Posts by boldbadger1

Boys, I’ve got an opening here at my firm in Germany for an Android UI designer—looking for a freelancer to put in about 10-20 hours a week.

If you know anyone who fits the bill, just shoot me a DM and I'll follow up with all the specifics.

mellowotter36 said:By the way, Ukraine doesn't recognize Mexico.

Now we'll see 😬

Matthew Collins20 said:Video showing the arrest of a spy within the Ukrainian ranks
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarV...ainian_forces/

And now we’re just going to sit here and blame the local news outlets—let them pass it along to their little buddies over in Russia, I guess... It’s almost a shame to take out a spy like that; they can be such a valuable asset.

Brandon Harris20 said:Keeping up with the County Prefect threads and the Ban corner is basically like watching Big Brother on this Reddit🍿

Honestly, those sections are really just for the folks who feel like they're right at home here on the site ☕

Anthony Nguyen81 said:They’re splitting up Canada—what am I even supposed to say about that? 🍿

Look, I'm definitely not here to be some pedantic nitpicker or a grammar cop correcting everyone's slang... 😁

It looks like the hate coming at you is getting pretty intense—it seems like all those 100k+ past and present haters are ganging up on you. 😬

Just let them burn.

hiddenmoose2 said:Haha, are we actually being serious right now? 🤣
I honestly thought people were just trolling when they started talking about kicking the letter U out of the alphabet altogether. 🙏

And you—well, you’re being especially clever with that username of yours. Sneaking that little letter in there between the L and the K... quite the subtle little camouflage job if I do say so myself.

Matthew Collins20 said:From what I can gather, even trolling isn't allowed here—so I’m pretty sure this kind of thing definitely shouldn't be flying.

The poster child for this whole new wave of SJW nonsense... ☕

Let above the coward's nest—I just can't get into it, and I honestly can't seem to sit through more than about 20 minutes of it🤷

Look, this is just part of Pampelona’s whole brand—he’s trolling, plain and simple. The guy has gone on record a million times over to distance himself from those extremist groups and all that nonsense.

Honestly, you’re being a complete tool with this report.

Full support for Pampelona!😬

Frank Hayes71 said:If you're gonna play, just go with a triple—it’s a lot safer that way...😁

I’m just sitting here watching this guy cheat—honestly, this whole crowd is shady. He spent all night running the numbers, analyzing the ingredient breakdowns and those lockdown patterns, trying his hardest to crack today’s specific type, and then the damn thing just completely skips right over the two-digit ones... ☕

1. Mexico - Republic of Ireland 1
2. Finland - Canada X
3. France - Ukraine X
4. Belgium - Wales 1
5. Cyprus - Slovakia X
6. Canada - USA 2

7. Bulgaria - Switzerland X
8. Israel - Denmark 2
9. Spain - Greece 1
10. Italy - Northern Ireland 1
11. Scotland - Austria 1
12. Canada - Poland 1

Through thick and thin with mistyhound94 👍

Christian Myers said:I’m right there with you. I walked away from those political forums—partly because of the constant bickering among politicians and partly due to all the nonsense over at KLLCK—and honestly, it feels like a weight off my shoulders.

Same here. They can keep their politics and their censorship; I’ll take my own freedom of thought and a few less fried brain cells any day...

Kyle Nelson2 said:Alright, I think we've finally figured it out... you aren't actually a lawyer—you're just some guy on Reddit playing amateur theologian with the Kuran.

☕ 🙂

Wait, weren't you the one who wrote that whole high-minded post earlier about mutual respect and not attacking anyone's identity?🙏

Kyle Nelson2 said:There’s really no reason to pretend when it comes to who sits on the right or the left... from where I'm sitting, us right-leaning folks don't have much trouble being upfront about it, whereas the lefties always seem to be hiding behind... well... certain (quasi)legal technicalities.

Now, I happen to be a "right-winger" myself—and let me tell you, I’ve been penalized and banned more times than I care to admit just for having "right-wing" views, constantly getting branded as a die-hard Republican or some other label... Eventually, they even scrubbed me from Politics and History sections entirely. I tried requesting a partial restoration, but once a year or two had passed and I asked to have those restrictions lifted, they basically decided it was easier to just keep me exiled from those specific discussions.

So, your conclusion that I’m a leftist is—to put it mildly—pretty far off the mark (even though I consider myself a liberal, socially conscious individual who gives a damn about our society and identity, which apparently makes me a "right-winger" in people's eyes).

