Posts by steelorca5

Who would you say is actually the most unattractive person on the off-topic board? It’s a decent enough topic for discussion, I suppose.

Jesse Howard43 said:Personally, I tend to prefer faces that are a bit flatter and less sharply defined in person. I’m not talking about having a totally featureless face, per se, but just avoiding those overly chiseled looks. To me, extreme definition can look a little unnatural.

Do you think Miss C had features that were too sharp? That is, if her look even stays in your memory.

wiredfox said:Not if you ask me—his features are just way too sharp
I’d probably rate him a 5

A five? Seriously? You’re either completely out of your mind or just trolling at this point.

wiredfox said:creepy motherfucker

Scale him from 1 to 10

I suppose he comes off as unsettling mainly due to those missing teeth, but honestly, if he weren't some kind of serial killer, he probably could have made a decent living as a model.

Jesse Howard43 said:You don't get it. He walks with his cheeks sucked in, it's basically a duckface. You can clearly see the tension around the corners of his mouth. It's what they all do, I'm telling you. He also has very low body fat, to the point where he looks malnourished. Looks much healthier in that shopped pic.

That is incredibly based and redpilled; I think you've hit the nail on the head there. I actually just caught another brief interview with Elias, and honestly, he doesn't exhibit that hollowed-out cheek look at all when he’s moving around or just speaking naturally.

That being said, I suppose I have to ask—what exactly are you implying? Are you suggesting that it's physically impossible to possess that specific facial structure without manipulating angles, playing with lighting, or sucking in one's cheeks, regardless of how prominent or protruding a person's bone structure might actually be?

I mean, look at Richard Ramirez. In this instance, he is simply talking casually, yet he possesses that exact same aesthetic without any sort of visual deception. In fact, if you take away the "fraudulent" posing, he arguably looks even better than this model guy, lol.

Jesse Howard43 said:Honestly, I think I look almost exactly like this guy when I'm trying to take a decent photo.

😲 In that case, you might actually be the most attractive person in this entire forum.

Jesse Howard43 said:When it comes to Photoshop, I suspect the vast majority of those images have been heavily edited. It seems they mostly use it to exaggerate or sharpen their facial features.

In person, his facial features probably wouldn't stand out nearly as much. I actually know a few male models, and let me tell you, they look like entirely different people in photos compared to how they appear in real life. On top of that, they almost always pull off this subtle, forced pout during shoots, which definitely serves to exaggerate certain features.

It’s still incredibly obvious when there's actual movement involved—just take a look at this video clip. It matches the photo on the right perfectly, and honestly, that's just the raw shot without any duckface or Photoshop tricks.



It might just be the lighting on the runway, but I honestly doubt that’s the case. He actually looks significantly better here than in that shot on the left—even when you consider those daytime runways where the light is way more washed out and weak.

Jesse Howard43 said:It's just the lens, the lighting, and some Photoshop work.

Please, cope harder. His bone structure is consistently elite; you aren't going to Photoshop facial bones in every single shot.

This is actually the true reason why he’s viewed as such a subhuman by everyone on the left:

Using a low focal length can absolutely distort anyone's face if the shot is taken too close up.

Try taking a selfie with your front camera from a close distance—you'll probably look way worse. Honestly, I look like shit from that angle.

wanderingheron9 said:That’s a solid point. If you use a low focal length while you're too close, it can pretty much distort anyone's facial features.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8f/2d...139d5bd8ca.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7e/1c...b8cb6a0661.jpg
https://media.istockphoto.com/photos...re-id527463761

Honestly, I'm laughing my head off here—how on earth is this the exact same individual?

left = total basement dweller vibes
right = absolute high-fashion icon with perfect structure

Kimberly Rodriguez51 said:Henry Evans10 and steelorca5, talk about dedication to one another—you guys basically poured every single thing you've ever typed on this forum into those verses. 🙏

steelorca5, were you actually head over heels for Hani, though? 🍿

Honestly, I have no clue why he even included that; I suppose he just needed it to rhyme. I don't think I've ever truly been in love in my entire life, so there's really no way I could be doing it over the internet.

