CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Christian Taylor3 › Posts

Posts by Christian Taylor3

435 posts shown.

Anthony Smith3 said:I didn't really catch that, haha.😁😁

Na Last thing I watched was back in 2009.They basically sang his praises over there.

By the way, I really can't get on board with the idea that this movie doesn't have a "bigger story to tell." Maybe it isn't some grand epic, but it works perfectly as a metaphor for capitalism and consumerism. Honestly, the small percentage of Americans who actually possess a shred of awareness are probably just going to end up flocking to that remake anyway.

Nah, I wasn't really paying attention to who was watching. L'héritage I can't seem to track down anything by Géla Babluani anywhere. It’s becoming a real struggle to actually get my hands on one of his films. 😢
Anthony Smith3 said:To be honest... I hadn't even heard of the original until recently...

Shame on you, have you seriously never seen 13 Tzameti? 🙂

And here I was, actually thinking about sending over that Story Coverage today. Now I think I'll pass—go watch the film first. 😁

Anthony Smith3 said:...and I suspect a lot of people aren't even aware that movie exists...

Speak for yourself, we've been dissecting this thing on here dozens of times. 😉
Well, damn, I certainly didn't see that coming. 😁

Roger Allen3 said:that director sold out pretty fast, 🙂

I mean, honestly, not many people get the chance to head to Hollywood to remake their own movie.

Anyway, the latest flick from Baltasar Kormákur is also hitting the rental shelves. 😉

And he sold out too, along with everything else. 😬
Sundance Film Festival in Movies ·
Roger Long67 said:Since we’re all pretty starved for events like this over here, I ended up rambling a bit more than intended, so if you have the patience, feel free to give it a read.

And here's my two cents on whether it was actually worth the effort: image

image
Sundance Film Festival in Movies ·
Mark Wood79 said:Has anyone checked out the new Iñárritu yet? I know he's on the schedule...

BIUTIFUL
Alejandro G. Iñárritu
Spain, Mexico 138 min

Tonight is the screening (11 PM).

@Richard Wilson4

You really can't afford to miss this one. 😁

There aren't many films over the last decade that have actually left me glued to my seat during a premiere; honestly, there are way more movies that just leave me wondering what on earth I'm doing sitting in a theater. But after a long wait, I found myself completely transfixed on Monday morning in the main hall at Lumiere during Cannes after watching the brilliant Biutiful by Mexican director Alejandro G. Iñárritu. There’s no doubt this thing is going to pick up some hardware—the only question is whether it'll be Best Picture, if Iñárritu takes Best Director, or if Javier Bardem walks away with Best Actor.

Source

BTW, do you happen to know what the weather's looking like tonight? I don't mind driving out to Cleveland, I'm just worried about rain potentially delaying the screening.
Best psychedelic trip scenes in movies? in Movies ·
Great topic.

WHERE THE FUCK WERE YOU??!!

🙏

I’m basically just here to sign off on this and add my two cents:

Harvey Keitel is one of the greatest actors ever. Fuck the Oscars, he never needed one. This is just overkill. He’s right up there with Marlon Brando, and neither of them ever needed an Oscar to prove they’re the absolute best at what they do.

WHERE THE FUCK WERE YOU??

That line belongs in the AFI Top 100 quotes, easy.
The Expendables sweepstakes! in Movies ·
Sweepstakes time!

image

I’m officially throwing my support behind Anthony Smith3 for president! 😁

1: Demolition Man.
2: Demolition Man 2
Yogi Bear (2010) in Movies ·
Yogi Bear’s Tagline is Ruder Than The Average.

The Tagline actually goes: Great things come in bears.

If you need me to break that one down for you, I can offer this excerpt from Wikipedia:

Bear is LGBT slang for those in the bear communities, a subculture in the gay/bisexual male communities and an emerging subset of LGBT communities with events, codes and culture-specific identity. It also describes a physical type.

Bears tend to have hairy bodies and facial hair; some are heavy-set; some project an image of working-class masculinity in their grooming and appearance, though none of these are requirements or unique indicators.

🤣🤣🤣

I wonder how much chaos this is going to cause over at Warner Bros.
Titanic 2 in Movies ·
I don't know about you guys, but I’m starting to think my internal clock is just broken beyond repair.
image

About thirty minutes later:

image

🤣
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
ruggedjackal46 said:I don't see why I'm being called "difficult" just because I refuse to judge a movie that hasn't even been filmed yet. Sorry, but that feels unprofessional to me. It's just as unserious as judging a film solely based on its script. And it's just as ridiculous as judging a film simply because I think the lead character is a total wimp.

