CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wiredotter14 › Posts

Posts by wiredotter14

2114 posts shown.

New and Used Photocopiers in Computer Peripherals ·
I’ve got an OKI at my office similar to the one you linked (it’s a 362dn or something close to that).
It’s a decent machine—tough, reliable prints, and the toner isn't too easy on the wallet.
Sadly, after just a few thousand pages, the drum gave out (cost me about $333). The tech told me it was because I used some cheap generic black toner that wasn't up to snuff, so I guess I need to stick to better quality stuff from now on.

Generally speaking, if you want classic photocopying, you need a laser printer—something like that OKI or maybe something beefier.
But honestly? Most people, even entire offices these days, don't really need that anymore since paper-to-paper copying is becoming a rarity.
Usually, you’re either printing something or scanning it to print later.
In those cases, you don't necessarily need a laser that kicks in instantly for copies; an inkjet works fine.

I used to have a Brother 3-in-1 inkjet (the 5910DW) for a long time, and I never felt the need to do high-speed paper-to-paper copying. You either scan 100 pages into a PDF and then decide whether to print it, or you just print some docs or study guides directly. For that, an inkjet is fine, even if it's a bit sluggish with the start-stop rhythm.

Price-wise, the best move is usually going with those EcoTank style printers that have become popular again lately. They're inkjets where you don't bother with cartridges; you just buy bottles and refill them directly. I think Epson, HP, and maybe a few others have setups like that.

Also: do you actually need A3 printing and scanning, or just printing?
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
I’m rocking this monitor right now:

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/monitor-31-5-inch-black-100300310

The picture quality is solid. Since it’s 1440p, you won't be staring at individual pixels like you would on a 1080p screen at this size. Plus, the image looks much sharper when you're downloading 4K movies.

If you've got about $667 in the budget, you could easily grab some speakers for $167 that’ll blow any standard TV audio out of the water.
I wouldn't suggest using a 32" TV for a PC setup, though. Sitting right in front of one like that just kills your eyes.

The only real downside to this monitor is the lack of a built-in TV tuner for live channels.

P.S.

That curved model you linked isn't great for watching movies—unless you're sitting way back in a recliner like you're gaming.
Windows 10 not recognizing printer in Computer Peripherals ·
Try uninstalling the driver first. If it isn't even installed yet, see if you can pull it down through Windows Update.

Go to Windows Settings and check for updates—make sure to look under optional updates too. If that fails, find the device in Device Manager; if it shows up as unknown, try to manually update or install the driver from there.

Otherwise, did you actually grab the 64-bit driver from the official site?
Windows 10 not recognizing printer in Computer Peripherals ·
Where's it getting stuck?
CPU recommendations? in Desktops ·
The 3600X isn't worth it unless it’s basically the same price as the 3600. The only real difference is a slightly better cooler. Just grab the 3600 and an aftermarket cooler instead, or just stick with the stock one.

Otherwise, if you can hold out until the end of the year, you might land a way better deal than a 2070S once the new GTX 1650 drops.

You don't need 32GB for gaming.
AMD Radeon R7 250 and 4K TV in Desktops ·
Me (well, my younger brother) has an extra RX 550 here in Washington, D.C. that’s up for grabs for $67. Shoot me a DM if you want it.

I think this is the one:

https://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/RX550-4G/
DVI Output : Yes x 1 (Native) (DVI-D)
HDMI Output : Yes x 1 (Native) (HDMI 2.0b)
Display Port : Yes x 1 (DisplayPort 1.4)
HDCP Support : Yes (2.2)
AMD Radeon R7 250 and 4K TV in Desktops ·
Bryan Taylor6 said:https://www.overclockers.co.uk/forum...card.18839351/

If I’m reading this right, the Nvidia GT 710, GT 730, and GT 1030 are all fine choices...

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/...

The GT 730 uses HDMI 1.4, so the GT 710 should be the same.

A GT 1030 would be the perfect card here—assuming I can snag one used for no more than $100.

Also, an RX 550 works too.
AMD Radeon R7 250 and 4K TV in Desktops ·
darkowl56 said:Thanks for the reply. Would something like this work better for 50 Hz: Check this out on the Webshop. It’s a Delock adapter—black, 200300317. Just a basic component you can grab if you need it.

I think so. If you're going to grab it, definitely order through the Webshop. Even if you plan on picking it up at a local Best Buy, you’ll still lock in that Webshop price. Plus, you get the whole 14-day return window if it turns out to be a dud.
AMD Radeon R7 250 and 4K TV in Desktops ·
50Hz is fine. Even for gaming, you won't notice much of a difference compared to 60.

