78 posts shown.
William Gomez5 said:I can't believe we're even talking about this again.
The World Cup 1998
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Matthew Anderson4 said:So, these are the jerseys http://www.fcbarcelona.cat/web/engli...a/galeria.html
The home kit actually looks decent, the away one? Not so much. 🙂
PS. Feeling a little bad for Valdez 🤣
Gerald Smith76 said:Come on, please
This motion picture is based upon true events in the life of Frank W. Dux.
From 1975 to 1980 Frank W. Dux fought 329 matches. He retired undefeated
as the World Heavy Weight Full Contact Kumite Champion.
Mr. Dux still holds four world records:
Fastest Knockout - 3.2 seconds
Fastest Punch with a Knockout - .42 seconds
Fastest Kick with a Knockout - 72 mph
Most Consecutive Knockouts in a Single Tournament - 56
Subsequently Mr. Dux founded the first American Ninjitsu
rapidstag2 said:The visiting team looks as though someone up above simply tossed a training marker at them from a great height. 🤦
cosmiclynx57 said:I'm right there with you regarding his acting "skills."👍
And yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if he's pulling in massive checks. These are all huge blockbusters, after all. But if anyone actually knows his exact earnings from TS, then Avatar, and now this latest flick—or even just knows which site I can use to look up that kind of data—I’d really appreciate the help.
brightwolf63 said:It's definitely lacking a bit of punch. 😁
Total rip-off. 😳
Jonathan Collins43 said:I watched the movie.
It’s definitely better than the third installment; part three was easily the worst of the bunch.
The script is mediocre. Those one-liners right before someone dies are pretty bad, though luckily there are only two of them.
The 3D is decent, but nothing to write home about. They honestly could have just shot this in 2D; the 3D feels more like a marketing gimmick. At the start of the film, they lean into the 3D effect, but it fades away as the movie progresses. Early on, there's one effective moment where a small object flies toward you so suddenly it actually feels like it might hit you, but after that, they stop being creative with how they use the depth.
Now, let's talk about the opening accident.
The setup here is handled a bit better than that sloppy mess in the third movie. Still, the highway accident from the second film was filmed with more tension and interest. There are maybe two standout deaths (a sharpened board and some heavy object falling on a woman), but then you get some subpar kills, like the one involving falling concrete and the final vision, which felt like a recycled version of something we'd already seen.
As for the other accidents, they're middle-of-the-road, but still an improvement over what we got in part three.
The worst ones are the first one (a tow truck scenario where you can barely see anything, but it ends with a head popping off) and the one at the salon (a whole chain reaction of mishaps at a beauty salon—not sure why it happens that way—and a woman dying way too quickly from a stone hitting her eye).
The best scene is the one at the car wash.
That includes everything from the very beginning when the woman hands money to the guy on the corner.
I am never stepping foot in a car wash again.
And I've lost my sense of security around swimming pools, too.
There's a decent little suicide twist, but they didn't really flesh it out enough.
The start of the film acts as a sort of tribute to the first three movies, using an X-ray style aesthetic.
The acting and character work aren't any worse than they were in the third one, but I found myself caring much more about the characters in the second film, especially the first.
The final scene takes place in a theater inside a shopping mall.
It's a clever way to mess with the audience.
And I happened to be in a theater in a mall myself.
Even if that specific scene wasn't the absolute highlight.
When I walked out of the theater, I definitely felt uneasy.
I'll never look at escalators the same way again.
The ending felt rushed; they could have shot it much better.