'In my opinion'; 'My issue with David Fincher'... No, ruggedjackal46, that (already highly subjective) argument doesn't rely solely on Benjamin Button and those unmade projects involving that weak-willed Mark Zuckerberg. It covers everything. ☕

edit:

That whole 'let's not act like martyrs' thing was probably an unnecessary generalization on my part (well, a paraphrase of it). Mea culpa. 🙂
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
northerncrane4 said:As if the "Panic Room" script was anything special—Fincher just delivered another stellar chamber thriller and pushed the boundaries of CGI once again. Honestly, the only real grievance one can have with Fincher is that he missed out on an Oscar for "Benjamin Button," which remains a perfectly fine film—perhaps even because of its flaws—and sits well above the quality of the other nominees that year. Sure, there are some screenwriting issues, specifically regarding the formulaic plot structure, but is there actually any collection of scripts in Hollywood today approaching the caliber of "Se7en" or "Gamma" that Fincher would pass up just to work with Justin Timberlake? 🤷

Smoogj, Smoogj, you really think Panic Room is that great of a Fincher movie? Personally, I don't see it that way, man, man. image

Everything you actually have against Fincher is just that he didn't win an Oscar for "Benjamin Button," which is a perfectly fine film regardless—or maybe because of that—and honestly sits way above the average of the other nominees that year.

Honestly, I’d probably jump off a building if he had actually snagged an Oscar for Benjamin Button. Luckily for him, he didn't (not even for directing). There's no connection to an Oscar here, nor is Button a bad movie. So, what exactly is my issue with Fincher? It’s just not that dark and stylish Fincher vibe; it leans too hard into melodrama. It feels a bit sugary, regardless of the premise, and frankly, it feels like Fincher kind of messed it up.

There are some flaws in the writing, mainly regarding the formulaic structure of the story, but is there really any collection of scripts in Hollywood today approaching the quality of "Se7en" or "Game" that Fincher is turning down just so he can work with Justin Timberlake? 🤷

Sure, they exist, though maybe not in massive quantities. Anyway, ScriptShadow basically cataloged and reviewed all of them. He even put up download links (yeah, I’m talking about those specific scripts/projects that Fincher eventually walked away from. And for what purpose, exactly? 🤣).

Now we just wait for The Social Network. 🙂

p.s. Word on the street is that Ridley Scott handed this project over to Fincher. 😬
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
Lisa Ross65 said:Among the newer directors, M. Night Shyamalan has really hit a slump. From what I’ve been reading in the reviews, he completely tanked with The Last Airbender—it sitting at a measly 8% on RT.

That’s old news; Shyamalan's slide started right after Unbreakable.
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
ruggedjackal46 said:So, Fincher leaked it? That theory is basically built on nothing more than Benjamin Button and some hypothetical movies he hasn't even made yet. Give me a break.

Let's be real here, we aren't going to pretend otherwise—the script for The Social Network has been out for ages, and honestly, it’s not even remotely close to the old Fincher vibe. Then you have this new hype job, which makes me wonder, good grief, what are we actually doing? A movie about little brat Zuckerberg feat. a newly enlightened Hollywood sweetheart version of Fincher, backed with Kanye West's new single, 'Power." 😕

I could go on forever about Benjamin Button, but if you ask me, there is absolutely nothing
Fincher-esque about it, IMHO. To paraphrase briskfalcon45 (just so there's no confusion): 'Well, he's finally sold out.' Or if you listen to xavierkat talking about Nolan: 'It's as if he's lost his sense of direction and his compass, just surrendering to the masses and simplifying himself so everyone can digest him and love him.' The last time Fincher truly felt like himself was with Zodiac, and since then, he's basically gone off the radar. Instead of maturing as a director, it feels like he's just started to rot.

As for this remake of an already mediocre film, everything has already been said, so I don't see why he even bothered. 🤷
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
ruggedfox28 said:If they can actually turn some supposedly trash materials into high-quality work, then maybe there's hope... The Family Just kicking him while he's down, and we'll probably end up thinking he's even better than he already is... 😉

Of course I’m interested; anything is possible, even if you manage to squeeze some actual substance out of that Hollywood nonsense. For instance, everyone is suddenly (once again!) burying Mel Gibson—totally forgetting they already laid him to rest once before—even though even the "solar-powered" DiCaprio has distanced himself from the guy.Viking I'm just rambling away here, sort of drifting through whatever thoughts happen to cross my mind at the moment. Honestly, getting involved in a partnership like that would probably just be a massive step backward for my career.And for what reason, exactly? So, I went and absolutely trashed my teeth. Some drunk Russian guy in an alcohol-induced delirium finally crawled back to his wife—the woman he’s actually stood by through thick and thin for decades and the mother of his kids. I'm talking about real, organic families here, not some performative nonsense like people going on safaris in Africa or playing around with adoption.