That said, almost everything else was spot on, and I have to say, I was quite impressed by how he structured and composed the whole thing. 😁

Henry Evans10 said:He hates taking anything on credit,
yet everyone adores him; they even let him cut the line at ExxonMobil,
he studies people's expressions, you give him a six, then maybe a seven,
he always assumes he's worth more than everyone else,
"Hey man, remember when we used to party?"
No—but I'll pretend I remember just so we can laugh foolishly together,
then steelorca5 heads home, cooks up some chicken and makes a salad,
gets a nice nap and dreams about being a Killer to his old man

Laughing Out Loud, I've been totally blindsided by this one🤣

Kudos, really. I probably shouldn't have written anything about that.

Well, you certainly did your homework, my friend. Just look at the sheer scale of what he's got ready to roll out 🙏 🤣

Emily Cook8 said:Excuse me, but would you mind if I joined in?
It’s a certain persona I’ve been attempting to cultivate within myself.
I suppose I am just far too polite, if you know what I mean, and honestly, it can be quite a hindrance.

Laughing Out Loud, it is truly amusing how you convince yourself you have a sarcastic bone in your body.
When you stand next to an actually attractive woman, the contrast is nothing short of staggering.
You are simply never going to be visually stunning.
But hey, I guess you still have this forum where you can pretend to be some kind of bombshell.

Looking at yourself in the mirror, the reality is pretty pathetic.
They say every woman is beautiful, but in your case, your face is just plain ugly.
You’ve wandered into the wrong place at the worst possible time.
We aren't playing games in a graveyard, and that's exactly where you belong.

Henry Evans10 said:If you keep insisting that you aren't trying to offend me, I suppose you think that’s actually going to make me any less irritated by you.🤣

Little Man, you bald-headed fool.
By most accounts, you’re the biggest clown on this entire forum.
You probably don't even hit six feet tall.
Your lips are unsightly and your ears are larger than the Rockies.

Orlando looks decent enough in that profile picture.
But once you uploaded it in high resolution, it became quite clear there's nothing to see.
You're sorely lacking in muscle mass and substance in your arms.
After this thread concludes, you'll be left in total misery.

You really are the court jester of this site.
This isn't even a fair fight; I'm just tearing into you, and you haven't even brought a raincoat.
I'm feeling quite bloated, so I hope you're thirsty.
Your reputation on every single sub-forum is absolutely pathetic.

Seventy-six thousand posts, and not a single one of them holds any weight.
You’re just a gloomy, insignificant little guy.
You can't even hold your own in a single sentence against me.
If you had Curry's hair, I might consider braiding it for you.

I truly feel for your ex-wife.
I can only imagine how miserable she was, being stuck with an idiot like you.
You talk behind her back, gossiping and trashing her.
Yet, you lack the backbone to say anything to her face.

I have never encountered a bigger moron in my life than this bald buffoon.
When I am finished with him, he'll be left weeping because I've utterly dismantled him.

You talk a big game, but you're completely insignificant.
Since you're addicted to adult films, you might as well just stay home.
If it hasn't sunk in yet, this is a total massacre.

In this whole ordeal, my greatest sympathy goes to your Little Man.
He had no idea his father would turn out to be such human refuse.
They say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
I suppose your son will likely end up just as much of a loser.

With this, I conclude the verse; you are effectively dead to the world.
You should have saved the boy the trouble.

If you’re feeling a bit short on inspiration, I suppose I could step up and go first, though I certainly wouldn't want to cause any offense

It seems we’ve been granted the blessing of our moderator, Louise. Insults are permitted, I suppose, provided they stay within some semblance of decency—we aren't just hurling baseless insults at someone's family here. Furthermore, Louise has decreed that you aren't to mention anyone else; you are strictly limited to addressing the individual you are actually debating.

Henry Evans10, since the elders and the ladies take precedence, please, after you.

>it’s a much better choice

The way I see it, looking at things from our perspective here in the States

What specifically in his post led you to that conclusion?
How did you arrive at that?
What exactly in his post points to that?
How did you pull that from what he wrote?
Whereabouts in that post did you draw that conclusion?

