silentpuma3 said:Two warnings and two bans.
Those bans were automated; we didn't issue them manually. For severe insults, there’s a standard warning that triggers an automatic 500-point penalty and a 7-day ban. That was issued by my colleague. From my end, you received a discretionary 100-point warning covering multiple posts rather than individual ones for each instance (1, 2, 3, 4, 5—I'm listing these for the admin review; they can see everything), which leads directly to a three-day ban.
Fine, I'm not expecting any special treatment or leniency, but I do expect you all to be just as prompt when it comes to punishing others. We're all equal, right?
If someone called you a psychopath and wasn't sanctioned for it, please send me the link; we'll fix it and apologize for the oversight.
We aren't giving you any concessions, nor do we intend to; we moderate you exactly like everyone else. It just seems this specific point is where the issue lies...
Or is it enough on Psychology forums to mention having schizophrenia in every third post just so you can verbally tear everyone apart without any consequences?
No, mentioning a diagnosis doesn't give anyone a pass to lash out at people. Just like depression or any other condition isn't an excuse. Again, without links showing where this verbal abuse occurred, we can't determine if anything actually happened or if the other party went unsanctioned for doing the same thing. This entire appeal is being vague, which makes it feel quite absurd...
I have nothing left to say to this.
An answer that was either
yes or
no would have been perfectly fine...
How am I supposed to provide links to something that doesn't exist? Are old chat logs with 10,000 posts just gone into thin air? I don't know. And honestly, I don't care anymore, nor do I trust your "fair" judgment.
They exist. They aren't gone. Everything is archived in PDF. If it isn't important, then there's no need to appeal it...
I suppose I could counter that by saying there are definitely true psychopaths within any nation, or at least I've encountered people whose reactions feel undeniably psychopathic to me. That’s just my observation, though. Regardless, I don't see why linking psychopathy to psychology is such a taboo subject. It feels like discussing cancer in an oncology ward... you can't ignore the reality of who might be affected.
Please, get serious. This is getting ridiculous. You’re complaining about someone calling you a bad person without cause, yet you don't see the issue when people are being labeled as psychopaths. There are no links provided, just accusations, and this isn't going anywhere. If the admin wants to lock the thread and move the discussion elsewhere, fine, but for now, the moderators from Psychology have already spent far too much time on this...