Christian Taylor3 said:Horseshit, looks like Hollywood turned its back on Mel Gibson a long time ago. I still find myself thinking about The Passion of the Christ every now and then, mostly because it’s one of those films that just refuses to leave your head once the credits roll. It’s heavy, sure, but there's something about the way it was put together that feels almost overwhelming in its intensity. They basically cut off his funding entirely—it was almost like they officially disowned him through The New York Times or something. So, what kind of mess did that old drunk actually get us into? This is it.. ☕ I ended up producing, editing, and distributing the whole damn film entirely on my own... honestly, the big shots in Hollywood nearly killed each other just watching me pull it off. It was pure chaos. And then, predictably, the exact same thing happened all over again with... ApocalyptMel Gibson and his whole deal. Icon Yeah, exactly. Honestly, Hollywood could probably do just fine without Mel Gibson. 😁

I’m telling you, only a complete idiot or a total moron would actually raise their hand for Zen, let alone open their wallet for that kind of garbage. Anyway, I guess I'll forgive him; I was practically weeping like it was a torrential downpour when I saw the news.

The foreign press was all over this rumor that Mel Gibson was planning to pack up and move to Australia to live out his days with his ex, Robyn Moore. She actually stepped up to defend him, telling everyone he’d never been abusive, which is quite the statement given how much noise there's been lately.

There’s something honestly beautiful about a woman who actually gives a damn—someone who pulls you close right when you're at your lowest. It’s a pretty incredible feeling to lean into that strength of hers, especially when she's the one dragging me out of my own mess.Kudos to Robyn Moore. 🙏

Let's get back to Fincher. I can't help but feel like that old version of David just isn't around anymore...

image

I'm honestly not sure how much "entertainment value" a movie actually needs to have. Personally, I've always been more drawn to the films that leave a permanent scar on you.

And honestly, it’s worth taking a second to remember what a total clusterfuck that whole situation actually was. I’m just someone who spends way too much time dissecting movies and overthinking plot holes that probably don't even matter. I tend to drift through life with a somewhat dry sense of humor and a tendency to write far more than necessary, usually while nursing a lukewarm coffee and wondering why certain directors can't just stick to a script. I’m not an expert by any means—just a person with some strong, perhaps overly opinionated, thoughts on cinema and a habit of being a little too self-critical about my own tastes. Expect long-winded ramblings and a healthy dose of sarcasm.:

If Fincher weren't a film director, I could easily see him stepping into some other role—maybe one of those Bond villains who gets to wipe out the entire world with a single button press, sending everything into a massive, glorious nothingness.

It feels like Fincher just can't stand the world we've built. To him, it seems like nothing more than a massive stage where he can play the role of some apocalyptic prophet, broadcasting his dark visions to an audience that he desperately wants to provoke into thinking. For this supposed "visionary" crusade, he’s basically recruited a small army of cinematic anti-heroes—ranging from that religiously obsessed killer in Se7en back in '95, to the emotionally stunted billionaire in The Game in '97, all the way up to the chaotic energy of Tyler Durden in Fight Club in '99. Each of them acts as a sort of messenger for Fincher's specific brand of cynicism, and honestly, they've become such staples of modern film and pop culture that they sometimes end up overshadowing the director's own aesthetic, especially when you look at what happened with Tyler Durden.

It took three long years for this to finally happen, but when it did, he jumped headfirst into the director's chair for that grim, unsettling thriller Se7en, based on an equally original script by Andrew Kevin Walker. It’s pretty much a given that both Walker and Pitt will become some of Fincher's most frequent creative collaborators in the years ahead.

In this tale about hunting down a religiously driven killer who punishes his victims by trapping them within their own sins—basically a twisted take on Dante’s concept of retribution—the director really starts to lay bare his own core obsessions. You can clearly see Fincher's preoccupation with things like spiritual emptiness, hypocrisy, mindless consumerism, that hollow sense of security we all cling to, and the sheer alienation of modern society. To build that heavy, suffocating atmosphere in Se7en, he plays it smart, starting off with these slow, lingering static shots before shifting gears into those frantic, rapid-fire cuts toward the end.

