others, simply because a mod holds a different opinion than them.
It’s like those pathetic little activist groups or those "task forces" trying to force everyone to think the same way. Get this—how is a mod supposed to issue a warning if they don't agree with the mob? Where does that right come from? Makes zero sense. 🤦
And honestly, it's getting out of hand. Look at the topics popping up lately. It used to be you couldn't question someone else's ban or warning—you could only deal with your own stuff. Now, everyone’s acting like a damn defense attorney for each other. First, there was that blowout over moderation on ZK, and now we've got this drama over in Politics.
If you ask me, mods need to stop making excuses for themselves. Just hand out more permabans. This isn't anarchy. It's a private forum. If you can't follow the rules the mods set, go somewhere else. Start your own site and write whatever you want there. If most of what you do is insulting people or filing complaints with the Prosecutor General, then Politics isn't the place for you.
Also, you guys should probably start reporting certain posts to the police. People shouldn't be using internet anonymity as a shield to spread hate before the owner gets in trouble. Trust me, sooner or later, someone’s gonna file a report.
Full support for the Politics mods. They're doing a solid job. 👍
Melissa Walker86 said:Honestly, I’d ask the same thing. It’s not like Charles Fox10 is finished or anything; everything is still moving through the legal process. Besides, I feel like we’re having some pretty heavy, serious discussions here. Seeing your post shut down an active topic just left me stunned—I was literally mid-sentence typing a reply when it happened. I haven't seen anyone locking up ongoing threads like this on any other forum I've been on.😕