And there are at least ten other ways to phrase the same question—all perfectly understandable and none of them illiterate

As long as the question isn't just plain ignorant and idiotic, like, "So how ya got to that thought from his post? : caveman: in my opinion that's right"

All this other stuff about making it simpler, shorter, or better... it doesn't really matter to me. The most important thing is that the question is clear and that I don't end up looking like a total caveman☕

bluebadger112 said:I’ve spotted some errors. I suppose the grammar itself is fine, but it just doesn't flow right; there's far too much literal translation in the first part and the word order in the second is all wrong. Plus, it’s all a bit too wordy.

grasping at straws ☕

Looks like Eros lost his 😢 main dance partner, and honestly, I think the mods made the right call. I mean, the platform rules against those fringe groups and whatnot, and this Eros guy was constantly lecturing Jesse Howard43 and me about how we were xenophobic—it was pretty obvious he was extremely far-left politically.

Regardless, it’s interesting to see that even here, users are basically hooking up behind the scenes. 😳

electrichawk94 said:That’s the reason why if you snap a gym selfie from a high angle, your shoulders end up looking much broader. 😁

Wait, are you actually making a comment about the last photo I shared in this thread? 😳 🤣

electrichawk94 said:And yeah, my English isn't great since I'm clearly lacking in the brain department. ☕

Honestly, who cares? As long as we get the gist of what you're saying, it doesn't matter. At least you aren't acting like a total condescending jerk like some other users here have. ☕

electrichawk94 said:This might actually exaggerate things even more than they are in real life, simply because of the lens's focal length.

wanderingheron9 said:That's a solid point. Using a short focal length can really distort someone's features if the shot is taken too close up.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8f/2d...139d5bd8ca.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7e/1c...b8cb6a0661.jpg
https://media.istockphoto.com/photos...re-id527463761

So that explains why I look terrible in certain shots.

Good grief, wow. That redhead in the first image looks like a completely different person on the left side. Her face appears much more elongated and thin, her nose looks less attractive, her eyes seem way too wide-set, and her nasolabial folds are significantly deeper.

I wonder if this focal length distortion happens in video as well, or is it strictly a photography issue?

Grace Hayes2 said:Major mommy issues. 😁

Would you mind expanding on that? What specifically in his message leads you to believe he's dealing with mommy issues?

Actually, what does "mommy issues" even mean? There doesn't seem to be a concrete definition for it; I suppose everyone just has their own subjective interpretation of the term. It seems unlike "daddy issues," where the concept is much more clearly defined for most people.

wanderingheron9 said:Damn son 😲
I have to concede that I find myself agreeing with the bulk of his points. Intellectual capacity is a genuine superpower, whereas sleeping with countless random women offers no real guarantee of fulfillment—much like how having an obscene amount of wealth doesn't necessarily lead to happiness.
Man, i also Love playing video Games and watching Michael and jak fra Vsauce too. However, I doubt I’ll ever resort to violence, primarily because i Got a Healthy dose of social intelligence and empathy.
The individual is remarkably sharp; he actually brings to mind our good friend Tab 🤣

Tab Well spotted, he does possess a similar temperament to Tabasco 🤣 though if my memory serves, Tab is a total baldhead

It seems you share a great deal in common with him, then 😲. Your perspectives on society and existence align, you share his taste in video games, you follow the same YouTube channels, and you both have a certain affinity for feet (albeit he's a complete deviant and hardcore fetishist, while you're just a casual fan)

I suppose I might disagree regarding the financial aspect based on my own lived experiences, but when it comes to the matter of women, he is likely correct. Looking ahead, I am considering taking an entire year off—which would involve abstaining from sex entirely and avoiding any kind of orgasm, including through drugs and such (I might even consider going completely off-cycle with zero testosterone for the full twelve months). I truly feel the need to challenge myself once to observe the mental and physical shifts after 365 days; the mental aspect is the priority, of course, as I realize I'll likely sacrifice a significant amount of muscle mass by being off testosterone for a year.

That said, I could potentially make massive strides in my cardiovascular endurance, stamina, and blood pressure. From a physiological standpoint, those improvements would be much more attainable during a sabbatical like this, as I wouldn't be pouring all my energy into the typical bodybuilding grind and meal prepping. To be honest, my joints and overall physique could certainly benefit from a prolonged reprieve from the constant heavy lifting and the cumulative wear and tear I've put my body through over the years.

If 1 are disfigured and deformed people, Dr. Eggman would be 2 (3 if looksmaxed).

In my opinion, 1 is truly revolting and unpleasant to behold, but within my specific ranking system, deformed and disfigured individuals fall into the 0/0.5 category.