He spends the entire runtime dragging his characters through these gloomy, claustrophobic interiors, which really just validates that one "witty" observation about how people in Fincher's movies seem to live in spaces where the power is perpetually cut off. He keeps us trapped in this heavy gloom, only pulling us out into the daylight right at the very end. It’s hardly a coincidence that the moment he finally moves the action into a bright, outdoor setting is exactly when he decides to show us the killer for the first time. By using a directorial move like that, he’s sending a pretty loud, unmistakable signal about whose perspective he's actually choosing to champion. His version of John Doe is basically just a mirror reflecting the true crimes of our modern world—hedonism, alienation, and that total loss of identity that seems to be one of Fincher's core obsessions.

With its unconventional vibe and that gritty atmosphere, Se7en completely flipped the script on what mainstream movies were supposed to look like. It was a massive hit with both critics and audiences alike, basically cementing Fincher’s status as the definitive voice for a whole new generation of filmmakers. And honestly, after seeing that, even Alien didn't seem quite as bad by comparison.

While he was taking a breather from his feature films, Fincher spent some time tending to his old flame by directing an ad for Levi's called "Reason" back in '98.

It seems like directors start finding a bit more inspiration once they get moving. Taking the literary blueprint of Chuck Palahniuk’s *Fight Club* from 1999, the film basically distilled Fincher's entire cinematic worldview into one project, making it feel less like a standalone movie and more like the inevitable next chapter in his body of work. There’s just something about how schizophrenia is portrayed here; it’s probably the only time mental instability has ever looked this poetic. You have the narrator, played by Edward Norton, who's just completely suffocated by this mindless consumerist lifestyle and constant daily frustrations, eventually snapping and manifesting his own alter-ego in the form of that charismatic anarchist, Tyler Durden, played by Brad Pitt.

Fincher builds his atmosphere by leaning heavily on classic film noir tropes—think that moody, narcissistic, cynical narrator and those fragmented flashbacks—all wrapped up in this incredibly polished, high-end visual style. It’s pretty ironic when you think about it; he’s basically delivering a message about anti-consumerism by using every single slick, consumerist filmmaking trick in the book.

Fincher pushes the narrator's duality to its breaking point at the end of the film when he’s forced to face the other half of his fractured psyche—Tyler Durden. Once you realize that losing your identity and your sense of purpose is permanent, it only makes sense that one of them has to go, whether it's the narrator or Durden.

It feels like the director is finally letting off some steam in those final scenes, where he gets almost obsessively carried away destroying the concrete monuments built by our consumerist society through massive explosions.

At first glance, Fincher’s latest flick, 'Zodiac' (2006), seems to drift away from his usual obsessions. But once you remember that the Zodiac is one of those rare serial killers who actually got away with it, things click into place. He's just another person without a true identity. What makes this killer so unsettling isn't just the crimes themselves, but that arrogant habit of detailing everything in letters sent to the press, like the San Francisco Chronicle. Again, Fincher suggests that identity is basically irrelevant; it’s just a way for people to put names on the things they’re too terrified to actually confront. And as the Zodiac proves, fear can be just as uncomfortable when it starts living in your subconscious under a nickname.

In an attempt to nail that retro vibe—something reminiscent of 'All the President's Men'—the director decided to shoot the whole thing using the cutting-edge digital tech from Valley Viper FilmStream, which was also used for 'Collateral'.

When building his stories, Fincher often flirts with mainstream elements, but his style and atmosphere remain leagues ahead of anything else out there. For him, style serves the content and vice versa. He loves dropping his characters into these cold, dark interiors, keeping their faces lost in the shadows and using muted tones to really hammer home their internal chaos.

Look, Fincher isn't some wide-eyed idealist who thinks he can lecture us or change the world through cinema. He just keeps throwing snapshots of his own demons—alienation, false security, hypocrisy, consumerism—in front of our faces, hoping that if we stare at them long enough, we might occasionally glance back at ourselves. Because let’s be honest, most of those demons are sitting right here in our laps, too. .

That’s why Fincher stands out as one of the most vital directors working today. .

Source: FilmDaily.com

There’s a quote from Fincher that perfectly captures where he is right now:

"People always say there are a million ways to shoot a scene. I think there are only two... and one is definitely wrong."

