Immigration: General Discussion Vol. IV (Read first post and moderator warning on pg. 309)
in Close to Politics ·
Nicole Barrett76 said:Since we can no longer keep them separated from us in camps, perhaps the most honest solution for everyone involved would be for the state to tie social assistance to a specific duty: caring for the aging European population. We have so many elderly citizens left behind in small towns because the youth all moved away looking for work.
In this scenario, migrants could, for example, spend five hours a day chopping wood for those residents, followed by three hours of intensive language study to facilitate some semblance of integration into the society they have entered. Afterward, a selection process should occur. Those who master the language effectively could be permitted to stay, while those who do not should be sent back via plane. Alternatively, they could be relocated to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the emirate, or Dubai.
Furthermore, language proficiency should be tested so rigorously that staying in the country becomes a genuine challenge to achieve.
Keeping people isolated is counterproductive. Setting up camps on the outskirts of cities is just bad policy; how are they supposed to socialize with the local population if that’s even the goal? You end up creating ghettos filled with people who lack any means of support, and that doesn't bode well for anyone. If they have already arrived, it implies the city leadership intends for them to stay permanently. You won't achieve integration by immediately removing them from society.
As for the idea about chopping wood... I'm not sure if that's sustainable long-term. This is a situation that requires serious, long-range planning.
We could utilize migrant labor for public works projects, or allow locals to provide services for a fee determined by the state. But this needs to be structured as a cohesive, time-bound project.