Regarding the signal—I doubt it'll work through a passive adapter.
The thing is, those adapters just convert the physical plug. The card detects that and sends an HDMI signal via the DP cable, but it won't magically upgrade the actual HDMI standard the card supports.

Still, you should get native 4K over HDMI at 30Hz, which is plenty for audio editing. It's even fine for video work, considering most footage—especially 4K—is shot at 30 or 24Hz anyway.
GPU Buying Guide - (Read first post) in Desktops ·
He was talking about the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Need help with my HP Envy printer in Computer Peripherals ·
Kava15 said:Please, I lost the manual... where can I find the WPS PIN for the D57562000000?

Thanks!!!!!

Build upgrade ideas? in Desktops ·
Jonathan Barrett said:you can grab a combo from Micro Center—Ryzen 1600 + Tomahawk B450 Max + 16GB 3200MHz—for $933 and you'll still have $733 left over for a GPU.

Quote: said:Also, looking at this Asrock board... does it have any of that RGB gimmickry on it? I'd rather pay more for one without it.

You can just turn the RGB off.

Otherwise, the Tomahawk is easily one of the best B450 boards out there. This combo is a decent deal ($2879, not
) if you're willing to drop that much, but honestly, you don't strictly need it. It won't change your actual performance. $933 The only thing is, if you're planning an upgrade to a much beefier CPU down the road, then yeah, go for it.

As for coolers, the Freezer 34 is perfectly fine; those CPUs pull a bit of power.
The LC-CC-120 is similar.
I’ve got the LC-CC-95 (95mm instead of 120mm) at my cousin's place, and it keeps an i7 3770 quiet—and that thing draws more juice than a Ryzen 1600 or 3600.
Build upgrade ideas? in Desktops ·
Bryan Scott4 said:Yeah, Cyberpunk 2077.

Look, I can bump the budget to $5k, but I'll probably just wait for GPU prices to tank first. I want big brand names though. My current rig lasted forever and I was extremely happy with my motherboard.

What's the deal with ASRock components? Weren't they considered low-tier quality once? Also, I don't recognize the brand for this RAM in the link.

Don't get hung up on brands. It's all model by model. For example, Asus and MSI are known for great motherboards and cards, then they turn around and release the absolute worst junk of the generation. The ASRock B450 Steel Legend is a solid board. That cheaper Gigabyte DS3H is fine too. If you want the deep dive, go watch Linus Tech Tips VRM testing for all the B450 boards on YouTube.

Regarding the RAM, there are only three actual chip makers in the world (Samsung, Micron, SK Hynix). Everyone else just picks chips and sticks them on a PCB.
Just make sure it's 3000+MHz and doesn't have crazy high latency. Patriot is a major player in RAM, but honestly, it doesn't matter much. It comes with a 5-year warranty, and RAM rarely fails anyway.

IMO, grab the platform now with your current GPU, then save up for a better card later. If the Nvidia RTX 3060 ends up being around $400, it might hit our local stores for about $300-$1333. Either that fits your budget, or the Nvidia RTX 2070 (Super) gets significantly cheaper. Plus, we'll see what AMD drops this year—announcements are coming next month.
Build upgrade ideas? in Desktops ·
You talking about Blade Runner?
The specs on this look pretty demanding, especially for the GPU.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cy...ecommendations

Here’s a suggestion for the platform, leaving you some room for the graphics card. You don't have to grab the GPU right away.
Since you clearly need more power there, I’d snatch up an Intel Core i5-9400F AF right now. It's a $300 killer deal. Save the rest of the cash for the GPU.

Just a heads up, stock is thin. If it disappears here, check sites like Amazon or Newegg to see if anyone has it. It might show up in one shop for a few days and then vanish (like seeing it at Best Buy or Micro Center...).