And yet, these scenes have become movies shot in the wrong way. 😢 So, what happened? Fincher swapped out Andrew Kevin Walker for the heavy hitters like Eric Roth, Aaron Sorkin, and Steven Zaillian (look, I won't complain about that—that's basically the A-list of screenwriters!), but that’s exactly where the trouble starts. Academy voters—who are basically all just buddies and colleagues—weren't exactly thrilled with how Fincher handled collaborations like The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. They went out of their way to make sure the Button crew felt like the biggest losers of the year that night. To put it bluntly without sugarcoating it: it just doesn't work. It’s like if Lynch hired some random hack to write his next script. It’s just bad.

Honestly, I've read most of the scripts from the era before Fincher drifted toward this middle-of-the-road, mediocre stuff. What can I say? I'm sad. Just really, really sad. 😢
Directors who totally missed the mark in Movies ·
Apparently, they aren't allowed to advertise The Social Network on Facebook

🤣🤣🤣

Like I said before, Fincher is officially garbage. ☕
Mod perspective.. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
hollowtrucker77 said:Since anyone watching this from the outside only sees that one public side of the story, they’re obviously going to conclude that the mods are total jerks, the admins are just enabling them, and the whole thing is basically just a rigged game played by a malicious administration against a bunch of helpless, pathetic users.
It’s pretty symptomatic that nobody stops to wonder what kind of motive a moderator would actually have to act like a dictator, or whether it wouldn't be much easier for him to simply stop handing out warnings and bans altogether. Or how it's possible that the mods, supermods, and admins are all clearly in cahoots, acting like a unified squad of sadists.

Kajgod, everyone watching this unfold from the sidelines...

Charles Fox10 said:My bad on the ranting. Originally, it was supposed to be a custom 5 points every 5 days for quoting moderator warnings.

The admin team will sort it out.

... they just laugh bitterly. ☕ Let's be clear here, Charles Fox10 is actually a decent moderator, but the way he went about fixing this "issue" regarding quoting moderator warnings isn't exactly great (IMHO, obviously). What kind of divine custom rule-breaking is it to change something from 10 points to 5? What's next, are we introducing a point-based yellow card system where one equals one? 😕 In this specific scenario, the head admin had absolutely no reason to "protect" a good moderator; he could have easily—and should have—just corrected the blunder. How? By issuing a yellow card as a warning to users like Gregory Howard and others to tell them to stop doing it. That would have been the right move. You don't need to explain the psychology of watching other people's red cards: you see them, give a little smirk, click on them, and enjoy a tiny bit of secondhand misery. But instead, nothing happens. You learn absolutely nothing from seeing someone else get flagged. Yellow cards are something entirely different—pure The OMG Cat psychology, without the part where you gloat...

Just use them; it's not like the sky is going to fall. 👍
Splice in Movies ·
graniteheron132 said:I swear I saw some "nipples" popping up in one of those trailers... but honestly, I can't quite remember which one. 😉

And yeah, they're definitely in this one too:

image

Nipples, boobs with nipples!

image

Man, look at those beauties... I think I'm in love. 😍

Thanks for the heads-up. 😁
Splice in Movies ·
So, I'm stuck on this one: Nipples, breasts without nipples? EL dren really doesn't have any... 😕 If anyone out there can spoil that little detail for me, please be my guest.
Splice in Movies ·
I mean, if we're talking about Brody, Adrien Brody is actually pretty sexy in Splice. Like, seriously? WTF? 😕

But honestly, it's just not worth it trying to sit through this crappy R5 version with its garbage audio quality.
Tom Cruise in Movies ·
mistyraven8 said:I get what you mean, but you really have to adjust to Hollywood movies first (since our brains are basically wired for the American films our TV networks feed us constantly). My Name Is Khan isn't exactly a gateway drug for someone who hasn't seen an American film before; you really need to watch some older stuff first to decide if it's actually good or not. These days, even the US is quite Americanized, so the newer films aren't the best starting point for beginners. 🙂

That's not right; I'm hardly a beginner, and I don't have any issues with Hollywood films. My Name Is Khan is nothing more than pure cinematic prostitution—just a "Hollywood movie" wrapped in colorful cellophane produced by the Hollywood machine, with one singular goal: to squeeze out as much cash as possible while brainwashing everyone in sight. To put it bluntly, it's a hellish joint venture between the devil himself (aka American corporate capitalism) and Shiva (Arthur Edens: I am Shiva, the god of death).

In fact, My Name Is Khan is more like a slap in the face to actual cinema. ☕