I think I'm just being extremely objective regarding the legal rights of anonymous internet users.

Kyle Nelson2 said:The second this forum turns into an actual government service desk where you go to pick up official paperwork—then I'll have an opinion. Until then, I'm cool.

But until that day comes, let's be real—this site is just a digital hangout for anonymous users with zero legal standing whatsoever.

Kyle Nelson2 said:If you actually want to exercise any rights guaranteed by law, you have to prove who you are—and no, your screen name doesn't count.

Look, are you even using your real identity on this site? You don't need to dox yourself; all you really need is a valid email address.

Just head down to the local clinic, sign up for an insurance card using nothing but an email, and then go ahead—try telling them what your "constitutional rights" are. See how that works out for you.☕

Kyle Nelson2 said:Look, I’ve gone through the fine print—the T&Cs, the actual statutes, even the internal regulatory handbooks—and let me tell you, there is absolutely nothing in there that says an individual can just sign away their constitutional rights simply by choosing to remain anonymous. It doesn't matter how much they try to bury it in the legalese. Under the laws of the USA, and honestly, under broader legal principles as well, you cannot waive your fundamental rights like that. Even if you were to sit down, sign a document, and have it notarized by some official, it would still be considered legally void. It's a non-starter.

The law applies to everyone equally—it doesn't matter if you're Dr. Stephen Smith or Peter Dudley. When we're talking about a person—an actual human being and a citizen of the USA—it's a different story entirely.

Can you actually file a defamation lawsuit in court against someone just for insulting your online handle? I mean, seriously—can you sue a username? It’s one of those things that makes you wonder where the legal line is drawn between being a jerk on the internet and actual legal liability. Is a digital persona protected under the law, or are we all just fair game for whatever insults get thrown our way?

If you think you can hide behind some anonymous online handle and still expect to walk into a public institution—whether it’s a hospital, a police station, or a courthouse—and demand your constitutional rights based solely on a forum username and an email address... well, you're dreaming. You know, those places that actually exist to uphold the rights guaranteed to us under the US Constitution? Yeah, they aren't going to care about your digital persona. You can't just show up at a precinct or a clinic and say, "Hey, I'm 'User123,' now fulfill my legal obligations and protections." It just doesn't work that way in reality.

And then you can try explaining to them that their refusal to uphold constitutional rights for someone without legal identification is actually a massive issue—though, honestly, I doubt they’re even listening.

Kyle Nelson2 said:Anonymity doesn't strip us of our standing as individuals with full rights and responsibilities under the law.
Besides, if anonymity actually did strip those rights away, then—hypothetically speaking—that would be the exact argument someone might use to claim they could break the law (say, through harassment) without being held accountable... which simply isn't how it works.

As for censorship—if it were truly an effective method for forcing opinions on people, we’d still be living under communism in Yugoslavia, or Russians and Ukrainians would still be stuck in the USSR, along with most other nations for that matter.

Look, anonymity doesn't grant you any special constitutional rights because you're essentially trading them away in exchange for the privilege of hiding your identity (for whatever reason you choose). But—and this is the crucial part—it doesn't diminish your legal obligations. The whole point of the Constitution and our legal system is to establish the norms and boundaries of acceptable behavior within society, ensuring that individuals, groups, and society at large are protected from things that fall outside those bounds.

If that weren't the case, nobody would ever have to answer for anonymous online crimes—think financial fraud, forgery, and the like (I know, I know, hate speech and harassment are lower on the priority list for societal protection, but they are still legally defined too)—because everyone would just choose to stay anonymous whenever they felt like breaking the law and hurting a fellow citizen.

Anyway—I could go on about the censorship of dissenters on this site, and honestly, I agree with what you laid out there—but at the end of the day, this forum is private property, and being here is my own personal choice...

Jeffrey Adams said:You've got it all wrong. The moderators here are supposed to follow their own internal rules—that's how these things work. Look, I honestly wouldn't mind getting banned if I were actually being offensive or discriminatory toward anyone, but in exchange, I expect some basic protection when others start coming for me. How am I supposed to get that kind of fairness when the very people tasked with handing out justice are the first ones throwing insults and discriminating based on their own political or ideological biases?

Well, if you're so damn certain that the moderators "must" follow the site's own rules—and that they're actively violating US laws in the process—then you have a civic duty to report them to the proper authorities.

Let us know how that goes ☕