Best Buy

Better option from Best Buy, but it'll push your budget:
https://www.nabava.net/search.php?q=b450+steel+legend

For RAM, try to find 2x8GB CL16 3200MHz under $167, maybe something like

Total comes out to roughly $650

For the GPU, you could go with an Nvidia GTX 1660 Super or, if you can stretch the budget, an Nvidia RTX 2060.
https://www.nabava.net/search.php?q=1660+super

A 1660 Ti sits somewhere in the middle price-wise, but honestly, probably not worth it.
The 1660 Super is definitely a step up from the recommended GTX 1060 6GB, and since the game seems to demand beefier hardware, it should be just right. You could also wait a bit; prices might drop now that new Nvidia cards are out and new AMD ones are coming. An Nvidia RTX 3060 should drive down the prices of everything weaker than it—cards that are currently overpriced, like the Nvidia RTX 2070.
Build upgrade ideas? in Desktops ·
Honestly, you can't reuse that DDR3 RAM; everything worth looking at now uses DDR4. You might be able to hang onto the power supply, though. Might as well sell the motherboard and RAM for whatever pocket change you can get. Maybe grab a GPU for around 500-$200
(just eyeballing it here).
What kind of games are we talking about? What resolution and refresh rate are you aiming for?
The GPU isn't total junk if you're just playing low-spec titles.
Otherwise, an Intel Core i5-7600K for $300 would be a solid upgrade (if you build around that).

Would you consider a used graphics card?
PC build under $1,000? in Desktops ·
neonheron9 said:Is a 500w power supply enough?

btw thanks 🙂

Yeah
Best gaming PC build for under $500? in Desktops ·
You're getting a much better foundation here—dual channel RAM paired with an AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G that punches right up against an R5 3600.
But obviously, right out of the gate, the integrated GPU can't touch any kind of dedicated graphics card.
Best gaming PC build for under $500? in Desktops ·
I’d personally grab an AMD B450 with four slots and pair it with a used GPU because:
- you’ve got room for a CPU upgrade later
- you can just toss in two more sticks of RAM if you start with 2x4GB

But look, if upgrading isn't on the table, then 1x8GB on an A320 is fine. You can always add another 8GB down the line.
Otherwise, I'm with you on the GTX 1050 Ti—honestly, don't waste your money there. Better to stretch the budget for a 1650 Super or hunt down a used AMD Radeon RX 580 that still has some warranty left. Or, if you're feeling reckless, buy something dirt cheap with zero warranty and just say "screw it" if it dies. Those games will run on a GTX 950 too.
The only exception is if you're aiming for an AMD FreeSync monitor; then you either go Nvidia GTX 1000 series or newer, or stick with an AMD card.
Best gaming PC build for under $500? in Desktops ·
If I were him, I’d just pick up a used card. There's a massive influx of them hitting the market right now because everyone is upgrading to the latest Nvidia gear or waiting on the new AMD releases. It's making everything way cheaper.

It makes more sense to sink an extra bit of cash into a better motherboard so the whole build stays relevant longer. Grab a cheap GPU for $233 and just deal with it.
PC build under $1,000? in Desktops ·
Adam Moore3 said:Personally, I’d never go for those massive monitors for everyday use—you know, just sitting at a desk at a normal distance.

1440p on a 27" looks way sharper than it does on a 32". If you really need an oversized screen, fine, but personally, I think 90% of people would find it overkill for a standard setup. You can get used to it, but I don't think it's worth the hassle.
Since he specifically wanted 1080p, I mainly suggested a decent 24" 1080p 75Hz G-Sync monitor. I still maintain that 1440p is a perfect fit for an RTX 3060, provided you don't jump to a screen larger than 30". Again, assuming you're sitting at a standard distance from the monitor.

There just aren't any high-quality 27" 1440p gaming monitors (looking for 75Hz + G-Sync + low input lag) under $667; they're all just basic office displays—that's why I recommended sticking to 24". That 27" AOC model was just an example of what an ideal match for this build might look like.

1) 1440p on a 32" is basically the same density as 1080p on a 23". It's subjective. It isn't some "problem" you have to adapt to like it's a bad thing.
Sure, you sit a bit further back than you would with a 23" monitor, but that's the whole point. Your eyes don't strain as much when you're further away, and when you lean in, you aren't losing resolution since it's the same as a standard FHD screen.

2) Obviously, you could go for 1440p on a 27" if you want higher pixel density. Personally, "standard" density is enough for me.

3) Points 1 and 2 are preference, but the bottom line is that card isn't meant for 1440p 144Hz gaming, so there's no point in getting the monitor you suggested. On the flip side, 1080p 75Hz is almost too low (depending on what you play).
With that card, 1080p 144Hz or 1440p 75Hz would be the move.

4) Back to your monitor suggestion (the AOC 1440p 144Hz). That's a VA panel, which means it has worse pixel response times than an IPS. VA is better for contrast, not speed.
My 32" 75Hz G-Sync AOC works just fine for gaming. Then again, you could always look for something more gaming-focused, like a 1080p 144Hz model.